MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy
Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Topics in magnetic resonance imaging 2021-08, Vol.30 (4), p.197-204 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 204 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | Topics in magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Muddasani, Varsha de Havenon, Adam McNally, J. Scott Baradaran, Hediyeh Alexander, Matthew D. |
description | Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8371677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561924101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3684-980515e5355585d3502a6971a0fc2b62727a1d658b7caafae0cd1f1e719d090f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1v1EAMhkcIRLeFf4BQjlxSxvORyVyQ0KpQpK5Aq3IeeScOCUwyZSZptf-eLC39wBfLr-3H1svYG-CnwK15v91sT_njEMY8YyvQsiqBc_WcrXhtbSmVtkfsOOefnIMytn7JjqSS1tjKrth6sy2-UWrn3Mex6Mdi6qg4u8Yw43RQYltsyHc49h5DcdmlOOzIT3HYF2scm75Bv3_FXrQYMr2-yyfs-6ezy_V5efH185f1x4vSy6pWpa25Bk1aaq1r3UjNBVbWAPLWi10ljDAITaXrnfGILRL3DbRABmzDLW_lCftwy72adwM1nsYpYXBXqR8w7V3E3j3tjH3nfsRrV0sDlTEL4N0dIMXfM-XJDX32FAKOFOfshK7ACgUcllF1O-pTzDlRe38GuDv47xb_3f_-L2tvH794v_TP8AfuTQwTpfwrzDeUXEcYpu4vT4ASpVgSr5eqPEhK_gEgcpAj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561924101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Muddasani, Varsha ; de Havenon, Adam ; McNally, J. Scott ; Baradaran, Hediyeh ; Alexander, Matthew D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Muddasani, Varsha ; de Havenon, Adam ; McNally, J. Scott ; Baradaran, Hediyeh ; Alexander, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><description>Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-3459</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1536-1004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-1004</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34397969</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Perfusion ; Stroke - diagnostic imaging ; Stroke - drug therapy ; Thrombectomy ; Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><ispartof>Topics in magnetic resonance imaging, 2021-08, Vol.30 (4), p.197-204</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3684-980515e5355585d3502a6971a0fc2b62727a1d658b7caafae0cd1f1e719d090f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3684-980515e5355585d3502a6971a0fc2b62727a1d658b7caafae0cd1f1e719d090f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00002142-202108000-00004$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00002142-202108000-00004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4609,27924,27925,64566,65333</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34397969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muddasani, Varsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Havenon, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNally, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baradaran, Hediyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><title>MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy</title><title>Topics in magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Top Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.</description><subject>Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Perfusion</subject><subject>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Stroke - drug therapy</subject><subject>Thrombectomy</subject><subject>Thrombolytic Therapy</subject><issn>0899-3459</issn><issn>1536-1004</issn><issn>1536-1004</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1v1EAMhkcIRLeFf4BQjlxSxvORyVyQ0KpQpK5Aq3IeeScOCUwyZSZptf-eLC39wBfLr-3H1svYG-CnwK15v91sT_njEMY8YyvQsiqBc_WcrXhtbSmVtkfsOOefnIMytn7JjqSS1tjKrth6sy2-UWrn3Mex6Mdi6qg4u8Yw43RQYltsyHc49h5DcdmlOOzIT3HYF2scm75Bv3_FXrQYMr2-yyfs-6ezy_V5efH185f1x4vSy6pWpa25Bk1aaq1r3UjNBVbWAPLWi10ljDAITaXrnfGILRL3DbRABmzDLW_lCftwy72adwM1nsYpYXBXqR8w7V3E3j3tjH3nfsRrV0sDlTEL4N0dIMXfM-XJDX32FAKOFOfshK7ACgUcllF1O-pTzDlRe38GuDv47xb_3f_-L2tvH794v_TP8AfuTQwTpfwrzDeUXEcYpu4vT4ASpVgSr5eqPEhK_gEgcpAj</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Muddasani, Varsha</creator><creator>de Havenon, Adam</creator><creator>McNally, J. Scott</creator><creator>Baradaran, Hediyeh</creator><creator>Alexander, Matthew D.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy</title><author>Muddasani, Varsha ; de Havenon, Adam ; McNally, J. Scott ; Baradaran, Hediyeh ; Alexander, Matthew D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3684-980515e5355585d3502a6971a0fc2b62727a1d658b7caafae0cd1f1e719d090f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Perfusion</topic><topic>Stroke - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Stroke - drug therapy</topic><topic>Thrombectomy</topic><topic>Thrombolytic Therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muddasani, Varsha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Havenon, Adam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNally, J. Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baradaran, Hediyeh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexander, Matthew D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Topics in magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muddasani, Varsha</au><au>de Havenon, Adam</au><au>McNally, J. Scott</au><au>Baradaran, Hediyeh</au><au>Alexander, Matthew D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy</atitle><jtitle>Topics in magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Top Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>197</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>197-204</pages><issn>0899-3459</issn><issn>1536-1004</issn><eissn>1536-1004</eissn><abstract>Stroke is a leading cause of disability and mortality, and the incidence of ischemic stroke is projected to continue to rise in coming decades. These projections emphasize the need for improved imaging techniques for accurate diagnosis allowing effective treatments for ischemic stroke. Ischemic stroke is commonly evaluated with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Noncontrast CT is typically used within 4.5 hours of symptom onset to identify candidates for thrombolysis. Beyond this time window, thrombolytic therapy may lead to poor outcomes if patients are not optimally selected using appropriate imaging. MRI provides an accurate method for the earliest identification of core infarct, and MR perfusion can identify salvageable hypoperfused penumbra. The prognostic value for a better outcome in these patients lies in the ability to distinguish between core infarct and salvageable brain at risk-the ischemic penumbra-which is a function of the degree of ischemia and time. Many centers underutilize MRI for acute evaluation of ischemic stroke. This review will illustrate how perfusion-diffusion mismatch calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI and MR perfusion is a reliable approach for patient selection for stroke therapy and can be performed in timeframes that are comparable to CT-based algorithms while providing potentially superior diagnostic information.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>34397969</pmid><doi>10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-3459 |
ispartof | Topics in magnetic resonance imaging, 2021-08, Vol.30 (4), p.197-204 |
issn | 0899-3459 1536-1004 1536-1004 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8371677 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Brain Ischemia - diagnostic imaging Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Perfusion Stroke - diagnostic imaging Stroke - drug therapy Thrombectomy Thrombolytic Therapy |
title | MR Perfusion in the Evaluation of Mechanical Thrombectomy Candidacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A44%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MR%20Perfusion%20in%20the%20Evaluation%20of%20Mechanical%20Thrombectomy%20Candidacy&rft.jtitle=Topics%20in%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Muddasani,%20Varsha&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=197&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=197-204&rft.issn=0899-3459&rft.eissn=1536-1004&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000277&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2561924101%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561924101&rft_id=info:pmid/34397969&rfr_iscdi=true |