Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay
Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay. This was an observational interrupted time ser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of emergency medicine 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.182-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 182 |
container_title | Annals of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 79 |
creator | Sangal, Rohit B. Peaper, David R. Rothenberg, Craig Landry, Marie L. Sussman, L. Scott Martinello, Richard A. Ulrich, Andrew Venkatesh, Arjun K. |
description | Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay.
This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively.
A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%.
Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8424016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064421008465</els_id><sourcerecordid>2596011427</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFvEzEQhS0EomnhL6DlxmWXseP1ei9IUVpKpUhIpOVqOd5x6mjXDvYmUv49XqVUReLAyYd58974e4R8pFBRoOLzrtLe44BxO2BXMWC0grYCqF-RGYW2KUUj4DWZAW1FCYLzC3KZ0g4AWs7oW3Ix500teM1mZHjw7ogx6b5YL36sy2X4WbLiHtPo_LYItriZYtCbU3GNex3HAf1YLLrBpeSCT8WdNxF1wvRv5Qr9dnycjNajPr0jb6zuE75_eq_Iw9eb--W3cvX99m65WJWGy_lYCiol6sZIafW8AdxoyTWnfGMlRdFZyrpNjQy10dSC1V1ruBHYNNzmiWzmV-TL2Xd_2GREJl8Sda_20Q06nlTQTv098e5RbcNRSc54JpwNPj0ZxPDrkGmo_GGDfa89hkNSrG4FUMrZlNWepSaGlCLa5xgKaqpL7dSLutRUl4JW5bry7oeXdz5v_uknC5ZnAWZaR4dRJeMyY-xcRDOqLrj_iPkNDwWvvg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2596011427</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sangal, Rohit B. ; Peaper, David R. ; Rothenberg, Craig ; Landry, Marie L. ; Sussman, L. Scott ; Martinello, Richard A. ; Ulrich, Andrew ; Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sangal, Rohit B. ; Peaper, David R. ; Rothenberg, Craig ; Landry, Marie L. ; Sussman, L. Scott ; Martinello, Richard A. ; Ulrich, Andrew ; Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creatorcontrib><description>Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay.
This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively.
A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%.
Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34756452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - epidemiology ; COVID-19 Testing - methods ; Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Pandemics ; SARS-CoV-2 ; The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.182-186</ispartof><rights>2021 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 by the American College of Emergency Physicians. 2021 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064421008465$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34756452$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sangal, Rohit B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaper, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothenberg, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Marie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sussman, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinello, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creatorcontrib><title>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay.
This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively.
A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%.
Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.</description><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - epidemiology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFvEzEQhS0EomnhL6DlxmWXseP1ei9IUVpKpUhIpOVqOd5x6mjXDvYmUv49XqVUReLAyYd58974e4R8pFBRoOLzrtLe44BxO2BXMWC0grYCqF-RGYW2KUUj4DWZAW1FCYLzC3KZ0g4AWs7oW3Ix500teM1mZHjw7ogx6b5YL36sy2X4WbLiHtPo_LYItriZYtCbU3GNex3HAf1YLLrBpeSCT8WdNxF1wvRv5Qr9dnycjNajPr0jb6zuE75_eq_Iw9eb--W3cvX99m65WJWGy_lYCiol6sZIafW8AdxoyTWnfGMlRdFZyrpNjQy10dSC1V1ruBHYNNzmiWzmV-TL2Xd_2GREJl8Sda_20Q06nlTQTv098e5RbcNRSc54JpwNPj0ZxPDrkGmo_GGDfa89hkNSrG4FUMrZlNWepSaGlCLa5xgKaqpL7dSLutRUl4JW5bry7oeXdz5v_uknC5ZnAWZaR4dRJeMyY-xcRDOqLrj_iPkNDwWvvg</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Sangal, Rohit B.</creator><creator>Peaper, David R.</creator><creator>Rothenberg, Craig</creator><creator>Landry, Marie L.</creator><creator>Sussman, L. Scott</creator><creator>Martinello, Richard A.</creator><creator>Ulrich, Andrew</creator><creator>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>by the American College of Emergency Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</title><author>Sangal, Rohit B. ; Peaper, David R. ; Rothenberg, Craig ; Landry, Marie L. ; Sussman, L. Scott ; Martinello, Richard A. ; Ulrich, Andrew ; Venkatesh, Arjun K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c483t-6188ea7c88fa370eba84a414bf81e6df12db5e2eaca1f0fad9c4c6e774f2db873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - epidemiology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sangal, Rohit B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peaper, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rothenberg, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landry, Marie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sussman, L. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinello, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulrich, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sangal, Rohit B.</au><au>Peaper, David R.</au><au>Rothenberg, Craig</au><au>Landry, Marie L.</au><au>Sussman, L. Scott</au><au>Martinello, Richard A.</au><au>Ulrich, Andrew</au><au>Venkatesh, Arjun K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>79</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>182</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>182-186</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Our institution experienced a change in SARS-CoV-2 testing policy as well as substantial changes in local COVID-19 prevalence, allowing for a unique examination of the relationship between SARS-CoV-2 testing and emergency department (ED) length of stay.
This was an observational interrupted time series of all patients admitted to an academic health system between March 15, 2020, and September 30, 2020. Given testing limitations from March 15 to April 24, all patients receiving SARS-CoV-2 tests were symptomatic. On April 24, testing was expanded to all ED admissions. The primary and secondary outcomes were ED length of stay and number needed to test to obtain a positive, respectively.
A total of 70,856 patients were cared for in the EDs during the 7-month period. The testing change increased admission length of stay by 1.89 hours (95% confidence interval 1.39 to 2.38). The number needed to test was 2.5 patients and was highest yield on April 1, 2020, when the state positivity rate was 39.7%; however, the number needed to test exceeded 170 patients by Sept 1, 2020, at which point the state positivity rate was 0.5%.
Although universal SARS-CoV-2 testing of ED admissions may meaningfully support mitigation and containment efforts, the clinical cost of testing all admissions amid low community positivity is notable. In our system, universal ED SARS-CoV-2 testing was associated with a 24% increase in admission length of stay alongside the detection of only 1 positive case every other day. Given the known harms and risks of ED boarding and crowding, solutions must be developed to support regular operational flow while balancing infection prevention needs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34756452</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-0644 |
ispartof | Annals of emergency medicine, 2022-02, Vol.79 (2), p.182-186 |
issn | 0196-0644 1097-6760 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8424016 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 - epidemiology COVID-19 Testing - methods Emergency Service, Hospital - statistics & numerical data Humans Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Pandemics SARS-CoV-2 The Practice of Emergency Medicine/Brief Research Report United States - epidemiology |
title | Universal SARS-CoV-2 Testing of Emergency Department Admissions Increases Emergency Department Length of Stay |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Universal%20SARS-CoV-2%20Testing%20of%20Emergency%20Department%20Admissions%20Increases%20Emergency%20Department%20Length%20of%20Stay&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Sangal,%20Rohit%20B.&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=79&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=182&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=182-186&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2596011427%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2596011427&rft_id=info:pmid/34756452&rft_els_id=S0196064421008465&rfr_iscdi=true |