A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears

The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The onlin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2021-09, Vol.10 (18), p.4072
Hauptverfasser: Berton, Alessandra, Longo, Umile Giuseppe, De Salvatore, Sergio, Sciotti, Gaia, Santamaria, Giulia, Piergentili, Ilaria, De Marinis, Maria Grazia, Denaro, Vincenzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 4072
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 10
creator Berton, Alessandra
Longo, Umile Giuseppe
De Salvatore, Sergio
Sciotti, Gaia
Santamaria, Giulia
Piergentili, Ilaria
De Marinis, Maria Grazia
Denaro, Vincenzo
description The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery were Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. This research was completed in September 2020. To assess the quality of reports, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) were used. From the research, 262 articles emerged. Finally, 79 studies were included in this historical analysis. There were no statistically significant changes in MCMS across trials that included or did not include a CONSORT diagram (p = 0.10). A statistically significant difference in MCMS was discovered between papers produced prior to 2009 and publications produced after 2015 (p = 0.03). There was no association between the number of checklist items for each article and the Coleman score. During the years there has been a significant increase in both quantity and quality of RCTs relating to pain in RC tears.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm10184072
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8470804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576416650</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-dcd691a7e24d0d1649ff25830bfec4cebb9cb050a355cfbd7d60f15e0025581b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtKBDEMhosoKuqVL1DwRpDVdNpOuzfCsngCRZH1unR60C4zU21nhPXprQdEDYGE5MtPSBDaJ3BM6RROlqYjQCQDUa2h7QqEmACVdP1XvoX2cl5CMSlZRcQm2qKMC04kbCM3w5chDzEFo1s863W7yiHj6PG97m3swpuzeB77IcW2LekiBd1mHHo8PDl8o3v96DrXDx8Td7qUi9_HQRdFPB-9xwunU95FG76Mub3vuIMezs8W88vJ9e3F1Xx2PTFU1sPEGltPiRauYhYsqdnU-4pLCo13hhnXNFPTAAdNOTe-scLW4Al3ABXnkjR0B51-6T6PTeesKYsl3arnFDqdVirqoP52-vCkHuOrkkyABFYEDr8FUnwZXR5UF7Jxbat7F8esKi4EY4JyKOjBP3QZx1QO-EnVjNT1J3X0RZkUc07O_yxDQH18UP36IH0HaT2NPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576416650</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Berton, Alessandra ; Longo, Umile Giuseppe ; De Salvatore, Sergio ; Sciotti, Gaia ; Santamaria, Giulia ; Piergentili, Ilaria ; De Marinis, Maria Grazia ; Denaro, Vincenzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Berton, Alessandra ; Longo, Umile Giuseppe ; De Salvatore, Sergio ; Sciotti, Gaia ; Santamaria, Giulia ; Piergentili, Ilaria ; De Marinis, Maria Grazia ; Denaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery were Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. This research was completed in September 2020. To assess the quality of reports, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) were used. From the research, 262 articles emerged. Finally, 79 studies were included in this historical analysis. There were no statistically significant changes in MCMS across trials that included or did not include a CONSORT diagram (p = 0.10). A statistically significant difference in MCMS was discovered between papers produced prior to 2009 and publications produced after 2015 (p = 0.03). There was no association between the number of checklist items for each article and the Coleman score. During the years there has been a significant increase in both quantity and quality of RCTs relating to pain in RC tears.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34575180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Normal distribution ; Pain ; Patient satisfaction ; Rehabilitation ; Review ; Rotator cuff ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Writers</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-09, Vol.10 (18), p.4072</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-dcd691a7e24d0d1649ff25830bfec4cebb9cb050a355cfbd7d60f15e0025581b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-dcd691a7e24d0d1649ff25830bfec4cebb9cb050a355cfbd7d60f15e0025581b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9111-3638 ; 0000-0001-9767-7824 ; 0000-0003-4063-9821</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470804/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8470804/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berton, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Salvatore, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sciotti, Gaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piergentili, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marinis, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><title>A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><description>The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery were Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. This research was completed in September 2020. To assess the quality of reports, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) were used. From the research, 262 articles emerged. Finally, 79 studies were included in this historical analysis. There were no statistically significant changes in MCMS across trials that included or did not include a CONSORT diagram (p = 0.10). A statistically significant difference in MCMS was discovered between papers produced prior to 2009 and publications produced after 2015 (p = 0.03). There was no association between the number of checklist items for each article and the Coleman score. During the years there has been a significant increase in both quantity and quality of RCTs relating to pain in RC tears.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Normal distribution</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Rotator cuff</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Writers</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtKBDEMhosoKuqVL1DwRpDVdNpOuzfCsngCRZH1unR60C4zU21nhPXprQdEDYGE5MtPSBDaJ3BM6RROlqYjQCQDUa2h7QqEmACVdP1XvoX2cl5CMSlZRcQm2qKMC04kbCM3w5chDzEFo1s863W7yiHj6PG97m3swpuzeB77IcW2LekiBd1mHHo8PDl8o3v96DrXDx8Td7qUi9_HQRdFPB-9xwunU95FG76Mub3vuIMezs8W88vJ9e3F1Xx2PTFU1sPEGltPiRauYhYsqdnU-4pLCo13hhnXNFPTAAdNOTe-scLW4Al3ABXnkjR0B51-6T6PTeesKYsl3arnFDqdVirqoP52-vCkHuOrkkyABFYEDr8FUnwZXR5UF7Jxbat7F8esKi4EY4JyKOjBP3QZx1QO-EnVjNT1J3X0RZkUc07O_yxDQH18UP36IH0HaT2NPg</recordid><startdate>20210909</startdate><enddate>20210909</enddate><creator>Berton, Alessandra</creator><creator>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</creator><creator>De Salvatore, Sergio</creator><creator>Sciotti, Gaia</creator><creator>Santamaria, Giulia</creator><creator>Piergentili, Ilaria</creator><creator>De Marinis, Maria Grazia</creator><creator>Denaro, Vincenzo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-3638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9767-7824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-9821</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210909</creationdate><title>A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears</title><author>Berton, Alessandra ; Longo, Umile Giuseppe ; De Salvatore, Sergio ; Sciotti, Gaia ; Santamaria, Giulia ; Piergentili, Ilaria ; De Marinis, Maria Grazia ; Denaro, Vincenzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-dcd691a7e24d0d1649ff25830bfec4cebb9cb050a355cfbd7d60f15e0025581b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Normal distribution</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Rotator cuff</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Writers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berton, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Salvatore, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sciotti, Gaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santamaria, Giulia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piergentili, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Marinis, Maria Grazia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Denaro, Vincenzo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berton, Alessandra</au><au>Longo, Umile Giuseppe</au><au>De Salvatore, Sergio</au><au>Sciotti, Gaia</au><au>Santamaria, Giulia</au><au>Piergentili, Ilaria</au><au>De Marinis, Maria Grazia</au><au>Denaro, Vincenzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><date>2021-09-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>4072</spage><pages>4072-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>The aim of this analysis was to assess the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relating to pain management in rotator cuff (RC) tears. This review evaluated the quality of the studies in the literature regarding this topic through the use of some factors and trends. The online databases used to search all RCTs on the topic of RC surgery were Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. This research was completed in September 2020. To assess the quality of reports, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) and the modified Coleman methodology score (MCMS) were used. From the research, 262 articles emerged. Finally, 79 studies were included in this historical analysis. There were no statistically significant changes in MCMS across trials that included or did not include a CONSORT diagram (p = 0.10). A statistically significant difference in MCMS was discovered between papers produced prior to 2009 and publications produced after 2015 (p = 0.03). There was no association between the number of checklist items for each article and the Coleman score. During the years there has been a significant increase in both quantity and quality of RCTs relating to pain in RC tears.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34575180</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm10184072</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-3638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9767-7824</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-9821</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2021-09, Vol.10 (18), p.4072
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8470804
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Clinical trials
Normal distribution
Pain
Patient satisfaction
Rehabilitation
Review
Rotator cuff
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Systematic review
Writers
title A Historical Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Management of Pain in Rotator Cuff Tears
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A57%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Historical%20Analysis%20of%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trials%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Pain%20in%20Rotator%20Cuff%20Tears&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Berton,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2021-09-09&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=4072&rft.pages=4072-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm10184072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2576416650%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576416650&rft_id=info:pmid/34575180&rfr_iscdi=true