Impacts of bunk management on steer performance and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of bunk management on dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, carcass characteristic, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations in beef steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS; DM basis). In Experiment 1, 139 steers (440.4...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational animal science 2021-10, Vol.5 (4), p.txab194-txab194
Hauptverfasser: Neville, Bryan W, Lekatz, Leslie A, Moore, Rebecca L, Pickinpaugh, Wayde J, Kassetas, Cierrah J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page txab194
container_issue 4
container_start_page txab194
container_title Translational animal science
container_volume 5
creator Neville, Bryan W
Lekatz, Leslie A
Moore, Rebecca L
Pickinpaugh, Wayde J
Kassetas, Cierrah J
description Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of bunk management on dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, carcass characteristic, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations in beef steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS; DM basis). In Experiment 1, 139 steers (440.4 ± 31.0 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens with pen randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) Control (CON, bunks managed to be devoid of feed prior to feeding), or 2) Over-fed (OVF, bunks managed to have minimum of 2.54 cm of feed remaining each morning) during adaptation. Following adaptation all steers in Experiment 1 were transitioned to CON bunks and followed to finishing. In Experiment 2, 126 steers (445.4 ± 40.63 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens. Treatments in Experiment 2 were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial and include the two bunk management strategies utilized in Experiment 1 (OVF or CON) and either 25% MDGS or 50% MDGS (DM basis). Ruminal H2S was measured via rumenocentesis during dietary adaptation. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.13) observed in either experiment for growth performance due to bunk management. In Experiment 1, OVF steers had greater (P = 0.001) DMI during adaptation; however, overall DMI was not different (P = 0.14) between treatments. In Experiment 2, DMI (d 0 to 104) tended to decrease (P = 0.09) with greater MDGS inclusion. Hot carcass weight, ribeye area, marbling score, and quality grade were not affected (P ≥ 0.48) by either bunk management or MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 2, back fat (1.30 vs. 1.17 ± 0.042 cm) and yield grade (3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.11) were greater (P = 0.03) for CON steers compared with OVF but were not affected (P = 0.59) by MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 1, H2S tended (P = 0.07) to be greater in steers on OVF compared with CON. In Experiment 2, bunk management strategy did not impact (P = 0.82) H2S concentrations. There was a MDGS inclusion × day interaction for H2S with steers fed 50% MDGS having greater (P < 0.01) H2S concentrations compared with steers fed 25% MDGS on d 28 and 35. Bunk management strategy during adaptation did not impact growth performance but did reduce intake in Experiment 1. Yield grade decreased when OVF bunk management was applied throughout Experiment 2. Response of H2S concentrations in the rumen were variable and likely influenced by inconsistencies in bunk management and resulting DMI during the early portions of the feedlot study.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/tas/txab194
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8557719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A776355153</galeid><sourcerecordid>A776355153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-262dff895cea4f753f4fbfe375e6c8b4af31000bb80622ab41ee0a4dd4fd99d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9qVTEQxoMobald9QWyFOS2-XvOzUYoxWqh4MauQ04yOTeak1yTHLWv0Sc25V5EySLDzG8-ZuZD6JKSK0oUv26mXrffZqJKvEJnTI58wyhhr_-JT9FFrd8IIVQpNVBygk65GJkSAzlDz_fL3thWcfZ4WtN3vJhkZlggNZwTrg2g4D0Un0uvWMAmOVzWJSQT8e7JlTxDx9bogwNsc0dSK6aFnCoOR4GKPTi8ZBd86IELtYUYX_JzMaGDv0Lb4ZrjOkWob9Ebb2KFi-N_jh7vPn69_bx5-PLp_vbmYWO5lG3DBua83yppwQg_Su6FnzzwUcJgt5MwntO-9DRtycCYmQQFIEY4J7xTyhF-jj4cdPfrtIA7DB71voTFlCedTdD_V1LY6Tn_1Fspx5GqLvDuKFDyjxVq00uoFmI0CfJaNZOKEzYMinX06oDOJoIOyeeuaPtzsIR-NfCh52_Gcei7Ucl7w_tDgy251gL-71yU6BfndXdeH53nfwDB8qbR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2593026692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of bunk management on steer performance and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Neville, Bryan W ; Lekatz, Leslie A ; Moore, Rebecca L ; Pickinpaugh, Wayde J ; Kassetas, Cierrah J</creator><creatorcontrib>Neville, Bryan W ; Lekatz, Leslie A ; Moore, Rebecca L ; Pickinpaugh, Wayde J ; Kassetas, Cierrah J</creatorcontrib><description>Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of bunk management on dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, carcass characteristic, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations in beef steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS; DM basis). In Experiment 1, 139 steers (440.4 ± 31.0 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens with pen randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) Control (CON, bunks managed to be devoid of feed prior to feeding), or 2) Over-fed (OVF, bunks managed to have minimum of 2.54 cm of feed remaining each morning) during adaptation. Following adaptation all steers in Experiment 1 were transitioned to CON bunks and followed to finishing. In Experiment 2, 126 steers (445.4 ± 40.63 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens. Treatments in Experiment 2 were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial and include the two bunk management strategies utilized in Experiment 1 (OVF or CON) and either 25% MDGS or 50% MDGS (DM basis). Ruminal H2S was measured via rumenocentesis during dietary adaptation. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.13) observed in either experiment for growth performance due to bunk management. In Experiment 1, OVF steers had greater (P = 0.001) DMI during adaptation; however, overall DMI was not different (P = 0.14) between treatments. In Experiment 2, DMI (d 0 to 104) tended to decrease (P = 0.09) with greater MDGS inclusion. Hot carcass weight, ribeye area, marbling score, and quality grade were not affected (P ≥ 0.48) by either bunk management or MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 2, back fat (1.30 vs. 1.17 ± 0.042 cm) and yield grade (3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.11) were greater (P = 0.03) for CON steers compared with OVF but were not affected (P = 0.59) by MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 1, H2S tended (P = 0.07) to be greater in steers on OVF compared with CON. In Experiment 2, bunk management strategy did not impact (P = 0.82) H2S concentrations. There was a MDGS inclusion × day interaction for H2S with steers fed 50% MDGS having greater (P &lt; 0.01) H2S concentrations compared with steers fed 25% MDGS on d 28 and 35. Bunk management strategy during adaptation did not impact growth performance but did reduce intake in Experiment 1. Yield grade decreased when OVF bunk management was applied throughout Experiment 2. Response of H2S concentrations in the rumen were variable and likely influenced by inconsistencies in bunk management and resulting DMI during the early portions of the feedlot study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2573-2102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-2102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tas/txab194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34729460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Beef cattle ; Costs (Law) ; Feedlots ; Hydrogen sulfide ; Rumen ; Ruminant Nutrition ; Strategic planning (Business)</subject><ispartof>Translational animal science, 2021-10, Vol.5 (4), p.txab194-txab194</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-262dff895cea4f753f4fbfe375e6c8b4af31000bb80622ab41ee0a4dd4fd99d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557719/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8557719/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Neville, Bryan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekatz, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickinpaugh, Wayde J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassetas, Cierrah J</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of bunk management on steer performance and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles</title><title>Translational animal science</title><description>Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of bunk management on dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, carcass characteristic, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations in beef steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS; DM basis). In Experiment 1, 139 steers (440.4 ± 31.0 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens with pen randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) Control (CON, bunks managed to be devoid of feed prior to feeding), or 2) Over-fed (OVF, bunks managed to have minimum of 2.54 cm of feed remaining each morning) during adaptation. Following adaptation all steers in Experiment 1 were transitioned to CON bunks and followed to finishing. In Experiment 2, 126 steers (445.4 ± 40.63 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens. Treatments in Experiment 2 were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial and include the two bunk management strategies utilized in Experiment 1 (OVF or CON) and either 25% MDGS or 50% MDGS (DM basis). Ruminal H2S was measured via rumenocentesis during dietary adaptation. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.13) observed in either experiment for growth performance due to bunk management. In Experiment 1, OVF steers had greater (P = 0.001) DMI during adaptation; however, overall DMI was not different (P = 0.14) between treatments. In Experiment 2, DMI (d 0 to 104) tended to decrease (P = 0.09) with greater MDGS inclusion. Hot carcass weight, ribeye area, marbling score, and quality grade were not affected (P ≥ 0.48) by either bunk management or MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 2, back fat (1.30 vs. 1.17 ± 0.042 cm) and yield grade (3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.11) were greater (P = 0.03) for CON steers compared with OVF but were not affected (P = 0.59) by MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 1, H2S tended (P = 0.07) to be greater in steers on OVF compared with CON. In Experiment 2, bunk management strategy did not impact (P = 0.82) H2S concentrations. There was a MDGS inclusion × day interaction for H2S with steers fed 50% MDGS having greater (P &lt; 0.01) H2S concentrations compared with steers fed 25% MDGS on d 28 and 35. Bunk management strategy during adaptation did not impact growth performance but did reduce intake in Experiment 1. Yield grade decreased when OVF bunk management was applied throughout Experiment 2. Response of H2S concentrations in the rumen were variable and likely influenced by inconsistencies in bunk management and resulting DMI during the early portions of the feedlot study.</description><subject>Beef cattle</subject><subject>Costs (Law)</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Hydrogen sulfide</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Ruminant Nutrition</subject><subject>Strategic planning (Business)</subject><issn>2573-2102</issn><issn>2573-2102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc9qVTEQxoMobald9QWyFOS2-XvOzUYoxWqh4MauQ04yOTeak1yTHLWv0Sc25V5EySLDzG8-ZuZD6JKSK0oUv26mXrffZqJKvEJnTI58wyhhr_-JT9FFrd8IIVQpNVBygk65GJkSAzlDz_fL3thWcfZ4WtN3vJhkZlggNZwTrg2g4D0Un0uvWMAmOVzWJSQT8e7JlTxDx9bogwNsc0dSK6aFnCoOR4GKPTi8ZBd86IELtYUYX_JzMaGDv0Lb4ZrjOkWob9Ebb2KFi-N_jh7vPn69_bx5-PLp_vbmYWO5lG3DBua83yppwQg_Su6FnzzwUcJgt5MwntO-9DRtycCYmQQFIEY4J7xTyhF-jj4cdPfrtIA7DB71voTFlCedTdD_V1LY6Tn_1Fspx5GqLvDuKFDyjxVq00uoFmI0CfJaNZOKEzYMinX06oDOJoIOyeeuaPtzsIR-NfCh52_Gcei7Ucl7w_tDgy251gL-71yU6BfndXdeH53nfwDB8qbR</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Neville, Bryan W</creator><creator>Lekatz, Leslie A</creator><creator>Moore, Rebecca L</creator><creator>Pickinpaugh, Wayde J</creator><creator>Kassetas, Cierrah J</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Impacts of bunk management on steer performance and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles</title><author>Neville, Bryan W ; Lekatz, Leslie A ; Moore, Rebecca L ; Pickinpaugh, Wayde J ; Kassetas, Cierrah J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-262dff895cea4f753f4fbfe375e6c8b4af31000bb80622ab41ee0a4dd4fd99d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Beef cattle</topic><topic>Costs (Law)</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Hydrogen sulfide</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Ruminant Nutrition</topic><topic>Strategic planning (Business)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Neville, Bryan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lekatz, Leslie A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pickinpaugh, Wayde J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassetas, Cierrah J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Neville, Bryan W</au><au>Lekatz, Leslie A</au><au>Moore, Rebecca L</au><au>Pickinpaugh, Wayde J</au><au>Kassetas, Cierrah J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of bunk management on steer performance and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles</atitle><jtitle>Translational animal science</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>txab194</spage><epage>txab194</epage><pages>txab194-txab194</pages><issn>2573-2102</issn><eissn>2573-2102</eissn><abstract>Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the impacts of bunk management on dry matter intake (DMI), growth performance, carcass characteristic, and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) concentrations in beef steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles (MDGS; DM basis). In Experiment 1, 139 steers (440.4 ± 31.0 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens with pen randomly assigned to one of two treatments: 1) Control (CON, bunks managed to be devoid of feed prior to feeding), or 2) Over-fed (OVF, bunks managed to have minimum of 2.54 cm of feed remaining each morning) during adaptation. Following adaptation all steers in Experiment 1 were transitioned to CON bunks and followed to finishing. In Experiment 2, 126 steers (445.4 ± 40.63 kg) were randomly assigned to one of 16 pens. Treatments in Experiment 2 were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial and include the two bunk management strategies utilized in Experiment 1 (OVF or CON) and either 25% MDGS or 50% MDGS (DM basis). Ruminal H2S was measured via rumenocentesis during dietary adaptation. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.13) observed in either experiment for growth performance due to bunk management. In Experiment 1, OVF steers had greater (P = 0.001) DMI during adaptation; however, overall DMI was not different (P = 0.14) between treatments. In Experiment 2, DMI (d 0 to 104) tended to decrease (P = 0.09) with greater MDGS inclusion. Hot carcass weight, ribeye area, marbling score, and quality grade were not affected (P ≥ 0.48) by either bunk management or MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 2, back fat (1.30 vs. 1.17 ± 0.042 cm) and yield grade (3.2 vs. 3.0 ± 0.11) were greater (P = 0.03) for CON steers compared with OVF but were not affected (P = 0.59) by MDGS inclusion. In Experiment 1, H2S tended (P = 0.07) to be greater in steers on OVF compared with CON. In Experiment 2, bunk management strategy did not impact (P = 0.82) H2S concentrations. There was a MDGS inclusion × day interaction for H2S with steers fed 50% MDGS having greater (P &lt; 0.01) H2S concentrations compared with steers fed 25% MDGS on d 28 and 35. Bunk management strategy during adaptation did not impact growth performance but did reduce intake in Experiment 1. Yield grade decreased when OVF bunk management was applied throughout Experiment 2. Response of H2S concentrations in the rumen were variable and likely influenced by inconsistencies in bunk management and resulting DMI during the early portions of the feedlot study.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34729460</pmid><doi>10.1093/tas/txab194</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2573-2102
ispartof Translational animal science, 2021-10, Vol.5 (4), p.txab194-txab194
issn 2573-2102
2573-2102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8557719
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Beef cattle
Costs (Law)
Feedlots
Hydrogen sulfide
Rumen
Ruminant Nutrition
Strategic planning (Business)
title Impacts of bunk management on steer performance and ruminal hydrogen sulfide concentrations in steers fed modified distillers grains with solubles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T18%3A50%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20bunk%20management%20on%20steer%20performance%20and%20ruminal%20hydrogen%20sulfide%20concentrations%20in%20steers%20fed%20modified%20distillers%20grains%20with%20solubles&rft.jtitle=Translational%20animal%20science&rft.au=Neville,%20Bryan%20W&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=txab194&rft.epage=txab194&rft.pages=txab194-txab194&rft.issn=2573-2102&rft.eissn=2573-2102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tas/txab194&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA776355153%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2593026692&rft_id=info:pmid/34729460&rft_galeid=A776355153&rfr_iscdi=true