Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction

In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of clinical investigation 2021-10, Vol.131 (20), p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson, Lim, Lillian, Shewale, Swapnil V, McDaid, Kendra, Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid, Tang, Alan T, Wittig, Carl, Guerrero, Andrea A, Sterling, Stephanie, Leu, N Adrian, Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle, Gimotty, Phyllis A, Kahn, Mark L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue 20
container_start_page 1
container_title The Journal of clinical investigation
container_volume 131
creator Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson
Lim, Lillian
Shewale, Swapnil V
McDaid, Kendra
Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid
Tang, Alan T
Wittig, Carl
Guerrero, Andrea A
Sterling, Stephanie
Leu, N Adrian
Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle
Gimotty, Phyllis A
Kahn, Mark L
description In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.
doi_str_mv 10.1172/JCI147070
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8516448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A680641825</galeid><sourcerecordid>A680641825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK1e-AckIIheTE1m8jU3Qlm0rhQKft2GTCbZTc0k2yQj7r83Y-uyK3shuUjI-5z3JOecqnqO4DlCrHn7abFEmEEGH1SniBBe86blD_fOJ9WTlG4gRBgT_Lg6aTGGbUu706q_1F5nq0DvgvohBw2CAW47btbSr2xYFTXZBIagE_AhAztupI1AyThYqYCZvMo2eCBN1hGM23CnOGC9kfGP9rR6ZKRL-tn9flZ9-_D-6-JjfXV9uVxcXNWKYpZrbSjBAyaMU84ZhJhAJgmkmreyZ7Q1picSa9Z2kCrY9U3fGcjpQJnEDSKqPave3flupn7Ug9I-R-nEJtpRxq0I0opDxdu1WIWfghNEMebF4PW9QQy3k05ZjDYp7Zz0OkxJNIQ2pEEUkYK-_Ae9CVP05XuF6krFuw7vUSvptCgVCSWvmk3FBeWQYsSbmaqPUHPlyyOD18aW6wP-_Ahf1qBHq44GvDkIKEzWv_JKTimJ5ZfP_89efz9kX-2xay1dXqfgprnp6aipiiGlqM2uKQiKeYLFboIL-2K_izvy78i2vwG3wOc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2592389945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson ; Lim, Lillian ; Shewale, Swapnil V ; McDaid, Kendra ; Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid ; Tang, Alan T ; Wittig, Carl ; Guerrero, Andrea A ; Sterling, Stephanie ; Leu, N Adrian ; Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle ; Gimotty, Phyllis A ; Kahn, Mark L</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson ; Lim, Lillian ; Shewale, Swapnil V ; McDaid, Kendra ; Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid ; Tang, Alan T ; Wittig, Carl ; Guerrero, Andrea A ; Sterling, Stephanie ; Leu, N Adrian ; Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle ; Gimotty, Phyllis A ; Kahn, Mark L</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-8238</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-8238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1172/JCI147070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34403369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Clinical Investigation</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical research ; Blood ; Cardiac function ; Cell therapy ; Ejection fraction ; Genetic aspects ; Health aspects ; Heart ; Heart - physiopathology ; Heart attack ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Hypotheses ; Immune clearance ; Lymphangiogenesis - physiology ; Mice ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Progenitor cells ; Regeneration (Biology) ; Stem cells ; Vascular endothelial growth factor ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology ; Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors ; Ventricle ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of clinical investigation, 2021-10, Vol.131 (20), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Investigation Oct 2021</rights><rights>2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3850-9799 ; 0000-0003-1422-0349 ; 0000-0002-6489-7086 ; 0000-0002-0336-6695 ; 0000-0002-5324-8232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516448/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516448/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shewale, Swapnil V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaid, Kendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Alan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittig, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Andrea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, N Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimotty, Phyllis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Mark L</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</title><title>The Journal of clinical investigation</title><addtitle>J Clin Invest</addtitle><description>In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cardiac function</subject><subject>Cell therapy</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart attack</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Immune clearance</subject><subject>Lymphangiogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Progenitor cells</subject><subject>Regeneration (Biology)</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>1558-8238</issn><issn>0021-9738</issn><issn>1558-8238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK1e-AckIIheTE1m8jU3Qlm0rhQKft2GTCbZTc0k2yQj7r83Y-uyK3shuUjI-5z3JOecqnqO4DlCrHn7abFEmEEGH1SniBBe86blD_fOJ9WTlG4gRBgT_Lg6aTGGbUu706q_1F5nq0DvgvohBw2CAW47btbSr2xYFTXZBIagE_AhAztupI1AyThYqYCZvMo2eCBN1hGM23CnOGC9kfGP9rR6ZKRL-tn9flZ9-_D-6-JjfXV9uVxcXNWKYpZrbSjBAyaMU84ZhJhAJgmkmreyZ7Q1picSa9Z2kCrY9U3fGcjpQJnEDSKqPave3flupn7Ug9I-R-nEJtpRxq0I0opDxdu1WIWfghNEMebF4PW9QQy3k05ZjDYp7Zz0OkxJNIQ2pEEUkYK-_Ae9CVP05XuF6krFuw7vUSvptCgVCSWvmk3FBeWQYsSbmaqPUHPlyyOD18aW6wP-_Ahf1qBHq44GvDkIKEzWv_JKTimJ5ZfP_89efz9kX-2xay1dXqfgprnp6aipiiGlqM2uKQiKeYLFboIL-2K_izvy78i2vwG3wOc4</recordid><startdate>20211015</startdate><enddate>20211015</enddate><creator>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</creator><creator>Lim, Lillian</creator><creator>Shewale, Swapnil V</creator><creator>McDaid, Kendra</creator><creator>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</creator><creator>Tang, Alan T</creator><creator>Wittig, Carl</creator><creator>Guerrero, Andrea A</creator><creator>Sterling, Stephanie</creator><creator>Leu, N Adrian</creator><creator>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</creator><creator>Gimotty, Phyllis A</creator><creator>Kahn, Mark L</creator><general>American Society for Clinical Investigation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-0349</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6489-7086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-6695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-8232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211015</creationdate><title>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</title><author>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson ; Lim, Lillian ; Shewale, Swapnil V ; McDaid, Kendra ; Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid ; Tang, Alan T ; Wittig, Carl ; Guerrero, Andrea A ; Sterling, Stephanie ; Leu, N Adrian ; Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle ; Gimotty, Phyllis A ; Kahn, Mark L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cardiac function</topic><topic>Cell therapy</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart attack</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Immune clearance</topic><topic>Lymphangiogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Progenitor cells</topic><topic>Regeneration (Biology)</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shewale, Swapnil V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaid, Kendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Alan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittig, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Andrea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, N Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimotty, Phyllis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Mark L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of clinical investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</au><au>Lim, Lillian</au><au>Shewale, Swapnil V</au><au>McDaid, Kendra</au><au>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</au><au>Tang, Alan T</au><au>Wittig, Carl</au><au>Guerrero, Andrea A</au><au>Sterling, Stephanie</au><au>Leu, N Adrian</au><au>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</au><au>Gimotty, Phyllis A</au><au>Kahn, Mark L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of clinical investigation</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Invest</addtitle><date>2021-10-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1558-8238</issn><issn>0021-9738</issn><eissn>1558-8238</eissn><abstract>In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Clinical Investigation</pub><pmid>34403369</pmid><doi>10.1172/JCI147070</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-0349</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6489-7086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-6695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-8232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1558-8238
ispartof The Journal of clinical investigation, 2021-10, Vol.131 (20), p.1-10
issn 1558-8238
0021-9738
1558-8238
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8516448
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animals
Biomedical research
Blood
Cardiac function
Cell therapy
Ejection fraction
Genetic aspects
Health aspects
Heart
Heart - physiopathology
Heart attack
Heart attacks
Heart failure
Hypotheses
Immune clearance
Lymphangiogenesis - physiology
Mice
Mortality
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology
Myocardial Infarction - therapy
Patient outcomes
Physiological aspects
Progenitor cells
Regeneration (Biology)
Stem cells
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology
Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors
Ventricle
Ventricular Function, Left
Wound healing
title Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20blockade%20of%20lymphangiogenesis%20does%20not%20impair%20cardiac%20function%20after%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20clinical%20investigation&rft.au=Keller,%204th,%20T%20C%20Stevenson&rft.date=2021-10-15&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1558-8238&rft.eissn=1558-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1172/JCI147070&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA680641825%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2592389945&rft_id=info:pmid/34403369&rft_galeid=A680641825&rfr_iscdi=true