PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet

Abstract Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performanc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.392-392
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Jung Wook, Chevalier, Tyler B, Monegue, Jim J, Lindemann, Merlin D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue Supplement_3
container_start_page 392
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 99
creator Lee, Jung Wook
Chevalier, Tyler B
Monegue, Jim J
Lindemann, Merlin D
description Abstract Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P < 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jas/skab235.714
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8506339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skab235.714</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2658843061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1994-3afb6c52e4b8074f6cfea185e6d649c616cbfc2ec05b75852391c0aa21587cc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9r2zAUx0VZYVm7866CXraCG_2wFPkyWEJ_QUsDa3sVsvzkOnMkV7Lb5r-vQ0Khp50ej_f98eCD0A9Kzigp-HRl0jT9MyXj4mxG8wM0oYKJjFPJv6AJIYxmSlH2FX1LaUUIZaIQE_S2_Hv9mM0zqvASogtxbbwFHCF1wSfAweFXML5tfI2Nr3AdwytE3DV1wg62u6nG0cILtGmr7sLQ9nGDy00XQzXYHq_BtPjncn77Czce90-Aqwb6Y3ToTJvg-34eoYeL8_vFVXZzd3m9-HOTWVoUecaNK6UVDPJSkVnupHVgqBIgK5kXVlJpS2cZWCLKmVCC8YJaYgyjQs2spfwI_d7ldkO5hsqC76NpdRebtYkbHUyjP19886Tr8KKVIJLzYgw42QfE8DxA6vUqDNGPP2smhVI5J3JbM92pbAwpRXAfDZToLR898tF7PnrkMzpOd44wdP8VvwN9MZQi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658843061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Jung Wook ; Chevalier, Tyler B ; Monegue, Jim J ; Lindemann, Merlin D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Wook ; Chevalier, Tyler B ; Monegue, Jim J ; Lindemann, Merlin D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P &lt; 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab235.714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Body weight ; Diet ; Feeders ; Feeding ; Physical growth ; Poster Presentations</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.392-392</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506339/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506339/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevalier, Tyler B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monegue, Jim J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindemann, Merlin D</creatorcontrib><title>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P &lt; 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.</description><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeders</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Poster Presentations</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9r2zAUx0VZYVm7866CXraCG_2wFPkyWEJ_QUsDa3sVsvzkOnMkV7Lb5r-vQ0Khp50ej_f98eCD0A9Kzigp-HRl0jT9MyXj4mxG8wM0oYKJjFPJv6AJIYxmSlH2FX1LaUUIZaIQE_S2_Hv9mM0zqvASogtxbbwFHCF1wSfAweFXML5tfI2Nr3AdwytE3DV1wg62u6nG0cILtGmr7sLQ9nGDy00XQzXYHq_BtPjncn77Czce90-Aqwb6Y3ToTJvg-34eoYeL8_vFVXZzd3m9-HOTWVoUecaNK6UVDPJSkVnupHVgqBIgK5kXVlJpS2cZWCLKmVCC8YJaYgyjQs2spfwI_d7ldkO5hsqC76NpdRebtYkbHUyjP19886Tr8KKVIJLzYgw42QfE8DxA6vUqDNGPP2smhVI5J3JbM92pbAwpRXAfDZToLR898tF7PnrkMzpOd44wdP8VvwN9MZQi</recordid><startdate>20211008</startdate><enddate>20211008</enddate><creator>Lee, Jung Wook</creator><creator>Chevalier, Tyler B</creator><creator>Monegue, Jim J</creator><creator>Lindemann, Merlin D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211008</creationdate><title>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</title><author>Lee, Jung Wook ; Chevalier, Tyler B ; Monegue, Jim J ; Lindemann, Merlin D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1994-3afb6c52e4b8074f6cfea185e6d649c616cbfc2ec05b75852391c0aa21587cc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeders</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Poster Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevalier, Tyler B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monegue, Jim J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindemann, Merlin D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jung Wook</au><au>Chevalier, Tyler B</au><au>Monegue, Jim J</au><au>Lindemann, Merlin D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2021-10-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>392-392</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P &lt; 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skab235.714</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.392-392
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8506339
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Body weight
Diet
Feeders
Feeding
Physical growth
Poster Presentations
title PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PSIV-B-18%20Performance%20response%20of%20weanling%20and%20grower%20pigs%20fed%20graded%20levels%20of%20poultry%20byproduct%20meal%20(PBM)%20in%20the%20diet&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Lee,%20Jung%20Wook&rft.date=2021-10-08&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=392-392&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skab235.714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2658843061%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658843061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skab235.714&rfr_iscdi=true