Perceived vulnerability to disease: adaptation and validation of the PVD-br
Perceived vulnerability to disease is characterized by the extent to which individuals perceive themselves to be susceptible to contracting infectious diseases, as well as by the emotional discomfort that results from assessing the risk of getting contaminated by pathogens. The PVD self-report scale...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2023-05, Vol.42 (14), p.11745-11758 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 11758 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 14 |
| container_start_page | 11745 |
| container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Do Bú, Emerson Araújo de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos |
| description | Perceived vulnerability to disease is characterized by the extent to which individuals perceive themselves to be susceptible to contracting infectious diseases, as well as by the emotional discomfort that results from assessing the risk of getting contaminated by pathogens. The PVD self-report scale, which measures this construct, is widely used internationally. However, it has not yet been adapted for Brazil. To address this gap, we adapted and validated the PVD scale for the Brazilian context (PVD-br) in four studies. Study 1 (
N
= 39) addressed translation, expert validation, and assessment of the comprehensibility of the scale’s items. Study 2 (
N
= 200) showed that the items were organized into two correlated factors and tested the scale’s items quality using the Item Response Theory. Study 3 (
N
= 201) confirmed the bifactorial structure and examined the invariance of PVD-br for men and women, while Study 4 analyzed the convergent (
N
= 432) and discriminant (
N
= 181) validity of the instrument. Results indicate strong evidence of content, factorial, and criterion validity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-021-02424-w |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8580363</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2826995099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8c42eca68ecb76d397fb74632e2290ab48de2b00841345340241cb9c3bd188783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS3Uilf5AyyqSN2wCfgVP7qohHirSJ1F261lO3fAKBNP7WQQ_x5D6NCyYGHZ1v3uuT4-CO0TfEgwlkeZUMJ5jSkpi1Ne32-gbaKZqLlk7EM5Yy5qwgjeQjs532FMpNB6E20xLlWjpNhG32eQPIQVtNVq7HpI1oUuDA_VEKs2ZLAZvla2tcvBDiH2le0LaLvQTtc4r4ZbqGa_T2uXPqGPc9tl2HvZd9Gv87OfJ5f19Y-Lq5Pj69pzyYdaeU7BW6HAOylapuXcSS4YBUo1to6rFqjDWHHCeMN48Ua80565liglFdtF3ybd5egW0Hroh2Q7s0xhYdODiTaY_yt9uDU3cWWKZ8wEKwIHLwIp_hkhD2YRsoeusz3EMRvaaNUwTYko6Jc36F0cU1_sGapo-c0Ga10oOlE-xZwTzNePIdg8ZWWmrEzJyjxnZe5L0-d_baxb_oZTADYBuZT6G0ivs9-RfQQon5-D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2826995099</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceived vulnerability to disease: adaptation and validation of the PVD-br</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo ; de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva ; Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira ; Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</creator><creatorcontrib>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo ; de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva ; Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira ; Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</creatorcontrib><description>Perceived vulnerability to disease is characterized by the extent to which individuals perceive themselves to be susceptible to contracting infectious diseases, as well as by the emotional discomfort that results from assessing the risk of getting contaminated by pathogens. The PVD self-report scale, which measures this construct, is widely used internationally. However, it has not yet been adapted for Brazil. To address this gap, we adapted and validated the PVD scale for the Brazilian context (PVD-br) in four studies. Study 1 (
N
= 39) addressed translation, expert validation, and assessment of the comprehensibility of the scale’s items. Study 2 (
N
= 200) showed that the items were organized into two correlated factors and tested the scale’s items quality using the Item Response Theory. Study 3 (
N
= 201) confirmed the bifactorial structure and examined the invariance of PVD-br for men and women, while Study 4 analyzed the convergent (
N
= 432) and discriminant (
N
= 181) validity of the instrument. Results indicate strong evidence of content, factorial, and criterion validity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-021-02424-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34785876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adaptation ; Attitudes ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Gender differences ; Hypochondria ; Illnesses ; Infectious diseases ; Item response theory ; Psychology ; Social Sciences ; Validation studies ; Validity ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023-05, Vol.42 (14), p.11745-11758</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8c42eca68ecb76d397fb74632e2290ab48de2b00841345340241cb9c3bd188783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8c42eca68ecb76d397fb74632e2290ab48de2b00841345340241cb9c3bd188783</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3864-3872 ; 0000-0001-9178-2957 ; 0000-0002-5381-2155 ; 0000-0003-3610-7208</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-021-02424-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-021-02424-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34785876$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</creatorcontrib><title>Perceived vulnerability to disease: adaptation and validation of the PVD-br</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>Perceived vulnerability to disease is characterized by the extent to which individuals perceive themselves to be susceptible to contracting infectious diseases, as well as by the emotional discomfort that results from assessing the risk of getting contaminated by pathogens. The PVD self-report scale, which measures this construct, is widely used internationally. However, it has not yet been adapted for Brazil. To address this gap, we adapted and validated the PVD scale for the Brazilian context (PVD-br) in four studies. Study 1 (
N
= 39) addressed translation, expert validation, and assessment of the comprehensibility of the scale’s items. Study 2 (
N
= 200) showed that the items were organized into two correlated factors and tested the scale’s items quality using the Item Response Theory. Study 3 (
N
= 201) confirmed the bifactorial structure and examined the invariance of PVD-br for men and women, while Study 4 analyzed the convergent (
N
= 432) and discriminant (
N
= 181) validity of the instrument. Results indicate strong evidence of content, factorial, and criterion validity.</description><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Hypochondria</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Item response theory</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS3Uilf5AyyqSN2wCfgVP7qohHirSJ1F261lO3fAKBNP7WQQ_x5D6NCyYGHZ1v3uuT4-CO0TfEgwlkeZUMJ5jSkpi1Ne32-gbaKZqLlk7EM5Yy5qwgjeQjs532FMpNB6E20xLlWjpNhG32eQPIQVtNVq7HpI1oUuDA_VEKs2ZLAZvla2tcvBDiH2le0LaLvQTtc4r4ZbqGa_T2uXPqGPc9tl2HvZd9Gv87OfJ5f19Y-Lq5Pj69pzyYdaeU7BW6HAOylapuXcSS4YBUo1to6rFqjDWHHCeMN48Ua80565liglFdtF3ybd5egW0Hroh2Q7s0xhYdODiTaY_yt9uDU3cWWKZ8wEKwIHLwIp_hkhD2YRsoeusz3EMRvaaNUwTYko6Jc36F0cU1_sGapo-c0Ga10oOlE-xZwTzNePIdg8ZWWmrEzJyjxnZe5L0-d_baxb_oZTADYBuZT6G0ivs9-RfQQon5-D</recordid><startdate>20230501</startdate><enddate>20230501</enddate><creator>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo</creator><creator>de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva</creator><creator>Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira</creator><creator>Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-3872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-2957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-2155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-7208</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230501</creationdate><title>Perceived vulnerability to disease: adaptation and validation of the PVD-br</title><author>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo ; de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva ; Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira ; Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-8c42eca68ecb76d397fb74632e2290ab48de2b00841345340241cb9c3bd188783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Hypochondria</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Item response theory</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Do Bú, Emerson Araújo</au><au>de Alexandre, Maria Edna Silva</au><au>Rezende, Alessandro Teixeira</au><au>Bezerra, Viviane Alves dos Santos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceived vulnerability to disease: adaptation and validation of the PVD-br</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><date>2023-05-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>11745</spage><epage>11758</epage><pages>11745-11758</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>Perceived vulnerability to disease is characterized by the extent to which individuals perceive themselves to be susceptible to contracting infectious diseases, as well as by the emotional discomfort that results from assessing the risk of getting contaminated by pathogens. The PVD self-report scale, which measures this construct, is widely used internationally. However, it has not yet been adapted for Brazil. To address this gap, we adapted and validated the PVD scale for the Brazilian context (PVD-br) in four studies. Study 1 (
N
= 39) addressed translation, expert validation, and assessment of the comprehensibility of the scale’s items. Study 2 (
N
= 200) showed that the items were organized into two correlated factors and tested the scale’s items quality using the Item Response Theory. Study 3 (
N
= 201) confirmed the bifactorial structure and examined the invariance of PVD-br for men and women, while Study 4 analyzed the convergent (
N
= 432) and discriminant (
N
= 181) validity of the instrument. Results indicate strong evidence of content, factorial, and criterion validity.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34785876</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12144-021-02424-w</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-3872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-2957</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5381-2155</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3610-7208</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
| ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2023-05, Vol.42 (14), p.11745-11758 |
| issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8580363 |
| source | SpringerNature Journals |
| subjects | Adaptation Attitudes Behavioral Science and Psychology Gender differences Hypochondria Illnesses Infectious diseases Item response theory Psychology Social Sciences Validation studies Validity Womens health |
| title | Perceived vulnerability to disease: adaptation and validation of the PVD-br |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T00%3A22%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceived%20vulnerability%20to%20disease:%20adaptation%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20PVD-br&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Do%20B%C3%BA,%20Emerson%20Ara%C3%BAjo&rft.date=2023-05-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=11745&rft.epage=11758&rft.pages=11745-11758&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-021-02424-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2826995099%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2826995099&rft_id=info:pmid/34785876&rfr_iscdi=true |