Comparison between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Post Total Knee Replacement Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Good quality analgesia posttotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) contributes majorly to early mobilization and shorter hospital stay. To compare adductor canal block (ACB) versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing TKA. This prospective, single-blind, rand...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anesthesia Essays & Researches 2021-01, Vol.15 (1), p.32-37 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 37 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Anesthesia Essays & Researches |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Narayan, Priti Sahitya, Vijay A Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M Butt, Ahsan J Johnston, Keith A Skowronski, Sharon |
description | Good quality analgesia posttotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) contributes majorly to early mobilization and shorter hospital stay.
To compare adductor canal block (ACB) versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing TKA.
This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary care university hospital.
Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I, II, and III, who received spinal anesthesia for TKA were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients had LIA of the knee joint using a mixture of 50 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 10 mg morphine (1 mL) and 99 mL of normal saline. Group B patients received ACB using 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. All patients received multimodal analgesia comprising of paracetamol, diclofenac, and patient controlled analgesia with morphine in the first 24 h' postoperative period. The primary outcome measures were first 24 h' morphine consumption and pain scores at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. The secondary outcome measures were nausea/vomiting, sedation, and patient satisfaction scores.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's
-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Chi-square test.
The 24 h morphine consumption was 11.97 ± 7.97 and 10.83 ± 6.41 mg in the LIA group and ACB group, respectively (
= 0.54). No significant differences were noted either in the pain scores at rest and flexion or secondary outcome measures between both groups in the first 24 h.
Single-shot ACB is equally effective as LIA as postoperative analgesia for TKA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/aer.aer_58_21 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8462420</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A674116791</galeid><sourcerecordid>A674116791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354s-c9aa23057b7f141fb00d779f2cf58c9335d3de5a38bb9eed4473b1b12971b4a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdR7FJ76a0EvPFm1nzN142wDlqLC0p3ex0yyZlpMJOsyYzS_qT-SjNsXSxICDnJec7LCefNstcErznB7L2EsE5bFLWg5Fm2opQ2eVXWxfNshWnR5ISU9Cy7iNF06U5o2RD-MjtjvCwrxotV9tD68SCDid6hDqbfAA5tvZIWXbne2CnIyaTUxkk7QDQSSafRzfIe_ZzCy9lo0Ghn3GAB7W79hDZaz2ryAbUyVaGP1qsf6LuPE9r7KT18dQDoGg5WKhjBTWg3hwHCHcrRBl0nfT-a-6TZejcFb20K98FI-yp70Usb4eLxPM9uPn_at1_y7bfLq3azzRUreMxVIyVluKi6qiec9B3Guqqanqq-qFXDWKGZhkKyuusaAM15xTrSEdpUpOOyZufZh6PuYe5G0Cq1GKQVh2BGGe6El0Y8zThzKwb_S9S8pJziJPDuUSD4nzPESYwmKrBWOvBzFLSoOSYUY5LQt0d0kBaEcb1PimrBxaaseBpf1SzU-j9UWhpGo7yDNCl4WpAfC1TwMQboT90TLBbniMU1J-ck_s2_Xz7Rf33C_gDpdsLJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584012001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Post Total Knee Replacement Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Narayan, Priti ; Sahitya, Vijay A ; Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M ; Butt, Ahsan J ; Johnston, Keith A ; Skowronski, Sharon</creator><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Priti ; Sahitya, Vijay A ; Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M ; Butt, Ahsan J ; Johnston, Keith A ; Skowronski, Sharon</creatorcontrib><description>Good quality analgesia posttotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) contributes majorly to early mobilization and shorter hospital stay.
To compare adductor canal block (ACB) versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing TKA.
This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary care university hospital.
Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I, II, and III, who received spinal anesthesia for TKA were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients had LIA of the knee joint using a mixture of 50 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 10 mg morphine (1 mL) and 99 mL of normal saline. Group B patients received ACB using 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. All patients received multimodal analgesia comprising of paracetamol, diclofenac, and patient controlled analgesia with morphine in the first 24 h' postoperative period. The primary outcome measures were first 24 h' morphine consumption and pain scores at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. The secondary outcome measures were nausea/vomiting, sedation, and patient satisfaction scores.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's
-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Chi-square test.
The 24 h morphine consumption was 11.97 ± 7.97 and 10.83 ± 6.41 mg in the LIA group and ACB group, respectively (
= 0.54). No significant differences were noted either in the pain scores at rest and flexion or secondary outcome measures between both groups in the first 24 h.
Single-shot ACB is equally effective as LIA as postoperative analgesia for TKA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0259-1162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2229-7685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_58_21</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34667345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Bupivacaine ; Care and treatment ; Medical societies ; Original ; Pain ; Surgery</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia Essays & Researches, 2021-01, Vol.15 (1), p.32-37</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2021 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354s-c9aa23057b7f141fb00d779f2cf58c9335d3de5a38bb9eed4473b1b12971b4a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354s-c9aa23057b7f141fb00d779f2cf58c9335d3de5a38bb9eed4473b1b12971b4a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462420/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8462420/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34667345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahitya, Vijay A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butt, Ahsan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Keith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skowronski, Sharon</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Post Total Knee Replacement Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><title>Anesthesia Essays & Researches</title><addtitle>Anesth Essays Res</addtitle><description>Good quality analgesia posttotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) contributes majorly to early mobilization and shorter hospital stay.
To compare adductor canal block (ACB) versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing TKA.
This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary care university hospital.
Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I, II, and III, who received spinal anesthesia for TKA were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients had LIA of the knee joint using a mixture of 50 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 10 mg morphine (1 mL) and 99 mL of normal saline. Group B patients received ACB using 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. All patients received multimodal analgesia comprising of paracetamol, diclofenac, and patient controlled analgesia with morphine in the first 24 h' postoperative period. The primary outcome measures were first 24 h' morphine consumption and pain scores at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. The secondary outcome measures were nausea/vomiting, sedation, and patient satisfaction scores.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's
-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Chi-square test.
The 24 h morphine consumption was 11.97 ± 7.97 and 10.83 ± 6.41 mg in the LIA group and ACB group, respectively (
= 0.54). No significant differences were noted either in the pain scores at rest and flexion or secondary outcome measures between both groups in the first 24 h.
Single-shot ACB is equally effective as LIA as postoperative analgesia for TKA.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bupivacaine</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Medical societies</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><issn>0259-1162</issn><issn>2229-7685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkl1rFDEUhgdR7FJ76a0EvPFm1nzN142wDlqLC0p3ex0yyZlpMJOsyYzS_qT-SjNsXSxICDnJec7LCefNstcErznB7L2EsE5bFLWg5Fm2opQ2eVXWxfNshWnR5ISU9Cy7iNF06U5o2RD-MjtjvCwrxotV9tD68SCDid6hDqbfAA5tvZIWXbne2CnIyaTUxkk7QDQSSafRzfIe_ZzCy9lo0Ghn3GAB7W79hDZaz2ryAbUyVaGP1qsf6LuPE9r7KT18dQDoGg5WKhjBTWg3hwHCHcrRBl0nfT-a-6TZejcFb20K98FI-yp70Usb4eLxPM9uPn_at1_y7bfLq3azzRUreMxVIyVluKi6qiec9B3Guqqanqq-qFXDWKGZhkKyuusaAM15xTrSEdpUpOOyZufZh6PuYe5G0Cq1GKQVh2BGGe6El0Y8zThzKwb_S9S8pJziJPDuUSD4nzPESYwmKrBWOvBzFLSoOSYUY5LQt0d0kBaEcb1PimrBxaaseBpf1SzU-j9UWhpGo7yDNCl4WpAfC1TwMQboT90TLBbniMU1J-ck_s2_Xz7Rf33C_gDpdsLJ</recordid><startdate>202101</startdate><enddate>202101</enddate><creator>Narayan, Priti</creator><creator>Sahitya, Vijay A</creator><creator>Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M</creator><creator>Butt, Ahsan J</creator><creator>Johnston, Keith A</creator><creator>Skowronski, Sharon</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202101</creationdate><title>Comparison between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Post Total Knee Replacement Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial</title><author>Narayan, Priti ; Sahitya, Vijay A ; Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M ; Butt, Ahsan J ; Johnston, Keith A ; Skowronski, Sharon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354s-c9aa23057b7f141fb00d779f2cf58c9335d3de5a38bb9eed4473b1b12971b4a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bupivacaine</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Medical societies</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Narayan, Priti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahitya, Vijay A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butt, Ahsan J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, Keith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skowronski, Sharon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia Essays & Researches</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Narayan, Priti</au><au>Sahitya, Vijay A</au><au>Chandrashekaraiah, Mahesh M</au><au>Butt, Ahsan J</au><au>Johnston, Keith A</au><au>Skowronski, Sharon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Post Total Knee Replacement Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia Essays & Researches</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Essays Res</addtitle><date>2021-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>32-37</pages><issn>0259-1162</issn><eissn>2229-7685</eissn><abstract>Good quality analgesia posttotal knee arthroplasty (TKA) contributes majorly to early mobilization and shorter hospital stay.
To compare adductor canal block (ACB) versus local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing TKA.
This prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial was undertaken at a tertiary care university hospital.
Sixty patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Classes I, II, and III, who received spinal anesthesia for TKA were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A patients had LIA of the knee joint using a mixture of 50 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, 10 mg morphine (1 mL) and 99 mL of normal saline. Group B patients received ACB using 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance. All patients received multimodal analgesia comprising of paracetamol, diclofenac, and patient controlled analgesia with morphine in the first 24 h' postoperative period. The primary outcome measures were first 24 h' morphine consumption and pain scores at 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h. The secondary outcome measures were nausea/vomiting, sedation, and patient satisfaction scores.
Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's
-test, Mann-Whitney test, and Chi-square test.
The 24 h morphine consumption was 11.97 ± 7.97 and 10.83 ± 6.41 mg in the LIA group and ACB group, respectively (
= 0.54). No significant differences were noted either in the pain scores at rest and flexion or secondary outcome measures between both groups in the first 24 h.
Single-shot ACB is equally effective as LIA as postoperative analgesia for TKA.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>34667345</pmid><doi>10.4103/aer.aer_58_21</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0259-1162 |
ispartof | Anesthesia Essays & Researches, 2021-01, Vol.15 (1), p.32-37 |
issn | 0259-1162 2229-7685 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8462420 |
source | Medknow Open Access Medical Journals(OpenAccess); PubMed Central (PMC); PubMed Central Open Access; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Analysis Bupivacaine Care and treatment Medical societies Original Pain Surgery |
title | Comparison between Local Infiltration Analgesia and Ultrasound Guided Single Shot Adductor Canal Block Post Total Knee Replacement Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T14%3A52%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Local%20Infiltration%20Analgesia%20and%20Ultrasound%20Guided%20Single%20Shot%20Adductor%20Canal%20Block%20Post%20Total%20Knee%20Replacement%20Surgery%20-%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20Essays%20&%20Researches&rft.au=Narayan,%20Priti&rft.date=2021-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=32-37&rft.issn=0259-1162&rft.eissn=2229-7685&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/aer.aer_58_21&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA674116791%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584012001&rft_id=info:pmid/34667345&rft_galeid=A674116791&rfr_iscdi=true |