182 Economic Impact of Bale Grazing on Delayed Feedlot Entry Steer Performance, Carcass Measurement, and Net Return
Abstract Senturklu et al., (2018) defined merits of delayed feedlot entry while grazing in an integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS). In a three-year follow up study, yearling steers (n = 144) grazed either an ICLS or a native range system (NR). After 177.9 days, free-ranging ICLS and NR steers wer...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.97-98 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 98 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | Supplement_3 |
| container_start_page | 97 |
| container_title | Journal of animal science |
| container_volume | 99 |
| creator | Senturklu, Songul Landblom, Douglas G Paisley, Steve |
| description | Abstract
Senturklu et al., (2018) defined merits of delayed feedlot entry while grazing in an integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS). In a three-year follow up study, yearling steers (n = 144) grazed either an ICLS or a native range system (NR). After 177.9 days, free-ranging ICLS and NR steers were fed cover crop hay bales 43.6 days to determine transition period bale-grazing on finishing performance, carcass measurements, and system net return. ICLS and NR gains did not differ (P = 0.24). ICLS 43.6-day bale grazing gain was greater (1.38 vs. 0.80 kg; P = 0.01). Feedlot arrival weight was greater for ICLS compared to NR (569.3 vs 530.1 kg; P = 0.04) and fed 95.7 days. Systems end weight (P = 0.19), gain (P = 0.57), ADG (P = 0.06), and gain cost (P = 0.71) did not differ. ICLS steer hot carcass weight (HCW: 444.8 vs. 419.2 kg; P = 0.03) and fat depth (1.35 vs. 1.17 cm; P = 0.04) were greater. NR steer dressing percent (62.48 vs. 61.83 %; P = 0.01) and muscling ratio to HCW (3.96 vs. 3.81 sq. cm.; P = 0.007) were greater. Choice quality grade did not differ (98.6 vs. 98.6; P = 1.00). Annual cow and steer winter feed cost were $752.00. ICLS grazing cost for NR was $115.30, pea-barley $74.98, unharvested corn $108.87, and cover crop $58.82 totaled $357.97 compared to $207.77 for the NR system. ICLS and NR steer bale and protein-energy supplement cost was $110.47 vs. 103.05, finishing cost $310.57 vs. 313.67 (P = 0.84), and total expense was lower for the NR system ($1531.01 vs. $1376.49). Carcass value was greater for the ICLS steers compared to NR steers ($2013.93 vs. $1921.67; P = 0.03). ICLS and NR systems’ net returns were ($482.92 vs. $545.18). NR system net return was $62.26 greater. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jas/skab235.175 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8499208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skab235.175</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2658843761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1995-4f329414b86d387da90c5e644fdb59c3fab4d817059009959829a529d3fb06d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcmLFDEUxoMo2I6evQa8ydR0lkpVchG07VlgXHA5h1fJq7HaqqQnqRLav95INwOePL3Dt7wPfoS85OyCMyPXO8jr_BM6IdUFb9UjsuJKqEryRj4mK8YEr7Tm4il5lvOOMS6UUSuSuRZ062KI0-DozbQHN9PY03cwIr1K8HsIdzQG-h5HOKCnl4h-jDPdhjkd6NcZMdHPmPqYJggOz-kGkoOc6QeEvCScMMznFIKnH3GmX3BeUnhOnvQwZnxxumfk--X22-a6uv10dbN5e1s5boyq6l4KU_O6042XuvVgmFPY1HXvO2Wc7KGrveYtU4axEjBaGFDCeNl3rPGtPCNvjr37pZvQuzIlwWj3aZggHWyEwf6rhOGHvYu_rK6NEUyXglenghTvF8yz3cWyv2y2olFa17JteHGtjy6XYs4J-4cPnNm_aGxBY09obEFTEq-Pibjs_2v-A_oFkT4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2658843761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>182 Economic Impact of Bale Grazing on Delayed Feedlot Entry Steer Performance, Carcass Measurement, and Net Return</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Senturklu, Songul ; Landblom, Douglas G ; Paisley, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Senturklu, Songul ; Landblom, Douglas G ; Paisley, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Senturklu et al., (2018) defined merits of delayed feedlot entry while grazing in an integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS). In a three-year follow up study, yearling steers (n = 144) grazed either an ICLS or a native range system (NR). After 177.9 days, free-ranging ICLS and NR steers were fed cover crop hay bales 43.6 days to determine transition period bale-grazing on finishing performance, carcass measurements, and system net return. ICLS and NR gains did not differ (P = 0.24). ICLS 43.6-day bale grazing gain was greater (1.38 vs. 0.80 kg; P = 0.01). Feedlot arrival weight was greater for ICLS compared to NR (569.3 vs 530.1 kg; P = 0.04) and fed 95.7 days. Systems end weight (P = 0.19), gain (P = 0.57), ADG (P = 0.06), and gain cost (P = 0.71) did not differ. ICLS steer hot carcass weight (HCW: 444.8 vs. 419.2 kg; P = 0.03) and fat depth (1.35 vs. 1.17 cm; P = 0.04) were greater. NR steer dressing percent (62.48 vs. 61.83 %; P = 0.01) and muscling ratio to HCW (3.96 vs. 3.81 sq. cm.; P = 0.007) were greater. Choice quality grade did not differ (98.6 vs. 98.6; P = 1.00). Annual cow and steer winter feed cost were $752.00. ICLS grazing cost for NR was $115.30, pea-barley $74.98, unharvested corn $108.87, and cover crop $58.82 totaled $357.97 compared to $207.77 for the NR system. ICLS and NR steer bale and protein-energy supplement cost was $110.47 vs. 103.05, finishing cost $310.57 vs. 313.67 (P = 0.84), and total expense was lower for the NR system ($1531.01 vs. $1376.49). Carcass value was greater for the ICLS steers compared to NR steers ($2013.93 vs. $1921.67; P = 0.03). ICLS and NR systems’ net returns were ($482.92 vs. $545.18). NR system net return was $62.26 greater.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skab235.175</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agricultural economics ; Agricultural practices ; Carcasses ; Cover crops ; Economic impact ; Feedlots ; Grazing ; Impact analysis ; Livestock ; Oral Presentations ; Quality ; Weight</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.97-98</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499208/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8499208/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1583,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Senturklu, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landblom, Douglas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paisley, Steve</creatorcontrib><title>182 Economic Impact of Bale Grazing on Delayed Feedlot Entry Steer Performance, Carcass Measurement, and Net Return</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract
Senturklu et al., (2018) defined merits of delayed feedlot entry while grazing in an integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS). In a three-year follow up study, yearling steers (n = 144) grazed either an ICLS or a native range system (NR). After 177.9 days, free-ranging ICLS and NR steers were fed cover crop hay bales 43.6 days to determine transition period bale-grazing on finishing performance, carcass measurements, and system net return. ICLS and NR gains did not differ (P = 0.24). ICLS 43.6-day bale grazing gain was greater (1.38 vs. 0.80 kg; P = 0.01). Feedlot arrival weight was greater for ICLS compared to NR (569.3 vs 530.1 kg; P = 0.04) and fed 95.7 days. Systems end weight (P = 0.19), gain (P = 0.57), ADG (P = 0.06), and gain cost (P = 0.71) did not differ. ICLS steer hot carcass weight (HCW: 444.8 vs. 419.2 kg; P = 0.03) and fat depth (1.35 vs. 1.17 cm; P = 0.04) were greater. NR steer dressing percent (62.48 vs. 61.83 %; P = 0.01) and muscling ratio to HCW (3.96 vs. 3.81 sq. cm.; P = 0.007) were greater. Choice quality grade did not differ (98.6 vs. 98.6; P = 1.00). Annual cow and steer winter feed cost were $752.00. ICLS grazing cost for NR was $115.30, pea-barley $74.98, unharvested corn $108.87, and cover crop $58.82 totaled $357.97 compared to $207.77 for the NR system. ICLS and NR steer bale and protein-energy supplement cost was $110.47 vs. 103.05, finishing cost $310.57 vs. 313.67 (P = 0.84), and total expense was lower for the NR system ($1531.01 vs. $1376.49). Carcass value was greater for the ICLS steers compared to NR steers ($2013.93 vs. $1921.67; P = 0.03). ICLS and NR systems’ net returns were ($482.92 vs. $545.18). NR system net return was $62.26 greater.</description><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Carcasses</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Feedlots</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcmLFDEUxoMo2I6evQa8ydR0lkpVchG07VlgXHA5h1fJq7HaqqQnqRLav95INwOePL3Dt7wPfoS85OyCMyPXO8jr_BM6IdUFb9UjsuJKqEryRj4mK8YEr7Tm4il5lvOOMS6UUSuSuRZ062KI0-DozbQHN9PY03cwIr1K8HsIdzQG-h5HOKCnl4h-jDPdhjkd6NcZMdHPmPqYJggOz-kGkoOc6QeEvCScMMznFIKnH3GmX3BeUnhOnvQwZnxxumfk--X22-a6uv10dbN5e1s5boyq6l4KU_O6042XuvVgmFPY1HXvO2Wc7KGrveYtU4axEjBaGFDCeNl3rPGtPCNvjr37pZvQuzIlwWj3aZggHWyEwf6rhOGHvYu_rK6NEUyXglenghTvF8yz3cWyv2y2olFa17JteHGtjy6XYs4J-4cPnNm_aGxBY09obEFTEq-Pibjs_2v-A_oFkT4</recordid><startdate>20211008</startdate><enddate>20211008</enddate><creator>Senturklu, Songul</creator><creator>Landblom, Douglas G</creator><creator>Paisley, Steve</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211008</creationdate><title>182 Economic Impact of Bale Grazing on Delayed Feedlot Entry Steer Performance, Carcass Measurement, and Net Return</title><author>Senturklu, Songul ; Landblom, Douglas G ; Paisley, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1995-4f329414b86d387da90c5e644fdb59c3fab4d817059009959829a529d3fb06d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Carcasses</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Feedlots</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Senturklu, Songul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landblom, Douglas G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paisley, Steve</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Senturklu, Songul</au><au>Landblom, Douglas G</au><au>Paisley, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>182 Economic Impact of Bale Grazing on Delayed Feedlot Entry Steer Performance, Carcass Measurement, and Net Return</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2021-10-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>97-98</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Senturklu et al., (2018) defined merits of delayed feedlot entry while grazing in an integrated crop-livestock system (ICLS). In a three-year follow up study, yearling steers (n = 144) grazed either an ICLS or a native range system (NR). After 177.9 days, free-ranging ICLS and NR steers were fed cover crop hay bales 43.6 days to determine transition period bale-grazing on finishing performance, carcass measurements, and system net return. ICLS and NR gains did not differ (P = 0.24). ICLS 43.6-day bale grazing gain was greater (1.38 vs. 0.80 kg; P = 0.01). Feedlot arrival weight was greater for ICLS compared to NR (569.3 vs 530.1 kg; P = 0.04) and fed 95.7 days. Systems end weight (P = 0.19), gain (P = 0.57), ADG (P = 0.06), and gain cost (P = 0.71) did not differ. ICLS steer hot carcass weight (HCW: 444.8 vs. 419.2 kg; P = 0.03) and fat depth (1.35 vs. 1.17 cm; P = 0.04) were greater. NR steer dressing percent (62.48 vs. 61.83 %; P = 0.01) and muscling ratio to HCW (3.96 vs. 3.81 sq. cm.; P = 0.007) were greater. Choice quality grade did not differ (98.6 vs. 98.6; P = 1.00). Annual cow and steer winter feed cost were $752.00. ICLS grazing cost for NR was $115.30, pea-barley $74.98, unharvested corn $108.87, and cover crop $58.82 totaled $357.97 compared to $207.77 for the NR system. ICLS and NR steer bale and protein-energy supplement cost was $110.47 vs. 103.05, finishing cost $310.57 vs. 313.67 (P = 0.84), and total expense was lower for the NR system ($1531.01 vs. $1376.49). Carcass value was greater for the ICLS steers compared to NR steers ($2013.93 vs. $1921.67; P = 0.03). ICLS and NR systems’ net returns were ($482.92 vs. $545.18). NR system net return was $62.26 greater.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skab235.175</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
| ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2021-10, Vol.99 (Supplement_3), p.97-98 |
| issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8499208 |
| source | PubMed (Medline); Oxford University Press Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
| subjects | Agricultural economics Agricultural practices Carcasses Cover crops Economic impact Feedlots Grazing Impact analysis Livestock Oral Presentations Quality Weight |
| title | 182 Economic Impact of Bale Grazing on Delayed Feedlot Entry Steer Performance, Carcass Measurement, and Net Return |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A22%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=182%20Economic%20Impact%20of%20Bale%20Grazing%20on%20Delayed%20Feedlot%20Entry%20Steer%20Performance,%20Carcass%20Measurement,%20and%20Net%20Return&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Senturklu,%20Songul&rft.date=2021-10-08&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=97-98&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skab235.175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2658843761%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2658843761&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skab235.175&rfr_iscdi=true |