PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet
Abstract Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performanc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.392-392 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 392 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_3 |
container_start_page | 392 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Lee, Jung Wook Chevalier, Tyler B Monegue, Jim J Lindemann, Merlin D |
description | Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P < 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jas/skab235.714 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8506339</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skab235.714</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2658843061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1994-3afb6c52e4b8074f6cfea185e6d649c616cbfc2ec05b75852391c0aa21587cc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9r2zAUx0VZYVm7866CXraCG_2wFPkyWEJ_QUsDa3sVsvzkOnMkV7Lb5r-vQ0Khp50ej_f98eCD0A9Kzigp-HRl0jT9MyXj4mxG8wM0oYKJjFPJv6AJIYxmSlH2FX1LaUUIZaIQE_S2_Hv9mM0zqvASogtxbbwFHCF1wSfAweFXML5tfI2Nr3AdwytE3DV1wg62u6nG0cILtGmr7sLQ9nGDy00XQzXYHq_BtPjncn77Czce90-Aqwb6Y3ToTJvg-34eoYeL8_vFVXZzd3m9-HOTWVoUecaNK6UVDPJSkVnupHVgqBIgK5kXVlJpS2cZWCLKmVCC8YJaYgyjQs2spfwI_d7ldkO5hsqC76NpdRebtYkbHUyjP19886Tr8KKVIJLzYgw42QfE8DxA6vUqDNGPP2smhVI5J3JbM92pbAwpRXAfDZToLR898tF7PnrkMzpOd44wdP8VvwN9MZQi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658843061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Jung Wook ; Chevalier, Tyler B ; Monegue, Jim J ; Lindemann, Merlin D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Wook ; Chevalier, Tyler B ; Monegue, Jim J ; Lindemann, Merlin D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P < 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab235.714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Body weight ; Diet ; Feeders ; Feeding ; Physical growth ; Poster Presentations</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.392-392</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506339/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8506339/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevalier, Tyler B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monegue, Jim J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindemann, Merlin D</creatorcontrib><title>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P < 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.</description><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Feeders</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Poster Presentations</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9r2zAUx0VZYVm7866CXraCG_2wFPkyWEJ_QUsDa3sVsvzkOnMkV7Lb5r-vQ0Khp50ej_f98eCD0A9Kzigp-HRl0jT9MyXj4mxG8wM0oYKJjFPJv6AJIYxmSlH2FX1LaUUIZaIQE_S2_Hv9mM0zqvASogtxbbwFHCF1wSfAweFXML5tfI2Nr3AdwytE3DV1wg62u6nG0cILtGmr7sLQ9nGDy00XQzXYHq_BtPjncn77Czce90-Aqwb6Y3ToTJvg-34eoYeL8_vFVXZzd3m9-HOTWVoUecaNK6UVDPJSkVnupHVgqBIgK5kXVlJpS2cZWCLKmVCC8YJaYgyjQs2spfwI_d7ldkO5hsqC76NpdRebtYkbHUyjP19886Tr8KKVIJLzYgw42QfE8DxA6vUqDNGPP2smhVI5J3JbM92pbAwpRXAfDZToLR898tF7PnrkMzpOd44wdP8VvwN9MZQi</recordid><startdate>20211008</startdate><enddate>20211008</enddate><creator>Lee, Jung Wook</creator><creator>Chevalier, Tyler B</creator><creator>Monegue, Jim J</creator><creator>Lindemann, Merlin D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211008</creationdate><title>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</title><author>Lee, Jung Wook ; Chevalier, Tyler B ; Monegue, Jim J ; Lindemann, Merlin D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1994-3afb6c52e4b8074f6cfea185e6d649c616cbfc2ec05b75852391c0aa21587cc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Feeders</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Poster Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jung Wook</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chevalier, Tyler B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monegue, Jim J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindemann, Merlin D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jung Wook</au><au>Chevalier, Tyler B</au><au>Monegue, Jim J</au><au>Lindemann, Merlin D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2021-10-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>392-392</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to investigate effects of feeding graded levels of PBM on performance of weanling pigs and to evaluate feed preference for PBM-based diets relative to spray-dried plasma protein (SDPP)-based diets. A third experiment evaluated PBM in grower diets on performance. In Exp. 1, 120 pigs [body weight (BW) 7.1 ± 0.6 kg] were randomly allotted to 1 of 5 treatments (0, 1, 2, 3, or 5% PBM) and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d growth trial. In Exp. 2, 60 pigs (BW 6.7 ± 1.4 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 3 comparisons including: Comparison 1) 0% PBM vs. 2% PBM, Comparison 2) 0% PBM vs. 2% SDPP, and Comparison 3) 2% PBM vs. 2% SDPP and housed 4 pigs/pen for a 28-d preference trial; pigs were provided ad libitum access to feeders; feeder location was switched 3 times/wk. In Exp. 3, 120 pigs (BW 25.9 ± 2.1 kg) were randomly allotted to 1 of 4 treatments (0, 1.25, 2.5 or 5% PBM) and housed 5 pigs/pen for a 41-d growth trial. Increasing PBM from 0 to 5% in Exp. 1 resulted in no differences in ADG (398, 417, 424, 432, and 428 g) or G:F (0.675, 0.686, 0.733, 0.711, and 0.717). Feed preference results (Exp. 2) demonstrated that pigs consumed a higher percentage (76 vs. 24%, P < 0.01) of their total feed intake from the 2% PBM-based diet compared to the 2% SDPP-based diet (Comparison 3). In Exp. 3, increasing PBM for grower pigs resulted in no differences in ADG (1007, 1025, 1002, and 1025 g) or G:F (0.484, 0.472, 0.484, and 0.478). Thus, feeding PBM up to 5% of the diet had no effect on overall performance of nursery or grower pigs, indicating it is an acceptable option as a feed ingredient.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skab235.714</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.392-392 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8506339 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Body weight Diet Feeders Feeding Physical growth Poster Presentations |
title | PSIV-B-18 Performance response of weanling and grower pigs fed graded levels of poultry byproduct meal (PBM) in the diet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T03%3A55%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PSIV-B-18%20Performance%20response%20of%20weanling%20and%20grower%20pigs%20fed%20graded%20levels%20of%20poultry%20byproduct%20meal%20(PBM)%20in%20the%20diet&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Lee,%20Jung%20Wook&rft.date=2021-10-08&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=392-392&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skab235.714&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2658843061%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658843061&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skab235.714&rfr_iscdi=true |