Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions
Slower than anticipated, COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have impaired efforts to curtail the current pandemic. The standard administration schedule for most COVID-19 vaccines currently approved is two doses administered 3 to 4 wk apart. To increase the number of individuals with partia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2021-08, Vol.118 (35), p.1-6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6 |
---|---|
container_issue | 35 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Silva, Paulo J. S. Sagastizábal, Claudia Nonato, Luís Gustavo Struchiner, Claudio José Pereira, Tiago |
description | Slower than anticipated, COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have impaired efforts to curtail the current pandemic. The standard administration schedule for most COVID-19 vaccines currently approved is two doses administered 3 to 4 wk apart. To increase the number of individuals with partial protection, some governments are considering delaying the second vaccine dose. However, the delay duration must take into account crucial factors, such as the degree of protection conferred by a single dose, the anticipated vaccine supply pipeline, and the potential emergence of more virulent COVID-19 variants. To help guide decision-making, we propose here an optimization model based on extended susceptible, exposed, infectious, and removed (SEIR) dynamics that determines the optimal delay duration between the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses. The model assumes lenient social distancing and uses intensive care unit (ICU) admission as a key metric while selecting the optimal duration between doses vs. the standard 4-wk delay. While epistemic uncertainties apply to the interpretation of simulation outputs, we found that the delay is dependent on the vaccine mechanism of action and first-dose efficacy. For infection-blocking vaccines with first-dose efficacy ≥50%, the model predicts that the second dose can be delayed by ≥8 wk (half of the maximal delay), whereas for symptom-alleviating vaccines, the same delay is recommended only if the first-dose efficacy is ≥70%. Our model predicts that a 12-wk second-dose delay of an infection-blocking vaccine with a first-dose efficacy ≥70% could reduce ICU admissions by 400 people per million over 200 d. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1073/pnas.2104640118 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8536357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27075285</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27075285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-37e1e8649c1f48e3f0949b02a9acf0bcbf25b1776ee0128a0199b05d9a8ce9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1L7DAUxYM80fFj7epB4G3epnrz0SbZCDLPjxFhNuo2pOmtdug085JW0L_elhFFV3dxfudwLoeQEwanDJQ423QunXIGspDAmN4hMwaGZYU08IvMALjKtORynxyktAIAk2vYI_tCStCgihm5XW76Zt28YUUrbN0rDTXtn5Em9KGr6Hz5uPiXMUNfnPdNh7QKCWnEavCY6GL-QF21blJqQpeOyG7t2oTHH_eQ3F9d3s9vsrvl9WJ-cZd5IXKdCYUM9djQs1pqFDUYaUrgzjhfQ-nLmuclU6pABMa1A2ZGOa-M0x6NF4fkfBu7Gco1Vh67PrrWbmKzdvHVBtfY70rXPNun8GJ1LgqRqzHg70dADP8HTL0dP_DYtq7DMCTL84JrbqSY0D8_0FUYYjd-N1FGjv3YRJ1tKR9DShHrzzIM7DSTnWayXzONjt9bxyr1IX7iXIHK-djzHfxbjQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2569412817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Silva, Paulo J. S. ; Sagastizábal, Claudia ; Nonato, Luís Gustavo ; Struchiner, Claudio José ; Pereira, Tiago</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, Paulo J. S. ; Sagastizábal, Claudia ; Nonato, Luís Gustavo ; Struchiner, Claudio José ; Pereira, Tiago</creatorcontrib><description>Slower than anticipated, COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have impaired efforts to curtail the current pandemic. The standard administration schedule for most COVID-19 vaccines currently approved is two doses administered 3 to 4 wk apart. To increase the number of individuals with partial protection, some governments are considering delaying the second vaccine dose. However, the delay duration must take into account crucial factors, such as the degree of protection conferred by a single dose, the anticipated vaccine supply pipeline, and the potential emergence of more virulent COVID-19 variants. To help guide decision-making, we propose here an optimization model based on extended susceptible, exposed, infectious, and removed (SEIR) dynamics that determines the optimal delay duration between the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses. The model assumes lenient social distancing and uses intensive care unit (ICU) admission as a key metric while selecting the optimal duration between doses vs. the standard 4-wk delay. While epistemic uncertainties apply to the interpretation of simulation outputs, we found that the delay is dependent on the vaccine mechanism of action and first-dose efficacy. For infection-blocking vaccines with first-dose efficacy ≥50%, the model predicts that the second dose can be delayed by ≥8 wk (half of the maximal delay), whereas for symptom-alleviating vaccines, the same delay is recommended only if the first-dose efficacy is ≥70%. Our model predicts that a 12-wk second-dose delay of an infection-blocking vaccine with a first-dose efficacy ≥70% could reduce ICU admissions by 400 people per million over 200 d.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-8424</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1091-6490</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2104640118</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34408076</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: National Academy of Sciences</publisher><subject>Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Decision making ; Delay ; Disease control ; Dosage ; Optimization ; Pandemics ; Patient admissions ; Physical Sciences ; Schedules ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2021-08, Vol.118 (35), p.1-6</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Academy of Sciences Aug 31, 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-37e1e8649c1f48e3f0949b02a9acf0bcbf25b1776ee0128a0199b05d9a8ce9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-37e1e8649c1f48e3f0949b02a9acf0bcbf25b1776ee0128a0199b05d9a8ce9c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9363-9297 ; 0000-0003-1340-965X ; 0000-0003-2114-847X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27075285$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27075285$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,801,883,27911,27912,53778,53780,58004,58237</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, Paulo J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagastizábal, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonato, Luís Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Struchiner, Claudio José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Tiago</creatorcontrib><title>Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions</title><title>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</title><description>Slower than anticipated, COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have impaired efforts to curtail the current pandemic. The standard administration schedule for most COVID-19 vaccines currently approved is two doses administered 3 to 4 wk apart. To increase the number of individuals with partial protection, some governments are considering delaying the second vaccine dose. However, the delay duration must take into account crucial factors, such as the degree of protection conferred by a single dose, the anticipated vaccine supply pipeline, and the potential emergence of more virulent COVID-19 variants. To help guide decision-making, we propose here an optimization model based on extended susceptible, exposed, infectious, and removed (SEIR) dynamics that determines the optimal delay duration between the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses. The model assumes lenient social distancing and uses intensive care unit (ICU) admission as a key metric while selecting the optimal duration between doses vs. the standard 4-wk delay. While epistemic uncertainties apply to the interpretation of simulation outputs, we found that the delay is dependent on the vaccine mechanism of action and first-dose efficacy. For infection-blocking vaccines with first-dose efficacy ≥50%, the model predicts that the second dose can be delayed by ≥8 wk (half of the maximal delay), whereas for symptom-alleviating vaccines, the same delay is recommended only if the first-dose efficacy is ≥70%. Our model predicts that a 12-wk second-dose delay of an infection-blocking vaccine with a first-dose efficacy ≥70% could reduce ICU admissions by 400 people per million over 200 d.</description><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Physical Sciences</subject><subject>Schedules</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0027-8424</issn><issn>1091-6490</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkc1L7DAUxYM80fFj7epB4G3epnrz0SbZCDLPjxFhNuo2pOmtdug085JW0L_elhFFV3dxfudwLoeQEwanDJQ423QunXIGspDAmN4hMwaGZYU08IvMALjKtORynxyktAIAk2vYI_tCStCgihm5XW76Zt28YUUrbN0rDTXtn5Em9KGr6Hz5uPiXMUNfnPdNh7QKCWnEavCY6GL-QF21blJqQpeOyG7t2oTHH_eQ3F9d3s9vsrvl9WJ-cZd5IXKdCYUM9djQs1pqFDUYaUrgzjhfQ-nLmuclU6pABMa1A2ZGOa-M0x6NF4fkfBu7Gco1Vh67PrrWbmKzdvHVBtfY70rXPNun8GJ1LgqRqzHg70dADP8HTL0dP_DYtq7DMCTL84JrbqSY0D8_0FUYYjd-N1FGjv3YRJ1tKR9DShHrzzIM7DSTnWayXzONjt9bxyr1IX7iXIHK-djzHfxbjQo</recordid><startdate>20210831</startdate><enddate>20210831</enddate><creator>Silva, Paulo J. S.</creator><creator>Sagastizábal, Claudia</creator><creator>Nonato, Luís Gustavo</creator><creator>Struchiner, Claudio José</creator><creator>Pereira, Tiago</creator><general>National Academy of Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-9297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1340-965X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-847X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210831</creationdate><title>Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions</title><author>Silva, Paulo J. S. ; Sagastizábal, Claudia ; Nonato, Luís Gustavo ; Struchiner, Claudio José ; Pereira, Tiago</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3358-37e1e8649c1f48e3f0949b02a9acf0bcbf25b1776ee0128a0199b05d9a8ce9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Physical Sciences</topic><topic>Schedules</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, Paulo J. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagastizábal, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonato, Luís Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Struchiner, Claudio José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Tiago</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, Paulo J. S.</au><au>Sagastizábal, Claudia</au><au>Nonato, Luís Gustavo</au><au>Struchiner, Claudio José</au><au>Pereira, Tiago</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS</jtitle><date>2021-08-31</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>35</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>6</epage><pages>1-6</pages><issn>0027-8424</issn><eissn>1091-6490</eissn><abstract>Slower than anticipated, COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have impaired efforts to curtail the current pandemic. The standard administration schedule for most COVID-19 vaccines currently approved is two doses administered 3 to 4 wk apart. To increase the number of individuals with partial protection, some governments are considering delaying the second vaccine dose. However, the delay duration must take into account crucial factors, such as the degree of protection conferred by a single dose, the anticipated vaccine supply pipeline, and the potential emergence of more virulent COVID-19 variants. To help guide decision-making, we propose here an optimization model based on extended susceptible, exposed, infectious, and removed (SEIR) dynamics that determines the optimal delay duration between the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses. The model assumes lenient social distancing and uses intensive care unit (ICU) admission as a key metric while selecting the optimal duration between doses vs. the standard 4-wk delay. While epistemic uncertainties apply to the interpretation of simulation outputs, we found that the delay is dependent on the vaccine mechanism of action and first-dose efficacy. For infection-blocking vaccines with first-dose efficacy ≥50%, the model predicts that the second dose can be delayed by ≥8 wk (half of the maximal delay), whereas for symptom-alleviating vaccines, the same delay is recommended only if the first-dose efficacy is ≥70%. Our model predicts that a 12-wk second-dose delay of an infection-blocking vaccine with a first-dose efficacy ≥70% could reduce ICU admissions by 400 people per million over 200 d.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>National Academy of Sciences</pub><pmid>34408076</pmid><doi>10.1073/pnas.2104640118</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9363-9297</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1340-965X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2114-847X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0027-8424 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS, 2021-08, Vol.118 (35), p.1-6 |
issn | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8536357 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Decision making Delay Disease control Dosage Optimization Pandemics Patient admissions Physical Sciences Schedules Vaccines |
title | Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T14%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimized%20delay%20of%20the%20second%20COVID-19%20vaccine%20dose%20reduces%20ICU%20admissions&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20National%20Academy%20of%20Sciences%20-%20PNAS&rft.au=Silva,%20Paulo%20J.%20S.&rft.date=2021-08-31&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=35&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=6&rft.pages=1-6&rft.issn=0027-8424&rft.eissn=1091-6490&rft_id=info:doi/10.1073/pnas.2104640118&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pubme%3E27075285%3C/jstor_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2569412817&rft_id=info:pmid/34408076&rft_jstor_id=27075285&rfr_iscdi=true |