Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery

Despite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied. To evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted hig...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of sexual medicine 2018-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1180-1186
Hauptverfasser: Habous, Mohamad, Tal, Raanan, Tealab, Alaa, Aziz, Mohammed, Sherif, Hammoda, Mahmoud, Saad, Abdelwahab, Osama, Nassar, Mohammed, Kamil, Usama, Abdelrahman, Ziad, Binsaleh, Saleh, Giona, Simone, Ralph, David, Bettocchi, Carlo, Mulhall, John P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1186
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1180
container_title Journal of sexual medicine
container_volume 15
creator Habous, Mohamad
Tal, Raanan
Tealab, Alaa
Aziz, Mohammed
Sherif, Hammoda
Mahmoud, Saad
Abdelwahab, Osama
Nassar, Mohammed
Kamil, Usama
Abdelrahman, Ziad
Binsaleh, Saleh
Giona, Simone
Ralph, David
Bettocchi, Carlo
Mulhall, John P.
description Despite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied. To evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted high patient satisfaction. The study population consisted of all patients undergoing PI surgery between 2009 and 2015. Comorbidity, demographic, and implant information were recorded. Complications recorded included: minor (requiring no re-operation) such as penile or scrotal hematoma, superficial wound breakdown; major (requiring hospitalization or re-operation) such as device infection, erosion, and mechanical malfunction. Patient satisfaction was defined using a single question posed to the patient 6 months after surgery using a 5-point Likert scale (5 being the most satisfied). Descriptive statistics were used to define complication rates and multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to define predictors of high satisfaction (score ≥ 4), including presence and degree of complications, Peyronie's disease (PD), diabetes mellitus (DM), number of vascular comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) > 30, and patient age. Patients with a major complication, with or without an additional minor complication, had a higher likelihood of being dissatisfied (25%) compared to patients with no complication or only minor complication 1.9% (no complications) and 3.7% (only minor complications), P < .001. 902 patients were analysed. Mean age was 56.6 ± 10.6 years. Mean BMI was 30 ± 5. Comorbidity profile was diabetes 75%, dyslipidaemia 44%, hypertension 33%, cigarette smoking 32%, and PD 34%. 76% had a malleable implant (MPP) and 24% an inflatable implant (IPP). 31% had a minor complication and 9% a major complication. 93% had high satisfaction (score ≥4). Patients with any complication had a reduced rate of high satisfaction (97.5% vs 87.7%; P < .001) and even more pronounced with a major complication (96.7% vs 64.2%; P < .001). On MVA, only the absence of a major complication was a significant predictor of high satisfaction (OR 20, 95% CI 9-50, P < .001). A high percentage of men are satisfied after penile implant surgery. Only the presence of a major complication is linked to a lower likelihood of achieving high satisfaction. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, et al. Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery. J Sex Med 2018;15:1180–1186.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8519171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1743609518310026</els_id><sourcerecordid>2071578205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-24a017349412e3c3e5db4395247fe99c812b7b4c7e6b81a6d5cbe37ed1acd4aa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LJDEQhoO4qOv6BzxIH71Mm8rHpBtEkEFXwWUHXM8hna7WDN2dMcmI_nszzCh62bpUQb31VtVDyDHQEihMzxblIr4OJaNQlVSWFGCHHIASfDIFWu9-1LSW--RnjAtKeQ62R_Y5paAUVAfkYh6wdTb5EAvfFfcmudgZm5wfCzcWf3AsLruEoZjj6Hosbodlb8ZU3K_CI4a3X-RHZ_qIR9t8SB6ur_7NbiZ3f3_fzi7vJlZImSZMmLyQi1oAQ245yrYRvJZMqA7r2lbAGtUIq3DaVGCmrbQNcoUtGNsKY_ghudj4LlfNgK3FMQXT62Vwgwlv2hunv3dG96Qf_YuuJNSgIBucbg2Cf15hTHpw0WKfn0G_ippRBVJVjMosZRupDT7GgN3nGqB6DV4v9Bq8XoPXVOoMPg-dfD3wc-SDdBacbwSYMb04DDpah6PN9APapFvv_uf_Drn0lWI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2071578205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Habous, Mohamad ; Tal, Raanan ; Tealab, Alaa ; Aziz, Mohammed ; Sherif, Hammoda ; Mahmoud, Saad ; Abdelwahab, Osama ; Nassar, Mohammed ; Kamil, Usama ; Abdelrahman, Ziad ; Binsaleh, Saleh ; Giona, Simone ; Ralph, David ; Bettocchi, Carlo ; Mulhall, John P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Habous, Mohamad ; Tal, Raanan ; Tealab, Alaa ; Aziz, Mohammed ; Sherif, Hammoda ; Mahmoud, Saad ; Abdelwahab, Osama ; Nassar, Mohammed ; Kamil, Usama ; Abdelrahman, Ziad ; Binsaleh, Saleh ; Giona, Simone ; Ralph, David ; Bettocchi, Carlo ; Mulhall, John P.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied. To evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted high patient satisfaction. The study population consisted of all patients undergoing PI surgery between 2009 and 2015. Comorbidity, demographic, and implant information were recorded. Complications recorded included: minor (requiring no re-operation) such as penile or scrotal hematoma, superficial wound breakdown; major (requiring hospitalization or re-operation) such as device infection, erosion, and mechanical malfunction. Patient satisfaction was defined using a single question posed to the patient 6 months after surgery using a 5-point Likert scale (5 being the most satisfied). Descriptive statistics were used to define complication rates and multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to define predictors of high satisfaction (score ≥ 4), including presence and degree of complications, Peyronie's disease (PD), diabetes mellitus (DM), number of vascular comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) &gt; 30, and patient age. Patients with a major complication, with or without an additional minor complication, had a higher likelihood of being dissatisfied (25%) compared to patients with no complication or only minor complication 1.9% (no complications) and 3.7% (only minor complications), P &lt; .001. 902 patients were analysed. Mean age was 56.6 ± 10.6 years. Mean BMI was 30 ± 5. Comorbidity profile was diabetes 75%, dyslipidaemia 44%, hypertension 33%, cigarette smoking 32%, and PD 34%. 76% had a malleable implant (MPP) and 24% an inflatable implant (IPP). 31% had a minor complication and 9% a major complication. 93% had high satisfaction (score ≥4). Patients with any complication had a reduced rate of high satisfaction (97.5% vs 87.7%; P &lt; .001) and even more pronounced with a major complication (96.7% vs 64.2%; P &lt; .001). On MVA, only the absence of a major complication was a significant predictor of high satisfaction (OR 20, 95% CI 9-50, P &lt; .001). A high percentage of men are satisfied after penile implant surgery. Only the presence of a major complication is linked to a lower likelihood of achieving high satisfaction. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, et al. Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery. J Sex Med 2018;15:1180–1186.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-6095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-6109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30017718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Body Mass Index ; Comorbidity ; Complications ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Penile Implantation - psychology ; Penile Implants ; Penile Prosthesis - psychology ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Predictors ; Prospective Studies ; Satisfaction ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of sexual medicine, 2018-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1180-1186</ispartof><rights>2018 International Society for Sexual Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-24a017349412e3c3e5db4395247fe99c812b7b4c7e6b81a6d5cbe37ed1acd4aa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-24a017349412e3c3e5db4395247fe99c812b7b4c7e6b81a6d5cbe37ed1acd4aa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017718$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habous, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tal, Raanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tealab, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherif, Hammoda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelwahab, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamil, Usama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Ziad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binsaleh, Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giona, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettocchi, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, John P.</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery</title><title>Journal of sexual medicine</title><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><description>Despite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied. To evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted high patient satisfaction. The study population consisted of all patients undergoing PI surgery between 2009 and 2015. Comorbidity, demographic, and implant information were recorded. Complications recorded included: minor (requiring no re-operation) such as penile or scrotal hematoma, superficial wound breakdown; major (requiring hospitalization or re-operation) such as device infection, erosion, and mechanical malfunction. Patient satisfaction was defined using a single question posed to the patient 6 months after surgery using a 5-point Likert scale (5 being the most satisfied). Descriptive statistics were used to define complication rates and multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to define predictors of high satisfaction (score ≥ 4), including presence and degree of complications, Peyronie's disease (PD), diabetes mellitus (DM), number of vascular comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) &gt; 30, and patient age. Patients with a major complication, with or without an additional minor complication, had a higher likelihood of being dissatisfied (25%) compared to patients with no complication or only minor complication 1.9% (no complications) and 3.7% (only minor complications), P &lt; .001. 902 patients were analysed. Mean age was 56.6 ± 10.6 years. Mean BMI was 30 ± 5. Comorbidity profile was diabetes 75%, dyslipidaemia 44%, hypertension 33%, cigarette smoking 32%, and PD 34%. 76% had a malleable implant (MPP) and 24% an inflatable implant (IPP). 31% had a minor complication and 9% a major complication. 93% had high satisfaction (score ≥4). Patients with any complication had a reduced rate of high satisfaction (97.5% vs 87.7%; P &lt; .001) and even more pronounced with a major complication (96.7% vs 64.2%; P &lt; .001). On MVA, only the absence of a major complication was a significant predictor of high satisfaction (OR 20, 95% CI 9-50, P &lt; .001). A high percentage of men are satisfied after penile implant surgery. Only the presence of a major complication is linked to a lower likelihood of achieving high satisfaction. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, et al. Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery. J Sex Med 2018;15:1180–1186.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Penile Implantation - psychology</subject><subject>Penile Implants</subject><subject>Penile Prosthesis - psychology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Predictors</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>1743-6095</issn><issn>1743-6109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LJDEQhoO4qOv6BzxIH71Mm8rHpBtEkEFXwWUHXM8hna7WDN2dMcmI_nszzCh62bpUQb31VtVDyDHQEihMzxblIr4OJaNQlVSWFGCHHIASfDIFWu9-1LSW--RnjAtKeQ62R_Y5paAUVAfkYh6wdTb5EAvfFfcmudgZm5wfCzcWf3AsLruEoZjj6Hosbodlb8ZU3K_CI4a3X-RHZ_qIR9t8SB6ur_7NbiZ3f3_fzi7vJlZImSZMmLyQi1oAQ245yrYRvJZMqA7r2lbAGtUIq3DaVGCmrbQNcoUtGNsKY_ghudj4LlfNgK3FMQXT62Vwgwlv2hunv3dG96Qf_YuuJNSgIBucbg2Cf15hTHpw0WKfn0G_ippRBVJVjMosZRupDT7GgN3nGqB6DV4v9Bq8XoPXVOoMPg-dfD3wc-SDdBacbwSYMb04DDpah6PN9APapFvv_uf_Drn0lWI</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Habous, Mohamad</creator><creator>Tal, Raanan</creator><creator>Tealab, Alaa</creator><creator>Aziz, Mohammed</creator><creator>Sherif, Hammoda</creator><creator>Mahmoud, Saad</creator><creator>Abdelwahab, Osama</creator><creator>Nassar, Mohammed</creator><creator>Kamil, Usama</creator><creator>Abdelrahman, Ziad</creator><creator>Binsaleh, Saleh</creator><creator>Giona, Simone</creator><creator>Ralph, David</creator><creator>Bettocchi, Carlo</creator><creator>Mulhall, John P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery</title><author>Habous, Mohamad ; Tal, Raanan ; Tealab, Alaa ; Aziz, Mohammed ; Sherif, Hammoda ; Mahmoud, Saad ; Abdelwahab, Osama ; Nassar, Mohammed ; Kamil, Usama ; Abdelrahman, Ziad ; Binsaleh, Saleh ; Giona, Simone ; Ralph, David ; Bettocchi, Carlo ; Mulhall, John P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-24a017349412e3c3e5db4395247fe99c812b7b4c7e6b81a6d5cbe37ed1acd4aa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Penile Implantation - psychology</topic><topic>Penile Implants</topic><topic>Penile Prosthesis - psychology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Predictors</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habous, Mohamad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tal, Raanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tealab, Alaa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aziz, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sherif, Hammoda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoud, Saad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelwahab, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nassar, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamil, Usama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelrahman, Ziad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binsaleh, Saleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giona, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ralph, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettocchi, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulhall, John P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habous, Mohamad</au><au>Tal, Raanan</au><au>Tealab, Alaa</au><au>Aziz, Mohammed</au><au>Sherif, Hammoda</au><au>Mahmoud, Saad</au><au>Abdelwahab, Osama</au><au>Nassar, Mohammed</au><au>Kamil, Usama</au><au>Abdelrahman, Ziad</au><au>Binsaleh, Saleh</au><au>Giona, Simone</au><au>Ralph, David</au><au>Bettocchi, Carlo</au><au>Mulhall, John P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sexual medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Sex Med</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1180</spage><epage>1186</epage><pages>1180-1186</pages><issn>1743-6095</issn><eissn>1743-6109</eissn><abstract>Despite the high satisfaction with penile implant (PI) surgery reported in the literature, a significant proportion of patients remain dissatisfied. To evaluate satisfaction after PI surgery, using a single question and a scoring system. Furthermore, we attempted to define factors that predicted high patient satisfaction. The study population consisted of all patients undergoing PI surgery between 2009 and 2015. Comorbidity, demographic, and implant information were recorded. Complications recorded included: minor (requiring no re-operation) such as penile or scrotal hematoma, superficial wound breakdown; major (requiring hospitalization or re-operation) such as device infection, erosion, and mechanical malfunction. Patient satisfaction was defined using a single question posed to the patient 6 months after surgery using a 5-point Likert scale (5 being the most satisfied). Descriptive statistics were used to define complication rates and multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed to define predictors of high satisfaction (score ≥ 4), including presence and degree of complications, Peyronie's disease (PD), diabetes mellitus (DM), number of vascular comorbidities, body mass index (BMI) &gt; 30, and patient age. Patients with a major complication, with or without an additional minor complication, had a higher likelihood of being dissatisfied (25%) compared to patients with no complication or only minor complication 1.9% (no complications) and 3.7% (only minor complications), P &lt; .001. 902 patients were analysed. Mean age was 56.6 ± 10.6 years. Mean BMI was 30 ± 5. Comorbidity profile was diabetes 75%, dyslipidaemia 44%, hypertension 33%, cigarette smoking 32%, and PD 34%. 76% had a malleable implant (MPP) and 24% an inflatable implant (IPP). 31% had a minor complication and 9% a major complication. 93% had high satisfaction (score ≥4). Patients with any complication had a reduced rate of high satisfaction (97.5% vs 87.7%; P &lt; .001) and even more pronounced with a major complication (96.7% vs 64.2%; P &lt; .001). On MVA, only the absence of a major complication was a significant predictor of high satisfaction (OR 20, 95% CI 9-50, P &lt; .001). A high percentage of men are satisfied after penile implant surgery. Only the presence of a major complication is linked to a lower likelihood of achieving high satisfaction. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, et al. Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery. J Sex Med 2018;15:1180–1186.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30017718</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-6095
ispartof Journal of sexual medicine, 2018-08, Vol.15 (8), p.1180-1186
issn 1743-6095
1743-6109
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8519171
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Adult
Aged
Body Mass Index
Comorbidity
Complications
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Penile Implantation - psychology
Penile Implants
Penile Prosthesis - psychology
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Predictors
Prospective Studies
Satisfaction
Socioeconomic Factors
title Predictors of Satisfaction in Men After Penile Implant Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T19%3A42%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20Satisfaction%20in%20Men%20After%20Penile%20Implant%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sexual%20medicine&rft.au=Habous,%20Mohamad&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1180&rft.epage=1186&rft.pages=1180-1186&rft.issn=1743-6095&rft.eissn=1743-6109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2071578205%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2071578205&rft_id=info:pmid/30017718&rft_els_id=S1743609518310026&rfr_iscdi=true