Searching for Social Media Addiction: A Content Analysis of Top Websites Found through Online Search Engines

Disordered social media use, often referred to as “social media addiction”, has not been officially recognized by medical bodies such as the American Psychiatric Association or the World Health Organization. However, websites still present information to laypeople on how to treat and manage social m...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-09, Vol.18 (19), p.10077
Hauptverfasser: McCarroll, Alexis M., Holtz, Bree E., Meshi, Dar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 10077
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator McCarroll, Alexis M.
Holtz, Bree E.
Meshi, Dar
description Disordered social media use, often referred to as “social media addiction”, has not been officially recognized by medical bodies such as the American Psychiatric Association or the World Health Organization. However, websites still present information to laypeople on how to treat and manage social media addiction, which can pose the risk of spreading low quality or incorrect information. As such, we aimed to assess how the most popular social media addiction websites present information across multiple metrics. We conducted an in-depth online search to identify the top social media addiction websites in November 2019 (N = 23). Websites were separated into four distinct classifications: (1) treatment/therapy/medical; (2) informational; (3) news article; and (4) blog/essay. Based on previous website analysis research, three trained coders evaluated these websites on six metrics: (1) design; (2) credibility; (3) accessibility; (4) literacy; (5) engagement; and (6) social media addiction content. Design features were the top-rated metric across all websites, followed by credibility. Websites scored the lowest for the engagement and social media addiction content metrics. Across website classifications, scores for social media addiction content varied greatly, with blog/essay websites ranking the lowest and informational websites ranking the highest. Our findings provide necessary information for both patients and healthcare providers, apprising these individuals and the field about the current online health information landscape for disordered social media use.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph181910077
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8507750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580968756</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-79fb6d88b7ff6b295017c683e196fe4ee587bf161c5420ef68e552a0e25b35af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMovtduA27cjCZN86gLYRh8geJCxWVI05tphk4yJq3gv7c6Iurq3sv9OBzOQeiIklPGKnLmF5BWLVW0ooRIuYF2qRBkUgpCN3_tO2gv5wUhTJWi2kY7rBSsYlLtou4RTLKtD3PsYsKP0XrT4XtovMHTpvG29zGc4ymexdBD6PE0mO49-4yjw09xhV-gzr6HjK_iEBrctykO8xY_hM4HwGt1fBnm45UP0JYzXYbD77mPnq8un2Y3k7uH69vZ9G5iGS_6iaxcLRqlaumcqIuKEyqtUAxoJRyUAFzJ2lFBLS8LAk4o4LwwBApeM24c20cXa93VUC-hsaPvZDq9Sn5p0ruOxuu_n-BbPY9vWvExRE5GgZNvgRRfB8i9XvpsoetMgDhkXXA1Zi5lWY7o8T90EYc0hvRFkUooycVIna0pm2LOCdyPGUr0Z5P6X5PsA-yzkZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580968756</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Searching for Social Media Addiction: A Content Analysis of Top Websites Found through Online Search Engines</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>McCarroll, Alexis M. ; Holtz, Bree E. ; Meshi, Dar</creator><creatorcontrib>McCarroll, Alexis M. ; Holtz, Bree E. ; Meshi, Dar</creatorcontrib><description>Disordered social media use, often referred to as “social media addiction”, has not been officially recognized by medical bodies such as the American Psychiatric Association or the World Health Organization. However, websites still present information to laypeople on how to treat and manage social media addiction, which can pose the risk of spreading low quality or incorrect information. As such, we aimed to assess how the most popular social media addiction websites present information across multiple metrics. We conducted an in-depth online search to identify the top social media addiction websites in November 2019 (N = 23). Websites were separated into four distinct classifications: (1) treatment/therapy/medical; (2) informational; (3) news article; and (4) blog/essay. Based on previous website analysis research, three trained coders evaluated these websites on six metrics: (1) design; (2) credibility; (3) accessibility; (4) literacy; (5) engagement; and (6) social media addiction content. Design features were the top-rated metric across all websites, followed by credibility. Websites scored the lowest for the engagement and social media addiction content metrics. Across website classifications, scores for social media addiction content varied greatly, with blog/essay websites ranking the lowest and informational websites ranking the highest. Our findings provide necessary information for both patients and healthcare providers, apprising these individuals and the field about the current online health information landscape for disordered social media use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910077</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34639378</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Addictions ; Classification ; Content analysis ; Credibility ; Digital media ; False information ; Health care ; Hypotheses ; Literacy ; Qualitative research ; Ranking ; Search engines ; Search strategies ; Social networks ; Social research ; Websites</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-09, Vol.18 (19), p.10077</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-79fb6d88b7ff6b295017c683e196fe4ee587bf161c5420ef68e552a0e25b35af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6247-0743 ; 0000-0001-8832-0049 ; 0000-0003-0772-037X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507750/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507750/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>McCarroll, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Bree E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meshi, Dar</creatorcontrib><title>Searching for Social Media Addiction: A Content Analysis of Top Websites Found through Online Search Engines</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><description>Disordered social media use, often referred to as “social media addiction”, has not been officially recognized by medical bodies such as the American Psychiatric Association or the World Health Organization. However, websites still present information to laypeople on how to treat and manage social media addiction, which can pose the risk of spreading low quality or incorrect information. As such, we aimed to assess how the most popular social media addiction websites present information across multiple metrics. We conducted an in-depth online search to identify the top social media addiction websites in November 2019 (N = 23). Websites were separated into four distinct classifications: (1) treatment/therapy/medical; (2) informational; (3) news article; and (4) blog/essay. Based on previous website analysis research, three trained coders evaluated these websites on six metrics: (1) design; (2) credibility; (3) accessibility; (4) literacy; (5) engagement; and (6) social media addiction content. Design features were the top-rated metric across all websites, followed by credibility. Websites scored the lowest for the engagement and social media addiction content metrics. Across website classifications, scores for social media addiction content varied greatly, with blog/essay websites ranking the lowest and informational websites ranking the highest. Our findings provide necessary information for both patients and healthcare providers, apprising these individuals and the field about the current online health information landscape for disordered social media use.</description><subject>Addictions</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Search strategies</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMovtduA27cjCZN86gLYRh8geJCxWVI05tphk4yJq3gv7c6Iurq3sv9OBzOQeiIklPGKnLmF5BWLVW0ooRIuYF2qRBkUgpCN3_tO2gv5wUhTJWi2kY7rBSsYlLtou4RTLKtD3PsYsKP0XrT4XtovMHTpvG29zGc4ymexdBD6PE0mO49-4yjw09xhV-gzr6HjK_iEBrctykO8xY_hM4HwGt1fBnm45UP0JYzXYbD77mPnq8un2Y3k7uH69vZ9G5iGS_6iaxcLRqlaumcqIuKEyqtUAxoJRyUAFzJ2lFBLS8LAk4o4LwwBApeM24c20cXa93VUC-hsaPvZDq9Sn5p0ruOxuu_n-BbPY9vWvExRE5GgZNvgRRfB8i9XvpsoetMgDhkXXA1Zi5lWY7o8T90EYc0hvRFkUooycVIna0pm2LOCdyPGUr0Z5P6X5PsA-yzkZQ</recordid><startdate>20210925</startdate><enddate>20210925</enddate><creator>McCarroll, Alexis M.</creator><creator>Holtz, Bree E.</creator><creator>Meshi, Dar</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-0743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-0049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-037X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210925</creationdate><title>Searching for Social Media Addiction: A Content Analysis of Top Websites Found through Online Search Engines</title><author>McCarroll, Alexis M. ; Holtz, Bree E. ; Meshi, Dar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-79fb6d88b7ff6b295017c683e196fe4ee587bf161c5420ef68e552a0e25b35af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Addictions</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Search strategies</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McCarroll, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Bree E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meshi, Dar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McCarroll, Alexis M.</au><au>Holtz, Bree E.</au><au>Meshi, Dar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Searching for Social Media Addiction: A Content Analysis of Top Websites Found through Online Search Engines</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><date>2021-09-25</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>10077</spage><pages>10077-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Disordered social media use, often referred to as “social media addiction”, has not been officially recognized by medical bodies such as the American Psychiatric Association or the World Health Organization. However, websites still present information to laypeople on how to treat and manage social media addiction, which can pose the risk of spreading low quality or incorrect information. As such, we aimed to assess how the most popular social media addiction websites present information across multiple metrics. We conducted an in-depth online search to identify the top social media addiction websites in November 2019 (N = 23). Websites were separated into four distinct classifications: (1) treatment/therapy/medical; (2) informational; (3) news article; and (4) blog/essay. Based on previous website analysis research, three trained coders evaluated these websites on six metrics: (1) design; (2) credibility; (3) accessibility; (4) literacy; (5) engagement; and (6) social media addiction content. Design features were the top-rated metric across all websites, followed by credibility. Websites scored the lowest for the engagement and social media addiction content metrics. Across website classifications, scores for social media addiction content varied greatly, with blog/essay websites ranking the lowest and informational websites ranking the highest. Our findings provide necessary information for both patients and healthcare providers, apprising these individuals and the field about the current online health information landscape for disordered social media use.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34639378</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph181910077</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6247-0743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-0049</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0772-037X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-09, Vol.18 (19), p.10077
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8507750
source EZB Free E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Addictions
Classification
Content analysis
Credibility
Digital media
False information
Health care
Hypotheses
Literacy
Qualitative research
Ranking
Search engines
Search strategies
Social networks
Social research
Websites
title Searching for Social Media Addiction: A Content Analysis of Top Websites Found through Online Search Engines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T06%3A14%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Searching%20for%20Social%20Media%20Addiction:%20A%20Content%20Analysis%20of%20Top%20Websites%20Found%20through%20Online%20Search%20Engines&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=McCarroll,%20Alexis%20M.&rft.date=2021-09-25&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=10077&rft.pages=10077-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph181910077&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2580968756%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580968756&rft_id=info:pmid/34639378&rfr_iscdi=true