Benchmarking network-based gene prioritization methods for cerebral small vessel disease
Network-based gene prioritization algorithms are designed to prioritize disease-associated genes based on known ones using biological networks of protein interactions, gene-disease associations (GDAs) and other relationships between biological entities. Various algorithms have been developed based o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Briefings in bioinformatics 2021-09, Vol.22 (5) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Briefings in bioinformatics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Zhang, Huayu Ferguson, Amy Robertson, Grant Jiang, Muchen Zhang, Teng Sudlow, Cathie Smith, Keith Rannikmae, Kristiina Wu, Honghan |
description | Network-based gene prioritization algorithms are designed to prioritize disease-associated genes based on known ones using biological networks of protein interactions, gene-disease associations (GDAs) and other relationships between biological entities. Various algorithms have been developed based on different mechanisms, but it is not obvious which algorithm is optimal for a specific disease. To address this issue, we benchmarked multiple algorithms for their application in cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). We curated protein-gene interactions (PGIs) and GDAs from databases and assembled PGI networks and disease-gene heterogeneous networks. A screening of algorithms resulted in seven representative algorithms to be benchmarked. Performance of algorithms was assessed using both leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and external validation with MEGASTROKE genome-wide association study (GWAS). We found that random walk with restart on the heterogeneous network (RWRH) showed best LOOCV performance, with median LOOCV rediscovery rank of 185.5 (out of 19 463 genes). The GenePanda algorithm had most GWAS-confirmable genes in top 200 predictions, while RWRH had best ranks for small vessel stroke-associated genes confirmed in GWAS. In conclusion, RWRH has overall better performance for application in cSVD despite its susceptibility to bias caused by degree centrality. Choice of algorithms should be determined before applying to specific disease. Current pure network-based gene prioritization algorithms are unlikely to find novel disease-associated genes that are not associated with known ones. The tools for implementing and benchmarking algorithms have been made available and can be generalized for other diseases. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/bib/bbab006 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8425308</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2494297227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-da04432eb4267e4d057a26c33f03eda42f3cd1bc77ee3489b6af3492178238f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1LxDAQxYMofp-8S46CVJNM2rQXQcUvELwoeAtJOt2Nto0m3RX96-2yq-gpA_nNmzfzCDng7ISzCk6tt6fWGstYsUa2uVQqkyyX64u6UFkuC9giOym9MCaYKvkm2QIoQAIX2-T5Ans37Ux89f2E9jh8hPiaWZOwphPskb5FH6If_JcZfOhph8M01Ik2IVKHEW00LU2daVs6x5SwpbVPOLbvkY3GtAn3V-8uebq-ery8ze4fbu4uz-8zByUfstowKUGglaJQKGuWKyMKB9AwwNpI0YCruXVKIYIsK1uYBmQluCoFlE0Ou-Rsqfs2sx3WDvthtKRH2-NSnzoYr___9H6qJ2GuSylyYOUocLQSiOF9hmnQnU8O29b0GGZJC1lJUSkh1IgeL1EXQ0oRm98xnOlFFnrMQq-yGOnDv85-2Z_jwzeMcYh4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2494297227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmarking network-based gene prioritization methods for cerebral small vessel disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zhang, Huayu ; Ferguson, Amy ; Robertson, Grant ; Jiang, Muchen ; Zhang, Teng ; Sudlow, Cathie ; Smith, Keith ; Rannikmae, Kristiina ; Wu, Honghan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huayu ; Ferguson, Amy ; Robertson, Grant ; Jiang, Muchen ; Zhang, Teng ; Sudlow, Cathie ; Smith, Keith ; Rannikmae, Kristiina ; Wu, Honghan</creatorcontrib><description>Network-based gene prioritization algorithms are designed to prioritize disease-associated genes based on known ones using biological networks of protein interactions, gene-disease associations (GDAs) and other relationships between biological entities. Various algorithms have been developed based on different mechanisms, but it is not obvious which algorithm is optimal for a specific disease. To address this issue, we benchmarked multiple algorithms for their application in cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). We curated protein-gene interactions (PGIs) and GDAs from databases and assembled PGI networks and disease-gene heterogeneous networks. A screening of algorithms resulted in seven representative algorithms to be benchmarked. Performance of algorithms was assessed using both leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and external validation with MEGASTROKE genome-wide association study (GWAS). We found that random walk with restart on the heterogeneous network (RWRH) showed best LOOCV performance, with median LOOCV rediscovery rank of 185.5 (out of 19 463 genes). The GenePanda algorithm had most GWAS-confirmable genes in top 200 predictions, while RWRH had best ranks for small vessel stroke-associated genes confirmed in GWAS. In conclusion, RWRH has overall better performance for application in cSVD despite its susceptibility to bias caused by degree centrality. Choice of algorithms should be determined before applying to specific disease. Current pure network-based gene prioritization algorithms are unlikely to find novel disease-associated genes that are not associated with known ones. The tools for implementing and benchmarking algorithms have been made available and can be generalized for other diseases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-4054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbab006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33634312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Benchmarking - methods ; Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases - genetics ; Computational Biology - methods ; Gene Regulatory Networks ; Genome-Wide Association Study ; Humans ; Multigene Family ; Phenotype ; Problem Solving Protocol ; Protein Interaction Maps - genetics ; Risk Factors</subject><ispartof>Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021-09, Vol.22 (5)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-da04432eb4267e4d057a26c33f03eda42f3cd1bc77ee3489b6af3492178238f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-da04432eb4267e4d057a26c33f03eda42f3cd1bc77ee3489b6af3492178238f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1625-4067 ; 0000-0002-5310-8766</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425308/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8425308/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33634312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huayu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Muchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudlow, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikmae, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Honghan</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmarking network-based gene prioritization methods for cerebral small vessel disease</title><title>Briefings in bioinformatics</title><addtitle>Brief Bioinform</addtitle><description>Network-based gene prioritization algorithms are designed to prioritize disease-associated genes based on known ones using biological networks of protein interactions, gene-disease associations (GDAs) and other relationships between biological entities. Various algorithms have been developed based on different mechanisms, but it is not obvious which algorithm is optimal for a specific disease. To address this issue, we benchmarked multiple algorithms for their application in cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). We curated protein-gene interactions (PGIs) and GDAs from databases and assembled PGI networks and disease-gene heterogeneous networks. A screening of algorithms resulted in seven representative algorithms to be benchmarked. Performance of algorithms was assessed using both leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and external validation with MEGASTROKE genome-wide association study (GWAS). We found that random walk with restart on the heterogeneous network (RWRH) showed best LOOCV performance, with median LOOCV rediscovery rank of 185.5 (out of 19 463 genes). The GenePanda algorithm had most GWAS-confirmable genes in top 200 predictions, while RWRH had best ranks for small vessel stroke-associated genes confirmed in GWAS. In conclusion, RWRH has overall better performance for application in cSVD despite its susceptibility to bias caused by degree centrality. Choice of algorithms should be determined before applying to specific disease. Current pure network-based gene prioritization algorithms are unlikely to find novel disease-associated genes that are not associated with known ones. The tools for implementing and benchmarking algorithms have been made available and can be generalized for other diseases.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Benchmarking - methods</subject><subject>Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases - genetics</subject><subject>Computational Biology - methods</subject><subject>Gene Regulatory Networks</subject><subject>Genome-Wide Association Study</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Multigene Family</subject><subject>Phenotype</subject><subject>Problem Solving Protocol</subject><subject>Protein Interaction Maps - genetics</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><issn>1467-5463</issn><issn>1477-4054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1LxDAQxYMofp-8S46CVJNM2rQXQcUvELwoeAtJOt2Nto0m3RX96-2yq-gpA_nNmzfzCDng7ISzCk6tt6fWGstYsUa2uVQqkyyX64u6UFkuC9giOym9MCaYKvkm2QIoQAIX2-T5Ans37Ux89f2E9jh8hPiaWZOwphPskb5FH6If_JcZfOhph8M01Ik2IVKHEW00LU2daVs6x5SwpbVPOLbvkY3GtAn3V-8uebq-ery8ze4fbu4uz-8zByUfstowKUGglaJQKGuWKyMKB9AwwNpI0YCruXVKIYIsK1uYBmQluCoFlE0Ou-Rsqfs2sx3WDvthtKRH2-NSnzoYr___9H6qJ2GuSylyYOUocLQSiOF9hmnQnU8O29b0GGZJC1lJUSkh1IgeL1EXQ0oRm98xnOlFFnrMQq-yGOnDv85-2Z_jwzeMcYh4</recordid><startdate>20210902</startdate><enddate>20210902</enddate><creator>Zhang, Huayu</creator><creator>Ferguson, Amy</creator><creator>Robertson, Grant</creator><creator>Jiang, Muchen</creator><creator>Zhang, Teng</creator><creator>Sudlow, Cathie</creator><creator>Smith, Keith</creator><creator>Rannikmae, Kristiina</creator><creator>Wu, Honghan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1625-4067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-8766</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210902</creationdate><title>Benchmarking network-based gene prioritization methods for cerebral small vessel disease</title><author>Zhang, Huayu ; Ferguson, Amy ; Robertson, Grant ; Jiang, Muchen ; Zhang, Teng ; Sudlow, Cathie ; Smith, Keith ; Rannikmae, Kristiina ; Wu, Honghan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-da04432eb4267e4d057a26c33f03eda42f3cd1bc77ee3489b6af3492178238f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Benchmarking - methods</topic><topic>Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases - genetics</topic><topic>Computational Biology - methods</topic><topic>Gene Regulatory Networks</topic><topic>Genome-Wide Association Study</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Multigene Family</topic><topic>Phenotype</topic><topic>Problem Solving Protocol</topic><topic>Protein Interaction Maps - genetics</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Huayu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Grant</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Muchen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Teng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudlow, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannikmae, Kristiina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Honghan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Briefings in bioinformatics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Huayu</au><au>Ferguson, Amy</au><au>Robertson, Grant</au><au>Jiang, Muchen</au><au>Zhang, Teng</au><au>Sudlow, Cathie</au><au>Smith, Keith</au><au>Rannikmae, Kristiina</au><au>Wu, Honghan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmarking network-based gene prioritization methods for cerebral small vessel disease</atitle><jtitle>Briefings in bioinformatics</jtitle><addtitle>Brief Bioinform</addtitle><date>2021-09-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>1467-5463</issn><eissn>1477-4054</eissn><abstract>Network-based gene prioritization algorithms are designed to prioritize disease-associated genes based on known ones using biological networks of protein interactions, gene-disease associations (GDAs) and other relationships between biological entities. Various algorithms have been developed based on different mechanisms, but it is not obvious which algorithm is optimal for a specific disease. To address this issue, we benchmarked multiple algorithms for their application in cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD). We curated protein-gene interactions (PGIs) and GDAs from databases and assembled PGI networks and disease-gene heterogeneous networks. A screening of algorithms resulted in seven representative algorithms to be benchmarked. Performance of algorithms was assessed using both leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and external validation with MEGASTROKE genome-wide association study (GWAS). We found that random walk with restart on the heterogeneous network (RWRH) showed best LOOCV performance, with median LOOCV rediscovery rank of 185.5 (out of 19 463 genes). The GenePanda algorithm had most GWAS-confirmable genes in top 200 predictions, while RWRH had best ranks for small vessel stroke-associated genes confirmed in GWAS. In conclusion, RWRH has overall better performance for application in cSVD despite its susceptibility to bias caused by degree centrality. Choice of algorithms should be determined before applying to specific disease. Current pure network-based gene prioritization algorithms are unlikely to find novel disease-associated genes that are not associated with known ones. The tools for implementing and benchmarking algorithms have been made available and can be generalized for other diseases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>33634312</pmid><doi>10.1093/bib/bbab006</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1625-4067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-8766</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-5463 |
ispartof | Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021-09, Vol.22 (5) |
issn | 1467-5463 1477-4054 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8425308 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Business Source Complete; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central |
subjects | Algorithms Benchmarking - methods Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases - genetics Computational Biology - methods Gene Regulatory Networks Genome-Wide Association Study Humans Multigene Family Phenotype Problem Solving Protocol Protein Interaction Maps - genetics Risk Factors |
title | Benchmarking network-based gene prioritization methods for cerebral small vessel disease |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T06%3A44%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmarking%20network-based%20gene%20prioritization%20methods%20for%20cerebral%20small%20vessel%20disease&rft.jtitle=Briefings%20in%20bioinformatics&rft.au=Zhang,%20Huayu&rft.date=2021-09-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=1467-5463&rft.eissn=1477-4054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bib/bbab006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2494297227%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2494297227&rft_id=info:pmid/33634312&rfr_iscdi=true |