Comparing Two Days of Dietary Intake in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES, 2013–2016

The objective of this research is to compare the Day 1 and Day 2 dietary intakes of adults in What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (WWEIA, NHANES) 2013–2016. Dietary recalls of males (n = 2599) and females (n = 2624) 20+ years who had both a Day 1 and Day 2 recall...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrients 2021-07, Vol.13 (8), p.2621
Hauptverfasser: Steinfeldt, Lois C., Martin, Carrie L., Clemens, John C., Moshfegh, Alanna J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2621
container_title Nutrients
container_volume 13
creator Steinfeldt, Lois C.
Martin, Carrie L.
Clemens, John C.
Moshfegh, Alanna J.
description The objective of this research is to compare the Day 1 and Day 2 dietary intakes of adults in What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (WWEIA, NHANES) 2013–2016. Dietary recalls of males (n = 2599) and females (n = 2624) 20+ years who had both a Day 1 and Day 2 recall and reported their intake as usual on both days in WWEIA, NHANES 2013–2016 were examined. Mean (±SE) energy intake for males was 2425 ± 26 kcal for Day 1 and 2334 ± 32 kcal for Day 2 (p = 0.004). For females, 1832 ± 18 kcal and 1775 ± 26 kcal were reported for Day 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.020). There were no significant differences between energy intake on Day 1 and Day 2 within males and females by ten-year age groups. Comparing 20 year age groups for males and females by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic) and income (350% of poverty level) also showed no significant differences in energy intake between Day 1 and Day 2. Mean energy intake of adults was not statistically different between the two days of recall by sex, race/ethnicity or income within selected age groups. Overall, the difference in energy intake was less than 4% for both males and females.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/nu13082621
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8399790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A765644988</galeid><sourcerecordid>A765644988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-d5468fe1124e16b12f74cad6691588163de303b09b40176562345adb7c567ae63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1u1DAUhS0EolXphiewxKagTvG_nQ1SNB3oSFVZUDQLFpbjOFOXxJ7aCag73oE35Elw1IpSxPXi-Oe7xzrSBeAlRieUVuhtmDBFigiCn4B9giRZCMHo07_2e-Aw52s0l0RS0Odgj7JSUuF98GUZh51JPmzh5fcIT81thrGDp96NJt3CdRjNVwd9gJsrM8KNg6si5VgPLnlr4NFms1rXr4_hxVl9sfp0DAnC9NePn0XEC_CsM312h_d6AD6_X10uzxbnHz-sl_X5wjKOxkXLmVCdw5gwh0WDSSeZNa0QFeZKYUFbRxFtUNUwhKXgglDGTdtIy4U0TtAD8O7Odzc1g2utC2Myvd4lP5QMOhqvH78Ef6W38ZtWtKpkhYrB0b1BijeTy6MefLau701wccqacCEQkRVmBX31D3odpxRKvJniTCGG-QO1Nb3TPnSx_GtnU13PCRirlCrUyX-oslo3eBuD63y5f9Tw5q7Bpphzct2fjBjpeRr0wzTQ36mPnws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565480415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing Two Days of Dietary Intake in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES, 2013–2016</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Steinfeldt, Lois C. ; Martin, Carrie L. ; Clemens, John C. ; Moshfegh, Alanna J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Steinfeldt, Lois C. ; Martin, Carrie L. ; Clemens, John C. ; Moshfegh, Alanna J.</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this research is to compare the Day 1 and Day 2 dietary intakes of adults in What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (WWEIA, NHANES) 2013–2016. Dietary recalls of males (n = 2599) and females (n = 2624) 20+ years who had both a Day 1 and Day 2 recall and reported their intake as usual on both days in WWEIA, NHANES 2013–2016 were examined. Mean (±SE) energy intake for males was 2425 ± 26 kcal for Day 1 and 2334 ± 32 kcal for Day 2 (p = 0.004). For females, 1832 ± 18 kcal and 1775 ± 26 kcal were reported for Day 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.020). There were no significant differences between energy intake on Day 1 and Day 2 within males and females by ten-year age groups. Comparing 20 year age groups for males and females by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic) and income (&lt;131%, 131–350%, and &gt;350% of poverty level) also showed no significant differences in energy intake between Day 1 and Day 2. Mean energy intake of adults was not statistically different between the two days of recall by sex, race/ethnicity or income within selected age groups. Overall, the difference in energy intake was less than 4% for both males and females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/nu13082621</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34444781</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adults ; Automation ; Beverages ; Diet ; Dietary intake ; Eating behavior ; Energy ; Energy intake ; Ethnicity ; Females ; Food ; Health surveys ; Males ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Nutrients ; Nutrition ; Nutrition research ; Population ; Poverty ; Restaurants ; Sociodemographics ; Surveys ; Type 2 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Nutrients, 2021-07, Vol.13 (8), p.2621</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-d5468fe1124e16b12f74cad6691588163de303b09b40176562345adb7c567ae63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-d5468fe1124e16b12f74cad6691588163de303b09b40176562345adb7c567ae63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6806-2011</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399790/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8399790/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27907,27908,53774,53776</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steinfeldt, Lois C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moshfegh, Alanna J.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing Two Days of Dietary Intake in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES, 2013–2016</title><title>Nutrients</title><description>The objective of this research is to compare the Day 1 and Day 2 dietary intakes of adults in What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (WWEIA, NHANES) 2013–2016. Dietary recalls of males (n = 2599) and females (n = 2624) 20+ years who had both a Day 1 and Day 2 recall and reported their intake as usual on both days in WWEIA, NHANES 2013–2016 were examined. Mean (±SE) energy intake for males was 2425 ± 26 kcal for Day 1 and 2334 ± 32 kcal for Day 2 (p = 0.004). For females, 1832 ± 18 kcal and 1775 ± 26 kcal were reported for Day 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.020). There were no significant differences between energy intake on Day 1 and Day 2 within males and females by ten-year age groups. Comparing 20 year age groups for males and females by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic) and income (&lt;131%, 131–350%, and &gt;350% of poverty level) also showed no significant differences in energy intake between Day 1 and Day 2. Mean energy intake of adults was not statistically different between the two days of recall by sex, race/ethnicity or income within selected age groups. Overall, the difference in energy intake was less than 4% for both males and females.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary intake</subject><subject>Eating behavior</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy intake</subject><subject>Ethnicity</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutrition research</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Sociodemographics</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><issn>2072-6643</issn><issn>2072-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1u1DAUhS0EolXphiewxKagTvG_nQ1SNB3oSFVZUDQLFpbjOFOXxJ7aCag73oE35Elw1IpSxPXi-Oe7xzrSBeAlRieUVuhtmDBFigiCn4B9giRZCMHo07_2e-Aw52s0l0RS0Odgj7JSUuF98GUZh51JPmzh5fcIT81thrGDp96NJt3CdRjNVwd9gJsrM8KNg6si5VgPLnlr4NFms1rXr4_hxVl9sfp0DAnC9NePn0XEC_CsM312h_d6AD6_X10uzxbnHz-sl_X5wjKOxkXLmVCdw5gwh0WDSSeZNa0QFeZKYUFbRxFtUNUwhKXgglDGTdtIy4U0TtAD8O7Odzc1g2utC2Myvd4lP5QMOhqvH78Ef6W38ZtWtKpkhYrB0b1BijeTy6MefLau701wccqacCEQkRVmBX31D3odpxRKvJniTCGG-QO1Nb3TPnSx_GtnU13PCRirlCrUyX-oslo3eBuD63y5f9Tw5q7Bpphzct2fjBjpeRr0wzTQ36mPnws</recordid><startdate>20210729</startdate><enddate>20210729</enddate><creator>Steinfeldt, Lois C.</creator><creator>Martin, Carrie L.</creator><creator>Clemens, John C.</creator><creator>Moshfegh, Alanna J.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6806-2011</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210729</creationdate><title>Comparing Two Days of Dietary Intake in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES, 2013–2016</title><author>Steinfeldt, Lois C. ; Martin, Carrie L. ; Clemens, John C. ; Moshfegh, Alanna J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-d5468fe1124e16b12f74cad6691588163de303b09b40176562345adb7c567ae63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary intake</topic><topic>Eating behavior</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy intake</topic><topic>Ethnicity</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutrition research</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Sociodemographics</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steinfeldt, Lois C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Carrie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemens, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moshfegh, Alanna J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steinfeldt, Lois C.</au><au>Martin, Carrie L.</au><au>Clemens, John C.</au><au>Moshfegh, Alanna J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing Two Days of Dietary Intake in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES, 2013–2016</atitle><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle><date>2021-07-29</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2621</spage><pages>2621-</pages><issn>2072-6643</issn><eissn>2072-6643</eissn><abstract>The objective of this research is to compare the Day 1 and Day 2 dietary intakes of adults in What We Eat in America, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (WWEIA, NHANES) 2013–2016. Dietary recalls of males (n = 2599) and females (n = 2624) 20+ years who had both a Day 1 and Day 2 recall and reported their intake as usual on both days in WWEIA, NHANES 2013–2016 were examined. Mean (±SE) energy intake for males was 2425 ± 26 kcal for Day 1 and 2334 ± 32 kcal for Day 2 (p = 0.004). For females, 1832 ± 18 kcal and 1775 ± 26 kcal were reported for Day 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.020). There were no significant differences between energy intake on Day 1 and Day 2 within males and females by ten-year age groups. Comparing 20 year age groups for males and females by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic) and income (&lt;131%, 131–350%, and &gt;350% of poverty level) also showed no significant differences in energy intake between Day 1 and Day 2. Mean energy intake of adults was not statistically different between the two days of recall by sex, race/ethnicity or income within selected age groups. Overall, the difference in energy intake was less than 4% for both males and females.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34444781</pmid><doi>10.3390/nu13082621</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6806-2011</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6643
ispartof Nutrients, 2021-07, Vol.13 (8), p.2621
issn 2072-6643
2072-6643
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8399790
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Adults
Automation
Beverages
Diet
Dietary intake
Eating behavior
Energy
Energy intake
Ethnicity
Females
Food
Health surveys
Males
Minority & ethnic groups
Nutrients
Nutrition
Nutrition research
Population
Poverty
Restaurants
Sociodemographics
Surveys
Type 2 diabetes
title Comparing Two Days of Dietary Intake in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES, 2013–2016
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T18%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20Two%20Days%20of%20Dietary%20Intake%20in%20What%20We%20Eat%20in%20America%20(WWEIA),%20NHANES,%202013%E2%80%932016&rft.jtitle=Nutrients&rft.au=Steinfeldt,%20Lois%20C.&rft.date=2021-07-29&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2621&rft.pages=2621-&rft.issn=2072-6643&rft.eissn=2072-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/nu13082621&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA765644988%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565480415&rft_id=info:pmid/34444781&rft_galeid=A765644988&rfr_iscdi=true