Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal

Background The introduction of eculizumab has significantly improved the outcome of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Because of the risk of relapse after discontinuation, eculizumab was proposed as life-long therapy. However, data on the outcome of relapse are limited. In t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical Kidney Journal 2021-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1939-1945
Hauptverfasser: Duineveld, Caroline, Bouwmeester, Romy, van der Heijden, Joost W, Berger, Stefan P, van de Kar, Nicole C A J, Wetzels, Jack F M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1945
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1939
container_title Clinical Kidney Journal
container_volume 14
creator Duineveld, Caroline
Bouwmeester, Romy
van der Heijden, Joost W
Berger, Stefan P
van de Kar, Nicole C A J
Wetzels, Jack F M
description Background The introduction of eculizumab has significantly improved the outcome of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Because of the risk of relapse after discontinuation, eculizumab was proposed as life-long therapy. However, data on the outcome of relapse are limited. In the Netherlands, patients with aHUS are treated with a restrictive eculizumab regime and are included in a national observational study (CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register NTR5988/NL5833). Methods For this interim safety analysis, we evaluated the outcome of all adult patients with a suspected relapse, defined as the need to intensify eculizumab after tapering or withdrawal of therapy. Results We describe 11 patients who received renewed eculizumab therapy because of suspected relapse. In three patients with aHUS in native kidneys, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) returned to baseline value and remained stable without overt proteinuria after follow-up. Six out of eight transplanted patients responded to eculizumab therapy with improvement in eGFR. After a median follow-up of 24.6 months, a reduction of eGFR ≥25% was observed in three of these transplanted patients, which was attributed to the aHUS relapse in only one patient. Conclusions This interim analysis suggests that re-treatment with eculizumab after relapse is safe and feasible. We will continue to use our restrictive treatment strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ckj/sfaa241
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8496203</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A766560194</galeid><oup_id>10.1093/ckj/sfaa241</oup_id><sourcerecordid>A766560194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8cc10d51a1e24b77ac61dc341af071e3b8b0534ff7295a60d7720b2b8d135fc13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1LHDEUxUOpVFn3qe9loFAKZd1kkszHS0HEqiD4oH0OdzI3bmxmMk1mlO1fb5Zdlwpi8nAPub97SHII-czoCaM1X-o_D8toAHLBPpCjnIpqUUnGP-41lYdkHuMDTSt1qJCfyCEXBU-SH5Hbm2nUvsPMmwzG9WA1uGwF2Hm3Hq3OppB0qnHdt2HDBXQwRMzAjBgy1JOz_6YOmuzJjqs2wBO4Y3JgwEWc7-qM_P51fnd2ubi-ubg6O71eaFHW46LSmtFWMmCYi6YsQRes1VwwMLRkyJuqoZILY8q8llDQtixz2uRN1TIujWZ8Rn5ufYep6bDV2I8BnBqC7SCslQerXnd6u1L3_lFVoi5yypPB951B8H8njKPqbNToHPTop6hyWdFacCrrhH7dovfgUNne-OSoN7g6LYtCFpQlckZO3qDSbjef6Hs0Np2_GvixHdDBxxjQ7G_PqNoErFLAahdwor_8_-A9-xJnAr5tAT8N7zo9A9ndr7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580943059</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Duineveld, Caroline ; Bouwmeester, Romy ; van der Heijden, Joost W ; Berger, Stefan P ; van de Kar, Nicole C A J ; Wetzels, Jack F M</creator><creatorcontrib>Duineveld, Caroline ; Bouwmeester, Romy ; van der Heijden, Joost W ; Berger, Stefan P ; van de Kar, Nicole C A J ; Wetzels, Jack F M ; Dutch aHUS Working Group ; the Dutch aHUS Working Group</creatorcontrib><description>Background The introduction of eculizumab has significantly improved the outcome of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Because of the risk of relapse after discontinuation, eculizumab was proposed as life-long therapy. However, data on the outcome of relapse are limited. In the Netherlands, patients with aHUS are treated with a restrictive eculizumab regime and are included in a national observational study (CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register NTR5988/NL5833). Methods For this interim safety analysis, we evaluated the outcome of all adult patients with a suspected relapse, defined as the need to intensify eculizumab after tapering or withdrawal of therapy. Results We describe 11 patients who received renewed eculizumab therapy because of suspected relapse. In three patients with aHUS in native kidneys, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) returned to baseline value and remained stable without overt proteinuria after follow-up. Six out of eight transplanted patients responded to eculizumab therapy with improvement in eGFR. After a median follow-up of 24.6 months, a reduction of eGFR ≥25% was observed in three of these transplanted patients, which was attributed to the aHUS relapse in only one patient. Conclusions This interim analysis suggests that re-treatment with eculizumab after relapse is safe and feasible. We will continue to use our restrictive treatment strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2048-8505</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2048-8513</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-8513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa241</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34631043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Original ; Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><ispartof>Clinical Kidney Journal, 2021-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1939-1945</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. 2020</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8cc10d51a1e24b77ac61dc341af071e3b8b0534ff7295a60d7720b2b8d135fc13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8cc10d51a1e24b77ac61dc341af071e3b8b0534ff7295a60d7720b2b8d135fc13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496203/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8496203/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34631043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duineveld, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwmeester, Romy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heijden, Joost W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Stefan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kar, Nicole C A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzels, Jack F M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch aHUS Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Dutch aHUS Working Group</creatorcontrib><title>Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal</title><title>Clinical Kidney Journal</title><addtitle>Clin Kidney J</addtitle><description>Background The introduction of eculizumab has significantly improved the outcome of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Because of the risk of relapse after discontinuation, eculizumab was proposed as life-long therapy. However, data on the outcome of relapse are limited. In the Netherlands, patients with aHUS are treated with a restrictive eculizumab regime and are included in a national observational study (CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register NTR5988/NL5833). Methods For this interim safety analysis, we evaluated the outcome of all adult patients with a suspected relapse, defined as the need to intensify eculizumab after tapering or withdrawal of therapy. Results We describe 11 patients who received renewed eculizumab therapy because of suspected relapse. In three patients with aHUS in native kidneys, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) returned to baseline value and remained stable without overt proteinuria after follow-up. Six out of eight transplanted patients responded to eculizumab therapy with improvement in eGFR. After a median follow-up of 24.6 months, a reduction of eGFR ≥25% was observed in three of these transplanted patients, which was attributed to the aHUS relapse in only one patient. Conclusions This interim analysis suggests that re-treatment with eculizumab after relapse is safe and feasible. We will continue to use our restrictive treatment strategy.</description><subject>Original</subject><subject>Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</subject><issn>2048-8505</issn><issn>2048-8513</issn><issn>2048-8513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1LHDEUxUOpVFn3qe9loFAKZd1kkszHS0HEqiD4oH0OdzI3bmxmMk1mlO1fb5Zdlwpi8nAPub97SHII-czoCaM1X-o_D8toAHLBPpCjnIpqUUnGP-41lYdkHuMDTSt1qJCfyCEXBU-SH5Hbm2nUvsPMmwzG9WA1uGwF2Hm3Hq3OppB0qnHdt2HDBXQwRMzAjBgy1JOz_6YOmuzJjqs2wBO4Y3JgwEWc7-qM_P51fnd2ubi-ubg6O71eaFHW46LSmtFWMmCYi6YsQRes1VwwMLRkyJuqoZILY8q8llDQtixz2uRN1TIujWZ8Rn5ufYep6bDV2I8BnBqC7SCslQerXnd6u1L3_lFVoi5yypPB951B8H8njKPqbNToHPTop6hyWdFacCrrhH7dovfgUNne-OSoN7g6LYtCFpQlckZO3qDSbjef6Hs0Np2_GvixHdDBxxjQ7G_PqNoErFLAahdwor_8_-A9-xJnAr5tAT8N7zo9A9ndr7M</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Duineveld, Caroline</creator><creator>Bouwmeester, Romy</creator><creator>van der Heijden, Joost W</creator><creator>Berger, Stefan P</creator><creator>van de Kar, Nicole C A J</creator><creator>Wetzels, Jack F M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal</title><author>Duineveld, Caroline ; Bouwmeester, Romy ; van der Heijden, Joost W ; Berger, Stefan P ; van de Kar, Nicole C A J ; Wetzels, Jack F M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-8cc10d51a1e24b77ac61dc341af071e3b8b0534ff7295a60d7720b2b8d135fc13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><topic>Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duineveld, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwmeester, Romy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Heijden, Joost W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berger, Stefan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Kar, Nicole C A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetzels, Jack F M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutch aHUS Working Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Dutch aHUS Working Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical Kidney Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duineveld, Caroline</au><au>Bouwmeester, Romy</au><au>van der Heijden, Joost W</au><au>Berger, Stefan P</au><au>van de Kar, Nicole C A J</au><au>Wetzels, Jack F M</au><aucorp>Dutch aHUS Working Group</aucorp><aucorp>the Dutch aHUS Working Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal</atitle><jtitle>Clinical Kidney Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Kidney J</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1939</spage><epage>1945</epage><pages>1939-1945</pages><issn>2048-8505</issn><issn>2048-8513</issn><eissn>2048-8513</eissn><abstract>Background The introduction of eculizumab has significantly improved the outcome of patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Because of the risk of relapse after discontinuation, eculizumab was proposed as life-long therapy. However, data on the outcome of relapse are limited. In the Netherlands, patients with aHUS are treated with a restrictive eculizumab regime and are included in a national observational study (CUREiHUS, Dutch Trial Register NTR5988/NL5833). Methods For this interim safety analysis, we evaluated the outcome of all adult patients with a suspected relapse, defined as the need to intensify eculizumab after tapering or withdrawal of therapy. Results We describe 11 patients who received renewed eculizumab therapy because of suspected relapse. In three patients with aHUS in native kidneys, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) returned to baseline value and remained stable without overt proteinuria after follow-up. Six out of eight transplanted patients responded to eculizumab therapy with improvement in eGFR. After a median follow-up of 24.6 months, a reduction of eGFR ≥25% was observed in three of these transplanted patients, which was attributed to the aHUS relapse in only one patient. Conclusions This interim analysis suggests that re-treatment with eculizumab after relapse is safe and feasible. We will continue to use our restrictive treatment strategy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34631043</pmid><doi>10.1093/ckj/sfaa241</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2048-8505
ispartof Clinical Kidney Journal, 2021-08, Vol.14 (8), p.1939-1945
issn 2048-8505
2048-8513
2048-8513
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8496203
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Original
Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc
title Outcome of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome relapse after eculizumab withdrawal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A28%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcome%20of%20atypical%20haemolytic%20uraemic%20syndrome%20relapse%20after%20eculizumab%20withdrawal&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20Kidney%20Journal&rft.au=Duineveld,%20Caroline&rft.aucorp=Dutch%20aHUS%20Working%20Group&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1939&rft.epage=1945&rft.pages=1939-1945&rft.issn=2048-8505&rft.eissn=2048-8513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ckj/sfaa241&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA766560194%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580943059&rft_id=info:pmid/34631043&rft_galeid=A766560194&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ckj/sfaa241&rfr_iscdi=true