Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard

FACBC (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a FDA-approved PET-tracer in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. In the diagnostic work-up of primary prostate cancer, accurate localization of the index tumor is needed for image-guidance of biopsies. We therefore asse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-01, Vol.11 (5), p.387-394
Hauptverfasser: Hole, Knut Håkon, Tulipan, Andreas Julius, Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan, Hernes, Eivor, Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Lie, Agnes Kathrine, Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth, Seierstad, Therese
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 394
container_issue 5
container_start_page 387
container_title American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 11
creator Hole, Knut Håkon
Tulipan, Andreas Julius
Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan
Hernes, Eivor
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
Lie, Agnes Kathrine
Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth
Seierstad, Therese
description FACBC (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a FDA-approved PET-tracer in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. In the diagnostic work-up of primary prostate cancer, accurate localization of the index tumor is needed for image-guidance of biopsies. We therefore assessed the performance of FACBC PET/CT to detect and localize the index tumor and compared it to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using whole-mount histopathology as reference standard. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer had FACBC PET/CT and mpMRI within two weeks prior to prostatectomy. FACBC PET/CT was acquired as 14 minutes list-mode and re-binned into seven 2-minutes intervals. Static FACBC was the acquired data from 4-6 minutes, whereas the dynamic FACBC included all seven intervals. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted the images and consensus was reached in case of discrepancy. Static PET detected 15 of 23 (65%) of the index tumors, dynamic PET detected 14 of 22 (64%), and MRI detected 20 of 23 (87%). To assess the extent of the tumor, the interpreters delineated the tumor in a 12-regions sector-based template. True positive, true negative, false positive and false negative sectors were recorded based on the template drawings and whole-mount histopathology. Both static and dynamic FACBC PET had sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 99%, whereas MRI had sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 100%. Our data indicate that FACBC PET/CT may be useful but that mpMRI is better for localizing the index tumor in patients with prostate cance
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8569330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2596020931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-f492570254155882c2a4d95678ac15103aa45711be56307d3ae8048ec9db27da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVj81OwzAQhCMEolXpM-Ajlwr_xEnMAalELVQqAqFytraO2xoldrAdUDny5AS1B9jL7GpH32hOkiElGZ4UKc5P_-yDZBzCG-6HYywycZ4MWJrzNMNimHwvnYLafEE0ziK3Qa03Dfh9ry5EiBopsEr7GzSflnclep6trssVUq5pwesKfZq4Q01XR9Pf0OjojUKPLwvUBWO3aGdCdC3Enavddo8gIK832useiXq8rcBXF8nZBuqgx0cdJa_z2ap8mCyf7hfldDlRRORxskkF5TmmPCWcFwVVFNJK8CwvQBFOMANIeU7IWvOM4bxioAucFlqJak3zCtgouT1w227d6EppGz3U8lhYOjDy_8eandy6D1nwTDCGe8DlAaB8X8tYaZ0HSXDBqRQM01_H1THCu_dOhygbE5Sua7DadUFSLrLeJxhhP4KZgsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596020931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Hole, Knut Håkon ; Tulipan, Andreas Julius ; Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan ; Hernes, Eivor ; Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ; Lie, Agnes Kathrine ; Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth ; Seierstad, Therese</creator><creatorcontrib>Hole, Knut Håkon ; Tulipan, Andreas Julius ; Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan ; Hernes, Eivor ; Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ; Lie, Agnes Kathrine ; Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth ; Seierstad, Therese</creatorcontrib><description>FACBC (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a FDA-approved PET-tracer in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. In the diagnostic work-up of primary prostate cancer, accurate localization of the index tumor is needed for image-guidance of biopsies. We therefore assessed the performance of FACBC PET/CT to detect and localize the index tumor and compared it to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using whole-mount histopathology as reference standard. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer had FACBC PET/CT and mpMRI within two weeks prior to prostatectomy. FACBC PET/CT was acquired as 14 minutes list-mode and re-binned into seven 2-minutes intervals. Static FACBC was the acquired data from 4-6 minutes, whereas the dynamic FACBC included all seven intervals. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted the images and consensus was reached in case of discrepancy. Static PET detected 15 of 23 (65%) of the index tumors, dynamic PET detected 14 of 22 (64%), and MRI detected 20 of 23 (87%). To assess the extent of the tumor, the interpreters delineated the tumor in a 12-regions sector-based template. True positive, true negative, false positive and false negative sectors were recorded based on the template drawings and whole-mount histopathology. Both static and dynamic FACBC PET had sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 99%, whereas MRI had sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 100%. Our data indicate that FACBC PET/CT may be useful but that mpMRI is better for localizing the index tumor in patients with prostate cance</description><identifier>ISSN: 2160-8407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-8407</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34754609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>E-Century Publishing Corporation</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-01, Vol.11 (5), p.387-394</ispartof><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>AJNMMI Copyright © 2021 2021</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569330/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8569330/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,26544,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hole, Knut Håkon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulipan, Andreas Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernes, Eivor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlatkovic, Ljiljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lie, Agnes Kathrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seierstad, Therese</creatorcontrib><title>Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard</title><title>American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><description>FACBC (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a FDA-approved PET-tracer in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. In the diagnostic work-up of primary prostate cancer, accurate localization of the index tumor is needed for image-guidance of biopsies. We therefore assessed the performance of FACBC PET/CT to detect and localize the index tumor and compared it to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using whole-mount histopathology as reference standard. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer had FACBC PET/CT and mpMRI within two weeks prior to prostatectomy. FACBC PET/CT was acquired as 14 minutes list-mode and re-binned into seven 2-minutes intervals. Static FACBC was the acquired data from 4-6 minutes, whereas the dynamic FACBC included all seven intervals. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted the images and consensus was reached in case of discrepancy. Static PET detected 15 of 23 (65%) of the index tumors, dynamic PET detected 14 of 22 (64%), and MRI detected 20 of 23 (87%). To assess the extent of the tumor, the interpreters delineated the tumor in a 12-regions sector-based template. True positive, true negative, false positive and false negative sectors were recorded based on the template drawings and whole-mount histopathology. Both static and dynamic FACBC PET had sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 99%, whereas MRI had sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 100%. Our data indicate that FACBC PET/CT may be useful but that mpMRI is better for localizing the index tumor in patients with prostate cance</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2160-8407</issn><issn>2160-8407</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNpVj81OwzAQhCMEolXpM-Ajlwr_xEnMAalELVQqAqFytraO2xoldrAdUDny5AS1B9jL7GpH32hOkiElGZ4UKc5P_-yDZBzCG-6HYywycZ4MWJrzNMNimHwvnYLafEE0ziK3Qa03Dfh9ry5EiBopsEr7GzSflnclep6trssVUq5pwesKfZq4Q01XR9Pf0OjojUKPLwvUBWO3aGdCdC3Enavddo8gIK832useiXq8rcBXF8nZBuqgx0cdJa_z2ap8mCyf7hfldDlRRORxskkF5TmmPCWcFwVVFNJK8CwvQBFOMANIeU7IWvOM4bxioAucFlqJak3zCtgouT1w227d6EppGz3U8lhYOjDy_8eandy6D1nwTDCGe8DlAaB8X8tYaZ0HSXDBqRQM01_H1THCu_dOhygbE5Sua7DadUFSLrLeJxhhP4KZgsI</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Hole, Knut Håkon</creator><creator>Tulipan, Andreas Julius</creator><creator>Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan</creator><creator>Hernes, Eivor</creator><creator>Vlatkovic, Ljiljana</creator><creator>Lie, Agnes Kathrine</creator><creator>Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth</creator><creator>Seierstad, Therese</creator><general>E-Century Publishing Corporation</general><general>e-Century Publishing Corporation</general><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard</title><author>Hole, Knut Håkon ; Tulipan, Andreas Julius ; Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan ; Hernes, Eivor ; Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ; Lie, Agnes Kathrine ; Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth ; Seierstad, Therese</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c197t-f492570254155882c2a4d95678ac15103aa45711be56307d3ae8048ec9db27da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hole, Knut Håkon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tulipan, Andreas Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernes, Eivor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlatkovic, Ljiljana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lie, Agnes Kathrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seierstad, Therese</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hole, Knut Håkon</au><au>Tulipan, Andreas Julius</au><au>Reijnen, Jeroen Sebastiaan</au><au>Hernes, Eivor</au><au>Vlatkovic, Ljiljana</au><au>Lie, Agnes Kathrine</au><au>Revheim, Mona-Elisabeth</au><au>Seierstad, Therese</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard</atitle><jtitle>American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>394</epage><pages>387-394</pages><issn>2160-8407</issn><eissn>2160-8407</eissn><abstract>FACBC (anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid) is a FDA-approved PET-tracer in patients with suspected recurrent prostate cancer. In the diagnostic work-up of primary prostate cancer, accurate localization of the index tumor is needed for image-guidance of biopsies. We therefore assessed the performance of FACBC PET/CT to detect and localize the index tumor and compared it to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using whole-mount histopathology as reference standard. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer had FACBC PET/CT and mpMRI within two weeks prior to prostatectomy. FACBC PET/CT was acquired as 14 minutes list-mode and re-binned into seven 2-minutes intervals. Static FACBC was the acquired data from 4-6 minutes, whereas the dynamic FACBC included all seven intervals. Two radiologists and two nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted the images and consensus was reached in case of discrepancy. Static PET detected 15 of 23 (65%) of the index tumors, dynamic PET detected 14 of 22 (64%), and MRI detected 20 of 23 (87%). To assess the extent of the tumor, the interpreters delineated the tumor in a 12-regions sector-based template. True positive, true negative, false positive and false negative sectors were recorded based on the template drawings and whole-mount histopathology. Both static and dynamic FACBC PET had sensitivity of 40% and specificity of 99%, whereas MRI had sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 100%. Our data indicate that FACBC PET/CT may be useful but that mpMRI is better for localizing the index tumor in patients with prostate cance</abstract><pub>E-Century Publishing Corporation</pub><pmid>34754609</pmid><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2160-8407
ispartof American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-01, Vol.11 (5), p.387-394
issn 2160-8407
2160-8407
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8569330
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Original
title Localization of primary prostate cancer: FACBC PET/CT compared with multiparametric MRI using histopathology as reference standard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T17%3A42%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Localization%20of%20primary%20prostate%20cancer:%20FACBC%20PET/CT%20compared%20with%20multiparametric%20MRI%20using%20histopathology%20as%20reference%20standard&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Hole,%20Knut%20H%C3%A5kon&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=394&rft.pages=387-394&rft.issn=2160-8407&rft.eissn=2160-8407&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2596020931%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596020931&rft_id=info:pmid/34754609&rfr_iscdi=true