Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) Reared on Different Host Plants
is a highly polyphagous and invasive agricultural pest that can harm more than 300 plants and cause huge economic losses to crops. Symbiotic bacteria play an important role in the host biology and ecology of herbivores, and have a wide range of effects on host growth and adaptation. In this study, h...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of molecular sciences 2021-10, Vol.22 (20), p.11266 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 20 |
| container_start_page | 11266 |
| container_title | International journal of molecular sciences |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Lv, Dongbiao Liu, Xueying Dong, Yanlu Yan, Zizheng Zhang, Xuan Wang, Ping Yuan, Xiangqun Li, Yiping |
| description | is a highly polyphagous and invasive agricultural pest that can harm more than 300 plants and cause huge economic losses to crops. Symbiotic bacteria play an important role in the host biology and ecology of herbivores, and have a wide range of effects on host growth and adaptation. In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the effects of different hosts (corn, wild oat, oilseed rape, pepper, and artificial diet) on gut microbial community structure and diversity. Corn is one of the most favored plants of
. We compared the gut microbiota on corn with and without a seed coating agent. The results showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated the gut microbial community. The microbial abundance on oilseed rape was the highest, the microbial diversity on wild oat was the lowest, and the microbial diversity on corn without a seed coating agent was significantly higher than that with such an agent. PCoA analysis showed that there were significant differences in the gut microbial community among different hosts. PICRUSt analysis showed that most of the functional prediction categories were related to metabolic and cellular processes. The results showed that the gut microbial community of
was affected not only by the host species, but also by different host treatments, which played an important role in host adaptation. It is important to deepen our understanding of the symbiotic relationships between invasive organisms and microorganisms. The study of the adaptability of host insects contributes to the development of more effective and environmentally friendly pest management strategies. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijms222011266 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8540368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584790759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dfdf557d8631ebf68f6bc10e83e55fd7eb02bbcd06126f837e8f6a2751d237b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxa2qVaFLj71WlnqBQ8AfseNcKtEFlkpIIKBny4nH1KskTu0ExH9fL18CTjPS--nNPD2EvlGyz3lNDvy6T4wxQimT8gPapiVjBSGy-vhq30JfUloTwjgT9We0xUupaM3kNorL0I8m-hQGHBxezRP-ZdoJojcdzlo_D37ykDbiiek6fBj7-7sQe7yLr8Zgw5hZg12cb_wI0Rq8hy_BRLA4Ox555yDCMOHTkCZ80ZlhSjvokzNdgq9Pc4H-nBxfL0-Ls_PV7-XhWdGWVEyFddYJUVklOYXGSeVk01ICioMQzlbQENY0rSUyJ3eKV5AJwypBLeNVU_MF-vnoO85ND7bNb0TT6TH63sR7HYzXb5XB_9U34VYrURIuVTbYfTKI4d8MadK9Ty10OQWEOWkmVFnVpBKbWz_eoeswxyHHe6BKVlJFM1U8Um0MKUVwL89Qojdt6jdtZv776wQv9HN9_D9sBpyQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584424181</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) Reared on Different Host Plants</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lv, Dongbiao ; Liu, Xueying ; Dong, Yanlu ; Yan, Zizheng ; Zhang, Xuan ; Wang, Ping ; Yuan, Xiangqun ; Li, Yiping</creator><creatorcontrib>Lv, Dongbiao ; Liu, Xueying ; Dong, Yanlu ; Yan, Zizheng ; Zhang, Xuan ; Wang, Ping ; Yuan, Xiangqun ; Li, Yiping</creatorcontrib><description>is a highly polyphagous and invasive agricultural pest that can harm more than 300 plants and cause huge economic losses to crops. Symbiotic bacteria play an important role in the host biology and ecology of herbivores, and have a wide range of effects on host growth and adaptation. In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the effects of different hosts (corn, wild oat, oilseed rape, pepper, and artificial diet) on gut microbial community structure and diversity. Corn is one of the most favored plants of
. We compared the gut microbiota on corn with and without a seed coating agent. The results showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated the gut microbial community. The microbial abundance on oilseed rape was the highest, the microbial diversity on wild oat was the lowest, and the microbial diversity on corn without a seed coating agent was significantly higher than that with such an agent. PCoA analysis showed that there were significant differences in the gut microbial community among different hosts. PICRUSt analysis showed that most of the functional prediction categories were related to metabolic and cellular processes. The results showed that the gut microbial community of
was affected not only by the host species, but also by different host treatments, which played an important role in host adaptation. It is important to deepen our understanding of the symbiotic relationships between invasive organisms and microorganisms. The study of the adaptability of host insects contributes to the development of more effective and environmentally friendly pest management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-6596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011266</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34681926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adaptability ; Adaptation ; Agricultural production ; Animals ; Artificial diets ; Avena - parasitology ; Bacteria - classification ; Bacteria - genetics ; Bacteria - isolation & purification ; Bees ; Biodiversity ; Brassica napus - parasitology ; Capsicum - parasitology ; Community structure ; Corn ; Crops ; Diet ; DNA, Bacterial - genetics ; DNA, Ribosomal - genetics ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Economic impact ; Gastrointestinal Microbiome ; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ; Host plants ; Host Specificity ; Insects ; Intestinal microflora ; Microbiota ; Microorganisms ; Mosquitoes ; Next-generation sequencing ; Oilseed crops ; Oilseeds ; Pest control ; Phylogeny ; Plants - classification ; Plants - parasitology ; Quality control ; Rape plants ; Rapeseed ; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics ; Seeds ; Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods ; Spodoptera - microbiology ; Spodoptera - physiology ; Spodoptera frugiperda ; Taxonomy ; Zea mays - parasitology</subject><ispartof>International journal of molecular sciences, 2021-10, Vol.22 (20), p.11266</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dfdf557d8631ebf68f6bc10e83e55fd7eb02bbcd06126f837e8f6a2751d237b93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dfdf557d8631ebf68f6bc10e83e55fd7eb02bbcd06126f837e8f6a2751d237b93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9461-813X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540368/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8540368/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34681926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lv, Dongbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yanlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Zizheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xiangqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yiping</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) Reared on Different Host Plants</title><title>International journal of molecular sciences</title><addtitle>Int J Mol Sci</addtitle><description>is a highly polyphagous and invasive agricultural pest that can harm more than 300 plants and cause huge economic losses to crops. Symbiotic bacteria play an important role in the host biology and ecology of herbivores, and have a wide range of effects on host growth and adaptation. In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the effects of different hosts (corn, wild oat, oilseed rape, pepper, and artificial diet) on gut microbial community structure and diversity. Corn is one of the most favored plants of
. We compared the gut microbiota on corn with and without a seed coating agent. The results showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated the gut microbial community. The microbial abundance on oilseed rape was the highest, the microbial diversity on wild oat was the lowest, and the microbial diversity on corn without a seed coating agent was significantly higher than that with such an agent. PCoA analysis showed that there were significant differences in the gut microbial community among different hosts. PICRUSt analysis showed that most of the functional prediction categories were related to metabolic and cellular processes. The results showed that the gut microbial community of
was affected not only by the host species, but also by different host treatments, which played an important role in host adaptation. It is important to deepen our understanding of the symbiotic relationships between invasive organisms and microorganisms. The study of the adaptability of host insects contributes to the development of more effective and environmentally friendly pest management strategies.</description><subject>Adaptability</subject><subject>Adaptation</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Artificial diets</subject><subject>Avena - parasitology</subject><subject>Bacteria - classification</subject><subject>Bacteria - genetics</subject><subject>Bacteria - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Brassica napus - parasitology</subject><subject>Capsicum - parasitology</subject><subject>Community structure</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</subject><subject>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Host Specificity</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Mosquitoes</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Oilseed crops</subject><subject>Oilseeds</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Plants - classification</subject><subject>Plants - parasitology</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Rape plants</subject><subject>Rapeseed</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</subject><subject>Spodoptera - microbiology</subject><subject>Spodoptera - physiology</subject><subject>Spodoptera frugiperda</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Zea mays - parasitology</subject><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1661-6596</issn><issn>1422-0067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1P3DAQxa2qVaFLj71WlnqBQ8AfseNcKtEFlkpIIKBny4nH1KskTu0ExH9fL18CTjPS--nNPD2EvlGyz3lNDvy6T4wxQimT8gPapiVjBSGy-vhq30JfUloTwjgT9We0xUupaM3kNorL0I8m-hQGHBxezRP-ZdoJojcdzlo_D37ykDbiiek6fBj7-7sQe7yLr8Zgw5hZg12cb_wI0Rq8hy_BRLA4Ox555yDCMOHTkCZ80ZlhSjvokzNdgq9Pc4H-nBxfL0-Ls_PV7-XhWdGWVEyFddYJUVklOYXGSeVk01ICioMQzlbQENY0rSUyJ3eKV5AJwypBLeNVU_MF-vnoO85ND7bNb0TT6TH63sR7HYzXb5XB_9U34VYrURIuVTbYfTKI4d8MadK9Ty10OQWEOWkmVFnVpBKbWz_eoeswxyHHe6BKVlJFM1U8Um0MKUVwL89Qojdt6jdtZv776wQv9HN9_D9sBpyQ</recordid><startdate>20211019</startdate><enddate>20211019</enddate><creator>Lv, Dongbiao</creator><creator>Liu, Xueying</creator><creator>Dong, Yanlu</creator><creator>Yan, Zizheng</creator><creator>Zhang, Xuan</creator><creator>Wang, Ping</creator><creator>Yuan, Xiangqun</creator><creator>Li, Yiping</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-813X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211019</creationdate><title>Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) Reared on Different Host Plants</title><author>Lv, Dongbiao ; Liu, Xueying ; Dong, Yanlu ; Yan, Zizheng ; Zhang, Xuan ; Wang, Ping ; Yuan, Xiangqun ; Li, Yiping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-dfdf557d8631ebf68f6bc10e83e55fd7eb02bbcd06126f837e8f6a2751d237b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptability</topic><topic>Adaptation</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Artificial diets</topic><topic>Avena - parasitology</topic><topic>Bacteria - classification</topic><topic>Bacteria - genetics</topic><topic>Bacteria - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Brassica napus - parasitology</topic><topic>Capsicum - parasitology</topic><topic>Community structure</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>DNA, Ribosomal - genetics</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Microbiome</topic><topic>High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Host Specificity</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Mosquitoes</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Oilseed crops</topic><topic>Oilseeds</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Plants - classification</topic><topic>Plants - parasitology</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Rape plants</topic><topic>Rapeseed</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods</topic><topic>Spodoptera - microbiology</topic><topic>Spodoptera - physiology</topic><topic>Spodoptera frugiperda</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Zea mays - parasitology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lv, Dongbiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xueying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yanlu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Zizheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Xiangqun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yiping</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lv, Dongbiao</au><au>Liu, Xueying</au><au>Dong, Yanlu</au><au>Yan, Zizheng</au><au>Zhang, Xuan</au><au>Wang, Ping</au><au>Yuan, Xiangqun</au><au>Li, Yiping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) Reared on Different Host Plants</atitle><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Mol Sci</addtitle><date>2021-10-19</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>11266</spage><pages>11266-</pages><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1661-6596</issn><eissn>1422-0067</eissn><abstract>is a highly polyphagous and invasive agricultural pest that can harm more than 300 plants and cause huge economic losses to crops. Symbiotic bacteria play an important role in the host biology and ecology of herbivores, and have a wide range of effects on host growth and adaptation. In this study, high-throughput sequencing technology was used to investigate the effects of different hosts (corn, wild oat, oilseed rape, pepper, and artificial diet) on gut microbial community structure and diversity. Corn is one of the most favored plants of
. We compared the gut microbiota on corn with and without a seed coating agent. The results showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated the gut microbial community. The microbial abundance on oilseed rape was the highest, the microbial diversity on wild oat was the lowest, and the microbial diversity on corn without a seed coating agent was significantly higher than that with such an agent. PCoA analysis showed that there were significant differences in the gut microbial community among different hosts. PICRUSt analysis showed that most of the functional prediction categories were related to metabolic and cellular processes. The results showed that the gut microbial community of
was affected not only by the host species, but also by different host treatments, which played an important role in host adaptation. It is important to deepen our understanding of the symbiotic relationships between invasive organisms and microorganisms. The study of the adaptability of host insects contributes to the development of more effective and environmentally friendly pest management strategies.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34681926</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijms222011266</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9461-813X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1422-0067 |
| ispartof | International journal of molecular sciences, 2021-10, Vol.22 (20), p.11266 |
| issn | 1422-0067 1661-6596 1422-0067 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8540368 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Adaptability Adaptation Agricultural production Animals Artificial diets Avena - parasitology Bacteria - classification Bacteria - genetics Bacteria - isolation & purification Bees Biodiversity Brassica napus - parasitology Capsicum - parasitology Community structure Corn Crops Diet DNA, Bacterial - genetics DNA, Ribosomal - genetics Ecological effects Ecology Economic impact Gastrointestinal Microbiome High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing Host plants Host Specificity Insects Intestinal microflora Microbiota Microorganisms Mosquitoes Next-generation sequencing Oilseed crops Oilseeds Pest control Phylogeny Plants - classification Plants - parasitology Quality control Rape plants Rapeseed RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics Seeds Sequence Analysis, DNA - methods Spodoptera - microbiology Spodoptera - physiology Spodoptera frugiperda Taxonomy Zea mays - parasitology |
| title | Comparison of Gut Bacterial Communities of Fall Armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) Reared on Different Host Plants |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A02%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Gut%20Bacterial%20Communities%20of%20Fall%20Armyworm%20(%20Spodoptera%20frugiperda%20)%20Reared%20on%20Different%20Host%20Plants&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20molecular%20sciences&rft.au=Lv,%20Dongbiao&rft.date=2021-10-19&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=11266&rft.pages=11266-&rft.issn=1422-0067&rft.eissn=1422-0067&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijms222011266&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2584790759%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584424181&rft_id=info:pmid/34681926&rfr_iscdi=true |