Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes

Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. Across a population of patients and healthy participant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2021-06, Vol.159 (6), p.2356-2365
Hauptverfasser: Berger, Kenneth I., Adam, Ori, Dal Negro, Roberto Walter, Kaminsky, David A., Shiner, Robert J., Burgos, Felip, de Jongh, Frans H.C., Cohen, Inon, Fredberg, Jeffrey J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2365
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2356
container_title Chest
container_volume 159
creator Berger, Kenneth I.
Adam, Ori
Dal Negro, Roberto Walter
Kaminsky, David A.
Shiner, Robert J.
Burgos, Felip
de Jongh, Frans H.C.
Cohen, Inon
Fredberg, Jeffrey J.
description Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography? A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLCPleth) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLCMB). TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLCPleth and TLCMB was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers. TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8411450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369221002087</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0012369221002087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-490e95ce2e40232f91ee05203602d164be3f95042b58f44cec4743234f97de423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1LAzEQDKLYWv0FguQP3JnPa_OgIEWtUPVB7WtIc3ttyt2lJHeF_nuvVou-CAvLsrMzs4PQJSUpJTS7XqV2CbFJGWE0JV1JdoT6VHGacCn4MeoTQlnCM8V66CzGFelmqrJT1ONccjXiqo8mM1O63DTO19gX2OAXv4ESj321NrbBb9vYQIULH3CzBPwMJrYBKqibHXra1gs882VbQTxHJ4UpI1x89wH6eLh_H0-S6evj0_humlghVZMIRUBJCwwEYZwVigJ0xgnPCMtpJubACyWJYHM5KoSwYMVQcMZFoYY5CMYH6HbPu27nFeS2sxJMqdfBVSZstTdO_93UbqkXfqNHglIhSUfA9wQ2-BgDFIdbSvQuWL3SX8HqXbCadCV3sle_ZQ83P0l2gJs9ALrnNw6CjtZBbSF3AWyjc-_-FfgE_QSK2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berger, Kenneth I. ; Adam, Ori ; Dal Negro, Roberto Walter ; Kaminsky, David A. ; Shiner, Robert J. ; Burgos, Felip ; de Jongh, Frans H.C. ; Cohen, Inon ; Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, Kenneth I. ; Adam, Ori ; Dal Negro, Roberto Walter ; Kaminsky, David A. ; Shiner, Robert J. ; Burgos, Felip ; de Jongh, Frans H.C. ; Cohen, Inon ; Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><description>Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography? A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLCPleth) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLCMB). TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLCPleth and TLCMB was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers. TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33539839</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Education and Clinical Practice: Original Research ; Europe ; Female ; Healthy Volunteers ; Humans ; Lung Volume Measurements - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; novel measurement ; physiology ; plethysmograph ; Plethysmography - methods ; pulmonary function test ; total lung capacity ; Total Lung Capacity - physiology ; United States</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2021-06, Vol.159 (6), p.2356-2365</ispartof><rights>2021 American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2021 American College of Chest Physicians</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-490e95ce2e40232f91ee05203602d164be3f95042b58f44cec4743234f97de423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-490e95ce2e40232f91ee05203602d164be3f95042b58f44cec4743234f97de423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539839$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, Kenneth I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adam, Ori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Negro, Roberto Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminsky, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiner, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos, Felip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jongh, Frans H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Inon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography? A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLCPleth) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLCMB). TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLCPleth and TLCMB was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers. TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Education and Clinical Practice: Original Research</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Healthy Volunteers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Volume Measurements - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>novel measurement</subject><subject>physiology</subject><subject>plethysmograph</subject><subject>Plethysmography - methods</subject><subject>pulmonary function test</subject><subject>total lung capacity</subject><subject>Total Lung Capacity - physiology</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UF1LAzEQDKLYWv0FguQP3JnPa_OgIEWtUPVB7WtIc3ttyt2lJHeF_nuvVou-CAvLsrMzs4PQJSUpJTS7XqV2CbFJGWE0JV1JdoT6VHGacCn4MeoTQlnCM8V66CzGFelmqrJT1ONccjXiqo8mM1O63DTO19gX2OAXv4ESj321NrbBb9vYQIULH3CzBPwMJrYBKqibHXra1gs882VbQTxHJ4UpI1x89wH6eLh_H0-S6evj0_humlghVZMIRUBJCwwEYZwVigJ0xgnPCMtpJubACyWJYHM5KoSwYMVQcMZFoYY5CMYH6HbPu27nFeS2sxJMqdfBVSZstTdO_93UbqkXfqNHglIhSUfA9wQ2-BgDFIdbSvQuWL3SX8HqXbCadCV3sle_ZQ83P0l2gJs9ALrnNw6CjtZBbSF3AWyjc-_-FfgE_QSK2g</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Berger, Kenneth I.</creator><creator>Adam, Ori</creator><creator>Dal Negro, Roberto Walter</creator><creator>Kaminsky, David A.</creator><creator>Shiner, Robert J.</creator><creator>Burgos, Felip</creator><creator>de Jongh, Frans H.C.</creator><creator>Cohen, Inon</creator><creator>Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American College of Chest Physicians</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes</title><author>Berger, Kenneth I. ; Adam, Ori ; Dal Negro, Roberto Walter ; Kaminsky, David A. ; Shiner, Robert J. ; Burgos, Felip ; de Jongh, Frans H.C. ; Cohen, Inon ; Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-490e95ce2e40232f91ee05203602d164be3f95042b58f44cec4743234f97de423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Education and Clinical Practice: Original Research</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Healthy Volunteers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Volume Measurements - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>novel measurement</topic><topic>physiology</topic><topic>plethysmograph</topic><topic>Plethysmography - methods</topic><topic>pulmonary function test</topic><topic>total lung capacity</topic><topic>Total Lung Capacity - physiology</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, Kenneth I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adam, Ori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dal Negro, Roberto Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaminsky, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shiner, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgos, Felip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Jongh, Frans H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Inon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, Kenneth I.</au><au>Adam, Ori</au><au>Dal Negro, Roberto Walter</au><au>Kaminsky, David A.</au><au>Shiner, Robert J.</au><au>Burgos, Felip</au><au>de Jongh, Frans H.C.</au><au>Cohen, Inon</au><au>Fredberg, Jeffrey J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2356</spage><epage>2365</epage><pages>2356-2365</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Current techniques for measuring absolute lung volumes rely on bulky and expensive equipment and are complicated to use for the operator and the patient. A novel method for measurement of absolute lung volumes, the MiniBox method, is presented. Across a population of patients and healthy participants, do values for total lung capacity (TLC) determined by the novel compact device (MiniBox, PulmOne Advanced Medical Devices, Ltd.) compare favorably with measurements determined by traditional whole body plethysmography? A total of 266 participants (130 men) and respiratory patients were recruited from five global centers (three in Europe and two in the United States). The study population comprised individuals with obstructive (n = 197) and restrictive (n = 33) disorders as well as healthy participants (n = 36). TLC measured by conventional plethysmography (TLCPleth) was compared with TLC measured by the MiniBox (TLCMB). TLC values ranged between 2.7 and 10.9 L. The normalized root mean square difference (NSD) between TLCPleth and TLCMB was 7.0% in healthy participants. In obstructed patients, the NSD was 7.9% in mild obstruction and 9.1% in severe obstruction. In restricted patients, the NSD was 7.8% in mild restriction and 13.9% in moderate and severe restriction. No significant differences were found between TLC values obtained by the two measurement techniques. Also no significant differences were found in results obtained among the five centers. TLC as measured by the novel MiniBox system is not significantly different from TLC measured by conventional whole body plethysmography, thus validating the MiniBox method as a reliable method to measure absolute lung volumes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33539839</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2021-06, Vol.159 (6), p.2356-2365
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8411450
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Education and Clinical Practice: Original Research
Europe
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Humans
Lung Volume Measurements - methods
Male
Middle Aged
novel measurement
physiology
plethysmograph
Plethysmography - methods
pulmonary function test
total lung capacity
Total Lung Capacity - physiology
United States
title Validation of a Novel Compact System for the Measurement of Lung Volumes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A42%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20Novel%20Compact%20System%20for%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Lung%20Volumes&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Berger,%20Kenneth%20I.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2356&rft.epage=2365&rft.pages=2356-2365&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.052&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES0012369221002087%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33539839&rft_els_id=S0012369221002087&rfr_iscdi=true