Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Assess Changes in Alveolar Bone Width around Dental Implants at Native and Reconstructed Bone Sites: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The aim of this study was to use a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess changes in alveolar bone width around dental implants at native and reconstructed bone sites before and after implant surgery. A total of 99 implant sites from 54 patients with at least two CBCT scans before and after...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personalized medicine 2021-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1011
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Kai-Fang, Lin, Szu-Wei, Lin, Ying-Chu, Jeng, Jiiang-Huei, Huang, Yu-Ting, Liu, Pei-Feng, Tseng, Ching-Jiunn, Chou, Yu-Hsiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1011
container_title Journal of personalized medicine
container_volume 11
creator Hu, Kai-Fang
Lin, Szu-Wei
Lin, Ying-Chu
Jeng, Jiiang-Huei
Huang, Yu-Ting
Liu, Pei-Feng
Tseng, Ching-Jiunn
Chou, Yu-Hsiang
description The aim of this study was to use a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess changes in alveolar bone width around dental implants at native and reconstructed bone sites before and after implant surgery. A total of 99 implant sites from 54 patients with at least two CBCT scans before and after implant surgery during 2010–2019 were assessed in this study. Demographic data, dental treatments and CBCT scans were collected. Horizontal alveolar bone widths around implants at three levels (subcrestal width 1 mm (CW1), subcrestal width 4 mm (CW4), and subcrestal width 7 mm (CW7)) were measured. A p-value of < 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. The initial bone widths (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) at CW1, CW4, and CW7 were 6.98 ± 2.24, 9.97 ± 2.64, and 11.33 ± 3.00 mm, respectively, and the postsurgery widths were 6.83 ± 2.02, 9.58 ± 2.55, and 11.19 ± 2.90 mm, respectively. The change in bone width was 0.15 ± 1.74 mm at CW1, 0.39 ± 1.12 mm at CW4 (p = 0.0008), and 0.14 ± 1.05 mm at CW7. A statistically significant change in bone width was observed at only the CW4 level. Compared with those at the native bone sites, the changes in bone width around implants at reconstructed sites did not differ significantly. A significant alveolar bone width resorption was found only at the middle third on CBCT scans. No significant changes in bone width around implants were detected between native and reconstructed bone sites.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jpm11101011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8537892</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584418284</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5490249c116b5e3fbe09739a37917fa44092f42efaab8c4be83147e4d3d00fc93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkttq3DAQhkVpaUKaq76AoDeF4lYn21IvChv3FAgtNAm9FLI8XnuxJVeSF_aN-phVNqGklRAa-L_5pRkGoZeUvOVckXe7ZaaUkrzpE3TKSF0WQrDq6aP4BJ3HuCN5yZKxijxHJ1xUktOSnaLft3F0W9x4B8UFmDlH87Im6PCNn_02mGU44OTxJkaIETeDcVuIeHR4M-3BTybgi5yLf45dGrAJfnUd_ggumQlfzstkXIrYJPzNpHEP2GT1B1jvYgqrvXvmmH09Jojv8SZrKfi4gD3SjR98SPg6rd3hBXrWmynC-cN9hm4_f7ppvhZX379cNpurwnJZpaIUijChLKVVWwLvWyCq5srwWtG6N0IQxXrBoDemlVa0kPsgahAd7wjpreJn6MO977K2M3Q2lxLMpJcwziYctDej_ldx46C3fq9lyWupWDZ4_WAQ_K8VYtLzGC1MuRXg16hZKUUty3wy-uo_dOfX4HJ5R0pQyaTI1Jt7yubWxAD9389Qou-GQD8aAv4HkdelMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584418284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Assess Changes in Alveolar Bone Width around Dental Implants at Native and Reconstructed Bone Sites: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hu, Kai-Fang ; Lin, Szu-Wei ; Lin, Ying-Chu ; Jeng, Jiiang-Huei ; Huang, Yu-Ting ; Liu, Pei-Feng ; Tseng, Ching-Jiunn ; Chou, Yu-Hsiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Kai-Fang ; Lin, Szu-Wei ; Lin, Ying-Chu ; Jeng, Jiiang-Huei ; Huang, Yu-Ting ; Liu, Pei-Feng ; Tseng, Ching-Jiunn ; Chou, Yu-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to use a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess changes in alveolar bone width around dental implants at native and reconstructed bone sites before and after implant surgery. A total of 99 implant sites from 54 patients with at least two CBCT scans before and after implant surgery during 2010–2019 were assessed in this study. Demographic data, dental treatments and CBCT scans were collected. Horizontal alveolar bone widths around implants at three levels (subcrestal width 1 mm (CW1), subcrestal width 4 mm (CW4), and subcrestal width 7 mm (CW7)) were measured. A p-value of &lt; 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. The initial bone widths (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) at CW1, CW4, and CW7 were 6.98 ± 2.24, 9.97 ± 2.64, and 11.33 ± 3.00 mm, respectively, and the postsurgery widths were 6.83 ± 2.02, 9.58 ± 2.55, and 11.19 ± 2.90 mm, respectively. The change in bone width was 0.15 ± 1.74 mm at CW1, 0.39 ± 1.12 mm at CW4 (p = 0.0008), and 0.14 ± 1.05 mm at CW7. A statistically significant change in bone width was observed at only the CW4 level. Compared with those at the native bone sites, the changes in bone width around implants at reconstructed sites did not differ significantly. A significant alveolar bone width resorption was found only at the middle third on CBCT scans. No significant changes in bone width around implants were detected between native and reconstructed bone sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4426</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jpm11101011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34683152</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alveolar bone ; Bone implants ; Bone resorption ; Bone surgery ; Cohort analysis ; Computed tomography ; Dental implants ; Dental prosthetics ; Precision medicine ; Software ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of personalized medicine, 2021-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1011</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5490249c116b5e3fbe09739a37917fa44092f42efaab8c4be83147e4d3d00fc93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5490249c116b5e3fbe09739a37917fa44092f42efaab8c4be83147e4d3d00fc93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7056-5686 ; 0000-0002-2499-8632 ; 0000-0002-3265-0361 ; 0000-0002-7849-8940</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537892/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8537892/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Kai-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ying-Chu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Jiiang-Huei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Pei-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ching-Jiunn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Yu-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><title>Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Assess Changes in Alveolar Bone Width around Dental Implants at Native and Reconstructed Bone Sites: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><title>Journal of personalized medicine</title><description>The aim of this study was to use a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess changes in alveolar bone width around dental implants at native and reconstructed bone sites before and after implant surgery. A total of 99 implant sites from 54 patients with at least two CBCT scans before and after implant surgery during 2010–2019 were assessed in this study. Demographic data, dental treatments and CBCT scans were collected. Horizontal alveolar bone widths around implants at three levels (subcrestal width 1 mm (CW1), subcrestal width 4 mm (CW4), and subcrestal width 7 mm (CW7)) were measured. A p-value of &lt; 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. The initial bone widths (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) at CW1, CW4, and CW7 were 6.98 ± 2.24, 9.97 ± 2.64, and 11.33 ± 3.00 mm, respectively, and the postsurgery widths were 6.83 ± 2.02, 9.58 ± 2.55, and 11.19 ± 2.90 mm, respectively. The change in bone width was 0.15 ± 1.74 mm at CW1, 0.39 ± 1.12 mm at CW4 (p = 0.0008), and 0.14 ± 1.05 mm at CW7. A statistically significant change in bone width was observed at only the CW4 level. Compared with those at the native bone sites, the changes in bone width around implants at reconstructed sites did not differ significantly. A significant alveolar bone width resorption was found only at the middle third on CBCT scans. No significant changes in bone width around implants were detected between native and reconstructed bone sites.</description><subject>Alveolar bone</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Bone resorption</subject><subject>Bone surgery</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Precision medicine</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2075-4426</issn><issn>2075-4426</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkttq3DAQhkVpaUKaq76AoDeF4lYn21IvChv3FAgtNAm9FLI8XnuxJVeSF_aN-phVNqGklRAa-L_5pRkGoZeUvOVckXe7ZaaUkrzpE3TKSF0WQrDq6aP4BJ3HuCN5yZKxijxHJ1xUktOSnaLft3F0W9x4B8UFmDlH87Im6PCNn_02mGU44OTxJkaIETeDcVuIeHR4M-3BTybgi5yLf45dGrAJfnUd_ggumQlfzstkXIrYJPzNpHEP2GT1B1jvYgqrvXvmmH09Jojv8SZrKfi4gD3SjR98SPg6rd3hBXrWmynC-cN9hm4_f7ppvhZX379cNpurwnJZpaIUijChLKVVWwLvWyCq5srwWtG6N0IQxXrBoDemlVa0kPsgahAd7wjpreJn6MO977K2M3Q2lxLMpJcwziYctDej_ldx46C3fq9lyWupWDZ4_WAQ_K8VYtLzGC1MuRXg16hZKUUty3wy-uo_dOfX4HJ5R0pQyaTI1Jt7yubWxAD9389Qou-GQD8aAv4HkdelMg</recordid><startdate>20211008</startdate><enddate>20211008</enddate><creator>Hu, Kai-Fang</creator><creator>Lin, Szu-Wei</creator><creator>Lin, Ying-Chu</creator><creator>Jeng, Jiiang-Huei</creator><creator>Huang, Yu-Ting</creator><creator>Liu, Pei-Feng</creator><creator>Tseng, Ching-Jiunn</creator><creator>Chou, Yu-Hsiang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-5686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-8632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-0361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-8940</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211008</creationdate><title>Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Assess Changes in Alveolar Bone Width around Dental Implants at Native and Reconstructed Bone Sites: A Retrospective Cohort Study</title><author>Hu, Kai-Fang ; Lin, Szu-Wei ; Lin, Ying-Chu ; Jeng, Jiiang-Huei ; Huang, Yu-Ting ; Liu, Pei-Feng ; Tseng, Ching-Jiunn ; Chou, Yu-Hsiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5490249c116b5e3fbe09739a37917fa44092f42efaab8c4be83147e4d3d00fc93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alveolar bone</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Bone resorption</topic><topic>Bone surgery</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Precision medicine</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Kai-Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Szu-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Ying-Chu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeng, Jiiang-Huei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yu-Ting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Pei-Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tseng, Ching-Jiunn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Yu-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Kai-Fang</au><au>Lin, Szu-Wei</au><au>Lin, Ying-Chu</au><au>Jeng, Jiiang-Huei</au><au>Huang, Yu-Ting</au><au>Liu, Pei-Feng</au><au>Tseng, Ching-Jiunn</au><au>Chou, Yu-Hsiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Assess Changes in Alveolar Bone Width around Dental Implants at Native and Reconstructed Bone Sites: A Retrospective Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personalized medicine</jtitle><date>2021-10-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1011</spage><pages>1011-</pages><issn>2075-4426</issn><eissn>2075-4426</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to use a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assess changes in alveolar bone width around dental implants at native and reconstructed bone sites before and after implant surgery. A total of 99 implant sites from 54 patients with at least two CBCT scans before and after implant surgery during 2010–2019 were assessed in this study. Demographic data, dental treatments and CBCT scans were collected. Horizontal alveolar bone widths around implants at three levels (subcrestal width 1 mm (CW1), subcrestal width 4 mm (CW4), and subcrestal width 7 mm (CW7)) were measured. A p-value of &lt; 0.05 indicated statistically significant differences. The initial bone widths (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) at CW1, CW4, and CW7 were 6.98 ± 2.24, 9.97 ± 2.64, and 11.33 ± 3.00 mm, respectively, and the postsurgery widths were 6.83 ± 2.02, 9.58 ± 2.55, and 11.19 ± 2.90 mm, respectively. The change in bone width was 0.15 ± 1.74 mm at CW1, 0.39 ± 1.12 mm at CW4 (p = 0.0008), and 0.14 ± 1.05 mm at CW7. A statistically significant change in bone width was observed at only the CW4 level. Compared with those at the native bone sites, the changes in bone width around implants at reconstructed sites did not differ significantly. A significant alveolar bone width resorption was found only at the middle third on CBCT scans. No significant changes in bone width around implants were detected between native and reconstructed bone sites.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34683152</pmid><doi>10.3390/jpm11101011</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-5686</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2499-8632</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-0361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-8940</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4426
ispartof Journal of personalized medicine, 2021-10, Vol.11 (10), p.1011
issn 2075-4426
2075-4426
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8537892
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Alveolar bone
Bone implants
Bone resorption
Bone surgery
Cohort analysis
Computed tomography
Dental implants
Dental prosthetics
Precision medicine
Software
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Systematic review
Tomography
title Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to Assess Changes in Alveolar Bone Width around Dental Implants at Native and Reconstructed Bone Sites: A Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T18%3A58%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20Cone-Beam%20Computed%20Tomography%20to%20Assess%20Changes%20in%20Alveolar%20Bone%20Width%20around%20Dental%20Implants%20at%20Native%20and%20Reconstructed%20Bone%20Sites:%20A%20Retrospective%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personalized%20medicine&rft.au=Hu,%20Kai-Fang&rft.date=2021-10-08&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1011&rft.pages=1011-&rft.issn=2075-4426&rft.eissn=2075-4426&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jpm11101011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2584418284%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584418284&rft_id=info:pmid/34683152&rfr_iscdi=true