Comparison of Urinary Tract Dilatation and Society of Fetal Urology systems in the detection of vesicourethral reflux and renal scar

The presence and degree of hydronephrosis is very important in the management of many diseases of the urinary tract. In this study, we aim to compare the sensitivity and specificity of 2 classification systems that are used for hydro-nephrosis grading in ultrasound, for reflux and scar detection. Th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Polish journal of radiology 2021, Vol.86, p.e449-454
Hauptverfasser: Dogan, Gulec Mert, Sigirci, Ahmet, Cengiz, Aslinur, Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz, Yildiz, Turan, Tabel, Yilmaz, Elmas, Ahmet Taner, Otlu, Muge, Dogan, Sait Murat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 454
container_issue
container_start_page e449
container_title Polish journal of radiology
container_volume 86
creator Dogan, Gulec Mert
Sigirci, Ahmet
Cengiz, Aslinur
Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz
Yildiz, Turan
Tabel, Yilmaz
Elmas, Ahmet Taner
Otlu, Muge
Dogan, Sait Murat
description The presence and degree of hydronephrosis is very important in the management of many diseases of the urinary tract. In this study, we aim to compare the sensitivity and specificity of 2 classification systems that are used for hydro-nephrosis grading in ultrasound, for reflux and scar detection. The classification systems were the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) and Urinary Tract Dilatation (UTD). Ultrasounds and dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphies (DMSA) of all patients who underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) due to urinary tract infection were examined retrospectively. DMSA was accepted for scar detection and VCUG for reflux detection as reference methods. SFU classification was used for hydronephrosis in ultrasound reports, and UTD classification was made over the reports. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of UTD and SFU classification systems for reflux and scar detection were calculated, and these 2 systems were compared. 103 (39%) of the patients were male and 162 (61%) were female. Pathologies were detected in 192 (35%) of 530 kidneys in ultrasound. In 110 (42%) of the children, reflux was detected in VCUG. Scars in DMSA were detected in only 16% (44) of 266 kidneys. Sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of the UTD classification system were statistically significantly higher than the SFU system for scar and reflux detection ( < 0.01). If we use the UTD system in ultrasounds of patients with urinary tract infections, children reported as UTD 0 may not need VCUG, which reduces radiation exposure to children and the cost of the diagnostic interventions.
doi_str_mv 10.5114/pjr.2021.107609
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8369818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564486981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-6895ca743d03e4abf5b7eef72c64667e0c3d020b1336803216515690fa065a813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtPAyEUhYnRWKNduzMs3UyFgWGGjYmpz8TEhZq4I5TeaTEzQwXG2L0_XPqwUTYQzncP93IQOqVkVFDKLxbvfpSTnI4oKQWRe-iIVlJmRIpyP51LxjLK-NsADUN4J2kJygTnh2jAOM9lKfMj9D127UJ7G1yHXY1fve20X-IXr03E17bRUUebNN1N8bMzFuJyxd1C1E2iXeNmSxyWIUIbsO1wnAOeQgSzrkrkJwRrXO8hzn0q8VA3_dfazkOXLoLR_gQd1LoJMNzux-j19uZlfJ89Pt09jK8eM8Mki5moZGF0ydmUMOB6UheTEqAucyO4ECUQk5ScTChjoiIsp6KghZCk1kQUuqLsGF1ufBf9pIWpgS6mntTC2zYNrZy26r_S2bmauU9VMSErWiWD862Bdx89hKhaGww0je7A9UHlRfrfasUm9GKDGu9CSGPvnqFEreJTKT61ik9t4ksVZ3-72_G_YbEfQNOY1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564486981</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Urinary Tract Dilatation and Society of Fetal Urology systems in the detection of vesicourethral reflux and renal scar</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Dogan, Gulec Mert ; Sigirci, Ahmet ; Cengiz, Aslinur ; Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz ; Yildiz, Turan ; Tabel, Yilmaz ; Elmas, Ahmet Taner ; Otlu, Muge ; Dogan, Sait Murat</creator><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Gulec Mert ; Sigirci, Ahmet ; Cengiz, Aslinur ; Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz ; Yildiz, Turan ; Tabel, Yilmaz ; Elmas, Ahmet Taner ; Otlu, Muge ; Dogan, Sait Murat</creatorcontrib><description>The presence and degree of hydronephrosis is very important in the management of many diseases of the urinary tract. In this study, we aim to compare the sensitivity and specificity of 2 classification systems that are used for hydro-nephrosis grading in ultrasound, for reflux and scar detection. The classification systems were the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) and Urinary Tract Dilatation (UTD). Ultrasounds and dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphies (DMSA) of all patients who underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) due to urinary tract infection were examined retrospectively. DMSA was accepted for scar detection and VCUG for reflux detection as reference methods. SFU classification was used for hydronephrosis in ultrasound reports, and UTD classification was made over the reports. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of UTD and SFU classification systems for reflux and scar detection were calculated, and these 2 systems were compared. 103 (39%) of the patients were male and 162 (61%) were female. Pathologies were detected in 192 (35%) of 530 kidneys in ultrasound. In 110 (42%) of the children, reflux was detected in VCUG. Scars in DMSA were detected in only 16% (44) of 266 kidneys. Sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of the UTD classification system were statistically significantly higher than the SFU system for scar and reflux detection ( &lt; 0.01). If we use the UTD system in ultrasounds of patients with urinary tract infections, children reported as UTD 0 may not need VCUG, which reduces radiation exposure to children and the cost of the diagnostic interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1733-134X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1899-0967</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1899-0967</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2021.107609</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34429792</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Termedia Publishing House</publisher><subject>Original Paper</subject><ispartof>Polish journal of radiology, 2021, Vol.86, p.e449-454</ispartof><rights>Pol J Radiol 2021.</rights><rights>Pol J Radiol 2021; 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-6895ca743d03e4abf5b7eef72c64667e0c3d020b1336803216515690fa065a813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-6895ca743d03e4abf5b7eef72c64667e0c3d020b1336803216515690fa065a813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369818/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8369818/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27902,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34429792$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Gulec Mert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigirci, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Aslinur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Turan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabel, Yilmaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmas, Ahmet Taner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otlu, Muge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Sait Murat</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Urinary Tract Dilatation and Society of Fetal Urology systems in the detection of vesicourethral reflux and renal scar</title><title>Polish journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Pol J Radiol</addtitle><description>The presence and degree of hydronephrosis is very important in the management of many diseases of the urinary tract. In this study, we aim to compare the sensitivity and specificity of 2 classification systems that are used for hydro-nephrosis grading in ultrasound, for reflux and scar detection. The classification systems were the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) and Urinary Tract Dilatation (UTD). Ultrasounds and dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphies (DMSA) of all patients who underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) due to urinary tract infection were examined retrospectively. DMSA was accepted for scar detection and VCUG for reflux detection as reference methods. SFU classification was used for hydronephrosis in ultrasound reports, and UTD classification was made over the reports. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of UTD and SFU classification systems for reflux and scar detection were calculated, and these 2 systems were compared. 103 (39%) of the patients were male and 162 (61%) were female. Pathologies were detected in 192 (35%) of 530 kidneys in ultrasound. In 110 (42%) of the children, reflux was detected in VCUG. Scars in DMSA were detected in only 16% (44) of 266 kidneys. Sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of the UTD classification system were statistically significantly higher than the SFU system for scar and reflux detection ( &lt; 0.01). If we use the UTD system in ultrasounds of patients with urinary tract infections, children reported as UTD 0 may not need VCUG, which reduces radiation exposure to children and the cost of the diagnostic interventions.</description><subject>Original Paper</subject><issn>1733-134X</issn><issn>1899-0967</issn><issn>1899-0967</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkUtPAyEUhYnRWKNduzMs3UyFgWGGjYmpz8TEhZq4I5TeaTEzQwXG2L0_XPqwUTYQzncP93IQOqVkVFDKLxbvfpSTnI4oKQWRe-iIVlJmRIpyP51LxjLK-NsADUN4J2kJygTnh2jAOM9lKfMj9D127UJ7G1yHXY1fve20X-IXr03E17bRUUebNN1N8bMzFuJyxd1C1E2iXeNmSxyWIUIbsO1wnAOeQgSzrkrkJwRrXO8hzn0q8VA3_dfazkOXLoLR_gQd1LoJMNzux-j19uZlfJ89Pt09jK8eM8Mki5moZGF0ydmUMOB6UheTEqAucyO4ECUQk5ScTChjoiIsp6KghZCk1kQUuqLsGF1ufBf9pIWpgS6mntTC2zYNrZy26r_S2bmauU9VMSErWiWD862Bdx89hKhaGww0je7A9UHlRfrfasUm9GKDGu9CSGPvnqFEreJTKT61ik9t4ksVZ3-72_G_YbEfQNOY1Q</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Dogan, Gulec Mert</creator><creator>Sigirci, Ahmet</creator><creator>Cengiz, Aslinur</creator><creator>Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz</creator><creator>Yildiz, Turan</creator><creator>Tabel, Yilmaz</creator><creator>Elmas, Ahmet Taner</creator><creator>Otlu, Muge</creator><creator>Dogan, Sait Murat</creator><general>Termedia Publishing House</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Comparison of Urinary Tract Dilatation and Society of Fetal Urology systems in the detection of vesicourethral reflux and renal scar</title><author>Dogan, Gulec Mert ; Sigirci, Ahmet ; Cengiz, Aslinur ; Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz ; Yildiz, Turan ; Tabel, Yilmaz ; Elmas, Ahmet Taner ; Otlu, Muge ; Dogan, Sait Murat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-6895ca743d03e4abf5b7eef72c64667e0c3d020b1336803216515690fa065a813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Original Paper</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Gulec Mert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigirci, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cengiz, Aslinur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yildiz, Turan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabel, Yilmaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmas, Ahmet Taner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otlu, Muge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogan, Sait Murat</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Polish journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dogan, Gulec Mert</au><au>Sigirci, Ahmet</au><au>Cengiz, Aslinur</au><au>Tasolar, Sevgi Demiroz</au><au>Yildiz, Turan</au><au>Tabel, Yilmaz</au><au>Elmas, Ahmet Taner</au><au>Otlu, Muge</au><au>Dogan, Sait Murat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Urinary Tract Dilatation and Society of Fetal Urology systems in the detection of vesicourethral reflux and renal scar</atitle><jtitle>Polish journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Pol J Radiol</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>86</volume><spage>e449</spage><epage>454</epage><pages>e449-454</pages><issn>1733-134X</issn><issn>1899-0967</issn><eissn>1899-0967</eissn><abstract>The presence and degree of hydronephrosis is very important in the management of many diseases of the urinary tract. In this study, we aim to compare the sensitivity and specificity of 2 classification systems that are used for hydro-nephrosis grading in ultrasound, for reflux and scar detection. The classification systems were the Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) and Urinary Tract Dilatation (UTD). Ultrasounds and dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphies (DMSA) of all patients who underwent voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) due to urinary tract infection were examined retrospectively. DMSA was accepted for scar detection and VCUG for reflux detection as reference methods. SFU classification was used for hydronephrosis in ultrasound reports, and UTD classification was made over the reports. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of UTD and SFU classification systems for reflux and scar detection were calculated, and these 2 systems were compared. 103 (39%) of the patients were male and 162 (61%) were female. Pathologies were detected in 192 (35%) of 530 kidneys in ultrasound. In 110 (42%) of the children, reflux was detected in VCUG. Scars in DMSA were detected in only 16% (44) of 266 kidneys. Sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values of the UTD classification system were statistically significantly higher than the SFU system for scar and reflux detection ( &lt; 0.01). If we use the UTD system in ultrasounds of patients with urinary tract infections, children reported as UTD 0 may not need VCUG, which reduces radiation exposure to children and the cost of the diagnostic interventions.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Termedia Publishing House</pub><pmid>34429792</pmid><doi>10.5114/pjr.2021.107609</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1733-134X
ispartof Polish journal of radiology, 2021, Vol.86, p.e449-454
issn 1733-134X
1899-0967
1899-0967
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8369818
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Original Paper
title Comparison of Urinary Tract Dilatation and Society of Fetal Urology systems in the detection of vesicourethral reflux and renal scar
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A07%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Urinary%20Tract%20Dilatation%20and%20Society%20of%20Fetal%20Urology%20systems%20in%20the%20detection%20of%20vesicourethral%20reflux%20and%20renal%20scar&rft.jtitle=Polish%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Dogan,%20Gulec%20Mert&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=86&rft.spage=e449&rft.epage=454&rft.pages=e449-454&rft.issn=1733-134X&rft.eissn=1899-0967&rft_id=info:doi/10.5114/pjr.2021.107609&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2564486981%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564486981&rft_id=info:pmid/34429792&rfr_iscdi=true