Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion
There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has show...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intelligent manufacturing 2021-12, Vol.32 (8), p.2353-2373 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2373 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2353 |
container_title | Journal of intelligent manufacturing |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Sanchez, Salomé Rengasamy, Divish Hyde, Christopher J. Figueredo, Grazziela P. Rothwell, Benjamin |
description | There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has shown that this difference in performance is due to the complex relationships between AM process parameters which affect the material microstructure and consequently the mechanical performance as well. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of different AM build parameters on the mechanical performance of parts. Machine learning (ML) models are able to find hidden relationships in data using iterative statistical analyses and have the potential to develop process–structure–property–performance relationships for manufacturing processes, including AM. The aim of this work is to apply ML techniques to materials testing data in order to understand the effect of AM process parameters on the creep rate of additively built nickel-based superalloy and to predict the creep rate of the material from these process parameters. In this work, the predictive capabilities of ML and its ability to develop process–structure–property relationships are applied to the creep properties of laser powder bed fused alloy 718. The input data for the ML model included the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) build parameters used—build orientation, scan strategy and number of lasers—and geometrical material descriptors which were extracted from optical microscope porosity images using image analysis techniques. The ML model was used to predict the minimum creep rate of the Laser Powder Bed Fused alloy 718 samples, which had been creep tested at
650
∘
C and 600 MPa. The ML model was also used to identify the most relevant material descriptors affecting the minimum creep rate of the material (determined by using an ensemble feature importance framework). The creep rate was accurately predicted with a percentage error of
1.40
%
in the best case. The most important material descriptors were found to be part density, number of pores, build orientation and scan strategy. These findings show the applicability and potential of using ML to determine and predict the mechanical properties of materials fabricated via different manufacturing processes, and to find process–structure–property relationships in AM. This increases the readiness of AM for use in critical applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8550259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2582666295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e3101dffe7a4dc970a5eeba3670829cc90cb9a03e1fe674490ce7bbf0165c6a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi1UBAvlD_RQWeqFS8rY8UdyqVQhoEhUvbRny3Emu0GJvbWdVv33eFmgH4eeZsbzzDsevYS8YfCeAeiLxKARsgLOKmC6KdkBWTGpedUwIV-RFbRSVVIyeUxOUroHgLZR7Igc10JzEFKtiPls3Wb0SCe00Y9-TXOgPWaM8-41b5DOdvR0sC6HmKgdBnR5x7mIuKXRZky0AJNNGOk2_OxL6LCnw5LG4F-Tw8FOCc-e4in5dn319fJTdffl5vby413lhBa5wpoB64u2tqJ3rQYrETtbKw0Nb51rwXWthRrZgEoLUWrUXTcAU9Ipy-pT8mGvu126GXuHPkc7mW0cZxt_mWBH83fHjxuzDj9MIyVw2RaB8yeBGL4vmLKZx-RwmqzHsCRTGMa5qusd-u4f9D4s0ZfzCtVwpRRvZaH4nnIxpBRxePkMA7Pzz-z9M8U_8-ifgTL09s8zXkaeDStAvQdSafk1xt-7_yP7ADbkp5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582666295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Sanchez, Salomé ; Rengasamy, Divish ; Hyde, Christopher J. ; Figueredo, Grazziela P. ; Rothwell, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Salomé ; Rengasamy, Divish ; Hyde, Christopher J. ; Figueredo, Grazziela P. ; Rothwell, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has shown that this difference in performance is due to the complex relationships between AM process parameters which affect the material microstructure and consequently the mechanical performance as well. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of different AM build parameters on the mechanical performance of parts. Machine learning (ML) models are able to find hidden relationships in data using iterative statistical analyses and have the potential to develop process–structure–property–performance relationships for manufacturing processes, including AM. The aim of this work is to apply ML techniques to materials testing data in order to understand the effect of AM process parameters on the creep rate of additively built nickel-based superalloy and to predict the creep rate of the material from these process parameters. In this work, the predictive capabilities of ML and its ability to develop process–structure–property relationships are applied to the creep properties of laser powder bed fused alloy 718. The input data for the ML model included the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) build parameters used—build orientation, scan strategy and number of lasers—and geometrical material descriptors which were extracted from optical microscope porosity images using image analysis techniques. The ML model was used to predict the minimum creep rate of the Laser Powder Bed Fused alloy 718 samples, which had been creep tested at
650
∘
C and 600 MPa. The ML model was also used to identify the most relevant material descriptors affecting the minimum creep rate of the material (determined by using an ensemble feature importance framework). The creep rate was accurately predicted with a percentage error of
1.40
%
in the best case. The most important material descriptors were found to be part density, number of pores, build orientation and scan strategy. These findings show the applicability and potential of using ML to determine and predict the mechanical properties of materials fabricated via different manufacturing processes, and to find process–structure–property relationships in AM. This increases the readiness of AM for use in critical applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-5515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34720456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Business and Management ; Control ; Creep rate ; Image analysis ; Iterative methods ; Lasers ; Machine learning ; Machines ; Manufacturing ; Manufacturing industry ; Material properties ; Materials testing ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical properties ; Mechatronics ; Nickel ; Nickel base alloys ; Optical microscopes ; Porosity ; Powder beds ; Process parameters ; Processes ; Production ; Robotics ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Superalloys</subject><ispartof>Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2021-12, Vol.32 (8), p.2353-2373</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e3101dffe7a4dc970a5eeba3670829cc90cb9a03e1fe674490ce7bbf0165c6a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e3101dffe7a4dc970a5eeba3670829cc90cb9a03e1fe674490ce7bbf0165c6a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3947-433X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34720456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Salomé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rengasamy, Divish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueredo, Grazziela P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothwell, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion</title><title>Journal of intelligent manufacturing</title><addtitle>J Intell Manuf</addtitle><addtitle>J Intell Manuf</addtitle><description>There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has shown that this difference in performance is due to the complex relationships between AM process parameters which affect the material microstructure and consequently the mechanical performance as well. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of different AM build parameters on the mechanical performance of parts. Machine learning (ML) models are able to find hidden relationships in data using iterative statistical analyses and have the potential to develop process–structure–property–performance relationships for manufacturing processes, including AM. The aim of this work is to apply ML techniques to materials testing data in order to understand the effect of AM process parameters on the creep rate of additively built nickel-based superalloy and to predict the creep rate of the material from these process parameters. In this work, the predictive capabilities of ML and its ability to develop process–structure–property relationships are applied to the creep properties of laser powder bed fused alloy 718. The input data for the ML model included the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) build parameters used—build orientation, scan strategy and number of lasers—and geometrical material descriptors which were extracted from optical microscope porosity images using image analysis techniques. The ML model was used to predict the minimum creep rate of the Laser Powder Bed Fused alloy 718 samples, which had been creep tested at
650
∘
C and 600 MPa. The ML model was also used to identify the most relevant material descriptors affecting the minimum creep rate of the material (determined by using an ensemble feature importance framework). The creep rate was accurately predicted with a percentage error of
1.40
%
in the best case. The most important material descriptors were found to be part density, number of pores, build orientation and scan strategy. These findings show the applicability and potential of using ML to determine and predict the mechanical properties of materials fabricated via different manufacturing processes, and to find process–structure–property relationships in AM. This increases the readiness of AM for use in critical applications.</description><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Creep rate</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Machines</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing industry</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Materials testing</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Nickel</subject><subject>Nickel base alloys</subject><subject>Optical microscopes</subject><subject>Porosity</subject><subject>Powder beds</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Processes</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Superalloys</subject><issn>0956-5515</issn><issn>1572-8145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhi1UBAvlD_RQWeqFS8rY8UdyqVQhoEhUvbRny3Emu0GJvbWdVv33eFmgH4eeZsbzzDsevYS8YfCeAeiLxKARsgLOKmC6KdkBWTGpedUwIV-RFbRSVVIyeUxOUroHgLZR7Igc10JzEFKtiPls3Wb0SCe00Y9-TXOgPWaM8-41b5DOdvR0sC6HmKgdBnR5x7mIuKXRZky0AJNNGOk2_OxL6LCnw5LG4F-Tw8FOCc-e4in5dn319fJTdffl5vby413lhBa5wpoB64u2tqJ3rQYrETtbKw0Nb51rwXWthRrZgEoLUWrUXTcAU9Ipy-pT8mGvu126GXuHPkc7mW0cZxt_mWBH83fHjxuzDj9MIyVw2RaB8yeBGL4vmLKZx-RwmqzHsCRTGMa5qusd-u4f9D4s0ZfzCtVwpRRvZaH4nnIxpBRxePkMA7Pzz-z9M8U_8-ifgTL09s8zXkaeDStAvQdSafk1xt-7_yP7ADbkp5w</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Sanchez, Salomé</creator><creator>Rengasamy, Divish</creator><creator>Hyde, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Figueredo, Grazziela P.</creator><creator>Rothwell, Benjamin</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-433X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion</title><author>Sanchez, Salomé ; Rengasamy, Divish ; Hyde, Christopher J. ; Figueredo, Grazziela P. ; Rothwell, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c474t-e3101dffe7a4dc970a5eeba3670829cc90cb9a03e1fe674490ce7bbf0165c6a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Creep rate</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Machines</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing industry</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Materials testing</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Nickel</topic><topic>Nickel base alloys</topic><topic>Optical microscopes</topic><topic>Porosity</topic><topic>Powder beds</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Processes</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Superalloys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Salomé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rengasamy, Divish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hyde, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Figueredo, Grazziela P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothwell, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of intelligent manufacturing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanchez, Salomé</au><au>Rengasamy, Divish</au><au>Hyde, Christopher J.</au><au>Figueredo, Grazziela P.</au><au>Rothwell, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intelligent manufacturing</jtitle><stitle>J Intell Manuf</stitle><addtitle>J Intell Manuf</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2353</spage><epage>2373</epage><pages>2353-2373</pages><issn>0956-5515</issn><eissn>1572-8145</eissn><abstract>There is an increasing need for the use of additive manufacturing (AM) to produce improved critical application engineering components. However, the materials manufactured using AM perform well below their traditionally manufactured counterparts, particularly for creep and fatigue. Research has shown that this difference in performance is due to the complex relationships between AM process parameters which affect the material microstructure and consequently the mechanical performance as well. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the impact of different AM build parameters on the mechanical performance of parts. Machine learning (ML) models are able to find hidden relationships in data using iterative statistical analyses and have the potential to develop process–structure–property–performance relationships for manufacturing processes, including AM. The aim of this work is to apply ML techniques to materials testing data in order to understand the effect of AM process parameters on the creep rate of additively built nickel-based superalloy and to predict the creep rate of the material from these process parameters. In this work, the predictive capabilities of ML and its ability to develop process–structure–property relationships are applied to the creep properties of laser powder bed fused alloy 718. The input data for the ML model included the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) build parameters used—build orientation, scan strategy and number of lasers—and geometrical material descriptors which were extracted from optical microscope porosity images using image analysis techniques. The ML model was used to predict the minimum creep rate of the Laser Powder Bed Fused alloy 718 samples, which had been creep tested at
650
∘
C and 600 MPa. The ML model was also used to identify the most relevant material descriptors affecting the minimum creep rate of the material (determined by using an ensemble feature importance framework). The creep rate was accurately predicted with a percentage error of
1.40
%
in the best case. The most important material descriptors were found to be part density, number of pores, build orientation and scan strategy. These findings show the applicability and potential of using ML to determine and predict the mechanical properties of materials fabricated via different manufacturing processes, and to find process–structure–property relationships in AM. This increases the readiness of AM for use in critical applications.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34720456</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-433X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-5515 |
ispartof | Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2021-12, Vol.32 (8), p.2353-2373 |
issn | 0956-5515 1572-8145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8550259 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Business and Management Control Creep rate Image analysis Iterative methods Lasers Machine learning Machines Manufacturing Manufacturing industry Material properties Materials testing Mathematical models Mechanical properties Mechatronics Nickel Nickel base alloys Optical microscopes Porosity Powder beds Process parameters Processes Production Robotics Statistical analysis Statistical methods Superalloys |
title | Machine learning to determine the main factors affecting creep rates in laser powder bed fusion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T16%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Machine%20learning%20to%20determine%20the%20main%20factors%20affecting%20creep%20rates%20in%20laser%20powder%20bed%20fusion&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intelligent%20manufacturing&rft.au=Sanchez,%20Salom%C3%A9&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2353&rft.epage=2373&rft.pages=2353-2373&rft.issn=0956-5515&rft.eissn=1572-8145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10845-021-01785-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2582666295%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582666295&rft_id=info:pmid/34720456&rfr_iscdi=true |