Limited usefulness of routine head and neck CT angiogram in the imaging assessment of dizziness in the emergency department

Objective To assess the usefulness of head and neck computed tomography angiogram for the investigation of isolated dizziness in the emergency department in detecting significant acute findings leading to a change in management in comparison to non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head. Meth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The neuroradiology journal 2021-08, Vol.34 (4), p.335-340
Hauptverfasser: Guarnizo, Angela, Farah, Kevin, Lelli, Daniel A, Tse, Darren, Zakhari, Nader
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 340
container_issue 4
container_start_page 335
container_title The neuroradiology journal
container_volume 34
creator Guarnizo, Angela
Farah, Kevin
Lelli, Daniel A
Tse, Darren
Zakhari, Nader
description Objective To assess the usefulness of head and neck computed tomography angiogram for the investigation of isolated dizziness in the emergency department in detecting significant acute findings leading to a change in management in comparison to non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head. Methods Patients presenting with isolated dizziness in the emergency department investigated with non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram over the span of 36 months were included. Findings on non-contrast computed tomography were classified as related to the emergency department presentation versus unrelated/no significant abnormality. Similarly, computed tomography angiogram scans were classified as positive or negative posterior circulation findings. Results One hundred and fifty-three patients were imaged as a result of emergency department presentation with isolated dizziness. Fourteen cases were diagnosed clinically as of central aetiology. Non-contrast computed tomography was positive in three patients, all with central causes with sensitivity 21.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 92.6% and accuracy 92.8%. Computed tomography angiogram was positive for angiographic posterior circulation abnormalities in five cases, and only two of them had a central cause of dizziness, with sensitivity 14.3%, specificity 97.7%, positive predictive value 40%, negative predictive value 91.46% and accuracy 92.1%. Conclusion Both non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram of the head and neck have low diagnostic yield for the detection of central causes of dizziness, However, non-contrast computed tomography has higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than computed tomography angiogram, implying a lack of diagnostic advantage from the routine use of computed tomography angiogram in the emergency department for the investigation of isolated dizziness. Further studies are required to determine the role of computed tomography angiogram in the work-up of isolated dizziness in the emergency department.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1971400920988665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8447815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1971400920988665</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1971400920988665</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-be55203ff3d20572fc8678ae3de93907eb150f93f9adb2e42524d86488ac0f913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9LxDAQxYMouqzePUm-QDVpkja5CLL4Dxa86Llkm0k36zZdklZQv7ypu4oK5pIw7_3ehBmETik5p7QsL6gqKSdE5URJWRRiD01yJkVGlSr20WSUs1E_Qicxrkg6TCrB5SE6YozLkkg1Qe9z17oeDB4i2GHtIUbcWRy6oXce8BK0wdob7KF-xrPH9G5c1wTdYudxvwTsWt0432AdY2Jb8P3IG_f25j7DdjZoITTg61dsYKNDPxqP0YHV6wgnu3uKnm6uH2d32fzh9n52Nc9qznifLUCInDBrmcmJKHNby6KUGpgBxRQpYUEFsYpZpc0iB56LnBtZcCl1neqUTdHlNnczLFowdWod9LrahPT38Fp12lW_Fe-WVdO9VJLzUlKRAsg2oA5djAHsN0tJNe6i-ruLhJz97PkNfE0-GbKtIeoGqlU3BJ9m8H_gB62MlGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Limited usefulness of routine head and neck CT angiogram in the imaging assessment of dizziness in the emergency department</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Guarnizo, Angela ; Farah, Kevin ; Lelli, Daniel A ; Tse, Darren ; Zakhari, Nader</creator><creatorcontrib>Guarnizo, Angela ; Farah, Kevin ; Lelli, Daniel A ; Tse, Darren ; Zakhari, Nader</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To assess the usefulness of head and neck computed tomography angiogram for the investigation of isolated dizziness in the emergency department in detecting significant acute findings leading to a change in management in comparison to non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head. Methods Patients presenting with isolated dizziness in the emergency department investigated with non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram over the span of 36 months were included. Findings on non-contrast computed tomography were classified as related to the emergency department presentation versus unrelated/no significant abnormality. Similarly, computed tomography angiogram scans were classified as positive or negative posterior circulation findings. Results One hundred and fifty-three patients were imaged as a result of emergency department presentation with isolated dizziness. Fourteen cases were diagnosed clinically as of central aetiology. Non-contrast computed tomography was positive in three patients, all with central causes with sensitivity 21.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 92.6% and accuracy 92.8%. Computed tomography angiogram was positive for angiographic posterior circulation abnormalities in five cases, and only two of them had a central cause of dizziness, with sensitivity 14.3%, specificity 97.7%, positive predictive value 40%, negative predictive value 91.46% and accuracy 92.1%. Conclusion Both non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram of the head and neck have low diagnostic yield for the detection of central causes of dizziness, However, non-contrast computed tomography has higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than computed tomography angiogram, implying a lack of diagnostic advantage from the routine use of computed tomography angiogram in the emergency department for the investigation of isolated dizziness. Further studies are required to determine the role of computed tomography angiogram in the work-up of isolated dizziness in the emergency department.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1971-4009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2385-1996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1971400920988665</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33487089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>The neuroradiology journal, 2021-08, Vol.34 (4), p.335-340</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021 2021 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-be55203ff3d20572fc8678ae3de93907eb150f93f9adb2e42524d86488ac0f913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-be55203ff3d20572fc8678ae3de93907eb150f93f9adb2e42524d86488ac0f913</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1343-541X ; 0000-0002-9990-2420</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1971400920988665$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8447815/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33487089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guarnizo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farah, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelli, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakhari, Nader</creatorcontrib><title>Limited usefulness of routine head and neck CT angiogram in the imaging assessment of dizziness in the emergency department</title><title>The neuroradiology journal</title><addtitle>Neuroradiol J</addtitle><description>Objective To assess the usefulness of head and neck computed tomography angiogram for the investigation of isolated dizziness in the emergency department in detecting significant acute findings leading to a change in management in comparison to non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head. Methods Patients presenting with isolated dizziness in the emergency department investigated with non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram over the span of 36 months were included. Findings on non-contrast computed tomography were classified as related to the emergency department presentation versus unrelated/no significant abnormality. Similarly, computed tomography angiogram scans were classified as positive or negative posterior circulation findings. Results One hundred and fifty-three patients were imaged as a result of emergency department presentation with isolated dizziness. Fourteen cases were diagnosed clinically as of central aetiology. Non-contrast computed tomography was positive in three patients, all with central causes with sensitivity 21.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 92.6% and accuracy 92.8%. Computed tomography angiogram was positive for angiographic posterior circulation abnormalities in five cases, and only two of them had a central cause of dizziness, with sensitivity 14.3%, specificity 97.7%, positive predictive value 40%, negative predictive value 91.46% and accuracy 92.1%. Conclusion Both non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram of the head and neck have low diagnostic yield for the detection of central causes of dizziness, However, non-contrast computed tomography has higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than computed tomography angiogram, implying a lack of diagnostic advantage from the routine use of computed tomography angiogram in the emergency department for the investigation of isolated dizziness. Further studies are required to determine the role of computed tomography angiogram in the work-up of isolated dizziness in the emergency department.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>1971-4009</issn><issn>2385-1996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9LxDAQxYMouqzePUm-QDVpkja5CLL4Dxa86Llkm0k36zZdklZQv7ypu4oK5pIw7_3ehBmETik5p7QsL6gqKSdE5URJWRRiD01yJkVGlSr20WSUs1E_Qicxrkg6TCrB5SE6YozLkkg1Qe9z17oeDB4i2GHtIUbcWRy6oXce8BK0wdob7KF-xrPH9G5c1wTdYudxvwTsWt0432AdY2Jb8P3IG_f25j7DdjZoITTg61dsYKNDPxqP0YHV6wgnu3uKnm6uH2d32fzh9n52Nc9qznifLUCInDBrmcmJKHNby6KUGpgBxRQpYUEFsYpZpc0iB56LnBtZcCl1neqUTdHlNnczLFowdWod9LrahPT38Fp12lW_Fe-WVdO9VJLzUlKRAsg2oA5djAHsN0tJNe6i-ruLhJz97PkNfE0-GbKtIeoGqlU3BJ9m8H_gB62MlGQ</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Guarnizo, Angela</creator><creator>Farah, Kevin</creator><creator>Lelli, Daniel A</creator><creator>Tse, Darren</creator><creator>Zakhari, Nader</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-541X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9990-2420</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Limited usefulness of routine head and neck CT angiogram in the imaging assessment of dizziness in the emergency department</title><author>Guarnizo, Angela ; Farah, Kevin ; Lelli, Daniel A ; Tse, Darren ; Zakhari, Nader</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-be55203ff3d20572fc8678ae3de93907eb150f93f9adb2e42524d86488ac0f913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guarnizo, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farah, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelli, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Darren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakhari, Nader</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>The neuroradiology journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guarnizo, Angela</au><au>Farah, Kevin</au><au>Lelli, Daniel A</au><au>Tse, Darren</au><au>Zakhari, Nader</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Limited usefulness of routine head and neck CT angiogram in the imaging assessment of dizziness in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>The neuroradiology journal</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroradiol J</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>335</spage><epage>340</epage><pages>335-340</pages><issn>1971-4009</issn><eissn>2385-1996</eissn><abstract>Objective To assess the usefulness of head and neck computed tomography angiogram for the investigation of isolated dizziness in the emergency department in detecting significant acute findings leading to a change in management in comparison to non-contrast computed tomography scan of the head. Methods Patients presenting with isolated dizziness in the emergency department investigated with non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram over the span of 36 months were included. Findings on non-contrast computed tomography were classified as related to the emergency department presentation versus unrelated/no significant abnormality. Similarly, computed tomography angiogram scans were classified as positive or negative posterior circulation findings. Results One hundred and fifty-three patients were imaged as a result of emergency department presentation with isolated dizziness. Fourteen cases were diagnosed clinically as of central aetiology. Non-contrast computed tomography was positive in three patients, all with central causes with sensitivity 21.4%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 92.6% and accuracy 92.8%. Computed tomography angiogram was positive for angiographic posterior circulation abnormalities in five cases, and only two of them had a central cause of dizziness, with sensitivity 14.3%, specificity 97.7%, positive predictive value 40%, negative predictive value 91.46% and accuracy 92.1%. Conclusion Both non-contrast computed tomography and computed tomography angiogram of the head and neck have low diagnostic yield for the detection of central causes of dizziness, However, non-contrast computed tomography has higher sensitivity and positive predictive value than computed tomography angiogram, implying a lack of diagnostic advantage from the routine use of computed tomography angiogram in the emergency department for the investigation of isolated dizziness. Further studies are required to determine the role of computed tomography angiogram in the work-up of isolated dizziness in the emergency department.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33487089</pmid><doi>10.1177/1971400920988665</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1343-541X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9990-2420</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1971-4009
ispartof The neuroradiology journal, 2021-08, Vol.34 (4), p.335-340
issn 1971-4009
2385-1996
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8447815
source SAGE Complete A-Z List; PubMed Central
subjects Original
title Limited usefulness of routine head and neck CT angiogram in the imaging assessment of dizziness in the emergency department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Limited%20usefulness%20of%20routine%20head%20and%20neck%20CT%20angiogram%20in%20the%20imaging%20assessment%20of%20dizziness%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=The%20neuroradiology%20journal&rft.au=Guarnizo,%20Angela&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=335&rft.epage=340&rft.pages=335-340&rft.issn=1971-4009&rft.eissn=2385-1996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1971400920988665&rft_dat=%3Csage_pubme%3E10.1177_1971400920988665%3C/sage_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33487089&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1971400920988665&rfr_iscdi=true