Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adop...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medicine (Baltimore) 2021-09, Vol.100 (38), p.e27148-e27148 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e27148 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 38 |
| container_start_page | e27148 |
| container_title | Medicine (Baltimore) |
| container_volume | 100 |
| creator | Liu, Ya Jin, Yunfeng Lu, Yuemei Zhong, Xiaorong Lu, Hong |
| description | Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients.
A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis.
This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/MD.0000000000027148 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8462562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576657346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3552-dfd61d2d7a96aa725f6d1fb28bbb3d60c9e2bb8450dd4b7bd0f2c867e40fe75b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhiMEokPhCZCQl2xSHMeXCQukasplpFZsYG35cjJjSOxgOxPN6_FkmE5bLt4c6Zzv_3_bp6peNviiwZ14c3N1gf8cIhq6flStGtbymnWcPq5Wpctq0Ql6Vj1L6RvGTSsIfVqdtZSxrsHtqvq5CeOkokvBo9CjvAcU5mzCCAlpyAuAR4MqREgmTM6gNMcdxCNS3iIT_AF8dsGrAYWpoPdT51GOoLLzOzSVUqiEFpf3KGW1A7TdIvC2pOToitaoaJwPo3qLLtEUQw4mDKgPEaVjyjAWB4MiHBwst8FFp2pVUo_JpefVk14NCV7c1fPq64f3Xzaf6uvPH7eby-vatIyR2vaWN5ZYoTqulCCs57bpNVlrrVvLsemAaL2mDFtLtdAW98SsuQCKexBMt-fVu5PvNOsRrClvimqQU3SjikcZlJP_Trzby104yDXlhHFSDF7fGcTwY4aU5eiSgWFQHsKcJGGCcyZaygvanlBTPj5F6B9iGix_b1_eXMn_t19Ur_6-4YPmft0FoCdgCUOGmL4P8wJR7kENeX_rx0RHaoJJySAU16XTkPYX8_zCRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576657346</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Wolters Kluwer Open Health</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liu, Ya ; Jin, Yunfeng ; Lu, Yuemei ; Zhong, Xiaorong ; Lu, Hong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ya ; Jin, Yunfeng ; Lu, Yuemei ; Zhong, Xiaorong ; Lu, Hong</creatorcontrib><description>Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients.
A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis.
This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-7974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027148</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34559103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality ; Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Neoplasm Staging ; Postoperative Complications ; Study Protocol Systematic Review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><ispartof>Medicine (Baltimore), 2021-09, Vol.100 (38), p.e27148-e27148</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3552-dfd61d2d7a96aa725f6d1fb28bbb3d60c9e2bb8450dd4b7bd0f2c867e40fe75b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2715-6518</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462562/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462562/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34559103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuemei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Xiaorong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Hong</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Medicine (Baltimore)</title><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><description>Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients.
A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis.
This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma.</description><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Study Protocol Systematic Review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><issn>0025-7974</issn><issn>1536-5964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctu1DAUhiMEokPhCZCQl2xSHMeXCQukasplpFZsYG35cjJjSOxgOxPN6_FkmE5bLt4c6Zzv_3_bp6peNviiwZ14c3N1gf8cIhq6flStGtbymnWcPq5Wpctq0Ql6Vj1L6RvGTSsIfVqdtZSxrsHtqvq5CeOkokvBo9CjvAcU5mzCCAlpyAuAR4MqREgmTM6gNMcdxCNS3iIT_AF8dsGrAYWpoPdT51GOoLLzOzSVUqiEFpf3KGW1A7TdIvC2pOToitaoaJwPo3qLLtEUQw4mDKgPEaVjyjAWB4MiHBwst8FFp2pVUo_JpefVk14NCV7c1fPq64f3Xzaf6uvPH7eby-vatIyR2vaWN5ZYoTqulCCs57bpNVlrrVvLsemAaL2mDFtLtdAW98SsuQCKexBMt-fVu5PvNOsRrClvimqQU3SjikcZlJP_Trzby104yDXlhHFSDF7fGcTwY4aU5eiSgWFQHsKcJGGCcyZaygvanlBTPj5F6B9iGix_b1_eXMn_t19Ur_6-4YPmft0FoCdgCUOGmL4P8wJR7kENeX_rx0RHaoJJySAU16XTkPYX8_zCRg</recordid><startdate>20210924</startdate><enddate>20210924</enddate><creator>Liu, Ya</creator><creator>Jin, Yunfeng</creator><creator>Lu, Yuemei</creator><creator>Zhong, Xiaorong</creator><creator>Lu, Hong</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-6518</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210924</creationdate><title>Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Liu, Ya ; Jin, Yunfeng ; Lu, Yuemei ; Zhong, Xiaorong ; Lu, Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3552-dfd61d2d7a96aa725f6d1fb28bbb3d60c9e2bb8450dd4b7bd0f2c867e40fe75b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Study Protocol Systematic Review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yunfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Yuemei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Xiaorong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ya</au><au>Jin, Yunfeng</au><au>Lu, Yuemei</au><au>Zhong, Xiaorong</au><au>Lu, Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</jtitle><addtitle>Medicine (Baltimore)</addtitle><date>2021-09-24</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>38</issue><spage>e27148</spage><epage>e27148</epage><pages>e27148-e27148</pages><issn>0025-7974</issn><eissn>1536-5964</eissn><abstract>Endometrial carcinoma is a prevalent form of cancer. In fact, its incidence ranks fourth among European and North American females. Moreover, it is the most common gynecological malignant disease. Laparotomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy, etc were common methods adopted in conventional open surgery. Recent developments in laparoscopic surgery (LPS) has made it more effective. The present study aims to compare the outcomes between LPS and a conventional open surgical procedure to treat stage II endometrial carcinoma patients.
A comprehensive search will be conducted on Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and China National of Knowledge Infrastructure to collect LPS and conventional open surgery in treating stage II endometrial carcinoma. The search will consider all articles published since the inception of the databases till July 2021. A pair of scholars will perform independent screening of the literature and extracted data to evaluate the bias risk in the selected studies. Afterwards, RevMan5.3 software will be used to conduct a meta-analysis.
This study will conduct a meta-analysis to compare the clinical efficacy of LPS and conventional open surgery in the treatment of stage II endometrial carcinoma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>34559103</pmid><doi>10.1097/MD.0000000000027148</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-6518</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-7974 |
| ispartof | Medicine (Baltimore), 2021-09, Vol.100 (38), p.e27148-e27148 |
| issn | 0025-7974 1536-5964 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8462562 |
| source | Wolters Kluwer Open Health; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; IngentaConnect Free/Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Endometrial Neoplasms - mortality Endometrial Neoplasms - pathology Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery Female Humans Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Meta-Analysis as Topic Neoplasm Staging Postoperative Complications Study Protocol Systematic Review Systematic Reviews as Topic |
| title | Comparison of the outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and conventional open surgery in treating patients with stage II endometrial carcinoma: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T19%3A45%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20outcomes%20between%20laparoscopic%20surgery%20and%20conventional%20open%20surgery%20in%20treating%20patients%20with%20stage%20II%20endometrial%20carcinoma:%20A%20protocol%20for%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Medicine%20(Baltimore)&rft.au=Liu,%20Ya&rft.date=2021-09-24&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=38&rft.spage=e27148&rft.epage=e27148&rft.pages=e27148-e27148&rft.issn=0025-7974&rft.eissn=1536-5964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MD.0000000000027148&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2576657346%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576657346&rft_id=info:pmid/34559103&rfr_iscdi=true |