The Psychosocial Impact of COVID‐19 on Registered Nurses

Research Objective Central the COVID‐19 pandemic response are registered nurses (nurses), making life and death decisions amidst personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages and scarcity in other resources (e.g., ventilators, medications, staff). Emerging international evidence suggests nurses are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health services research 2021-09, Vol.56 (S2), p.47-48
Hauptverfasser: Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski, Ghazal, Lauren, Goldsamt, Lloyd, Zhanay, Jessie, Dickson, Victoria Vaughan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue S2
container_start_page 47
container_title Health services research
container_volume 56
creator Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski
Ghazal, Lauren
Goldsamt, Lloyd
Zhanay, Jessie
Dickson, Victoria Vaughan
description Research Objective Central the COVID‐19 pandemic response are registered nurses (nurses), making life and death decisions amidst personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages and scarcity in other resources (e.g., ventilators, medications, staff). Emerging international evidence suggests nurses are at higher risk for detrimental psychosocial outcomes related to the pandemic, such as anxiety, depression, and sleep problems, compared to other clinician groups. The objective of this research is to describe the psychosocial impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on nurses currently practicing in the U.S. Study Design We conducted a concurrent mixed methods study from May‐August 2020. Participants were recruited through email listservs from regional professional nursing organizations, NIOSH‐funded Education and Research Centers nationwide, and through social media. Through REDCap, participants completed researcher‐developed sociodemographic and work characteristic questions (e.g., unit type, staffing levels, availability of PPE), and several validated instruments to measure depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ‐9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder; GAD‐7), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI), and resilience (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale; CD‐RISC‐10). A subset of participants was purposefully selected for semi‐structured individual phone interviews to achieve maximum variation. Following data collection, we randomly drew 10 participants to receive a $50 Amazon giftcard. Population Studied We recruited a sample of nurses from 36 states and the District of Columbia. The analytic sample included N=629 for the survey and N=34 for the interviews. We report only survey findings herein. Principal Findings Participants were on average 43 years old (SD 13), 92% female, and 80% White; 92% were non‐Hispanic. Three‐quarters (76%) worked in inpatient hospital settings; 20% worked in intensive care or step‐down units. Approximately 70% of the sample worked day shifts and 59% worked 12‐hour shifts. Out of a list of 13 common PPE items, 91% of the sample reported at least one PPE shortage since the pandemic began, and 24% reported bringing or making their own PPE for use at work. Over one in four (28%) nurses reported being unsure or planned to leave their employer in the next year. About 18% of the sample scored ≥ 15 on the ISI, suggesting insomnia symptoms significant enough to warrant evaluation and treatment. A third of participants (34%) had scores r
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-6773.13800
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8441264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572398682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2570-f3023537902439b10dff262be03b85cc13b5e38f28c09d011d89ae2af7e402853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbPXgOe087-SbLxIEittlCs1Op12Ww2bUqarbuJ0puP4DP6JKamFDw5l4GZ7_tm-CF0iaGHm-pjFgV-GEW0hykHOEKdw-QYdQBw5MeYsFN05twKADjlrIOu50vtPbmtWhpnVC4Lb7zeSFV5JvMG09fx3ffnF449U3ozvchdpa1OvcfaOu3O0UkmC6cv9r2LXu6H88HIn0wfxoPbia9IEIGfUSA0oFEMhNE4wZBmGQlJooEmPFAK0yTQlGeEK4hTwDjlsdREZpFmQHhAu-imzd3UyVqnSpeVlYXY2Hwt7VYYmYu_mzJfioV5F5wxTELWBFztA6x5q7WrxMrUtmx-Fs2HhMY85KRR9VuVssY5q7PDBQxiR1jseIodT_FLuHGEreMjL_T2P7kYDZ9nrfEHkiB8yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572398682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Psychosocial Impact of COVID‐19 on Registered Nurses</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski ; Ghazal, Lauren ; Goldsamt, Lloyd ; Zhanay, Jessie ; Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</creator><creatorcontrib>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski ; Ghazal, Lauren ; Goldsamt, Lloyd ; Zhanay, Jessie ; Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</creatorcontrib><description>Research Objective Central the COVID‐19 pandemic response are registered nurses (nurses), making life and death decisions amidst personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages and scarcity in other resources (e.g., ventilators, medications, staff). Emerging international evidence suggests nurses are at higher risk for detrimental psychosocial outcomes related to the pandemic, such as anxiety, depression, and sleep problems, compared to other clinician groups. The objective of this research is to describe the psychosocial impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on nurses currently practicing in the U.S. Study Design We conducted a concurrent mixed methods study from May‐August 2020. Participants were recruited through email listservs from regional professional nursing organizations, NIOSH‐funded Education and Research Centers nationwide, and through social media. Through REDCap, participants completed researcher‐developed sociodemographic and work characteristic questions (e.g., unit type, staffing levels, availability of PPE), and several validated instruments to measure depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ‐9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder; GAD‐7), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI), and resilience (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale; CD‐RISC‐10). A subset of participants was purposefully selected for semi‐structured individual phone interviews to achieve maximum variation. Following data collection, we randomly drew 10 participants to receive a $50 Amazon giftcard. Population Studied We recruited a sample of nurses from 36 states and the District of Columbia. The analytic sample included N=629 for the survey and N=34 for the interviews. We report only survey findings herein. Principal Findings Participants were on average 43 years old (SD 13), 92% female, and 80% White; 92% were non‐Hispanic. Three‐quarters (76%) worked in inpatient hospital settings; 20% worked in intensive care or step‐down units. Approximately 70% of the sample worked day shifts and 59% worked 12‐hour shifts. Out of a list of 13 common PPE items, 91% of the sample reported at least one PPE shortage since the pandemic began, and 24% reported bringing or making their own PPE for use at work. Over one in four (28%) nurses reported being unsure or planned to leave their employer in the next year. About 18% of the sample scored ≥ 15 on the ISI, suggesting insomnia symptoms significant enough to warrant evaluation and treatment. A third of participants (34%) had scores reflecting mild anxiety, a quarter (24%) had scores reflecting moderate anxiety, and 9% scored in the range reflecting severe anxiety on the GAD‐7. Reports on the PHQ‐9 showed 9% of the sample with scores consistent with major depressive disorder while another 7% scored in the range consistent with other depressive disorder. Finally, the average CD‐RISC score was 29, with lower scores indicating lower resilience (range 0‐40). Conclusions As with other countries, U.S. nurses are facing highly stressful working conditions, with warning signals indicated in the psychosocial domains of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Overall, resilience levels are worse than pre‐pandemic levels from previously published literature. Implications for Policy or Practice As healthcare organizations adapt and respond to the pandemic, priority should be given to assessing and treating the psychosocial harm to nurses. Evidence‐based treatments and development of novel interventions to support this vital healthcare sector are warranted. Primary Funding Source intramural university funds</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety disorders ; COVID-19 ; Data collection ; Depressive personality disorders ; Email ; Generalized anxiety disorder ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Inpatient care ; Insomnia ; Intensive care ; Interviews ; Mailing lists ; Medical education ; Mental depression ; Nurses ; Organizations ; Pandemics ; Personal protective equipment ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Population studies ; Protective equipment ; Psychosocial factors ; Research facilities ; Resilience ; Scarcity ; Shortages ; Sleep disorders ; Social media ; Sociodemographics ; Special Issue Abstract ; Ventilators ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2021-09, Vol.56 (S2), p.47-48</ispartof><rights>2021 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2570-f3023537902439b10dff262be03b85cc13b5e38f28c09d011d89ae2af7e402853</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441264/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8441264/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazal, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsamt, Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhanay, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</creatorcontrib><title>The Psychosocial Impact of COVID‐19 on Registered Nurses</title><title>Health services research</title><description>Research Objective Central the COVID‐19 pandemic response are registered nurses (nurses), making life and death decisions amidst personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages and scarcity in other resources (e.g., ventilators, medications, staff). Emerging international evidence suggests nurses are at higher risk for detrimental psychosocial outcomes related to the pandemic, such as anxiety, depression, and sleep problems, compared to other clinician groups. The objective of this research is to describe the psychosocial impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on nurses currently practicing in the U.S. Study Design We conducted a concurrent mixed methods study from May‐August 2020. Participants were recruited through email listservs from regional professional nursing organizations, NIOSH‐funded Education and Research Centers nationwide, and through social media. Through REDCap, participants completed researcher‐developed sociodemographic and work characteristic questions (e.g., unit type, staffing levels, availability of PPE), and several validated instruments to measure depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ‐9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder; GAD‐7), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI), and resilience (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale; CD‐RISC‐10). A subset of participants was purposefully selected for semi‐structured individual phone interviews to achieve maximum variation. Following data collection, we randomly drew 10 participants to receive a $50 Amazon giftcard. Population Studied We recruited a sample of nurses from 36 states and the District of Columbia. The analytic sample included N=629 for the survey and N=34 for the interviews. We report only survey findings herein. Principal Findings Participants were on average 43 years old (SD 13), 92% female, and 80% White; 92% were non‐Hispanic. Three‐quarters (76%) worked in inpatient hospital settings; 20% worked in intensive care or step‐down units. Approximately 70% of the sample worked day shifts and 59% worked 12‐hour shifts. Out of a list of 13 common PPE items, 91% of the sample reported at least one PPE shortage since the pandemic began, and 24% reported bringing or making their own PPE for use at work. Over one in four (28%) nurses reported being unsure or planned to leave their employer in the next year. About 18% of the sample scored ≥ 15 on the ISI, suggesting insomnia symptoms significant enough to warrant evaluation and treatment. A third of participants (34%) had scores reflecting mild anxiety, a quarter (24%) had scores reflecting moderate anxiety, and 9% scored in the range reflecting severe anxiety on the GAD‐7. Reports on the PHQ‐9 showed 9% of the sample with scores consistent with major depressive disorder while another 7% scored in the range consistent with other depressive disorder. Finally, the average CD‐RISC score was 29, with lower scores indicating lower resilience (range 0‐40). Conclusions As with other countries, U.S. nurses are facing highly stressful working conditions, with warning signals indicated in the psychosocial domains of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Overall, resilience levels are worse than pre‐pandemic levels from previously published literature. Implications for Policy or Practice As healthcare organizations adapt and respond to the pandemic, priority should be given to assessing and treating the psychosocial harm to nurses. Evidence‐based treatments and development of novel interventions to support this vital healthcare sector are warranted. Primary Funding Source intramural university funds</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Depressive personality disorders</subject><subject>Email</subject><subject>Generalized anxiety disorder</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Insomnia</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Mailing lists</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Organizations</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Protective equipment</subject><subject>Psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Research facilities</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Shortages</subject><subject>Sleep disorders</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Special Issue Abstract</subject><subject>Ventilators</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9Kw0AQxhdRsFbPXgOe087-SbLxIEittlCs1Op12Ww2bUqarbuJ0puP4DP6JKamFDw5l4GZ7_tm-CF0iaGHm-pjFgV-GEW0hykHOEKdw-QYdQBw5MeYsFN05twKADjlrIOu50vtPbmtWhpnVC4Lb7zeSFV5JvMG09fx3ffnF449U3ozvchdpa1OvcfaOu3O0UkmC6cv9r2LXu6H88HIn0wfxoPbia9IEIGfUSA0oFEMhNE4wZBmGQlJooEmPFAK0yTQlGeEK4hTwDjlsdREZpFmQHhAu-imzd3UyVqnSpeVlYXY2Hwt7VYYmYu_mzJfioV5F5wxTELWBFztA6x5q7WrxMrUtmx-Fs2HhMY85KRR9VuVssY5q7PDBQxiR1jseIodT_FLuHGEreMjL_T2P7kYDZ9nrfEHkiB8yQ</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski</creator><creator>Ghazal, Lauren</creator><creator>Goldsamt, Lloyd</creator><creator>Zhanay, Jessie</creator><creator>Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>The Psychosocial Impact of COVID‐19 on Registered Nurses</title><author>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski ; Ghazal, Lauren ; Goldsamt, Lloyd ; Zhanay, Jessie ; Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2570-f3023537902439b10dff262be03b85cc13b5e38f28c09d011d89ae2af7e402853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Depressive personality disorders</topic><topic>Email</topic><topic>Generalized anxiety disorder</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Insomnia</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Mailing lists</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Organizations</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Protective equipment</topic><topic>Psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Research facilities</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Shortages</topic><topic>Sleep disorders</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Special Issue Abstract</topic><topic>Ventilators</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghazal, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsamt, Lloyd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhanay, Jessie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stimpfel, Amy Witkoski</au><au>Ghazal, Lauren</au><au>Goldsamt, Lloyd</au><au>Zhanay, Jessie</au><au>Dickson, Victoria Vaughan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Psychosocial Impact of COVID‐19 on Registered Nurses</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>47-48</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><abstract>Research Objective Central the COVID‐19 pandemic response are registered nurses (nurses), making life and death decisions amidst personal protective equipment (PPE) shortages and scarcity in other resources (e.g., ventilators, medications, staff). Emerging international evidence suggests nurses are at higher risk for detrimental psychosocial outcomes related to the pandemic, such as anxiety, depression, and sleep problems, compared to other clinician groups. The objective of this research is to describe the psychosocial impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on nurses currently practicing in the U.S. Study Design We conducted a concurrent mixed methods study from May‐August 2020. Participants were recruited through email listservs from regional professional nursing organizations, NIOSH‐funded Education and Research Centers nationwide, and through social media. Through REDCap, participants completed researcher‐developed sociodemographic and work characteristic questions (e.g., unit type, staffing levels, availability of PPE), and several validated instruments to measure depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire; PHQ‐9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder; GAD‐7), insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index; ISI), and resilience (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale; CD‐RISC‐10). A subset of participants was purposefully selected for semi‐structured individual phone interviews to achieve maximum variation. Following data collection, we randomly drew 10 participants to receive a $50 Amazon giftcard. Population Studied We recruited a sample of nurses from 36 states and the District of Columbia. The analytic sample included N=629 for the survey and N=34 for the interviews. We report only survey findings herein. Principal Findings Participants were on average 43 years old (SD 13), 92% female, and 80% White; 92% were non‐Hispanic. Three‐quarters (76%) worked in inpatient hospital settings; 20% worked in intensive care or step‐down units. Approximately 70% of the sample worked day shifts and 59% worked 12‐hour shifts. Out of a list of 13 common PPE items, 91% of the sample reported at least one PPE shortage since the pandemic began, and 24% reported bringing or making their own PPE for use at work. Over one in four (28%) nurses reported being unsure or planned to leave their employer in the next year. About 18% of the sample scored ≥ 15 on the ISI, suggesting insomnia symptoms significant enough to warrant evaluation and treatment. A third of participants (34%) had scores reflecting mild anxiety, a quarter (24%) had scores reflecting moderate anxiety, and 9% scored in the range reflecting severe anxiety on the GAD‐7. Reports on the PHQ‐9 showed 9% of the sample with scores consistent with major depressive disorder while another 7% scored in the range consistent with other depressive disorder. Finally, the average CD‐RISC score was 29, with lower scores indicating lower resilience (range 0‐40). Conclusions As with other countries, U.S. nurses are facing highly stressful working conditions, with warning signals indicated in the psychosocial domains of anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Overall, resilience levels are worse than pre‐pandemic levels from previously published literature. Implications for Policy or Practice As healthcare organizations adapt and respond to the pandemic, priority should be given to assessing and treating the psychosocial harm to nurses. Evidence‐based treatments and development of novel interventions to support this vital healthcare sector are warranted. Primary Funding Source intramural university funds</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.13800</doi><tpages>87</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9124
ispartof Health services research, 2021-09, Vol.56 (S2), p.47-48
issn 0017-9124
1475-6773
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8441264
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Anxiety
Anxiety disorders
COVID-19
Data collection
Depressive personality disorders
Email
Generalized anxiety disorder
Health care
Health care industry
Inpatient care
Insomnia
Intensive care
Interviews
Mailing lists
Medical education
Mental depression
Nurses
Organizations
Pandemics
Personal protective equipment
Polls & surveys
Population studies
Protective equipment
Psychosocial factors
Research facilities
Resilience
Scarcity
Shortages
Sleep disorders
Social media
Sociodemographics
Special Issue Abstract
Ventilators
Working conditions
title The Psychosocial Impact of COVID‐19 on Registered Nurses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T01%3A46%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Psychosocial%20Impact%20of%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20on%20Registered%20Nurses&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Stimpfel,%20Amy%20Witkoski&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=47-48&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.13800&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2572398682%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572398682&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true