Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02

The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species PCR Assay utilizes Solaris™ reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces. The aims were to demonstrate the reproducibility of the Thermo Scientifi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of AOAC International 2022-02, Vol.105 (1), p.167-190
Hauptverfasser: Bastin, Benjamin, Thompson, Wesley, Benzinger, M Joseph, Crowley, Erin S, Leonte, Ana-Maria, Vandoros, Evangelos J, Thomas, Daniel, Hughes, Annette, Crabtree, David, Evans, Katharine, Sohier, Daniele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 190
container_issue 1
container_start_page 167
container_title Journal of AOAC International
container_volume 105
creator Bastin, Benjamin
Thompson, Wesley
Benzinger, M Joseph
Crowley, Erin S
Leonte, Ana-Maria
Vandoros, Evangelos J
Thomas, Daniel
Hughes, Annette
Crabtree, David
Evans, Katharine
Sohier, Daniele
description The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species PCR Assay utilizes Solaris™ reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces. The aims were to demonstrate the reproducibility of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella species PCR Assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, cocoa powder, and to extend the scope of the method. In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). Fourteen participants from nine laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection statistical model. In addition, 11 matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM Chapter 5 or US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 4.10 Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg, and Siluriformes (Fish) Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges reference method. Nine of these matrices were also compared to the EN ISO 6579-1:2017/Amd.1:2020(E) Microbiology of the food chain-Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella-Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp.-AMENDMENT 1: Broader range of incubation temperatures, amendment to the status of Annex D, and correction of the composition of MSRV and SC reference method. In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False-positive and false-negative rates were determined for the matrix and produced values of
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jaoacint/qsab122
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8500116</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2577735245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-ad6133706a44bf2e5d992de9efa1f08eb08e035fa1fa61daf84171f3f81a8be53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUhaOqVaG0-64qL7sJ-JEni0rT0QxUQioi07V141wzRok92MlI8wf7u-rAgMrC8uue7x77JMlXRs8ZrcXFAzhQxo4XjwFaxvm75JTVWZaWNefv45oWNBW8ZCfJpxAeKM1YQfnH5ERkeVWIqj5N_q720E8wGmeJ02TcItls0Q-ONMqgHY02ijSTxw2qkTTQD85i3wNpdhgLArld3pFFCHAgxhIgP72DjtyBvceZt3auCwRsRxrsZ8LK7o13doho6GewBoXhktx6TJcuglvno5s9PonenjTj1B0uydr4MJKFevLMKWfnlH9OPmjoA345zmfJn_Vqs7xOb35f_VoublIlsnpMoSuYECUtIMtazTHv6pp3WKMGpmmFbRxU5PMOCtaBrjJWMi10xaBqMRdnyY9n7m5qB-xUfIaHXu68GcAfpAMj395Ys5X3bi-rnFLGigj4fgR49zhhGOVggpp_1KKbguR5WZYi59nciz6XKu9C8Khf2zAq5_jlS_zyGH-UfPvf3qvgJW_xD8G1stU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2577735245</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Bastin, Benjamin ; Thompson, Wesley ; Benzinger, M Joseph ; Crowley, Erin S ; Leonte, Ana-Maria ; Vandoros, Evangelos J ; Thomas, Daniel ; Hughes, Annette ; Crabtree, David ; Evans, Katharine ; Sohier, Daniele</creator><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Benjamin ; Thompson, Wesley ; Benzinger, M Joseph ; Crowley, Erin S ; Leonte, Ana-Maria ; Vandoros, Evangelos J ; Thomas, Daniel ; Hughes, Annette ; Crabtree, David ; Evans, Katharine ; Sohier, Daniele</creatorcontrib><description>The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species PCR Assay utilizes Solaris™ reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces. The aims were to demonstrate the reproducibility of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella species PCR Assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, cocoa powder, and to extend the scope of the method. In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). Fourteen participants from nine laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection statistical model. In addition, 11 matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM Chapter 5 or US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 4.10 Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg, and Siluriformes (Fish) Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges reference method. Nine of these matrices were also compared to the EN ISO 6579-1:2017/Amd.1:2020(E) Microbiology of the food chain-Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella-Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp.-AMENDMENT 1: Broader range of incubation temperatures, amendment to the status of Annex D, and correction of the composition of MSRV and SC reference method. In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False-positive and false-negative rates were determined for the matrix and produced values of &lt;2%. The two PCR thermocyclers (QS5, 7500 Fast) performed equivalently. There were no result differences between candidate method confirmations and reference method confirmations. In the pre-collaborative matrix extension, the results from the matrix studies showed a comparable performance between the candidate method and the tested reference methods. Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some participants had to be trained remotely. Additionally, 375 g cocoa powder is known to be a challenging matrix for PCR methods. No unusual cross-contamination or false-positive/negative was reported, highlighting the ease of use, reproducibility, and robustness of the method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1060-3271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7922</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jaoacint/qsab122</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34586389</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; COVID-19 ; Food Microbiology ; Humans ; Meat - analysis ; Microbiological Methods ; Pandemics ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Reproducibility of Results ; Salmonella - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of AOAC International, 2022-02, Vol.105 (1), p.167-190</ispartof><rights>AOAC INTERNATIONAL 2021.</rights><rights>AOAC INTERNATIONAL 2021. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-ad6133706a44bf2e5d992de9efa1f08eb08e035fa1fa61daf84171f3f81a8be53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0624-1441 ; 0000-0001-5561-9351 ; 0000-0003-0399-7785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34586389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzinger, M Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Erin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonte, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandoros, Evangelos J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohier, Daniele</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02</title><title>Journal of AOAC International</title><addtitle>J AOAC Int</addtitle><description>The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species PCR Assay utilizes Solaris™ reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces. The aims were to demonstrate the reproducibility of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella species PCR Assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, cocoa powder, and to extend the scope of the method. In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). Fourteen participants from nine laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection statistical model. In addition, 11 matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM Chapter 5 or US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 4.10 Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg, and Siluriformes (Fish) Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges reference method. Nine of these matrices were also compared to the EN ISO 6579-1:2017/Amd.1:2020(E) Microbiology of the food chain-Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella-Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp.-AMENDMENT 1: Broader range of incubation temperatures, amendment to the status of Annex D, and correction of the composition of MSRV and SC reference method. In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False-positive and false-negative rates were determined for the matrix and produced values of &lt;2%. The two PCR thermocyclers (QS5, 7500 Fast) performed equivalently. There were no result differences between candidate method confirmations and reference method confirmations. In the pre-collaborative matrix extension, the results from the matrix studies showed a comparable performance between the candidate method and the tested reference methods. Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some participants had to be trained remotely. Additionally, 375 g cocoa powder is known to be a challenging matrix for PCR methods. No unusual cross-contamination or false-positive/negative was reported, highlighting the ease of use, reproducibility, and robustness of the method.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meat - analysis</subject><subject>Microbiological Methods</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Salmonella - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1060-3271</issn><issn>1944-7922</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtP3DAUhaOqVaG0-64qL7sJ-JEni0rT0QxUQioi07V141wzRok92MlI8wf7u-rAgMrC8uue7x77JMlXRs8ZrcXFAzhQxo4XjwFaxvm75JTVWZaWNefv45oWNBW8ZCfJpxAeKM1YQfnH5ERkeVWIqj5N_q720E8wGmeJ02TcItls0Q-ONMqgHY02ijSTxw2qkTTQD85i3wNpdhgLArld3pFFCHAgxhIgP72DjtyBvceZt3auCwRsRxrsZ8LK7o13doho6GewBoXhktx6TJcuglvno5s9PonenjTj1B0uydr4MJKFevLMKWfnlH9OPmjoA345zmfJn_Vqs7xOb35f_VoublIlsnpMoSuYECUtIMtazTHv6pp3WKMGpmmFbRxU5PMOCtaBrjJWMi10xaBqMRdnyY9n7m5qB-xUfIaHXu68GcAfpAMj395Ys5X3bi-rnFLGigj4fgR49zhhGOVggpp_1KKbguR5WZYi59nciz6XKu9C8Khf2zAq5_jlS_zyGH-UfPvf3qvgJW_xD8G1stU</recordid><startdate>20220204</startdate><enddate>20220204</enddate><creator>Bastin, Benjamin</creator><creator>Thompson, Wesley</creator><creator>Benzinger, M Joseph</creator><creator>Crowley, Erin S</creator><creator>Leonte, Ana-Maria</creator><creator>Vandoros, Evangelos J</creator><creator>Thomas, Daniel</creator><creator>Hughes, Annette</creator><creator>Crabtree, David</creator><creator>Evans, Katharine</creator><creator>Sohier, Daniele</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-1441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-9351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0399-7785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220204</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02</title><author>Bastin, Benjamin ; Thompson, Wesley ; Benzinger, M Joseph ; Crowley, Erin S ; Leonte, Ana-Maria ; Vandoros, Evangelos J ; Thomas, Daniel ; Hughes, Annette ; Crabtree, David ; Evans, Katharine ; Sohier, Daniele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-ad6133706a44bf2e5d992de9efa1f08eb08e035fa1fa61daf84171f3f81a8be53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meat - analysis</topic><topic>Microbiological Methods</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Salmonella - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bastin, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benzinger, M Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowley, Erin S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonte, Ana-Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandoros, Evangelos J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crabtree, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sohier, Daniele</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of AOAC International</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bastin, Benjamin</au><au>Thompson, Wesley</au><au>Benzinger, M Joseph</au><au>Crowley, Erin S</au><au>Leonte, Ana-Maria</au><au>Vandoros, Evangelos J</au><au>Thomas, Daniel</au><au>Hughes, Annette</au><au>Crabtree, David</au><au>Evans, Katharine</au><au>Sohier, Daniele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02</atitle><jtitle>Journal of AOAC International</jtitle><addtitle>J AOAC Int</addtitle><date>2022-02-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>167-190</pages><issn>1060-3271</issn><eissn>1944-7922</eissn><abstract>The Thermo Scientific™ SureTect™ Salmonella species PCR Assay utilizes Solaris™ reagents for performing PCR for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in a broad range of foods and select environmental surfaces. The aims were to demonstrate the reproducibility of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella species PCR Assay in a collaborative study using a challenging matrix, cocoa powder, and to extend the scope of the method. In the collaborative study, the candidate method was compared to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. The candidate method used two PCR thermocyclers, the Applied Biosystems™ QuantStudio™ 5 Real-Time PCR instrument (QS5) and the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR instrument (7500 Fast). Fourteen participants from nine laboratories located within the United States and Europe were solicited for the collaborative study, with 12 participants submitting valid data. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection statistical model. In addition, 11 matrix studies were performed comparing the candidate method to the FDA/BAM Chapter 5 or US Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service, Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 4.10 Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg, and Siluriformes (Fish) Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges reference method. Nine of these matrices were also compared to the EN ISO 6579-1:2017/Amd.1:2020(E) Microbiology of the food chain-Horizontal method for the detection, enumeration and serotyping of Salmonella-Part 1: Detection of Salmonella spp.-AMENDMENT 1: Broader range of incubation temperatures, amendment to the status of Annex D, and correction of the composition of MSRV and SC reference method. In the collaborative study, the difference in laboratory results indicates equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False-positive and false-negative rates were determined for the matrix and produced values of &lt;2%. The two PCR thermocyclers (QS5, 7500 Fast) performed equivalently. There were no result differences between candidate method confirmations and reference method confirmations. In the pre-collaborative matrix extension, the results from the matrix studies showed a comparable performance between the candidate method and the tested reference methods. Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, some participants had to be trained remotely. Additionally, 375 g cocoa powder is known to be a challenging matrix for PCR methods. No unusual cross-contamination or false-positive/negative was reported, highlighting the ease of use, reproducibility, and robustness of the method.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34586389</pmid><doi>10.1093/jaoacint/qsab122</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0624-1441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5561-9351</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0399-7785</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1060-3271
ispartof Journal of AOAC International, 2022-02, Vol.105 (1), p.167-190
issn 1060-3271
1944-7922
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8500116
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Animals
COVID-19
Food Microbiology
Humans
Meat - analysis
Microbiological Methods
Pandemics
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Reproducibility of Results
Salmonella - genetics
SARS-CoV-2
United States
title Evaluation of the Thermo Scientific SureTect Salmonella Species PCR Assay in a Broad Range of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Pre-Collaborative and Collaborative Study: First Action 2021.02
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T01%3A05%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Thermo%20Scientific%20SureTect%20Salmonella%20Species%20PCR%20Assay%20in%20a%20Broad%20Range%20of%20Foods%20and%20Select%20Environmental%20Surfaces:%20Pre-Collaborative%20and%20Collaborative%20Study:%20First%20Action%202021.02&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20AOAC%20International&rft.au=Bastin,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2022-02-04&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=167-190&rft.issn=1060-3271&rft.eissn=1944-7922&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jaoacint/qsab122&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2577735245%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2577735245&rft_id=info:pmid/34586389&rfr_iscdi=true