Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey

Background To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines. Methods Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2021-10, Vol.75 (10), p.e14666-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Tanacan, Efsun, Ibis, Ogulcan, Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy, Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can, Dincer, Didem, Erdogan, Fatma Gulru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 10
container_start_page e14666
container_title International journal of clinical practice (Esher)
container_volume 75
creator Tanacan, Efsun
Ibis, Ogulcan
Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy
Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can
Dincer, Didem
Erdogan, Fatma Gulru
description Background To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines. Methods Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters. Results Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P < .001; r = .335, P < .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively). Conclusion The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijcp.14666
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8420361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2573272819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi0EoqWw4QkssUFI0_ruGRZIVbg0VaV2AWwtj-e4OJrYwc4EZccj8Iw8CZ6mQqILvPBF_3d-neMfoZeUnNK6zsLKbU6pUEo9QsdUC9ZQJujjeueqbSTh9Ag9K2VFCJOyJU_RERecsU7rYzTeQC4bcNuwg4KTxwPktd2mMd3u8SwEO4ayLdjGAWcoYYBYXynixfXX5fvfP3_RDu-scyFCeYvP8fcJyjakGG3IUOXeFhhwmfIO9s_RE2_HAi_uzxP05eOHz4uL5ur603JxftU4Iblqeqa9paqnTnrBWib1AMpzNcjeKcK0go534CWhwtNWEudaL62m0nV1Y5SfoHcH383Ur2FwteVsR7PJYW3z3iQbzL9KDN_MbdqZVjDC1Wzw-t4gp7uBzDoUB-NoI6SpmPkfhZSakoq-eoCu0pRjHa9SmjPNWtpV6s2BcjmVksH_bYYSM4do5hDNXYgVpgf4Rxhh_x_SLC8XN4eaP7jLoEY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2573272819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Tanacan, Efsun ; Ibis, Ogulcan ; Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy ; Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can ; Dincer, Didem ; Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanacan, Efsun ; Ibis, Ogulcan ; Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy ; Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can ; Dincer, Didem ; Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creatorcontrib><description>Background To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines. Methods Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters. Results Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P &lt; .001; r = .335, P &lt; .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively). Conclusion The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1368-5031</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1241</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14666</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34322977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Chronic illnesses ; Coronaviruses ; Correlation analysis ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Dermatology ; Immunization ; Information sources ; Original Paper ; Original Papers ; Population studies ; Questionnaires ; Risk factors ; Statistical analysis ; Vaccines ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2021-10, Vol.75 (10), p.e14666-n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0933-4619 ; 0000-0003-1975-7460</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijcp.14666$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijcp.14666$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanacan, Efsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibis, Ogulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Didem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creatorcontrib><title>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</title><title>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</title><description>Background To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines. Methods Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters. Results Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P &lt; .001; r = .335, P &lt; .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively). Conclusion The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.</description><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Original Papers</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1368-5031</issn><issn>1742-1241</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi0EoqWw4QkssUFI0_ruGRZIVbg0VaV2AWwtj-e4OJrYwc4EZccj8Iw8CZ6mQqILvPBF_3d-neMfoZeUnNK6zsLKbU6pUEo9QsdUC9ZQJujjeueqbSTh9Ag9K2VFCJOyJU_RERecsU7rYzTeQC4bcNuwg4KTxwPktd2mMd3u8SwEO4ayLdjGAWcoYYBYXynixfXX5fvfP3_RDu-scyFCeYvP8fcJyjakGG3IUOXeFhhwmfIO9s_RE2_HAi_uzxP05eOHz4uL5ur603JxftU4Iblqeqa9paqnTnrBWib1AMpzNcjeKcK0go534CWhwtNWEudaL62m0nV1Y5SfoHcH383Ur2FwteVsR7PJYW3z3iQbzL9KDN_MbdqZVjDC1Wzw-t4gp7uBzDoUB-NoI6SpmPkfhZSakoq-eoCu0pRjHa9SmjPNWtpV6s2BcjmVksH_bYYSM4do5hDNXYgVpgf4Rxhh_x_SLC8XN4eaP7jLoEY</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Tanacan, Efsun</creator><creator>Ibis, Ogulcan</creator><creator>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</creator><creator>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</creator><creator>Dincer, Didem</creator><creator>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0933-4619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-7460</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</title><author>Tanacan, Efsun ; Ibis, Ogulcan ; Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy ; Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can ; Dincer, Didem ; Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4536-b27fa16b1c5f428257de6f36d5bc60276e939ef5014f1850cc8f5a715c9715213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Original Papers</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanacan, Efsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibis, Ogulcan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Didem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanacan, Efsun</au><au>Ibis, Ogulcan</au><au>Sarac, Gulhan Aksoy</au><au>Emeksiz, Mehmet Ali Can</au><au>Dincer, Didem</au><au>Erdogan, Fatma Gulru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical practice (Esher)</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e14666</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14666-n/a</pages><issn>1368-5031</issn><eissn>1742-1241</eissn><abstract>Background To evaluate the perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines. Methods Present questionnaire‐based study was conducted on dermatology residents and specialists between January 5 and 20. A non‐validated online questionary evaluating the attitude of the participants about the COVID‐19 vaccine was performed. In the first step of the study, data related to the demographic features, all participants' clinical characteristics, and working conditions were recorded. Thereafter answers given to 12 specific questions were recorded. The study population was divided into two groups: dermatology residents (n = 138) and specialists (n = 159). Mentioned variables were compared between the two defined groups. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship between vaccination acceptance and various study parameters. Results Majority of the cases had positive attitudes against COVID‐19 vaccines. However, there were significant differences between the resident and specialist groups related to the source of information, working conditions, degree of concern, and type of vaccines. Statistically significant negative, weak correlations were observed for age and duration of medical practice (r = −.128, P = .028; r = −.132, P = .041 respectively). Statistically significant positive weak correlations were observed for chronic diseases, level of knowledge about COVID‐19 vaccines, number of information sources about COVİD‐19, and previous COVİD‐19 infection (r = .133, P = .021; r = .207, P &lt; .001; r = .335, P &lt; .001; r = .176, P = .002 respectively). Conclusion The acceptance of COVID‐19 vaccination may be affected by working conditions, medical experience, level of knowledge and the presence of risk factors for severe disease among dermatology residents and specialists.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>34322977</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijcp.14666</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0933-4619</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-7460</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1368-5031
ispartof International journal of clinical practice (Esher), 2021-10, Vol.75 (10), p.e14666-n/a
issn 1368-5031
1742-1241
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8420361
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Chronic illnesses
Coronaviruses
Correlation analysis
COVID-19
COVID-19 vaccines
Dermatology
Immunization
Information sources
Original Paper
Original Papers
Population studies
Questionnaires
Risk factors
Statistical analysis
Vaccines
Working conditions
title Perspectives of dermatology specialists and residents on COVID‐19 vaccines: A questionnaire‐based survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A30%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perspectives%20of%20dermatology%20specialists%20and%20residents%20on%20COVID%E2%80%9019%20vaccines:%20A%20questionnaire%E2%80%90based%20survey&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20practice%20(Esher)&rft.au=Tanacan,%20Efsun&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e14666&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14666-n/a&rft.issn=1368-5031&rft.eissn=1742-1241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcp.14666&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2573272819%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2573272819&rft_id=info:pmid/34322977&rfr_iscdi=true