The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future

The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews Reviews, 2021-08, Vol.27 (4), p.341-352
Hauptverfasser: Greaney, Allison M, Niklason, Laura E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 352
container_issue 4
container_start_page 341
container_title Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews
container_volume 27
creator Greaney, Allison M
Niklason, Laura E
description The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8390779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2450649006</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-5ca5589fa9c9bf528e94ec87d0c46c8f31d76809b1eb85be95418cdae63da3783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLJDEUhYM4qKPzA9xIwI2b7kkqlZcLQRpfIMwwtMshpFK3uiPVqTZJCf77SdPaOLOaRUi4-c7h3nsQOqVkSonS3zOEaYZmWpGKTEnF1B46oprJCWNS7O_eQh2iryk9EyKIkOoAHTJGaq7r6gj9ni8B3_uUh_iGhw7fhIUPABFaPI_WLcH2-Bese-tgBSGnS_wQMsR1hOzDAuei_mlTxja0-G707UfxdsxjhBP0pbN9gm_v9zF6ur2Zz-4njz_uHmbXjxPHa5on3FnOle6sdrrpeKVA1-CUbImrhVMdo60UiuiGQqN4A7qolGstCNZaJhU7Rldb3_XYrKB1pdNoe7OOfmXjmxmsN3__BL80i-HVKKaJlLoYXLwbxOFlhJTNyicHfW8DDGMyVc2JqHXZYEHP_0GfhzGGMp6puKBcFLIqFN1SLg4pReh2zVBiNuGZEl45jdmEZzbhFc3Z5yl2io-0CiC3wKZsQ-g9NBDzf1j_AUupqvM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561565062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Greaney, Allison M ; Niklason, Laura E</creator><creatorcontrib>Greaney, Allison M ; Niklason, Laura E</creatorcontrib><description>The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-3368</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-3376</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33045942</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</publisher><subject>Allografts ; Autografts ; Cadavers ; Collaboration ; Fascia ; Humans ; Review ; Review Articles ; Tissue Engineering ; Tissue Scaffolds ; Trachea</subject><ispartof>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2021-08, Vol.27 (4), p.341-352</ispartof><rights>Allison M. Greaney, et al. 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Aug 2021</rights><rights>Allison M. Greaney, 2021; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2021 Allison M. Greaney, et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-5ca5589fa9c9bf528e94ec87d0c46c8f31d76809b1eb85be95418cdae63da3783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-5ca5589fa9c9bf528e94ec87d0c46c8f31d76809b1eb85be95418cdae63da3783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045942$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greaney, Allison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niklason, Laura E</creatorcontrib><title>The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future</title><title>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</title><addtitle>Tissue Eng Part B Rev</addtitle><description>The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft.</description><subject>Allografts</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Cadavers</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Fascia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Review Articles</subject><subject>Tissue Engineering</subject><subject>Tissue Scaffolds</subject><subject>Trachea</subject><issn>1937-3368</issn><issn>1937-3376</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>1-M</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLJDEUhYM4qKPzA9xIwI2b7kkqlZcLQRpfIMwwtMshpFK3uiPVqTZJCf77SdPaOLOaRUi4-c7h3nsQOqVkSonS3zOEaYZmWpGKTEnF1B46oprJCWNS7O_eQh2iryk9EyKIkOoAHTJGaq7r6gj9ni8B3_uUh_iGhw7fhIUPABFaPI_WLcH2-Bese-tgBSGnS_wQMsR1hOzDAuei_mlTxja0-G707UfxdsxjhBP0pbN9gm_v9zF6ur2Zz-4njz_uHmbXjxPHa5on3FnOle6sdrrpeKVA1-CUbImrhVMdo60UiuiGQqN4A7qolGstCNZaJhU7Rldb3_XYrKB1pdNoe7OOfmXjmxmsN3__BL80i-HVKKaJlLoYXLwbxOFlhJTNyicHfW8DDGMyVc2JqHXZYEHP_0GfhzGGMp6puKBcFLIqFN1SLg4pReh2zVBiNuGZEl45jdmEZzbhFc3Z5yl2io-0CiC3wKZsQ-g9NBDzf1j_AUupqvM</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Greaney, Allison M</creator><creator>Niklason, Laura E</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</general><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>1-M</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future</title><author>Greaney, Allison M ; Niklason, Laura E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-5ca5589fa9c9bf528e94ec87d0c46c8f31d76809b1eb85be95418cdae63da3783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Allografts</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Cadavers</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Fascia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Review Articles</topic><topic>Tissue Engineering</topic><topic>Tissue Scaffolds</topic><topic>Trachea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greaney, Allison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niklason, Laura E</creatorcontrib><collection>Mary Ann Liebert Online - Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greaney, Allison M</au><au>Niklason, Laura E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future</atitle><jtitle>Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Tissue Eng Part B Rev</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>341</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>341-352</pages><issn>1937-3368</issn><eissn>1937-3376</eissn><abstract>The development of a tracheal graft to replace long-segment defects has thwarted clinicians and engineers alike for over 100 years. To better understand the challenges facing this field today, we have consolidated all published reports of engineered tracheal grafts used to repair long-segment circumferential defects in humans, from the first in 1898 to the most recent in 2018, totaling 290 clinical cases. Distinct trends emerge in the types of grafts used over time, including repair using autologous fascia, rigid tubes of various inert materials, and pretreated cadaveric allografts. Our analysis of maximum clinical follow-up, as a proxy for graft performance, revealed that the Leuven protocol has a significantly longer clinical follow-up time than all other methods of airway reconstruction. This method involves transplanting a cadaveric tracheal allograft that is first prevascularized heterotopically in the recipient. We further quantified graft-related causes of mortality, revealing failure modes that have been resolved, and those that remain a hurdle, such as graft mechanics. Finally, we briefly summarize recent preclinical work in tracheal graft development. In conclusion, we synthesized top clinical care priorities and design criteria to inform and inspire collaboration between engineers and clinicians toward the development of a functional tracheal replacement graft.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers</pub><pmid>33045942</pmid><doi>10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1937-3368
ispartof Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews, 2021-08, Vol.27 (4), p.341-352
issn 1937-3368
1937-3376
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8390779
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Allografts
Autografts
Cadavers
Collaboration
Fascia
Humans
Review
Review Articles
Tissue Engineering
Tissue Scaffolds
Trachea
title The History of Engineered Tracheal Replacements: Interpreting the Past and Guiding the Future
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A08%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20History%20of%20Engineered%20Tracheal%20Replacements:%20Interpreting%20the%20Past%20and%20Guiding%20the%20Future&rft.jtitle=Tissue%20engineering.%20Part%20B,%20Reviews&rft.au=Greaney,%20Allison%20M&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=341&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=341-352&rft.issn=1937-3368&rft.eissn=1937-3376&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/ten.teb.2020.0238&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2450649006%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561565062&rft_id=info:pmid/33045942&rfr_iscdi=true