"These Questions Have Everything That Happens to me": Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil
Purpose The purpose of this mixed-methods triangulation study was to assess the face validity and comprehension of a femicide risk assessment tool, the Danger Assessment-Brazil (DA-Brazil) among women seeking care in a one stop center for abused women in Curitiba, Brazil. Our secondary aim was to as...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of family violence 2022-05, Vol.37 (4), p.547-557 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 557 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 547 |
container_title | Journal of family violence |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Evans, Dabney P. Xavier Hall, Casey D. da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães Prado, Sandra Marques Signorelli, Marcos C. |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this mixed-methods triangulation study was to assess the face validity and comprehension of a femicide risk assessment tool, the Danger Assessment-Brazil (DA-Brazil) among women seeking care in a one stop center for abused women in Curitiba, Brazil. Our secondary aim was to assess professionals' perceptions of feasibility for using the DA-Brazil in the same setting.
Method
Fifty-five women experiencing relationship violence completed the instrument and participated in cognitive interviews about their experience; professionals attending survivors were also interviewed.
Results
The vast majority of women described the DA-Brazil instrument as being easy to comprehend (
n
= 41, 73.2%). Nearly half of participants (
n
= 26, 46.4%) had some kind of question regarding the DA-Brazil calendar, a tool to visualize abuse frequency and severity. Queries aligned with five categories: recollection of dates, scale, relationship status, terminology, and discomfort. Professionals reported that the DA-Brazil instrument would support referral decision-making.
Conclusion
The overall face validity and comprehension of the DA-Brazil appears to be high. The majority of challenges were around the calendar activity. Professional perceptions of the DA-Brazil suggest a high degree of feasibility for its use in Brazilian healthcare settings. In order for the DA-Brazil to effectively be administered with facilitated support there is a need for training on the best use of the instrument. Accurate assessment of femicide risk is critical in a country like Brazil with high rates of femicide. The DA-Brazil provides a valid assessment of femicide risk and has the potential to trigger early intervention for those at risk. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8414033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A701029367</galeid><sourcerecordid>A701029367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-80c97f0002e5af1e9d606d9bd38a5a39884069214e4190accb8da921bea7b8c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkFv1DAQhS0EokvhD3BAVrlwSbFjJ7E5IIWqpUiVEGgRR8txJrsuib3YyUqL-PE4bCktWqEcrMx88zx6fgg9p-SUElK9jpQIWWYkpxkhjLKMPkALWlQsy0VBH6IFEaLIKi7yI_QkxmtCiBS8eoyOGOeSCSkW6OfJcg0R8KcJ4mi9i_hSbwGfbyHsxrV1K7xc6zEVNxtIzdHjAU7e4NrpfhdtxL7DGl_AYI1tAX-28RuuY4QYB3AjXnrf484HXDdThBZ_9amMrcPvgv5h-6foUaf7CM9uzmP05eJ8eXaZXX18_-GsvspMUckxE8TIqkvb51DojoJsS1K2smmZ0IVmUghOSplTDpxKoo1pRKvTfwO6aoSp2DF6u9fdTM0ArUmrBd2rTbCDDjvltVX3O86u1cpvleCUE8aSwKsbgeC_z06pwUYDfa8d-CmqvKgIS0ZLkdCX_6DXfgrJrkSVRc4p4-wOtdI9KOs6n-41s6iqK0JJLlk5750doFbgIC3pHXQ2le_xpwf49LXzAx0cyPcDJvgYA3S3nlCi5oypfcZUypj6nTFF09CLu27ejvwJVQLYHoip5VYQ_lrwH9lfisTapA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652413438</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"These Questions Have Everything That Happens to me": Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Evans, Dabney P. ; Xavier Hall, Casey D. ; da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães ; Prado, Sandra Marques ; Signorelli, Marcos C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Dabney P. ; Xavier Hall, Casey D. ; da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães ; Prado, Sandra Marques ; Signorelli, Marcos C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this mixed-methods triangulation study was to assess the face validity and comprehension of a femicide risk assessment tool, the Danger Assessment-Brazil (DA-Brazil) among women seeking care in a one stop center for abused women in Curitiba, Brazil. Our secondary aim was to assess professionals' perceptions of feasibility for using the DA-Brazil in the same setting.
Method
Fifty-five women experiencing relationship violence completed the instrument and participated in cognitive interviews about their experience; professionals attending survivors were also interviewed.
Results
The vast majority of women described the DA-Brazil instrument as being easy to comprehend (
n
= 41, 73.2%). Nearly half of participants (
n
= 26, 46.4%) had some kind of question regarding the DA-Brazil calendar, a tool to visualize abuse frequency and severity. Queries aligned with five categories: recollection of dates, scale, relationship status, terminology, and discomfort. Professionals reported that the DA-Brazil instrument would support referral decision-making.
Conclusion
The overall face validity and comprehension of the DA-Brazil appears to be high. The majority of challenges were around the calendar activity. Professional perceptions of the DA-Brazil suggest a high degree of feasibility for its use in Brazilian healthcare settings. In order for the DA-Brazil to effectively be administered with facilitated support there is a need for training on the best use of the instrument. Accurate assessment of femicide risk is critical in a country like Brazil with high rates of femicide. The DA-Brazil provides a valid assessment of femicide risk and has the potential to trigger early intervention for those at risk.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34493898</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abused women ; Calendars ; Clinical Psychology ; Cognitive interviews ; Comprehension ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Decision making ; Discomfort ; Domestic violence ; Early intervention ; Evaluation ; Feasibility ; Femicide ; Gender-based violence ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health services ; Homicide ; Law and Psychology ; Management ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Murders & murder attempts ; Original ; Original Article ; Perceptions ; Prevention ; Professionals ; Psychological aspects ; Psychotherapy and Counseling ; Public health ; Quality of Life Research ; Risk assessment ; Social aspects ; Terminology ; Triangulation ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of family violence, 2022-05, Vol.37 (4), p.547-557</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-80c97f0002e5af1e9d606d9bd38a5a39884069214e4190accb8da921bea7b8c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-80c97f0002e5af1e9d606d9bd38a5a39884069214e4190accb8da921bea7b8c73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2201-5655</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,12846,27344,27924,27925,30999,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34493898$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Dabney P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier Hall, Casey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, Sandra Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Marcos C.</creatorcontrib><title>"These Questions Have Everything That Happens to me": Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil</title><title>Journal of family violence</title><addtitle>J Fam Viol</addtitle><addtitle>J Fam Violence</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of this mixed-methods triangulation study was to assess the face validity and comprehension of a femicide risk assessment tool, the Danger Assessment-Brazil (DA-Brazil) among women seeking care in a one stop center for abused women in Curitiba, Brazil. Our secondary aim was to assess professionals' perceptions of feasibility for using the DA-Brazil in the same setting.
Method
Fifty-five women experiencing relationship violence completed the instrument and participated in cognitive interviews about their experience; professionals attending survivors were also interviewed.
Results
The vast majority of women described the DA-Brazil instrument as being easy to comprehend (
n
= 41, 73.2%). Nearly half of participants (
n
= 26, 46.4%) had some kind of question regarding the DA-Brazil calendar, a tool to visualize abuse frequency and severity. Queries aligned with five categories: recollection of dates, scale, relationship status, terminology, and discomfort. Professionals reported that the DA-Brazil instrument would support referral decision-making.
Conclusion
The overall face validity and comprehension of the DA-Brazil appears to be high. The majority of challenges were around the calendar activity. Professional perceptions of the DA-Brazil suggest a high degree of feasibility for its use in Brazilian healthcare settings. In order for the DA-Brazil to effectively be administered with facilitated support there is a need for training on the best use of the instrument. Accurate assessment of femicide risk is critical in a country like Brazil with high rates of femicide. The DA-Brazil provides a valid assessment of femicide risk and has the potential to trigger early intervention for those at risk.</description><subject>Abused women</subject><subject>Calendars</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive interviews</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Femicide</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Homicide</subject><subject>Law and Psychology</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Murders & murder attempts</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychotherapy and Counseling</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Triangulation</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0885-7482</issn><issn>1573-2851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkFv1DAQhS0EokvhD3BAVrlwSbFjJ7E5IIWqpUiVEGgRR8txJrsuib3YyUqL-PE4bCktWqEcrMx88zx6fgg9p-SUElK9jpQIWWYkpxkhjLKMPkALWlQsy0VBH6IFEaLIKi7yI_QkxmtCiBS8eoyOGOeSCSkW6OfJcg0R8KcJ4mi9i_hSbwGfbyHsxrV1K7xc6zEVNxtIzdHjAU7e4NrpfhdtxL7DGl_AYI1tAX-28RuuY4QYB3AjXnrf484HXDdThBZ_9amMrcPvgv5h-6foUaf7CM9uzmP05eJ8eXaZXX18_-GsvspMUckxE8TIqkvb51DojoJsS1K2smmZ0IVmUghOSplTDpxKoo1pRKvTfwO6aoSp2DF6u9fdTM0ArUmrBd2rTbCDDjvltVX3O86u1cpvleCUE8aSwKsbgeC_z06pwUYDfa8d-CmqvKgIS0ZLkdCX_6DXfgrJrkSVRc4p4-wOtdI9KOs6n-41s6iqK0JJLlk5750doFbgIC3pHXQ2le_xpwf49LXzAx0cyPcDJvgYA3S3nlCi5oypfcZUypj6nTFF09CLu27ejvwJVQLYHoip5VYQ_lrwH9lfisTapA</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Evans, Dabney P.</creator><creator>Xavier Hall, Casey D.</creator><creator>da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães</creator><creator>Prado, Sandra Marques</creator><creator>Signorelli, Marcos C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-5655</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>"These Questions Have Everything That Happens to me": Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil</title><author>Evans, Dabney P. ; Xavier Hall, Casey D. ; da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães ; Prado, Sandra Marques ; Signorelli, Marcos C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c579t-80c97f0002e5af1e9d606d9bd38a5a39884069214e4190accb8da921bea7b8c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Abused women</topic><topic>Calendars</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive interviews</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Femicide</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Homicide</topic><topic>Law and Psychology</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Murders & murder attempts</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Triangulation</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Dabney P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xavier Hall, Casey D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prado, Sandra Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Marcos C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Dabney P.</au><au>Xavier Hall, Casey D.</au><au>da Rocha, Raiza Wallace Guimarães</au><au>Prado, Sandra Marques</au><au>Signorelli, Marcos C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"These Questions Have Everything That Happens to me": Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle><stitle>J Fam Viol</stitle><addtitle>J Fam Violence</addtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>547</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>547-557</pages><issn>0885-7482</issn><eissn>1573-2851</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this mixed-methods triangulation study was to assess the face validity and comprehension of a femicide risk assessment tool, the Danger Assessment-Brazil (DA-Brazil) among women seeking care in a one stop center for abused women in Curitiba, Brazil. Our secondary aim was to assess professionals' perceptions of feasibility for using the DA-Brazil in the same setting.
Method
Fifty-five women experiencing relationship violence completed the instrument and participated in cognitive interviews about their experience; professionals attending survivors were also interviewed.
Results
The vast majority of women described the DA-Brazil instrument as being easy to comprehend (
n
= 41, 73.2%). Nearly half of participants (
n
= 26, 46.4%) had some kind of question regarding the DA-Brazil calendar, a tool to visualize abuse frequency and severity. Queries aligned with five categories: recollection of dates, scale, relationship status, terminology, and discomfort. Professionals reported that the DA-Brazil instrument would support referral decision-making.
Conclusion
The overall face validity and comprehension of the DA-Brazil appears to be high. The majority of challenges were around the calendar activity. Professional perceptions of the DA-Brazil suggest a high degree of feasibility for its use in Brazilian healthcare settings. In order for the DA-Brazil to effectively be administered with facilitated support there is a need for training on the best use of the instrument. Accurate assessment of femicide risk is critical in a country like Brazil with high rates of femicide. The DA-Brazil provides a valid assessment of femicide risk and has the potential to trigger early intervention for those at risk.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>34493898</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-5655</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-7482 |
ispartof | Journal of family violence, 2022-05, Vol.37 (4), p.547-557 |
issn | 0885-7482 1573-2851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8414033 |
source | SpringerLink Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Abused women Calendars Clinical Psychology Cognitive interviews Comprehension Criminology and Criminal Justice Decision making Discomfort Domestic violence Early intervention Evaluation Feasibility Femicide Gender-based violence Health aspects Health care Health services Homicide Law and Psychology Management Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Murders & murder attempts Original Original Article Perceptions Prevention Professionals Psychological aspects Psychotherapy and Counseling Public health Quality of Life Research Risk assessment Social aspects Terminology Triangulation Women |
title | "These Questions Have Everything That Happens to me": Analysis of a Femicide Risk Assessment Tool for Abused Women in Brazil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A10%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22These%20Questions%20Have%20Everything%20That%20Happens%20to%20me%22:%20Analysis%20of%20a%20Femicide%20Risk%20Assessment%20Tool%20for%20Abused%20Women%20in%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20violence&rft.au=Evans,%20Dabney%20P.&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=547&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=547-557&rft.issn=0885-7482&rft.eissn=1573-2851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10896-021-00313-1&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA701029367%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652413438&rft_id=info:pmid/34493898&rft_galeid=A701029367&rfr_iscdi=true |