Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey
Background To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines. Methods Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2021-10, Vol.75 (10), p.e14666-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e14666 |
container_title | International journal of clinical practice (Esher) |
container_volume | 75 |
creator | Tanacan, Efsun Ibis, Ogulcan Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can Dincer, Didem Erdogan, Fatma Gulru |
description | Background
To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines.
Methods
Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters.
Results
Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P < .001; r = .335, P < .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively).
Conclusion
The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijcp.14666 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8420361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2573272819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi0EoqWw4QkssUFI0_ruGRZIVbg0VaV2AWwtj-e4OJrYwc4EZccj8Iw8CZ6mQqILvPBF_3d-neMfoZeUnNK6zsLKbU6pUEo9QsdUC9ZQJujjeueqbSTh9Ag9K2VFCJOyJU_RERecsU7rYzTeQC4bcNuwg4KTxwPktd2mMd3u8SwEO4ayLdjGAWcoYYBYXynixfXX5fvfP3_RDu-scyFCeYvP8fcJyjakGG3IUOXeFhhwmfIO9s_RE2_HAi_uzxP05eOHz4uL5ur603JxftU4Iblqeqa9paqnTnrBWib1AMpzNcjeKcK0go534CWhwtNWEudaL62m0nV1Y5SfoHcH383Ur2FwteVsR7PJYW3z3iQbzL9KDN_MbdqZVjDC1Wzw-t4gp7uBzDoUB-NoI6SpmPkfhZSakoq-eoCu0pRjHa9SmjPNWtpV6s2BcjmVksH_bYYSM4do5hDNXYgVpgf4Rxhh_x_SLC8XN4eaP7jLoEY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2573272819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tanacan, Efsun ; Ibis, Ogulcan ; Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy ; Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can ; Dincer, Didem ; Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanacan, Efsun ; Ibis, Ogulcan ; Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy ; Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can ; Dincer, Didem ; Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creatorcontrib><description>Background
To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines.
Methods
Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters.
Results
Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P < .001; r = .335, P < .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively).
Conclusion
The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14666</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34322977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Coronaviruses ; Correlation analysis ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Dermatology ; Immunization ; Information sources ; Original Paper ; Original Papers ; Population studies ; Questionnaires ; Risk factors ; Statistical analysis ; Vaccines ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2021-10, Vol.75 (10), p.e14666-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0933-4619 ; 0000-0003-1975-7460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijcp.14666$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijcp.14666$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanacan, Efsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibis, Ogulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Didem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creatorcontrib><title>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</title><title>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</title><description>Background
To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines.
Methods
Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters.
Results
Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P < .001; r = .335, P < .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively).
Conclusion
The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1368-5031</issn><issn>1742-1241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi0EoqWw4QkssUFI0_ruGRZIVbg0VaV2AWwtj-e4OJrYwc4EZccj8Iw8CZ6mQqILvPBF_3d-neMfoZeUnNK6zsLKbU6pUEo9QsdUC9ZQJujjeueqbSTh9Ag9K2VFCJOyJU_RERecsU7rYzTeQC4bcNuwg4KTxwPktd2mMd3u8SwEO4ayLdjGAWcoYYBYXynixfXX5fvfP3_RDu-scyFCeYvP8fcJyjakGG3IUOXeFhhwmfIO9s_RE2_HAi_uzxP05eOHz4uL5ur603JxftU4Iblqeqa9paqnTnrBWib1AMpzNcjeKcK0go534CWhwtNWEudaL62m0nV1Y5SfoHcH383Ur2FwteVsR7PJYW3z3iQbzL9KDN_MbdqZVjDC1Wzw-t4gp7uBzDoUB-NoI6SpmPkfhZSakoq-eoCu0pRjHa9SmjPNWtpV6s2BcjmVksH_bYYSM4do5hDNXYgVpgf4Rxhh_x_SLC8XN4eaP7jLoEY</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Tanacan, Efsun</creator><creator>Ibis, Ogulcan</creator><creator>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</creator><creator>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</creator><creator>Dincer, Didem</creator><creator>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0933-4619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-7460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</title><author>Tanacan, Efsun ; Ibis, Ogulcan ; Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy ; Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can ; Dincer, Didem ; Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanacan, Efsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibis, Ogulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Didem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanacan, Efsun</au><au>Ibis, Ogulcan</au><au>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</au><au>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</au><au>Dincer, Didem</au><au>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e14666</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14666-n/a</pages><issn>1368-5031</issn><eissn>1742-1241</eissn><abstract>Background
To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines.
Methods
Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters.
Results
Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P < .001; r = .335, P < .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively).
Conclusion
The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>34322977</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijcp.14666</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0933-4619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-7460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1368-5031 |
ispartof | International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2021-10, Vol.75 (10), p.e14666-n/a |
issn | 1368-5031 1742-1241 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8420361 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Chronic illnesses Coronaviruses Correlation analysis COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Dermatology Immunization Information sources Original Paper Original Papers Population studies Questionnaires Risk factors Statistical analysis Vaccines Working conditions |
title | Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspectives%20of%20dermatology%20specialists%20and%20residents%20on%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20vaccines:%20A%20questionnaire%E2%80%90based%20survey&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20practice%20(Esher)&rft.au=Tanacan,%20Efsun&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e14666&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14666-n/a&rft.issn=1368-5031&rft.eissn=1742-1241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcp.14666&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2573272819%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2573272819&rft_id=info:pmid/34322977&rfr_iscdi=true |