Impaired arterial responsiveness in untreated gout patients compared with healthy non-gout controls: association with serum urate and C-reactive protein

To determine whether arterial responsiveness is impaired among patients with gout, and whether arterial responsiveness inversely correlates with serum urate and inflammatory measures. This is a cross-sectional study of untreated gout subjects ( n  = 34) and non-gout healthy controls ( n  = 64). High...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2018-07, Vol.37 (7), p.1903-1911
Hauptverfasser: Krasnokutsky, Svetlana, Romero, Aaron Garza, Bang, Daisy, Pike, Virginia C., Shah, Binita, Igel, Talia F., Dektiarev, Irina, Guo, Yu, Zhong, Judy, Katz, Stuart D., Pillinger, Michael H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To determine whether arterial responsiveness is impaired among patients with gout, and whether arterial responsiveness inversely correlates with serum urate and inflammatory measures. This is a cross-sectional study of untreated gout subjects ( n  = 34) and non-gout healthy controls ( n  = 64). High-resolution dynamic ultrasound-measured flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) assessed endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent arterial responsiveness respectively. Serum urate (sUA) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured in the gout group, and correlated with FMD and NMD responses. Both FMD (2.20 ± 0.53 vs 3.56 ± 0.31, p  = 0.021) and NMD (16.69 ± 1.54 vs 24.51 ± 0.90, p  = 0.00002) were impaired in the gout versus control group. Stratification for individual comorbidities suggested that no single risk factor accounted for impaired FMD/NMD in the gout subjects. However, the degree of association between gout and FMD, but not NMD impairment, was dampened after multivariable adjustment (FMD unadjusted beta = − 1.36 (SE 0.58), p  = 0.02; adjusted beta = − 1.16 (SE 0.78), p  = 0.14 and NMD unadjusted beta = − 7.68 (SE 1.78), p  
ISSN:0770-3198
1434-9949
DOI:10.1007/s10067-018-4029-y