Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?

The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial age...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biophysical journal 2021-08, Vol.120 (16), p.3392-3408
Hauptverfasser: Rzycki, Mateusz, Drabik, Dominik, Szostak-Paluch, Kamila, Hanus-Lorenz, Beata, Kraszewski, Sebastian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3408
container_issue 16
container_start_page 3392
container_title Biophysical journal
container_volume 120
creator Rzycki, Mateusz
Drabik, Dominik
Szostak-Paluch, Kamila
Hanus-Lorenz, Beata
Kraszewski, Sebastian
description The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial agents from the detergent family—octenidine dichloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). Both of them are reported to be agents selectively attacking the cell membrane through interaction inducing membrane disruption by emulsification. They are believed to present electrostatic selectivity toward charged lipids. In this study, we tested this hypothesis and revised previously proposed molecular mechanisms of action. Employing a variety of techniques such as molecular dynamics, ζ potential with dynamic light scattering, vesicle fluctuation spectroscopy, carboxyfluorescein leakage measurement, and fluorescence trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene- and diphenylhexatriene-based studies for determination of OCT and CHX membrane location, we performed experimental studies using two model membrane systems—zwitterionic PC and negatively charged PG (18:1/18:1):PC (16:0/18:1) 3:7, respectively. These studies were extended by molecular dynamics simulations performed on a three-component bacterial membrane model system to further test interactions with another negatively charged lipid, cardiolipin. In summary, our study demonstrated that detergent selectivity is far more complicated than supposed simple electrostatic interactions. Although OCT does disrupt the membrane, our results suggest that its primary selectivity was more linked to mechanical properties of the membrane. On the other hand, CHX did not disrupt membranes as a primary activity, nor did it show any sign of electrostatic selectivity toward negatively charged membranes at any stage of interactions, which suggests membrane disruption by influencing more discrete membrane properties. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8391085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006349521005142</els_id><sourcerecordid>2548412305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-dda629a0511396665bc189cf83c4097bce1f78a7b067dc88bfdec775f39beab43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoUfwC1HLgnPTuw4IIFQCxSpEhd6tvzx0niV2IvtXdF_09_SX0ZWWyFx6elJ783M08wQ8pZCQ4GK99vG7LYNA0YbEA2w_hnZUN6xGkCK52QDAKJuu4GfkVc5bwEo40BfkrO2Y7TjTG6IuwlJH3D24bYqE1YL2kkHn5cqjlW0BYN3PmClg3u4t9Mc04R_TqsYVvRikg6YP1SXEfPDPc5oS4q56OJtrhZdCqbPr8mLUc8Z3zzOc3Lz7euvi6v6-uf3HxdfrmvbMVlq57RggwZOaTsIIbixVA52lK3tYOiNRTr2UvcGRO-slGZ0aPuej-1gUJuuPSefTrq7vVnQWQwl6Vntkl90ulNRe_X_JfhJ3caDku1AQfJV4N2jQIq_95iLWny2OM-rx7jPivFOdpS1cITSE9SudnPC8d8bCurYjtqqtR11bEeBUGs7K-fjiYNrCAePSWXrMVh0Pq25KRf9E-y_-DCbGQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2548412305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?</title><source>Cell Press Free Archives</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rzycki, Mateusz ; Drabik, Dominik ; Szostak-Paluch, Kamila ; Hanus-Lorenz, Beata ; Kraszewski, Sebastian</creator><creatorcontrib>Rzycki, Mateusz ; Drabik, Dominik ; Szostak-Paluch, Kamila ; Hanus-Lorenz, Beata ; Kraszewski, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial agents from the detergent family—octenidine dichloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). Both of them are reported to be agents selectively attacking the cell membrane through interaction inducing membrane disruption by emulsification. They are believed to present electrostatic selectivity toward charged lipids. In this study, we tested this hypothesis and revised previously proposed molecular mechanisms of action. Employing a variety of techniques such as molecular dynamics, ζ potential with dynamic light scattering, vesicle fluctuation spectroscopy, carboxyfluorescein leakage measurement, and fluorescence trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene- and diphenylhexatriene-based studies for determination of OCT and CHX membrane location, we performed experimental studies using two model membrane systems—zwitterionic PC and negatively charged PG (18:1/18:1):PC (16:0/18:1) 3:7, respectively. These studies were extended by molecular dynamics simulations performed on a three-component bacterial membrane model system to further test interactions with another negatively charged lipid, cardiolipin. In summary, our study demonstrated that detergent selectivity is far more complicated than supposed simple electrostatic interactions. Although OCT does disrupt the membrane, our results suggest that its primary selectivity was more linked to mechanical properties of the membrane. On the other hand, CHX did not disrupt membranes as a primary activity, nor did it show any sign of electrostatic selectivity toward negatively charged membranes at any stage of interactions, which suggests membrane disruption by influencing more discrete membrane properties. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-0086</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34214528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><ispartof>Biophysical journal, 2021-08, Vol.120 (16), p.3392-3408</ispartof><rights>2021 Biophysical Society</rights><rights>2021 Biophysical Society. 2021 Biophysical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-dda629a0511396665bc189cf83c4097bce1f78a7b067dc88bfdec775f39beab43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-dda629a0511396665bc189cf83c4097bce1f78a7b067dc88bfdec775f39beab43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8391085/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rzycki, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drabik, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szostak-Paluch, Kamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanus-Lorenz, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraszewski, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><title>Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?</title><title>Biophysical journal</title><description>The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial agents from the detergent family—octenidine dichloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). Both of them are reported to be agents selectively attacking the cell membrane through interaction inducing membrane disruption by emulsification. They are believed to present electrostatic selectivity toward charged lipids. In this study, we tested this hypothesis and revised previously proposed molecular mechanisms of action. Employing a variety of techniques such as molecular dynamics, ζ potential with dynamic light scattering, vesicle fluctuation spectroscopy, carboxyfluorescein leakage measurement, and fluorescence trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene- and diphenylhexatriene-based studies for determination of OCT and CHX membrane location, we performed experimental studies using two model membrane systems—zwitterionic PC and negatively charged PG (18:1/18:1):PC (16:0/18:1) 3:7, respectively. These studies were extended by molecular dynamics simulations performed on a three-component bacterial membrane model system to further test interactions with another negatively charged lipid, cardiolipin. In summary, our study demonstrated that detergent selectivity is far more complicated than supposed simple electrostatic interactions. Although OCT does disrupt the membrane, our results suggest that its primary selectivity was more linked to mechanical properties of the membrane. On the other hand, CHX did not disrupt membranes as a primary activity, nor did it show any sign of electrostatic selectivity toward negatively charged membranes at any stage of interactions, which suggests membrane disruption by influencing more discrete membrane properties. [Display omitted]</description><issn>0006-3495</issn><issn>1542-0086</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAUtBCILoUfwC1HLgnPTuw4IIFQCxSpEhd6tvzx0niV2IvtXdF_09_SX0ZWWyFx6elJ783M08wQ8pZCQ4GK99vG7LYNA0YbEA2w_hnZUN6xGkCK52QDAKJuu4GfkVc5bwEo40BfkrO2Y7TjTG6IuwlJH3D24bYqE1YL2kkHn5cqjlW0BYN3PmClg3u4t9Mc04R_TqsYVvRikg6YP1SXEfPDPc5oS4q56OJtrhZdCqbPr8mLUc8Z3zzOc3Lz7euvi6v6-uf3HxdfrmvbMVlq57RggwZOaTsIIbixVA52lK3tYOiNRTr2UvcGRO-slGZ0aPuej-1gUJuuPSefTrq7vVnQWQwl6Vntkl90ulNRe_X_JfhJ3caDku1AQfJV4N2jQIq_95iLWny2OM-rx7jPivFOdpS1cITSE9SudnPC8d8bCurYjtqqtR11bEeBUGs7K-fjiYNrCAePSWXrMVh0Pq25KRf9E-y_-DCbGQ</recordid><startdate>20210817</startdate><enddate>20210817</enddate><creator>Rzycki, Mateusz</creator><creator>Drabik, Dominik</creator><creator>Szostak-Paluch, Kamila</creator><creator>Hanus-Lorenz, Beata</creator><creator>Kraszewski, Sebastian</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>The Biophysical Society</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210817</creationdate><title>Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?</title><author>Rzycki, Mateusz ; Drabik, Dominik ; Szostak-Paluch, Kamila ; Hanus-Lorenz, Beata ; Kraszewski, Sebastian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-dda629a0511396665bc189cf83c4097bce1f78a7b067dc88bfdec775f39beab43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rzycki, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drabik, Dominik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szostak-Paluch, Kamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanus-Lorenz, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kraszewski, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rzycki, Mateusz</au><au>Drabik, Dominik</au><au>Szostak-Paluch, Kamila</au><au>Hanus-Lorenz, Beata</au><au>Kraszewski, Sebastian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?</atitle><jtitle>Biophysical journal</jtitle><date>2021-08-17</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>3392</spage><epage>3408</epage><pages>3392-3408</pages><issn>0006-3495</issn><eissn>1542-0086</eissn><abstract>The increasing problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria requires the development of new antimicrobial candidates. There are several well-known substances with commercial use, but their molecular mode of action is not fully understood. In this work, we focus on two commonly used antimicrobial agents from the detergent family—octenidine dichloride (OCT) and chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX). Both of them are reported to be agents selectively attacking the cell membrane through interaction inducing membrane disruption by emulsification. They are believed to present electrostatic selectivity toward charged lipids. In this study, we tested this hypothesis and revised previously proposed molecular mechanisms of action. Employing a variety of techniques such as molecular dynamics, ζ potential with dynamic light scattering, vesicle fluctuation spectroscopy, carboxyfluorescein leakage measurement, and fluorescence trimethylammonium-diphenylhexatriene- and diphenylhexatriene-based studies for determination of OCT and CHX membrane location, we performed experimental studies using two model membrane systems—zwitterionic PC and negatively charged PG (18:1/18:1):PC (16:0/18:1) 3:7, respectively. These studies were extended by molecular dynamics simulations performed on a three-component bacterial membrane model system to further test interactions with another negatively charged lipid, cardiolipin. In summary, our study demonstrated that detergent selectivity is far more complicated than supposed simple electrostatic interactions. Although OCT does disrupt the membrane, our results suggest that its primary selectivity was more linked to mechanical properties of the membrane. On the other hand, CHX did not disrupt membranes as a primary activity, nor did it show any sign of electrostatic selectivity toward negatively charged membranes at any stage of interactions, which suggests membrane disruption by influencing more discrete membrane properties. [Display omitted]</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34214528</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3495
ispartof Biophysical journal, 2021-08, Vol.120 (16), p.3392-3408
issn 0006-3495
1542-0086
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8391085
source Cell Press Free Archives; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); PubMed Central
title Unraveling the mechanism of octenidine and chlorhexidine on membranes: Does electrostatics matter?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A27%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Unraveling%20the%20mechanism%20of%20octenidine%20and%C2%A0chlorhexidine%20on%20membranes:%20Does%C2%A0electrostatics%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Biophysical%20journal&rft.au=Rzycki,%20Mateusz&rft.date=2021-08-17&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=3392&rft.epage=3408&rft.pages=3392-3408&rft.issn=0006-3495&rft.eissn=1542-0086&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.06.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2548412305%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2548412305&rft_id=info:pmid/34214528&rft_els_id=S0006349521005142&rfr_iscdi=true