Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials

Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cemen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polymers 2021-08, Vol.13 (17), p.2851
Hauptverfasser: Labban, Nawaf, AlSheikh, Rasha, Lund, Melvin, Matis, Bruce A., Moore, B. Keith, Cochran, Michael A., Platt, Jeffrey A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 17
container_start_page 2851
container_title Polymers
container_volume 13
creator Labban, Nawaf
AlSheikh, Rasha
Lund, Melvin
Matis, Bruce A.
Moore, B. Keith
Cochran, Michael A.
Platt, Jeffrey A.
description Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W1 − W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 − W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p < 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/polym13172851
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8434010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2571922155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d8ee0f9c8370631eea978069d13215a90551bbd0db5b624a7405edc72af81f933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtLwzAUh4Mobsw9-l7wxZdqrm3zIniZF5goqPgY0zbZMtpmJu1g_73pNsSZl5OT8_HxCweAUwQvCOHwcmmrdY0ISnHG0AEYYpiSmJIEHv65D8DY-wUMh7IkQekxGBDKIM44GoKvyUpWnWyNbSKro3auok_ZKhe9WbfcvMqmDE3V5aYy7Tq6UXO5Mtb19J3RWjnVtNFrH0Q5U0TTrjXNLHruJUZW_gQc6VDUeFdH4ON-8n77GE9fHp5ur6dxQThu4zJTCmpeZCSFCUFKSZ5mMOElIhgxySFjKM9LWOYsTzCVKYVMlUWKpc6Q5oSMwNXWu-zyOkxCKicrsXSmlm4trDRif9KYuZjZlcgooRDBIDjfCZz97pRvRW18oapKNsp2XmCWIo5DGBbQs3_ownauCd_bUDRhGemF8ZYqnPXeKf0bBkHRr0_srY_8AKmPjXo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571465830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Labban, Nawaf ; AlSheikh, Rasha ; Lund, Melvin ; Matis, Bruce A. ; Moore, B. Keith ; Cochran, Michael A. ; Platt, Jeffrey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Labban, Nawaf ; AlSheikh, Rasha ; Lund, Melvin ; Matis, Bruce A. ; Moore, B. Keith ; Cochran, Michael A. ; Platt, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W1 − W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 − W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p &lt; 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4360</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/polym13172851</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34502891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adhesives ; Bond strength ; Cement ; Composite materials ; Curing ; Evaluation ; Glass ionomer cements ; Resins ; Solubility ; Sorption ; Statistical methods ; Statistical tests ; Variance analysis ; Water immersion ; Water storage</subject><ispartof>Polymers, 2021-08, Vol.13 (17), p.2851</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d8ee0f9c8370631eea978069d13215a90551bbd0db5b624a7405edc72af81f933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d8ee0f9c8370631eea978069d13215a90551bbd0db5b624a7405edc72af81f933</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2910-5511</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434010/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8434010/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Labban, Nawaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlSheikh, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matis, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, B. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials</title><title>Polymers</title><description>Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W1 − W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 − W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p &lt; 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.</description><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Cement</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Curing</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Glass ionomer cements</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Solubility</subject><subject>Sorption</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Water immersion</subject><subject>Water storage</subject><issn>2073-4360</issn><issn>2073-4360</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtLwzAUh4Mobsw9-l7wxZdqrm3zIniZF5goqPgY0zbZMtpmJu1g_73pNsSZl5OT8_HxCweAUwQvCOHwcmmrdY0ISnHG0AEYYpiSmJIEHv65D8DY-wUMh7IkQekxGBDKIM44GoKvyUpWnWyNbSKro3auok_ZKhe9WbfcvMqmDE3V5aYy7Tq6UXO5Mtb19J3RWjnVtNFrH0Q5U0TTrjXNLHruJUZW_gQc6VDUeFdH4ON-8n77GE9fHp5ur6dxQThu4zJTCmpeZCSFCUFKSZ5mMOElIhgxySFjKM9LWOYsTzCVKYVMlUWKpc6Q5oSMwNXWu-zyOkxCKicrsXSmlm4trDRif9KYuZjZlcgooRDBIDjfCZz97pRvRW18oapKNsp2XmCWIo5DGBbQs3_ownauCd_bUDRhGemF8ZYqnPXeKf0bBkHRr0_srY_8AKmPjXo</recordid><startdate>20210825</startdate><enddate>20210825</enddate><creator>Labban, Nawaf</creator><creator>AlSheikh, Rasha</creator><creator>Lund, Melvin</creator><creator>Matis, Bruce A.</creator><creator>Moore, B. Keith</creator><creator>Cochran, Michael A.</creator><creator>Platt, Jeffrey A.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-5511</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210825</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials</title><author>Labban, Nawaf ; AlSheikh, Rasha ; Lund, Melvin ; Matis, Bruce A. ; Moore, B. Keith ; Cochran, Michael A. ; Platt, Jeffrey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-d8ee0f9c8370631eea978069d13215a90551bbd0db5b624a7405edc72af81f933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Cement</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Curing</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Glass ionomer cements</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Solubility</topic><topic>Sorption</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Water immersion</topic><topic>Water storage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Labban, Nawaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AlSheikh, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Melvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matis, Bruce A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, B. Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Labban, Nawaf</au><au>AlSheikh, Rasha</au><au>Lund, Melvin</au><au>Matis, Bruce A.</au><au>Moore, B. Keith</au><au>Cochran, Michael A.</au><au>Platt, Jeffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials</atitle><jtitle>Polymers</jtitle><date>2021-08-25</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>2851</spage><pages>2851-</pages><issn>2073-4360</issn><eissn>2073-4360</eissn><abstract>Objective: The study evaluated the water sorption (WSP) and water solubility (WSL) characteristics of different luting agents over a 180-day water storage period. Materials and Methods: Nine luting materials, i.e., conventional resin cement: Panavia F (PF), Rely X ARC (RA), self-adhesive resin cement: Rely X Unicem (RU), Breez (BZ), Maxcem Elite (MX), BisCem (BC) and resin-modified glass ionomer cement: FujiCem (FC), FujiPlus (FP) Rely X luting plus (RL) were assessed and fifty-two-disc specimens of each material were fabricated. All specimens were desiccated until a constant weight (W0) was reached. Thirteen specimens for each luting material were then randomly assigned to one of the four water immersion periods (7, 30, 90, and 180 days). After each period, the specimens were removed from the water and weighed to get W1. The samples were again desiccated for a second time and W2 was measured. Both WSP and WSL were determined by the following equations: WSP (%) = (W1 − W2) × 100/W0 and WSL (%) = (W0 − W2) × 100/W0. Assessments were performed following ISO standards. ANOVA was used to assess the effect of luting agent and time period on water sorption and solubility. Pair-wise comparisons were adjusted using Tukey’s multiple comparison procedure. A significance level of 0.05 was used for all statistical tests. Results: The highest mean WSP and WSL (WSP/WSL) were demonstrated by resin-modified glass-ionomers (RL 18.32/3.25, FC 17.08/4.83, and FP 14.14/1.99), while resin luting agents showed lower WSP and WSL results (PF 1.6/0.67 and RA 1.76/0.46), respectively. The self-adhesive agents exhibited a wide range of WSP and WSL values (RU 1.86/0.13, BZ 4.66/0.93, and MX 3.68/1.11). Self-adhesive cement showed lower WSP and WSL compared with the resin-modified glass-ionomers (p &lt; 0.05). All the materials reached equilibrium after 90-days. Conclusions: Resin-based luting materials have the lowest sorption and solubility. Rely X Unicem self-adhesive luting materials were comparable to resin luting materials for WSL and WSP. Resin-modified glass-ionomer showed the highest water sorption and solubility compared with both resin and self-adhesive materials.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34502891</pmid><doi>10.3390/polym13172851</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-5511</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4360
ispartof Polymers, 2021-08, Vol.13 (17), p.2851
issn 2073-4360
2073-4360
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8434010
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Adhesives
Bond strength
Cement
Composite materials
Curing
Evaluation
Glass ionomer cements
Resins
Solubility
Sorption
Statistical methods
Statistical tests
Variance analysis
Water immersion
Water storage
title Evaluation of the Water Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Different Polymeric Luting Materials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A53%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Water%20Sorption%20and%20Solubility%20Behavior%20of%20Different%20Polymeric%20Luting%20Materials&rft.jtitle=Polymers&rft.au=Labban,%20Nawaf&rft.date=2021-08-25&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=2851&rft.pages=2851-&rft.issn=2073-4360&rft.eissn=2073-4360&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/polym13172851&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2571922155%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571465830&rft_id=info:pmid/34502891&rfr_iscdi=true