Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease

Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Neural Transmission 2021-11, Vol.128 (11), p.1655-1661
Hauptverfasser: Nuuttila, Simo, Eklund, Mikael, Joutsa, Juho, Jaakkola, Elina, Mäkinen, Elina, Honkanen, Emma A., Lindholm, Kari, Noponen, Tommi, Ihalainen, Toni, Murtomäki, Kirsi, Nojonen, Tanja, Levo, Reeta, Mertsalmi, Tuomas, Scheperjans, Filip, Kaasinen, Valtteri
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1661
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1655
container_title Journal of Neural Transmission
container_volume 128
creator Nuuttila, Simo
Eklund, Mikael
Joutsa, Juho
Jaakkola, Elina
Mäkinen, Elina
Honkanen, Emma A.
Lindholm, Kari
Noponen, Tommi
Ihalainen, Toni
Murtomäki, Kirsi
Nojonen, Tanja
Levo, Reeta
Mertsalmi, Tuomas
Scheperjans, Filip
Kaasinen, Valtteri
description Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [ 123 I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls ( p   0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8536581</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557223916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-c4cd37c955020e673b6fe8116590e1b4c0a935cf8cf1da50f4186979b8872baa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9O3DAQh62qqGyBF-CUYy8pYzt2nAtStaV_pJXgAGdr4nWCIWsvdoK0t75GX48nwUtQJXrg4PHB8_1m_BFySuErBajPUi7ASmA0H97Qkn8gC1pxUdJK8o9kARygbISsDsnnlO4AgNJafSKHvOJMCckXZPndYe9DGp0p0JgpotkVoSv6AVs7DBiLEbdFcr0vuhCLK4z3zqfgn_78TcXaJYvJHpODDodkT17vI3Lz4-J6-atcXf78vfy2Kk3F-JirWfPaNEIAAytr3srOKkqlaMDStjKADRemU6ajaxTQVVTJpm5apWrWIvIjcj7nbqd2Y9fG-jHioLfRbTDudECn3754d6v78KiV4FIomgO-vAbE8DDZNOqNS2b_TW_DlDQTomZ7kzK3srnVxJBStN2_MRT03r6e7etsX7_Y1zxD6j_IuBFHF_bruOF9lM9oynN8b6O-C1P0Wed71DNT0pl2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557223916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Nuuttila, Simo ; Eklund, Mikael ; Joutsa, Juho ; Jaakkola, Elina ; Mäkinen, Elina ; Honkanen, Emma A. ; Lindholm, Kari ; Noponen, Tommi ; Ihalainen, Toni ; Murtomäki, Kirsi ; Nojonen, Tanja ; Levo, Reeta ; Mertsalmi, Tuomas ; Scheperjans, Filip ; Kaasinen, Valtteri</creator><creatorcontrib>Nuuttila, Simo ; Eklund, Mikael ; Joutsa, Juho ; Jaakkola, Elina ; Mäkinen, Elina ; Honkanen, Emma A. ; Lindholm, Kari ; Noponen, Tommi ; Ihalainen, Toni ; Murtomäki, Kirsi ; Nojonen, Tanja ; Levo, Reeta ; Mertsalmi, Tuomas ; Scheperjans, Filip ; Kaasinen, Valtteri</creatorcontrib><description>Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [ 123 I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls ( p  &lt; 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients ( p  = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p  = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs ( p  &gt; 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9564</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-1463</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34328563</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; NCT ; NCT02650843 ; Neurology ; Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original ; Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article ; Neurosciences ; Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>Journal of Neural Transmission, 2021-11, Vol.128 (11), p.1655-1661</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-c4cd37c955020e673b6fe8116590e1b4c0a935cf8cf1da50f4186979b8872baa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-c4cd37c955020e673b6fe8116590e1b4c0a935cf8cf1da50f4186979b8872baa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1749-7936</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nuuttila, Simo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joutsa, Juho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaakkola, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäkinen, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkanen, Emma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindholm, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noponen, Tommi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihalainen, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtomäki, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nojonen, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levo, Reeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertsalmi, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheperjans, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaasinen, Valtteri</creatorcontrib><title>Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease</title><title>Journal of Neural Transmission</title><addtitle>J Neural Transm</addtitle><description>Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [ 123 I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls ( p  &lt; 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients ( p  = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p  = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs ( p  &gt; 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes.</description><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>NCT</subject><subject>NCT02650843</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original</subject><subject>Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><issn>0300-9564</issn><issn>1435-1463</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9O3DAQh62qqGyBF-CUYy8pYzt2nAtStaV_pJXgAGdr4nWCIWsvdoK0t75GX48nwUtQJXrg4PHB8_1m_BFySuErBajPUi7ASmA0H97Qkn8gC1pxUdJK8o9kARygbISsDsnnlO4AgNJafSKHvOJMCckXZPndYe9DGp0p0JgpotkVoSv6AVs7DBiLEbdFcr0vuhCLK4z3zqfgn_78TcXaJYvJHpODDodkT17vI3Lz4-J6-atcXf78vfy2Kk3F-JirWfPaNEIAAytr3srOKkqlaMDStjKADRemU6ajaxTQVVTJpm5apWrWIvIjcj7nbqd2Y9fG-jHioLfRbTDudECn3754d6v78KiV4FIomgO-vAbE8DDZNOqNS2b_TW_DlDQTomZ7kzK3srnVxJBStN2_MRT03r6e7etsX7_Y1zxD6j_IuBFHF_bruOF9lM9oynN8b6O-C1P0Wed71DNT0pl2</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Nuuttila, Simo</creator><creator>Eklund, Mikael</creator><creator>Joutsa, Juho</creator><creator>Jaakkola, Elina</creator><creator>Mäkinen, Elina</creator><creator>Honkanen, Emma A.</creator><creator>Lindholm, Kari</creator><creator>Noponen, Tommi</creator><creator>Ihalainen, Toni</creator><creator>Murtomäki, Kirsi</creator><creator>Nojonen, Tanja</creator><creator>Levo, Reeta</creator><creator>Mertsalmi, Tuomas</creator><creator>Scheperjans, Filip</creator><creator>Kaasinen, Valtteri</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7936</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease</title><author>Nuuttila, Simo ; Eklund, Mikael ; Joutsa, Juho ; Jaakkola, Elina ; Mäkinen, Elina ; Honkanen, Emma A. ; Lindholm, Kari ; Noponen, Tommi ; Ihalainen, Toni ; Murtomäki, Kirsi ; Nojonen, Tanja ; Levo, Reeta ; Mertsalmi, Tuomas ; Scheperjans, Filip ; Kaasinen, Valtteri</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-c4cd37c955020e673b6fe8116590e1b4c0a935cf8cf1da50f4186979b8872baa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>NCT</topic><topic>NCT02650843</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original</topic><topic>Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nuuttila, Simo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eklund, Mikael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joutsa, Juho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaakkola, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mäkinen, Elina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honkanen, Emma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindholm, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noponen, Tommi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihalainen, Toni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murtomäki, Kirsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nojonen, Tanja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levo, Reeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mertsalmi, Tuomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheperjans, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaasinen, Valtteri</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Neural Transmission</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nuuttila, Simo</au><au>Eklund, Mikael</au><au>Joutsa, Juho</au><au>Jaakkola, Elina</au><au>Mäkinen, Elina</au><au>Honkanen, Emma A.</au><au>Lindholm, Kari</au><au>Noponen, Tommi</au><au>Ihalainen, Toni</au><au>Murtomäki, Kirsi</au><au>Nojonen, Tanja</au><au>Levo, Reeta</au><au>Mertsalmi, Tuomas</au><au>Scheperjans, Filip</au><au>Kaasinen, Valtteri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Neural Transmission</jtitle><stitle>J Neural Transm</stitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1655</spage><epage>1661</epage><pages>1655-1661</pages><issn>0300-9564</issn><eissn>1435-1463</eissn><abstract>Glabellar tap or reflex (GR) is an old bedside clinical test used in the diagnostics of Parkinson’s disease (PD), but its diagnostic value is unclear. This study examines the diagnostic validity and reliability of GR in PD in relation to brain dopaminergic activity. GR was performed on 161 patients with PD, 47 patients with essential tremor (ET) and 40 healthy controls immediately prior to dopamine transporter (DAT) [ 123 I]FP-CIT SPECT scanning. The binding ratios were investigated with consideration of the GR result (normal/abnormal). In addition, the consistency of the GR was investigated with 89 patients after a mean follow-up of 2.2 years. PD and ET patients had higher GR scores than healthy controls ( p  &lt; 0.001), but there was no difference in GR between PD and ET patients ( p  = 0.09). There were no differences in the ratio of abnormal to normal GRs between the PD and ET groups (73% vs. 64% abnormal, respectively, p  = 0.13) or in DAT binding between PD patients with abnormal and normal GRs ( p  &gt; 0.36). Over follow-up, the GR changed from abnormal to normal in 20% of PD patients despite the presence of clinically typical disease. The sensitivity and specificity of GR for differentiating PD from ET were 78.3% and 36.2%, respectively. Although GR has been used by clinicians in the diagnostics of PD, it does not separate PD from ET. It also shows considerable inconsistency over time, and abnormal GR has no relationship with dopamine loss. Its usefulness should be tested for other clinical diagnostic purposes.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>34328563</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1749-7936</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9564
ispartof Journal of Neural Transmission, 2021-11, Vol.128 (11), p.1655-1661
issn 0300-9564
1435-1463
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8536581
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
NCT
NCT02650843
Neurology
Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original
Neurology and Preclinical Neurological Studies - Original Article
Neurosciences
Psychiatry
title Diagnostic accuracy of glabellar tap sign for Parkinson’s disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T21%3A00%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diagnostic%20accuracy%20of%20glabellar%20tap%20sign%20for%20Parkinson%E2%80%99s%20disease&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Neural%20Transmission&rft.au=Nuuttila,%20Simo&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1655&rft.epage=1661&rft.pages=1655-1661&rft.issn=0300-9564&rft.eissn=1435-1463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00702-021-02391-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2557223916%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557223916&rft_id=info:pmid/34328563&rfr_iscdi=true