Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers
This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BioMed research international 2021, Vol.2021, p.3818652-5 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 3818652 |
| container_title | BioMed research international |
| container_volume | 2021 |
| creator | Eren, Birgul Ozasir, Tufan Kandemir, Baris Gulsahi, Kamran |
| description | This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n=10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal–Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2021/3818652 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8556980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A696844245</galeid><sourcerecordid>A696844245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-cd864f85e319f62ea5e8c8cc3314d242540dfc5562f46baab12d029a804b1f463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vGyEQhldVqyZKc-u5QuqlUuNmYQGzl0qRG6eVIrVK3DNiYYiJdsEFtpH_TX9qWdlxPw7hwsc8vMO8TFW9xvUHjBk7JzXB543AgjPyrDomDaYzjil-flg3zVF1mtJ9XYbAvG75y-qooXPCeDM_rn4twrBR0aXgUbBoGZXOYwR0A8mlrLyG6fjSm2CCz06rvt-iVQSVwaAVQF5PaA6xbB9c2S1dB_HWZUDfQsppmzIMSHmDrnqV0i58hkrWzvnHO5-ctRDBZ3QTQkYL5VWPbkH1ENOr6oVVfYLT_XxSfV9erhafZ9dfr74sLq5nmnKcZ9oITq1g0ODWcgKKgdBC66a4YAgljNbGasY4sZR3SnWYmJq0StS0w-WoOak-7nQ3YzeA0eU1UfVyE92g4lYG5eS_Ee_W8i78lKKItqIuAu_2AjH8GIsncnBJQ98rD2FMkrC2fAkmpC3o2__Q-zDGUvREiZbN63lL_1B3xQjpvA0lr55E5QVvuaCUUPY0JRrGigFTxrMdpWNIKYI9FIZrOXWSnDpJ7jup4G_-NuMAP_ZNAd7vgLXzRj24p-V-A8tM0EA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2589570794</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eren, Birgul ; Ozasir, Tufan ; Kandemir, Baris ; Gulsahi, Kamran</creator><contributor>Patini, Romeo ; Romeo Patini</contributor><creatorcontrib>Eren, Birgul ; Ozasir, Tufan ; Kandemir, Baris ; Gulsahi, Kamran ; Patini, Romeo ; Romeo Patini</creatorcontrib><description>This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n=10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal–Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2314-6133</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-6141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2021/3818652</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34725637</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Biomedical research ; Cement ; Comparative analysis ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins ; Composition ; Dental Pulp Cavity ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Endodontics ; Epoxy Resins ; Fracture toughness ; Glass ; Glass fibers ; Glass reinforced plastics ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Methods ; Pit and fissure sealants (Dentistry) ; Prevention ; Properties ; Prostheses ; Root Canal Filling Materials - analysis ; Root Canal Obturation - methods ; Root Canal Preparation - methods ; Root canal therapy ; Root Canal Therapy - methods ; Root canals ; Sealers ; Sealing compounds ; Statistical analysis ; Stress, Mechanical ; Teeth ; Test equipment ; Testing ; Tooth fractures ; Tooth Fractures - therapy ; Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement</subject><ispartof>BioMed research international, 2021, Vol.2021, p.3818652-5</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Birgul Eren et al.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Birgul Eren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Birgul Eren et al. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-cd864f85e319f62ea5e8c8cc3314d242540dfc5562f46baab12d029a804b1f463</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6424-2250 ; 0000-0003-3510-7265 ; 0000-0001-8778-9005 ; 0000-0002-3276-0843</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556980/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8556980/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34725637$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Patini, Romeo</contributor><contributor>Romeo Patini</contributor><creatorcontrib>Eren, Birgul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozasir, Tufan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandemir, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulsahi, Kamran</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers</title><title>BioMed research international</title><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><description>This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n=10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal–Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2.</description><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Composite Resins</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Dental Pulp Cavity</subject><subject>Dentin</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Epoxy Resins</subject><subject>Fracture toughness</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Glass fibers</subject><subject>Glass reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pit and fissure sealants (Dentistry)</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Root Canal Filling Materials - analysis</subject><subject>Root Canal Obturation - methods</subject><subject>Root Canal Preparation - methods</subject><subject>Root canal therapy</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Sealers</subject><subject>Sealing compounds</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Test equipment</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Tooth fractures</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - therapy</subject><subject>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement</subject><issn>2314-6133</issn><issn>2314-6141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vGyEQhldVqyZKc-u5QuqlUuNmYQGzl0qRG6eVIrVK3DNiYYiJdsEFtpH_TX9qWdlxPw7hwsc8vMO8TFW9xvUHjBk7JzXB543AgjPyrDomDaYzjil-flg3zVF1mtJ9XYbAvG75y-qooXPCeDM_rn4twrBR0aXgUbBoGZXOYwR0A8mlrLyG6fjSm2CCz06rvt-iVQSVwaAVQF5PaA6xbB9c2S1dB_HWZUDfQsppmzIMSHmDrnqV0i58hkrWzvnHO5-ctRDBZ3QTQkYL5VWPbkH1ENOr6oVVfYLT_XxSfV9erhafZ9dfr74sLq5nmnKcZ9oITq1g0ODWcgKKgdBC66a4YAgljNbGasY4sZR3SnWYmJq0StS0w-WoOak-7nQ3YzeA0eU1UfVyE92g4lYG5eS_Ee_W8i78lKKItqIuAu_2AjH8GIsncnBJQ98rD2FMkrC2fAkmpC3o2__Q-zDGUvREiZbN63lL_1B3xQjpvA0lr55E5QVvuaCUUPY0JRrGigFTxrMdpWNIKYI9FIZrOXWSnDpJ7jup4G_-NuMAP_ZNAd7vgLXzRj24p-V-A8tM0EA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Eren, Birgul</creator><creator>Ozasir, Tufan</creator><creator>Kandemir, Baris</creator><creator>Gulsahi, Kamran</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-7265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-9005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-0843</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers</title><author>Eren, Birgul ; Ozasir, Tufan ; Kandemir, Baris ; Gulsahi, Kamran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-cd864f85e319f62ea5e8c8cc3314d242540dfc5562f46baab12d029a804b1f463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Composite Resins</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Dental Pulp Cavity</topic><topic>Dentin</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Epoxy Resins</topic><topic>Fracture toughness</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Glass fibers</topic><topic>Glass reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pit and fissure sealants (Dentistry)</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Root Canal Filling Materials - analysis</topic><topic>Root Canal Obturation - methods</topic><topic>Root Canal Preparation - methods</topic><topic>Root canal therapy</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Sealers</topic><topic>Sealing compounds</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Test equipment</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Tooth fractures</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - therapy</topic><topic>Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eren, Birgul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozasir, Tufan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandemir, Baris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulsahi, Kamran</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East & Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eren, Birgul</au><au>Ozasir, Tufan</au><au>Kandemir, Baris</au><au>Gulsahi, Kamran</au><au>Patini, Romeo</au><au>Romeo Patini</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers</atitle><jtitle>BioMed research international</jtitle><addtitle>Biomed Res Int</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2021</volume><spage>3818652</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>3818652-5</pages><issn>2314-6133</issn><eissn>2314-6141</eissn><abstract>This study is aimed at evaluating the effects of FiberSite and glass fiber postsystems on the fracture resistance of endodontically restored teeth, when combined with various root canal sealers. Forty human mandibular premolar teeth, each having a single root with anatomically comparable dimension and length, were selected. The teeth in each experimental group (n=10) were instrumented, obturated, and restored with the following procedures: in group 1, AH Plus root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; in group 2, AH Plus root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem; in group 3, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a glass fiber post with a composite core; and in group 4, Sure-Seal Root canal sealer and a FiberSite postsystem. The specimens were placed on a universal test machine. The fracture resistance of all specimens was tested using generic test equipment, and the value of the force in newton (N) during fracture was measured for each root. A statistical analysis was conducted through the Kruskal–Wallis test as well as the post hoc test. The tests showed a significant difference between groups 2 and 3, with group 3 producing load values that were significantly higher than group 2. In contrast, no significant differences were found to exist between the other groups. Regardless of postsystems, groups 3 and 4 showed higher mean fracture values (but no statistically significant differences) than groups 1 and 2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><pmid>34725637</pmid><doi>10.1155/2021/3818652</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-2250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-7265</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8778-9005</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3276-0843</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2314-6133 |
| ispartof | BioMed research international, 2021, Vol.2021, p.3818652-5 |
| issn | 2314-6133 2314-6141 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8556980 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biomedical research Cement Comparative analysis Composite materials Composite Resins Composition Dental Pulp Cavity Dentin Dentistry Endodontics Epoxy Resins Fracture toughness Glass Glass fibers Glass reinforced plastics Humans Materials Testing Mechanical properties Methods Pit and fissure sealants (Dentistry) Prevention Properties Prostheses Root Canal Filling Materials - analysis Root Canal Obturation - methods Root Canal Preparation - methods Root canal therapy Root Canal Therapy - methods Root canals Sealers Sealing compounds Statistical analysis Stress, Mechanical Teeth Test equipment Testing Tooth fractures Tooth Fractures - therapy Zinc Oxide-Eugenol Cement |
| title | Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with FiberSite Postsystem and Glass Fiber, Combined with Different Root Canal Sealers |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A18%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Fracture%20Resistance%20of%20Endodontically%20Treated%20Teeth%20Restored%20with%20FiberSite%20Postsystem%20and%20Glass%20Fiber,%20Combined%20with%20Different%20Root%20Canal%20Sealers&rft.jtitle=BioMed%20research%20international&rft.au=Eren,%20Birgul&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=2021&rft.spage=3818652&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=3818652-5&rft.issn=2314-6133&rft.eissn=2314-6141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2021/3818652&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA696844245%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2589570794&rft_id=info:pmid/34725637&rft_galeid=A696844245&rfr_iscdi=true |