Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey

Motivation Detailed empirical work on the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on food security is scant. Local management of food security has received little attention. Purpose This article describes emergency food policies in Wuhan and Nanjing, China during lockdown in 2020 and their implications for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Development policy review 2022-05, Vol.40 (3), p.1-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Zhong, Taiyang, Crush, Jonathan, Si, Zhenzhong, Scott, Steffanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1
container_title Development policy review
container_volume 40
creator Zhong, Taiyang
Crush, Jonathan
Si, Zhenzhong
Scott, Steffanie
description Motivation Detailed empirical work on the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on food security is scant. Local management of food security has received little attention. Purpose This article describes emergency food policies in Wuhan and Nanjing, China during lockdown in 2020 and their implications for household food security in the two cities. Methods and approach Policy documents and background data describe the emergency measures. Online surveys of residents of two Chinese cities were used to gauge household food security. Findings Despite the determined efforts of provincial and city governments to ensure that food reached people who were locked down in Wuhan, or subject to restrictions on movement in Nanjing, households experienced some decline in food security. Most households found they could not access their preferred foods. But a minority of households did not get enough to eat. Government had contingency plans for the pandemic that ensured that most people had sufficient, if not preferred, food. But not all households were fully covered. Policy implications A more resilient system of food distribution is needed, including a relatively closed and independent home delivery system. Grassroots organizations such as residential community committees, property management organizations, and spontaneous volunteer groups need to be brought into the management of emergency food provision.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dpr.12575
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8444884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575376555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5615-55b3dfb5f0f9f210f347cd6aedceb7fe021c356c6fc0dcb8212d1dc431f16b2b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi1ERYfCghdAltgUqWntxHYSFpXQdCiVKooQl6Xl-DLjUWIHezIoOyRegGfkSfA0Q7lIeGPpnO_8_zn6AXiC0SlO70z14RTntKT3wAwTVmYlK-v7YIZqijJWMnIIHsa4RgiRgrAH4LAglFSpPgPfFp0OS-3kCI33Csah71urIxRO7StaDsFuRmgd_DSshLttvRFubd3yBM5X1okTqBLjlnCz0nB-8_Hq4sfX77iGfUJ1Z-ULuNhalVw0NMF3UEBjdbtzC1s9PgIHRrRRP97_R-DDq8X7-evs-ubyav7yOpOUYZpR2hTKNNQgU5scI1OQUiomtJK6KY1GOZYFZZIZiZRsqhznCitJCmwwa_KmOALnk24_NN1uym2CaHkfbCfCyL2w_O-Osyu-9FteEUKqiiSB471A8J8HHTe8s1HqthVO-yHyXQRFySilCX32D7r2Q3DpPJ4zUtU5qYo8Uc8nSgYfY9DmbhmM-C5anqLlt9Em9umf29-Rv7JMAJwALb2z8bdUhVCar1mdkLMJ-WJbPf7fjF-8fTe5_gQO97po</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2648924832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Zhong, Taiyang ; Crush, Jonathan ; Si, Zhenzhong ; Scott, Steffanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Taiyang ; Crush, Jonathan ; Si, Zhenzhong ; Scott, Steffanie</creatorcontrib><description>Motivation Detailed empirical work on the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on food security is scant. Local management of food security has received little attention. Purpose This article describes emergency food policies in Wuhan and Nanjing, China during lockdown in 2020 and their implications for household food security in the two cities. Methods and approach Policy documents and background data describe the emergency measures. Online surveys of residents of two Chinese cities were used to gauge household food security. Findings Despite the determined efforts of provincial and city governments to ensure that food reached people who were locked down in Wuhan, or subject to restrictions on movement in Nanjing, households experienced some decline in food security. Most households found they could not access their preferred foods. But a minority of households did not get enough to eat. Government had contingency plans for the pandemic that ensured that most people had sufficient, if not preferred, food. But not all households were fully covered. Policy implications A more resilient system of food distribution is needed, including a relatively closed and independent home delivery system. Grassroots organizations such as residential community committees, property management organizations, and spontaneous volunteer groups need to be brought into the management of emergency food provision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-6764</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-7679</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12575</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34548764</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ausgangssperre ; Cities ; Committees ; Community property ; COVID-19 ; Epidemie/Pandemie ; Ernährungssicherung ; Feldforschung ; food access ; food insecurity ; Food security ; Grass roots movement ; Households ; Internet ; Local government ; Local management ; Management ; Motivation ; Nahrungsmittelversorgung ; Pandemics ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Residents ; Seuchenbekämpfung ; Social services delivery ; Volksrepublik China</subject><ispartof>Development policy review, 2022-05, Vol.40 (3), p.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>The Authors 2021. Development Policy Review © 2021 Overseas Development Institute</rights><rights>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Overseas Development Institute</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5615-55b3dfb5f0f9f210f347cd6aedceb7fe021c356c6fc0dcb8212d1dc431f16b2b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5615-55b3dfb5f0f9f210f347cd6aedceb7fe021c356c6fc0dcb8212d1dc431f16b2b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1060-9376 ; 0000-0002-4754-246X ; 0000-0003-4780-7445</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdpr.12575$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdpr.12575$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27866,27924,27925,33774,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34548764$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Taiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crush, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Zhenzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Steffanie</creatorcontrib><title>Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey</title><title>Development policy review</title><addtitle>Dev Policy Rev</addtitle><description>Motivation Detailed empirical work on the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on food security is scant. Local management of food security has received little attention. Purpose This article describes emergency food policies in Wuhan and Nanjing, China during lockdown in 2020 and their implications for household food security in the two cities. Methods and approach Policy documents and background data describe the emergency measures. Online surveys of residents of two Chinese cities were used to gauge household food security. Findings Despite the determined efforts of provincial and city governments to ensure that food reached people who were locked down in Wuhan, or subject to restrictions on movement in Nanjing, households experienced some decline in food security. Most households found they could not access their preferred foods. But a minority of households did not get enough to eat. Government had contingency plans for the pandemic that ensured that most people had sufficient, if not preferred, food. But not all households were fully covered. Policy implications A more resilient system of food distribution is needed, including a relatively closed and independent home delivery system. Grassroots organizations such as residential community committees, property management organizations, and spontaneous volunteer groups need to be brought into the management of emergency food provision.</description><subject>Ausgangssperre</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Committees</subject><subject>Community property</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Epidemie/Pandemie</subject><subject>Ernährungssicherung</subject><subject>Feldforschung</subject><subject>food access</subject><subject>food insecurity</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Grass roots movement</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Local management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Nahrungsmittelversorgung</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Residents</subject><subject>Seuchenbekämpfung</subject><subject>Social services delivery</subject><subject>Volksrepublik China</subject><issn>0950-6764</issn><issn>1467-7679</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi1ERYfCghdAltgUqWntxHYSFpXQdCiVKooQl6Xl-DLjUWIHezIoOyRegGfkSfA0Q7lIeGPpnO_8_zn6AXiC0SlO70z14RTntKT3wAwTVmYlK-v7YIZqijJWMnIIHsa4RgiRgrAH4LAglFSpPgPfFp0OS-3kCI33Csah71urIxRO7StaDsFuRmgd_DSshLttvRFubd3yBM5X1okTqBLjlnCz0nB-8_Hq4sfX77iGfUJ1Z-ULuNhalVw0NMF3UEBjdbtzC1s9PgIHRrRRP97_R-DDq8X7-evs-ubyav7yOpOUYZpR2hTKNNQgU5scI1OQUiomtJK6KY1GOZYFZZIZiZRsqhznCitJCmwwa_KmOALnk24_NN1uym2CaHkfbCfCyL2w_O-Osyu-9FteEUKqiiSB471A8J8HHTe8s1HqthVO-yHyXQRFySilCX32D7r2Q3DpPJ4zUtU5qYo8Uc8nSgYfY9DmbhmM-C5anqLlt9Em9umf29-Rv7JMAJwALb2z8bdUhVCar1mdkLMJ-WJbPf7fjF-8fTe5_gQO97po</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Zhong, Taiyang</creator><creator>Crush, Jonathan</creator><creator>Si, Zhenzhong</creator><creator>Scott, Steffanie</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-9376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4754-246X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-7445</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey</title><author>Zhong, Taiyang ; Crush, Jonathan ; Si, Zhenzhong ; Scott, Steffanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5615-55b3dfb5f0f9f210f347cd6aedceb7fe021c356c6fc0dcb8212d1dc431f16b2b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ausgangssperre</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Committees</topic><topic>Community property</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Epidemie/Pandemie</topic><topic>Ernährungssicherung</topic><topic>Feldforschung</topic><topic>food access</topic><topic>food insecurity</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Grass roots movement</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Local management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Nahrungsmittelversorgung</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Residents</topic><topic>Seuchenbekämpfung</topic><topic>Social services delivery</topic><topic>Volksrepublik China</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Taiyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crush, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Zhenzhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Steffanie</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Development policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhong, Taiyang</au><au>Crush, Jonathan</au><au>Si, Zhenzhong</au><au>Scott, Steffanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey</atitle><jtitle>Development policy review</jtitle><addtitle>Dev Policy Rev</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>1-n/a</pages><issn>0950-6764</issn><eissn>1467-7679</eissn><abstract>Motivation Detailed empirical work on the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on food security is scant. Local management of food security has received little attention. Purpose This article describes emergency food policies in Wuhan and Nanjing, China during lockdown in 2020 and their implications for household food security in the two cities. Methods and approach Policy documents and background data describe the emergency measures. Online surveys of residents of two Chinese cities were used to gauge household food security. Findings Despite the determined efforts of provincial and city governments to ensure that food reached people who were locked down in Wuhan, or subject to restrictions on movement in Nanjing, households experienced some decline in food security. Most households found they could not access their preferred foods. But a minority of households did not get enough to eat. Government had contingency plans for the pandemic that ensured that most people had sufficient, if not preferred, food. But not all households were fully covered. Policy implications A more resilient system of food distribution is needed, including a relatively closed and independent home delivery system. Grassroots organizations such as residential community committees, property management organizations, and spontaneous volunteer groups need to be brought into the management of emergency food provision.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34548764</pmid><doi>10.1111/dpr.12575</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1060-9376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4754-246X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-7445</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-6764
ispartof Development policy review, 2022-05, Vol.40 (3), p.1-n/a
issn 0950-6764
1467-7679
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8444884
source PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Access via Wiley Online Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete
subjects Ausgangssperre
Cities
Committees
Community property
COVID-19
Epidemie/Pandemie
Ernährungssicherung
Feldforschung
food access
food insecurity
Food security
Grass roots movement
Households
Internet
Local government
Local management
Management
Motivation
Nahrungsmittelversorgung
Pandemics
Polls & surveys
Residents
Seuchenbekämpfung
Social services delivery
Volksrepublik China
title Emergency food supplies and food security in Wuhan and Nanjing, China, during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from a field survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A01%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emergency%20food%20supplies%20and%20food%20security%20in%20Wuhan%20and%20Nanjing,%20China,%20during%20the%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20pandemic:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20field%20survey&rft.jtitle=Development%20policy%20review&rft.au=Zhong,%20Taiyang&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=1-n/a&rft.issn=0950-6764&rft.eissn=1467-7679&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dpr.12575&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2575376555%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2648924832&rft_id=info:pmid/34548764&rfr_iscdi=true