Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?

Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e17194-e17194
Hauptverfasser: Milton, Cyril Joseph, Ganesamoorthy, Karthika, GS, Dharanya, Kannan, Amudhan, Vijayakumar, Chellappa, Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman, Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e17194
container_issue 8
container_start_page e17194
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 13
creator Milton, Cyril Joseph
Ganesamoorthy, Karthika
GS, Dharanya
Kannan, Amudhan
Vijayakumar, Chellappa
Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman
Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan
description Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (HPE) adds to increased costs and workload on pathologists. This study was undertaken to estimate the clinical concordance and the frequency of malignancy in these lesions. Methods A total of 1,815 HPE reports of clinically benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia from January 2014 to December 2018 were studied. Results Lipoma (31.3%) and sebaceous cyst (29.9%) were the common clinical diagnosis in our study. The clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of lipoma was 88.6%, and for sebaceous cyst, it was 72.7%. There were six reports of malignancy in our study from the clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions (0.33%). None of the cases of lipoma and the sebaceous cyst had a malignancy in the final histopathology report. The frequency of malignancy in the rest of the lesions is 0.85% (six out of 699 cases); (p-value: 0.003). Discussion In the absence of red flag signs, lesions like lipoma, sebaceous cyst, corn, and callus can be discarded without an HPE. We advocate routine HPE of other solid lesions, cystic lesions with solid areas, and pigmented or ulcerated lesions, as the clinical concordance is low and there is a significant occurrence of malignancy in these lesions.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.17194
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8439399</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574744432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-adda451b85f633865015b69e69a0a7745bf5a2c3c0b94e5f8129b7db5a95a0103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1uEzEURi0EolXpjgfwkgVp_Tseb0AltLRSBBKha-uO505imNhh7EH0WXhZHFIhWNmSj8_V_T5CXnJ2YYy2l36ecM4X3HCrnpBTwZt20fJWPf3nfkLOc_7KGOPMCGbYc3IilVZMCXFKft1lGgr9iB5zhumBlkTXGHu6HEMMHsbxgb4PsIkpY0_fYQybSNffQqRQofXc-blAxDRnusIcUsz0-qcPB_g-9jjRVaoSehUxl20FgA5pop_TXEJEehtySXso2zSmzWFa_Qy7EKFU09sX5NkAY8bzx_OM3N9cf1neLlafPtwtr1YLLywvC-h7UJp3rR4aKdtGM667xmJjgYExSneDBuGlZ51VqIeWC9uZvtNgNdRQ5Bl5c_Tu526HvcdYJhjdfgq7mohLENz_LzFs3Sb9cK2SVlpbBa8eBVP6PtdN3S5kj-N4TMYJbZRRSklR0ddH1E8p5wmHv2M4c4dK3bFS96dS-RvqRJfE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2574744432</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Milton, Cyril Joseph ; Ganesamoorthy, Karthika ; GS, Dharanya ; Kannan, Amudhan ; Vijayakumar, Chellappa ; Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman ; Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</creator><creatorcontrib>Milton, Cyril Joseph ; Ganesamoorthy, Karthika ; GS, Dharanya ; Kannan, Amudhan ; Vijayakumar, Chellappa ; Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman ; Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</creatorcontrib><description>Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (HPE) adds to increased costs and workload on pathologists. This study was undertaken to estimate the clinical concordance and the frequency of malignancy in these lesions. Methods A total of 1,815 HPE reports of clinically benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia from January 2014 to December 2018 were studied. Results Lipoma (31.3%) and sebaceous cyst (29.9%) were the common clinical diagnosis in our study. The clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of lipoma was 88.6%, and for sebaceous cyst, it was 72.7%. There were six reports of malignancy in our study from the clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions (0.33%). None of the cases of lipoma and the sebaceous cyst had a malignancy in the final histopathology report. The frequency of malignancy in the rest of the lesions is 0.85% (six out of 699 cases); (p-value: 0.003). Discussion In the absence of red flag signs, lesions like lipoma, sebaceous cyst, corn, and callus can be discarded without an HPE. We advocate routine HPE of other solid lesions, cystic lesions with solid areas, and pigmented or ulcerated lesions, as the clinical concordance is low and there is a significant occurrence of malignancy in these lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17194</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34540422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto (CA): Cureus</publisher><subject>Dermatology ; General Surgery ; Medical Education</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e17194-e17194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Milton et al. 2021 Milton et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-adda451b85f633865015b69e69a0a7745bf5a2c3c0b94e5f8129b7db5a95a0103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-adda451b85f633865015b69e69a0a7745bf5a2c3c0b94e5f8129b7db5a95a0103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439399/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8439399/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Milton, Cyril Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesamoorthy, Karthika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GS, Dharanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kannan, Amudhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, Chellappa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</creatorcontrib><title>Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (HPE) adds to increased costs and workload on pathologists. This study was undertaken to estimate the clinical concordance and the frequency of malignancy in these lesions. Methods A total of 1,815 HPE reports of clinically benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia from January 2014 to December 2018 were studied. Results Lipoma (31.3%) and sebaceous cyst (29.9%) were the common clinical diagnosis in our study. The clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of lipoma was 88.6%, and for sebaceous cyst, it was 72.7%. There were six reports of malignancy in our study from the clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions (0.33%). None of the cases of lipoma and the sebaceous cyst had a malignancy in the final histopathology report. The frequency of malignancy in the rest of the lesions is 0.85% (six out of 699 cases); (p-value: 0.003). Discussion In the absence of red flag signs, lesions like lipoma, sebaceous cyst, corn, and callus can be discarded without an HPE. We advocate routine HPE of other solid lesions, cystic lesions with solid areas, and pigmented or ulcerated lesions, as the clinical concordance is low and there is a significant occurrence of malignancy in these lesions.</description><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>General Surgery</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkc1uEzEURi0EolXpjgfwkgVp_Tseb0AltLRSBBKha-uO505imNhh7EH0WXhZHFIhWNmSj8_V_T5CXnJ2YYy2l36ecM4X3HCrnpBTwZt20fJWPf3nfkLOc_7KGOPMCGbYc3IilVZMCXFKft1lGgr9iB5zhumBlkTXGHu6HEMMHsbxgb4PsIkpY0_fYQybSNffQqRQofXc-blAxDRnusIcUsz0-qcPB_g-9jjRVaoSehUxl20FgA5pop_TXEJEehtySXso2zSmzWFa_Qy7EKFU09sX5NkAY8bzx_OM3N9cf1neLlafPtwtr1YLLywvC-h7UJp3rR4aKdtGM667xmJjgYExSneDBuGlZ51VqIeWC9uZvtNgNdRQ5Bl5c_Tu526HvcdYJhjdfgq7mohLENz_LzFs3Sb9cK2SVlpbBa8eBVP6PtdN3S5kj-N4TMYJbZRRSklR0ddH1E8p5wmHv2M4c4dK3bFS96dS-RvqRJfE</recordid><startdate>20210815</startdate><enddate>20210815</enddate><creator>Milton, Cyril Joseph</creator><creator>Ganesamoorthy, Karthika</creator><creator>GS, Dharanya</creator><creator>Kannan, Amudhan</creator><creator>Vijayakumar, Chellappa</creator><creator>Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman</creator><creator>Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</creator><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210815</creationdate><title>Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?</title><author>Milton, Cyril Joseph ; Ganesamoorthy, Karthika ; GS, Dharanya ; Kannan, Amudhan ; Vijayakumar, Chellappa ; Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman ; Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c291t-adda451b85f633865015b69e69a0a7745bf5a2c3c0b94e5f8129b7db5a95a0103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>General Surgery</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Milton, Cyril Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganesamoorthy, Karthika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GS, Dharanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kannan, Amudhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vijayakumar, Chellappa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Milton, Cyril Joseph</au><au>Ganesamoorthy, Karthika</au><au>GS, Dharanya</au><au>Kannan, Amudhan</au><au>Vijayakumar, Chellappa</au><au>Srinivas, Bheemanathi Hanuman</au><au>Sundaramurthi, Sudharsanan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2021-08-15</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e17194</spage><epage>e17194</epage><pages>e17194-e17194</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Background The common benign surgical lesions of skin and subcutaneous tissues like lipoma and sebaceous cysts are diagnosed clinically and treated by surgical excision under local anesthesia. The occurrence of malignancy in these lesions is extremely low, and routine histopathological examination (HPE) adds to increased costs and workload on pathologists. This study was undertaken to estimate the clinical concordance and the frequency of malignancy in these lesions. Methods A total of 1,815 HPE reports of clinically benign skin and subcutaneous lesions excised under local anesthesia from January 2014 to December 2018 were studied. Results Lipoma (31.3%) and sebaceous cyst (29.9%) were the common clinical diagnosis in our study. The clinical accuracy in the diagnosis of lipoma was 88.6%, and for sebaceous cyst, it was 72.7%. There were six reports of malignancy in our study from the clinically diagnosed benign skin and subcutaneous lesions (0.33%). None of the cases of lipoma and the sebaceous cyst had a malignancy in the final histopathology report. The frequency of malignancy in the rest of the lesions is 0.85% (six out of 699 cases); (p-value: 0.003). Discussion In the absence of red flag signs, lesions like lipoma, sebaceous cyst, corn, and callus can be discarded without an HPE. We advocate routine HPE of other solid lesions, cystic lesions with solid areas, and pigmented or ulcerated lesions, as the clinical concordance is low and there is a significant occurrence of malignancy in these lesions.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto (CA)</cop><pub>Cureus</pub><pmid>34540422</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.17194</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-08, Vol.13 (8), p.e17194-e17194
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8439399
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Dermatology
General Surgery
Medical Education
title Is it Necessary to Send Clinically Diagnosed Benign Skin and Subcutaneous Lesions Excised Under Local Anesthesia for Routine Histopathological Examination?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20it%20Necessary%20to%20Send%20Clinically%20Diagnosed%20Benign%20Skin%20and%20Subcutaneous%20Lesions%20Excised%20Under%20Local%20Anesthesia%20for%20Routine%20Histopathological%20Examination?&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Milton,%20Cyril%20Joseph&rft.date=2021-08-15&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e17194&rft.epage=e17194&rft.pages=e17194-e17194&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.17194&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2574744432%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2574744432&rft_id=info:pmid/34540422&rfr_iscdi=true