Applications of machine and deep learning to patient‐specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance
In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2021-09, Vol.22 (9), p.20-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 36 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 20 |
container_title | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Osman, Alexander F. I. Maalej, Nabil M. |
description | In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT dose measurements in a phantom using various devices have been clinically adopted as standard method for QA. This approach allows the verification of the accuracy of the dose calculation, data transfer, and the delivery system. However, patient‐specific QA procedures are expensive and require significant time and effort by the physicists. Over the past 5 years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for predictions of IMRT/VMAT QA outcome have been investigated. Various ML and DL models have shown promising prediction accuracy and a high potential as time‐efficient virtual QA tool. In this paper, we review the ML and DL based models that were developed for patient specific IMRT and VMAT QA outcome predictions from algorithmic and clinical applicability perspectives. We focus on comparing the algorithms, the dataset sizes, the input parameters and features, the QA outcome prediction approaches, the validation, the performance, the clinical applicability, and the potential clinical impact. In addition, we discuss the present challenges as well as the future directions in the implementation of these models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review on the application of ML and DL based models in IMRT/VMAT QA predictions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.13375 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8425899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711118391</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711118391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5585-9ab7c1a5ade97a09fbbe353d9abb5e1bf80991f68bfca54a6861ed3a5ae6b5833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QkscUFIu7XjdeJckKIVfyp1hYQWLhysiTPeukrs1E6K9tZH6DPyJDikQsAB-WBr_Pu-mdGXZS8ZXTNK83PQfb5mnJfiUXbKRF6sqoptHv_xPsmexXhNKWOSy6fZCd_Mh-Wn2bd6GDqrYbTeReIN6UFfWYcEXEtaxIF0CMFZdyCjJ0Pi0I0_7u7jgNoaq8nF7vP-_Ouu3pObCTo7HgnEOAVwGp9nTwx0EV883GfZl_fv9tuPq8tPHy629eVKCyHFqoKm1AwEtFiVQCvTNMgFb1O9EcgaI2nawRSyMRrEBgpZMGx5EmDRCMn5WfZ28R2mpsdWpwkDdGoItodwVB6s-vvH2St18LdKbnIhqyoZvH4wCP5mwjiq3kaNXQcO_RRVnuakFWXl3OvVP-i1n4JL6yWqTEhyZIlaL9QBOlTWGZ_66nRa7K32Do1N9bpkbE6kmgVvFoEOPsaA5vf0jKo5ZDWHrH6FnGC2wN-Ty_E_pKq3u3zR_ASjF6lR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2570172581</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applications of machine and deep learning to patient‐specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Osman, Alexander F. I. ; Maalej, Nabil M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Osman, Alexander F. I. ; Maalej, Nabil M.</creatorcontrib><description>In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT dose measurements in a phantom using various devices have been clinically adopted as standard method for QA. This approach allows the verification of the accuracy of the dose calculation, data transfer, and the delivery system. However, patient‐specific QA procedures are expensive and require significant time and effort by the physicists. Over the past 5 years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for predictions of IMRT/VMAT QA outcome have been investigated. Various ML and DL models have shown promising prediction accuracy and a high potential as time‐efficient virtual QA tool. In this paper, we review the ML and DL based models that were developed for patient specific IMRT and VMAT QA outcome predictions from algorithmic and clinical applicability perspectives. We focus on comparing the algorithms, the dataset sizes, the input parameters and features, the QA outcome prediction approaches, the validation, the performance, the clinical applicability, and the potential clinical impact. In addition, we discuss the present challenges as well as the future directions in the implementation of these models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review on the application of ML and DL based models in IMRT/VMAT QA predictions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13375</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34343412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Classification ; Datasets ; Decision trees ; Deep learning ; Expected values ; gamma passing rate prediction ; Health aspects ; IMRT quality assurance ; Machine learning ; patient‐specific QA ; Quality control ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy ; Regression analysis ; Regularization methods ; Review ; Variables ; VMAT quality assurance</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-09, Vol.22 (9), p.20-36</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5585-9ab7c1a5ade97a09fbbe353d9abb5e1bf80991f68bfca54a6861ed3a5ae6b5833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5585-9ab7c1a5ade97a09fbbe353d9abb5e1bf80991f68bfca54a6861ed3a5ae6b5833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1286-475X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425899/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425899/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1416,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475,53790,53792</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Osman, Alexander F. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maalej, Nabil M.</creatorcontrib><title>Applications of machine and deep learning to patient‐specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><description>In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT dose measurements in a phantom using various devices have been clinically adopted as standard method for QA. This approach allows the verification of the accuracy of the dose calculation, data transfer, and the delivery system. However, patient‐specific QA procedures are expensive and require significant time and effort by the physicists. Over the past 5 years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for predictions of IMRT/VMAT QA outcome have been investigated. Various ML and DL models have shown promising prediction accuracy and a high potential as time‐efficient virtual QA tool. In this paper, we review the ML and DL based models that were developed for patient specific IMRT and VMAT QA outcome predictions from algorithmic and clinical applicability perspectives. We focus on comparing the algorithms, the dataset sizes, the input parameters and features, the QA outcome prediction approaches, the validation, the performance, the clinical applicability, and the potential clinical impact. In addition, we discuss the present challenges as well as the future directions in the implementation of these models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review on the application of ML and DL based models in IMRT/VMAT QA predictions.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Decision trees</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>gamma passing rate prediction</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>IMRT quality assurance</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>patient‐specific QA</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regularization methods</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Variables</subject><subject>VMAT quality assurance</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QkscUFIu7XjdeJckKIVfyp1hYQWLhysiTPeukrs1E6K9tZH6DPyJDikQsAB-WBr_Pu-mdGXZS8ZXTNK83PQfb5mnJfiUXbKRF6sqoptHv_xPsmexXhNKWOSy6fZCd_Mh-Wn2bd6GDqrYbTeReIN6UFfWYcEXEtaxIF0CMFZdyCjJ0Pi0I0_7u7jgNoaq8nF7vP-_Ouu3pObCTo7HgnEOAVwGp9nTwx0EV883GfZl_fv9tuPq8tPHy629eVKCyHFqoKm1AwEtFiVQCvTNMgFb1O9EcgaI2nawRSyMRrEBgpZMGx5EmDRCMn5WfZ28R2mpsdWpwkDdGoItodwVB6s-vvH2St18LdKbnIhqyoZvH4wCP5mwjiq3kaNXQcO_RRVnuakFWXl3OvVP-i1n4JL6yWqTEhyZIlaL9QBOlTWGZ_66nRa7K32Do1N9bpkbE6kmgVvFoEOPsaA5vf0jKo5ZDWHrH6FnGC2wN-Ty_E_pKq3u3zR_ASjF6lR</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Osman, Alexander F. I.</creator><creator>Maalej, Nabil M.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-475X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Applications of machine and deep learning to patient‐specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance</title><author>Osman, Alexander F. I. ; Maalej, Nabil M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5585-9ab7c1a5ade97a09fbbe353d9abb5e1bf80991f68bfca54a6861ed3a5ae6b5833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Decision trees</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>gamma passing rate prediction</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>IMRT quality assurance</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>patient‐specific QA</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regularization methods</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Variables</topic><topic>VMAT quality assurance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Osman, Alexander F. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maalej, Nabil M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Osman, Alexander F. I.</au><au>Maalej, Nabil M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applications of machine and deep learning to patient‐specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>20</spage><epage>36</epage><pages>20-36</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric‐arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT dose measurements in a phantom using various devices have been clinically adopted as standard method for QA. This approach allows the verification of the accuracy of the dose calculation, data transfer, and the delivery system. However, patient‐specific QA procedures are expensive and require significant time and effort by the physicists. Over the past 5 years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for predictions of IMRT/VMAT QA outcome have been investigated. Various ML and DL models have shown promising prediction accuracy and a high potential as time‐efficient virtual QA tool. In this paper, we review the ML and DL based models that were developed for patient specific IMRT and VMAT QA outcome predictions from algorithmic and clinical applicability perspectives. We focus on comparing the algorithms, the dataset sizes, the input parameters and features, the QA outcome prediction approaches, the validation, the performance, the clinical applicability, and the potential clinical impact. In addition, we discuss the present challenges as well as the future directions in the implementation of these models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review on the application of ML and DL based models in IMRT/VMAT QA predictions.</abstract><cop>Malden Massachusetts</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34343412</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.13375</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-475X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-09, Vol.22 (9), p.20-36 |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8425899 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles; Wiley Online Library All Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial intelligence Cancer patients Care and treatment Classification Datasets Decision trees Deep learning Expected values gamma passing rate prediction Health aspects IMRT quality assurance Machine learning patient‐specific QA Quality control Radiation Radiation therapy Radiotherapy Regression analysis Regularization methods Review Variables VMAT quality assurance |
title | Applications of machine and deep learning to patient‐specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A36%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applications%20of%20machine%20and%20deep%20learning%20to%20patient%E2%80%90specific%20IMRT/VMAT%20quality%20assurance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Osman,%20Alexander%20F.%20I.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=36&rft.pages=20-36&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.13375&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA711118391%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2570172581&rft_id=info:pmid/34343412&rft_galeid=A711118391&rfr_iscdi=true |