Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population
In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient's perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-10, Vol.18 (19), p.10372 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 19 |
| container_start_page | 10372 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Romero-Moreno, Antonio Paramio, Alberto Cruces-Montes, Serafín J Zayas, Antonio Gómez-Carmona, Diego Merchán-Clavellino, Ana |
| description | In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient's perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of psychotherapists' attributions of effectiveness: to what factors psychotherapists attribute responsibility for the cure of the therapies they provide. The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the attribution of the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a population of 69 psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations. After an initial process of inter-judge content validation, 12 items were selected for validation in the targeted population, adequately fulfilling the quality requirements in the validity-reliability tests, and grouped into four factors after principal component analysis. These factors were as follows: (1) therapeutic alliance enhancers; (2) psychotherapist emotional characteristics; (3) therapy-specific variables; and (4) facilitators of patient engagement with therapy. This four-factor structure also showed a good fit for the fit indices checked in confirmatory factor analysis. In summary, we can conclude that the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) developed in our research can be helpful if tested on a larger number of individuals. The results can be replicated in other populations of psychotherapists. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph181910372 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8507653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2580971373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-118b0a11ffb0bd56a4e66adc94623c796efb167a301290eb29babd9ad2db07cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtr3DAUhUVpadK06-6KoJt04UYPj2RtCkM6fUCgE_rYCj2uaw0eyZHsgSz632snaUiz0gF999x7OAi9puQ954qchR3koaMNVZRwyZ6gYyoEqWpB6NMH-gi9KGVHCG9qoZ6jI14LroRkx-jPRzhAn4Y9xBGb6PEv0wdvxpAiTi0eO8Dbcu26NKtsBpjG4PCmbcGN4QARSsHrcczBTjcjlxOURUQTMuDT7WZ9WVH2DoeIDf4-mBhKh7dpmPqbFS_Rs9b0BV7dvSfo56fNj_Mv1cW3z1_P1xeVqxkdK0obSwylbWuJ9SthahDCeKdqwbiTSkBrqZCGE8oUAcuUNdYr45m3RDrPT9CHW99hsnvwbg6bTa-HHPYmX-tkgv7_J4ZO_04H3ayIFCs-G5zeGeR0tWTU-1Ac9L2JkKai2aqZS2CSyhl9-wjdpSnHOd5CESUpl4vh2S3lciolQ3t_DCV6qVY_qnaeePMwwz3_r0v-F6Iioz8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580971373</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Romero-Moreno, Antonio ; Paramio, Alberto ; Cruces-Montes, Serafín J ; Zayas, Antonio ; Gómez-Carmona, Diego ; Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero-Moreno, Antonio ; Paramio, Alberto ; Cruces-Montes, Serafín J ; Zayas, Antonio ; Gómez-Carmona, Diego ; Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient's perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of psychotherapists' attributions of effectiveness: to what factors psychotherapists attribute responsibility for the cure of the therapies they provide. The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the attribution of the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a population of 69 psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations. After an initial process of inter-judge content validation, 12 items were selected for validation in the targeted population, adequately fulfilling the quality requirements in the validity-reliability tests, and grouped into four factors after principal component analysis. These factors were as follows: (1) therapeutic alliance enhancers; (2) psychotherapist emotional characteristics; (3) therapy-specific variables; and (4) facilitators of patient engagement with therapy. This four-factor structure also showed a good fit for the fit indices checked in confirmatory factor analysis. In summary, we can conclude that the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) developed in our research can be helpful if tested on a larger number of individuals. The results can be replicated in other populations of psychotherapists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910372</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34639672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Component reliability ; Empathy ; Factor analysis ; Humans ; Patients ; Principal components analysis ; Psychotherapists ; Psychotherapy ; Questionnaires ; Reliability analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Social Perception ; Success ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Therapists ; Therapy ; Variables</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-10, Vol.18 (19), p.10372</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-118b0a11ffb0bd56a4e66adc94623c796efb167a301290eb29babd9ad2db07cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-118b0a11ffb0bd56a4e66adc94623c796efb167a301290eb29babd9ad2db07cd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7036-4692 ; 0000-0003-2904-1239 ; 0000-0001-5746-2626 ; 0000-0002-0094-3100 ; 0000-0002-3567-0288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507653/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8507653/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34639672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paramio, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruces-Montes, Serafín J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayas, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Carmona, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient's perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of psychotherapists' attributions of effectiveness: to what factors psychotherapists attribute responsibility for the cure of the therapies they provide. The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the attribution of the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a population of 69 psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations. After an initial process of inter-judge content validation, 12 items were selected for validation in the targeted population, adequately fulfilling the quality requirements in the validity-reliability tests, and grouped into four factors after principal component analysis. These factors were as follows: (1) therapeutic alliance enhancers; (2) psychotherapist emotional characteristics; (3) therapy-specific variables; and (4) facilitators of patient engagement with therapy. This four-factor structure also showed a good fit for the fit indices checked in confirmatory factor analysis. In summary, we can conclude that the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) developed in our research can be helpful if tested on a larger number of individuals. The results can be replicated in other populations of psychotherapists.</description><subject>Component reliability</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Psychotherapists</subject><subject>Psychotherapy</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>Therapy</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtr3DAUhUVpadK06-6KoJt04UYPj2RtCkM6fUCgE_rYCj2uaw0eyZHsgSz632snaUiz0gF999x7OAi9puQ954qchR3koaMNVZRwyZ6gYyoEqWpB6NMH-gi9KGVHCG9qoZ6jI14LroRkx-jPRzhAn4Y9xBGb6PEv0wdvxpAiTi0eO8Dbcu26NKtsBpjG4PCmbcGN4QARSsHrcczBTjcjlxOURUQTMuDT7WZ9WVH2DoeIDf4-mBhKh7dpmPqbFS_Rs9b0BV7dvSfo56fNj_Mv1cW3z1_P1xeVqxkdK0obSwylbWuJ9SthahDCeKdqwbiTSkBrqZCGE8oUAcuUNdYr45m3RDrPT9CHW99hsnvwbg6bTa-HHPYmX-tkgv7_J4ZO_04H3ayIFCs-G5zeGeR0tWTU-1Ac9L2JkKai2aqZS2CSyhl9-wjdpSnHOd5CESUpl4vh2S3lciolQ3t_DCV6qVY_qnaeePMwwz3_r0v-F6Iioz8</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Romero-Moreno, Antonio</creator><creator>Paramio, Alberto</creator><creator>Cruces-Montes, Serafín J</creator><creator>Zayas, Antonio</creator><creator>Gómez-Carmona, Diego</creator><creator>Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7036-4692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-1239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5746-2626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-3100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-0288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population</title><author>Romero-Moreno, Antonio ; Paramio, Alberto ; Cruces-Montes, Serafín J ; Zayas, Antonio ; Gómez-Carmona, Diego ; Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-118b0a11ffb0bd56a4e66adc94623c796efb167a301290eb29babd9ad2db07cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Component reliability</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Psychotherapists</topic><topic>Psychotherapy</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>Therapy</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero-Moreno, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paramio, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruces-Montes, Serafín J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zayas, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Carmona, Diego</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero-Moreno, Antonio</au><au>Paramio, Alberto</au><au>Cruces-Montes, Serafín J</au><au>Zayas, Antonio</au><au>Gómez-Carmona, Diego</au><au>Merchán-Clavellino, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>10372</spage><pages>10372-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient's perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of psychotherapists' attributions of effectiveness: to what factors psychotherapists attribute responsibility for the cure of the therapies they provide. The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the attribution of the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a population of 69 psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations. After an initial process of inter-judge content validation, 12 items were selected for validation in the targeted population, adequately fulfilling the quality requirements in the validity-reliability tests, and grouped into four factors after principal component analysis. These factors were as follows: (1) therapeutic alliance enhancers; (2) psychotherapist emotional characteristics; (3) therapy-specific variables; and (4) facilitators of patient engagement with therapy. This four-factor structure also showed a good fit for the fit indices checked in confirmatory factor analysis. In summary, we can conclude that the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) developed in our research can be helpful if tested on a larger number of individuals. The results can be replicated in other populations of psychotherapists.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34639672</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph181910372</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7036-4692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2904-1239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5746-2626</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0094-3100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3567-0288</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-10, Vol.18 (19), p.10372 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8507653 |
| source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; PubMed Central Open Access |
| subjects | Component reliability Empathy Factor analysis Humans Patients Principal components analysis Psychotherapists Psychotherapy Questionnaires Reliability analysis Reproducibility of Results Social Perception Success Surveys and Questionnaires Therapists Therapy Variables |
| title | Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20Validation%20of%20the%20Psychotherapeutic%20Effectiveness%20Attribution%20Questionnaire%20(PEAQ-12)%20in%20a%20Spanish%20Population&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Romero-Moreno,%20Antonio&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=10372&rft.pages=10372-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph181910372&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2580971373%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580971373&rft_id=info:pmid/34639672&rfr_iscdi=true |