Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction
In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of clinical investigation 2021-10, Vol.131 (20), p.1-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 10 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | The Journal of clinical investigation |
container_volume | 131 |
creator | Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson Lim, Lillian Shewale, Swapnil V McDaid, Kendra Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid Tang, Alan T Wittig, Carl Guerrero, Andrea A Sterling, Stephanie Leu, N Adrian Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle Gimotty, Phyllis A Kahn, Mark L |
description | In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1172/JCI147070 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8516448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A680641825</galeid><sourcerecordid>A680641825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK1e-AckIIheTE1m8jU3Qlm0rhQKft2GTCbZTc0k2yQj7r83Y-uyK3shuUjI-5z3JOecqnqO4DlCrHn7abFEmEEGH1SniBBe86blD_fOJ9WTlG4gRBgT_Lg6aTGGbUu706q_1F5nq0DvgvohBw2CAW47btbSr2xYFTXZBIagE_AhAztupI1AyThYqYCZvMo2eCBN1hGM23CnOGC9kfGP9rR6ZKRL-tn9flZ9-_D-6-JjfXV9uVxcXNWKYpZrbSjBAyaMU84ZhJhAJgmkmreyZ7Q1picSa9Z2kCrY9U3fGcjpQJnEDSKqPave3flupn7Ug9I-R-nEJtpRxq0I0opDxdu1WIWfghNEMebF4PW9QQy3k05ZjDYp7Zz0OkxJNIQ2pEEUkYK-_Ae9CVP05XuF6krFuw7vUSvptCgVCSWvmk3FBeWQYsSbmaqPUHPlyyOD18aW6wP-_Ahf1qBHq44GvDkIKEzWv_JKTimJ5ZfP_89efz9kX-2xay1dXqfgprnp6aipiiGlqM2uKQiKeYLFboIL-2K_izvy78i2vwG3wOc4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2592389945</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson ; Lim, Lillian ; Shewale, Swapnil V ; McDaid, Kendra ; Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid ; Tang, Alan T ; Wittig, Carl ; Guerrero, Andrea A ; Sterling, Stephanie ; Leu, N Adrian ; Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle ; Gimotty, Phyllis A ; Kahn, Mark L</creator><creatorcontrib>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson ; Lim, Lillian ; Shewale, Swapnil V ; McDaid, Kendra ; Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid ; Tang, Alan T ; Wittig, Carl ; Guerrero, Andrea A ; Sterling, Stephanie ; Leu, N Adrian ; Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle ; Gimotty, Phyllis A ; Kahn, Mark L</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1558-8238</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9738</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-8238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1172/JCI147070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34403369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Clinical Investigation</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical research ; Blood ; Cardiac function ; Cell therapy ; Ejection fraction ; Genetic aspects ; Health aspects ; Heart ; Heart - physiopathology ; Heart attack ; Heart attacks ; Heart failure ; Hypotheses ; Immune clearance ; Lymphangiogenesis - physiology ; Mice ; Mortality ; Myocardial infarction ; Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology ; Myocardial Infarction - therapy ; Patient outcomes ; Physiological aspects ; Progenitor cells ; Regeneration (Biology) ; Stem cells ; Vascular endothelial growth factor ; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology ; Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors ; Ventricle ; Ventricular Function, Left ; Wound healing</subject><ispartof>The Journal of clinical investigation, 2021-10, Vol.131 (20), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Investigation Oct 2021</rights><rights>2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation 2021 American Society for Clinical Investigation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3850-9799 ; 0000-0003-1422-0349 ; 0000-0002-6489-7086 ; 0000-0002-0336-6695 ; 0000-0002-5324-8232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516448/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8516448/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shewale, Swapnil V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaid, Kendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Alan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittig, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Andrea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, N Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimotty, Phyllis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Mark L</creatorcontrib><title>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</title><title>The Journal of clinical investigation</title><addtitle>J Clin Invest</addtitle><description>In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Cardiac function</subject><subject>Cell therapy</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Genetic aspects</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart attack</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Immune clearance</subject><subject>Lymphangiogenesis - physiology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Myocardial infarction</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Progenitor cells</subject><subject>Regeneration (Biology)</subject><subject>Stem cells</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor</subject><subject>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology</subject><subject>Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Ventricular Function, Left</subject><subject>Wound healing</subject><issn>1558-8238</issn><issn>0021-9738</issn><issn>1558-8238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRbK1e-AckIIheTE1m8jU3Qlm0rhQKft2GTCbZTc0k2yQj7r83Y-uyK3shuUjI-5z3JOecqnqO4DlCrHn7abFEmEEGH1SniBBe86blD_fOJ9WTlG4gRBgT_Lg6aTGGbUu706q_1F5nq0DvgvohBw2CAW47btbSr2xYFTXZBIagE_AhAztupI1AyThYqYCZvMo2eCBN1hGM23CnOGC9kfGP9rR6ZKRL-tn9flZ9-_D-6-JjfXV9uVxcXNWKYpZrbSjBAyaMU84ZhJhAJgmkmreyZ7Q1picSa9Z2kCrY9U3fGcjpQJnEDSKqPave3flupn7Ug9I-R-nEJtpRxq0I0opDxdu1WIWfghNEMebF4PW9QQy3k05ZjDYp7Zz0OkxJNIQ2pEEUkYK-_Ae9CVP05XuF6krFuw7vUSvptCgVCSWvmk3FBeWQYsSbmaqPUHPlyyOD18aW6wP-_Ahf1qBHq44GvDkIKEzWv_JKTimJ5ZfP_89efz9kX-2xay1dXqfgprnp6aipiiGlqM2uKQiKeYLFboIL-2K_izvy78i2vwG3wOc4</recordid><startdate>20211015</startdate><enddate>20211015</enddate><creator>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</creator><creator>Lim, Lillian</creator><creator>Shewale, Swapnil V</creator><creator>McDaid, Kendra</creator><creator>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</creator><creator>Tang, Alan T</creator><creator>Wittig, Carl</creator><creator>Guerrero, Andrea A</creator><creator>Sterling, Stephanie</creator><creator>Leu, N Adrian</creator><creator>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</creator><creator>Gimotty, Phyllis A</creator><creator>Kahn, Mark L</creator><general>American Society for Clinical Investigation</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-0349</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6489-7086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-6695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-8232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211015</creationdate><title>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</title><author>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson ; Lim, Lillian ; Shewale, Swapnil V ; McDaid, Kendra ; Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid ; Tang, Alan T ; Wittig, Carl ; Guerrero, Andrea A ; Sterling, Stephanie ; Leu, N Adrian ; Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle ; Gimotty, Phyllis A ; Kahn, Mark L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c647t-ef654d45786887004507a506e83ab763ffb5a4e73906c09b2b9f086d67a4215c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Cardiac function</topic><topic>Cell therapy</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Genetic aspects</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart attack</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Immune clearance</topic><topic>Lymphangiogenesis - physiology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Myocardial infarction</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - therapy</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Progenitor cells</topic><topic>Regeneration (Biology)</topic><topic>Stem cells</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor</topic><topic>Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology</topic><topic>Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Ventricular Function, Left</topic><topic>Wound healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Lillian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shewale, Swapnil V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDaid, Kendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Alan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittig, Carl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerrero, Andrea A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterling, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leu, N Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gimotty, Phyllis A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Mark L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of clinical investigation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keller, 4th, T C Stevenson</au><au>Lim, Lillian</au><au>Shewale, Swapnil V</au><au>McDaid, Kendra</au><au>Martí-Pàmies, Íngrid</au><au>Tang, Alan T</au><au>Wittig, Carl</au><au>Guerrero, Andrea A</au><au>Sterling, Stephanie</au><au>Leu, N Adrian</au><au>Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle</au><au>Gimotty, Phyllis A</au><au>Kahn, Mark L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of clinical investigation</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Invest</addtitle><date>2021-10-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>131</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1558-8238</issn><issn>0021-9738</issn><eissn>1558-8238</eissn><abstract>In recent decades, treatments for myocardial infarction (MI), such as stem and progenitor cell therapy, have attracted considerable scientific and clinical attention but failed to improve patient outcomes. These efforts indicate that more rigorous mechanistic and functional testing of potential MI therapies is required. Recent studies have suggested that augmenting post-MI lymphatic growth via VEGF-C administration improves cardiac function. However, the mechanisms underlying this proposed therapeutic approach remain vague and untested. To more rigorously test the role of lymphatic vessel growth after MI, we examined the post-MI cardiac function of mice in which lymphangiogenesis had been blocked genetically by pan-endothelial or lymphatic endothelial loss of the lymphangiogenic receptor VEGFR3 or global loss of the VEGF-C and VEGF-D ligands. The results obtained using all 3 genetic approaches were highly concordant and demonstrated that loss of lymphatic vessel growth did not impair left ventricular ejection fraction 2 weeks after MI in mice. We observed a trend toward excess fluid in the infarcted region of the left ventricle, but immune cell infiltration and clearance were unchanged with loss of expanded lymphatics. These studies refute the hypothesis that lymphangiogenesis contributes significantly to cardiac function after MI, and suggest that any effect of exogenous VEGF-C is likely to be mediated by nonlymphangiogenic mechanisms.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Clinical Investigation</pub><pmid>34403369</pmid><doi>10.1172/JCI147070</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3850-9799</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1422-0349</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6489-7086</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-6695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-8232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1558-8238 |
ispartof | The Journal of clinical investigation, 2021-10, Vol.131 (20), p.1-10 |
issn | 1558-8238 0021-9738 1558-8238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8516448 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animals Biomedical research Blood Cardiac function Cell therapy Ejection fraction Genetic aspects Health aspects Heart Heart - physiopathology Heart attack Heart attacks Heart failure Hypotheses Immune clearance Lymphangiogenesis - physiology Mice Mortality Myocardial infarction Myocardial Infarction - physiopathology Myocardial Infarction - therapy Patient outcomes Physiological aspects Progenitor cells Regeneration (Biology) Stem cells Vascular endothelial growth factor Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3 - physiology Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors Ventricle Ventricular Function, Left Wound healing |
title | Genetic blockade of lymphangiogenesis does not impair cardiac function after myocardial infarction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A01%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genetic%20blockade%20of%20lymphangiogenesis%20does%20not%20impair%20cardiac%20function%20after%20myocardial%20infarction&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20clinical%20investigation&rft.au=Keller,%204th,%20T%20C%20Stevenson&rft.date=2021-10-15&rft.volume=131&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1558-8238&rft.eissn=1558-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1172/JCI147070&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA680641825%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2592389945&rft_id=info:pmid/34403369&rft_galeid=A680641825&rfr_iscdi=true |