Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay

Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay. This was an observational interrupted time ser...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.182-186
Hauptverfasser: Sangal, Rohit B., Peaper, David R., Rothenberg, Craig, Landry, Marie L., Sussman, L. Scott, Martinello, Richard A., Ulrich, Andrew, Venkatesh, Arjun K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 2
container_start_page 182
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 79
creator Sangal, Rohit B.
Peaper, David R.
Rothenberg, Craig
Landry, Marie L.
Sussman, L. Scott
Martinello, Richard A.
Ulrich, Andrew
Venkatesh, Arjun K.
description Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay. This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively. A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%. Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8424016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064421008465</els_id><sourcerecordid>2596011427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvEzEQhS0EomnhL6DlxmWXseP1ei9IUVpKpUhIpOVqOd5x6mjXDvYmUv49XqVUReLAyYd58974e4R8pFBRoOLzrtLe44BxO2BXMWC0grYCqF-RGYW2KUUj4DWZAW1FCYLzC3KZ0g4AWs7oW3Ix500teM1mZHjw7ogx6b5YL36sy2X4WbLiHtPo_LYItriZYtCbU3GNex3HAf1YLLrBpeSCT8WdNxF1wvRv5Qr9dnycjNajPr0jb6zuE75_eq_Iw9eb--W3cvX99m65WJWGy_lYCiol6sZIafW8AdxoyTWnfGMlRdFZyrpNjQy10dSC1V1ruBHYNNzmiWzmV-TL2Xd_2GREJl8Sda_20Q06nlTQTv098e5RbcNRSc54JpwNPj0ZxPDrkGmo_GGDfa89hkNSrG4FUMrZlNWepSaGlCLa5xgKaqpL7dSLutRUl4JW5bry7oeXdz5v_uknC5ZnAWZaR4dRJeMyY-xcRDOqLrj_iPkNDwWvvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596011427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sangal, Rohit B. ; Peaper, David R. ; Rothenberg, Craig ; Landry, Marie L. ; Sussman, L. Scott ; Martinello, Richard A. ; Ulrich, Andrew ; Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sangal, Rohit B. ; Peaper, David R. ; Rothenberg, Craig ; Landry, Marie L. ; Sussman, L. Scott ; Martinello, Richard A. ; Ulrich, Andrew ; Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creatorcontrib><description>Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay. This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively. A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%. Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34756452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 Testing - methods ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.182-186</ispartof><rights>2021 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 by the American College of Emergency Physicians. 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064421008465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34756452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sangal, Rohit B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaper, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothenberg, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Marie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sussman, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinello, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creatorcontrib><title>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay. This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively. A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%. Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.</description><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvEzEQhS0EomnhL6DlxmWXseP1ei9IUVpKpUhIpOVqOd5x6mjXDvYmUv49XqVUReLAyYd58974e4R8pFBRoOLzrtLe44BxO2BXMWC0grYCqF-RGYW2KUUj4DWZAW1FCYLzC3KZ0g4AWs7oW3Ix500teM1mZHjw7ogx6b5YL36sy2X4WbLiHtPo_LYItriZYtCbU3GNex3HAf1YLLrBpeSCT8WdNxF1wvRv5Qr9dnycjNajPr0jb6zuE75_eq_Iw9eb--W3cvX99m65WJWGy_lYCiol6sZIafW8AdxoyTWnfGMlRdFZyrpNjQy10dSC1V1ruBHYNNzmiWzmV-TL2Xd_2GREJl8Sda_20Q06nlTQTv098e5RbcNRSc54JpwNPj0ZxPDrkGmo_GGDfa89hkNSrG4FUMrZlNWepSaGlCLa5xgKaqpL7dSLutRUl4JW5bry7oeXdz5v_uknC5ZnAWZaR4dRJeMyY-xcRDOqLrj_iPkNDwWvvg</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Sangal, Rohit B.</creator><creator>Peaper, David R.</creator><creator>Rothenberg, Craig</creator><creator>Landry, Marie L.</creator><creator>Sussman, L. Scott</creator><creator>Martinello, Richard A.</creator><creator>Ulrich, Andrew</creator><creator>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>by the American College of Emergency Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</title><author>Sangal, Rohit B. ; Peaper, David R. ; Rothenberg, Craig ; Landry, Marie L. ; Sussman, L. Scott ; Martinello, Richard A. ; Ulrich, Andrew ; Venkatesh, Arjun K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sangal, Rohit B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaper, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothenberg, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Marie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sussman, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinello, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sangal, Rohit B.</au><au>Peaper, David R.</au><au>Rothenberg, Craig</au><au>Landry, Marie L.</au><au>Sussman, L. Scott</au><au>Martinello, Richard A.</au><au>Ulrich, Andrew</au><au>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>182-186</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay. This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively. A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%. Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34756452</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.182-186
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8424016
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - epidemiology
COVID-19 Testing - methods
Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Pandemics
SARS-CoV-2
The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report
United States - epidemiology
title Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20SARS-CoV-2%20Testing%20of%20Emergency%20Department%20Admissions%20Increases%20Emergency%20Department%20Length%20of%20Stay&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Sangal,%20Rohit%20B.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=182-186&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2596011427%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596011427&rft_id=info:pmid/34756452&rft_els_id=S0196064421008465&rfr_iscdi=true