Multi‐institution consensus paper for acquisition of portable chest radiographs through glass barriers

Background To conserve personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduce exposure to potentially infected COVID‐19 patients, several Californian facilities independently implemented a method of acquiring portable chest radiographs through glass barriers that was originally developed by the University o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.219-229
Hauptverfasser: McKenney, Sarah E., Wait, John M. S., Cooper, Virgil N., Johnson, Amirh M., Wang, Jia, Leung, Ann N., Clements, Jessica
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 229
container_issue 8
container_start_page 219
container_title Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
container_volume 22
creator McKenney, Sarah E.
Wait, John M. S.
Cooper, Virgil N.
Johnson, Amirh M.
Wang, Jia
Leung, Ann N.
Clements, Jessica
description Background To conserve personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduce exposure to potentially infected COVID‐19 patients, several Californian facilities independently implemented a method of acquiring portable chest radiographs through glass barriers that was originally developed by the University of Washington. Methods This work quantifies the transmission of radiation through a glass barrier using six radiographic systems at five facilities. Patient entrance air kerma (EAK) and effective dose were estimated both with and without the glass barrier. Beam penetrability and resulting exposure index (EI) and deviation index (DI) were measured and used to adjust the tube current‐time product (mAs) for glass barriers. Because of beam hardening, the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was measured with image quality phantoms to ensure diagnostic integrity. Finally, scatter surveys were performed to assess staff radiation exposure both inside and outside the exam room. Results The glass barriers attenuated a mean of 61% of the normal X‐ray beams. When the mAs was increased to match EI values, there was no discernible degradation of image quality as determined by the CNR. This was corroborated with subjective assessments of image quality by chest radiologists. The glass‐hardened beams acted as a filter for low energy X‐rays, and some facilities observed slight changes in patient effective doses. There was scattering from both the phantoms and the glass barriers within the room. Conclusions Glass barriers require an approximate 2.5 times increase in beam intensity, with all other technique factors held constant. Further refinements are necessary for increased source‐to‐image distance and beam quality in order to adequately match EI values. This does not result in a significant increase in the radiation dose delivered to the patient. The use of lead aprons, mobile shields, and increased distance from scattering sources should be employed where practicable in order to keep staff radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.13330
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8364281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711114887</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711114887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-24bbf39cc959d4013afbe0368bebefccc9012bdc8f3dfd50cfe927fb917e59c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0Eou3ChQdAlrggpF38L4l9QVqtoCC14gJny3bsxFVip3YC6o1H4Bl5ErxNqQoH7IOtmd984_EHwAuMdhgh8laZkewwpRQ9Aqe4IvVWCMweP7ifgLOcrxDCmFP-FJxQRnCNBD4F_eUyzP7Xj58-5NnPy-xjgCaGbENeMpzUZBN0MUFlrhef_W0-OjjFNCs9WGh6m2eYVOtjl9TUZzj3KS5dD7tB5Qy1SsnblJ-BJ04N2T6_Ozfg64f3Xw4ftxefzz8d9hdbwxqGtoRp7agwRlSiZQhT5bRFtObaautMiSNMdGu4o61rK2ScFaRxWuDGVsIIugHvVt1p0aNtjQ1zUoOckh9VupFRefl3JvhedvGb5LRmhOMi8PpOIMXrpQwnR5-NHQYVbFyyJBXjDDe1OPZ69Q96FZcUyniFqjFighdXNmC3Up0arPTBxdLXlN3a0Zevts6X-L7BZTHOm1LwZi0wKeacrLt_PUby6Lg8Oi5vHS_wy4fz3qN_LC4AXoHvpc3Nf6Tk_nBJVtHfLP66Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561049833</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi‐institution consensus paper for acquisition of portable chest radiographs through glass barriers</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>McKenney, Sarah E. ; Wait, John M. S. ; Cooper, Virgil N. ; Johnson, Amirh M. ; Wang, Jia ; Leung, Ann N. ; Clements, Jessica</creator><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Sarah E. ; Wait, John M. S. ; Cooper, Virgil N. ; Johnson, Amirh M. ; Wang, Jia ; Leung, Ann N. ; Clements, Jessica</creatorcontrib><description>Background To conserve personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduce exposure to potentially infected COVID‐19 patients, several Californian facilities independently implemented a method of acquiring portable chest radiographs through glass barriers that was originally developed by the University of Washington. Methods This work quantifies the transmission of radiation through a glass barrier using six radiographic systems at five facilities. Patient entrance air kerma (EAK) and effective dose were estimated both with and without the glass barrier. Beam penetrability and resulting exposure index (EI) and deviation index (DI) were measured and used to adjust the tube current‐time product (mAs) for glass barriers. Because of beam hardening, the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was measured with image quality phantoms to ensure diagnostic integrity. Finally, scatter surveys were performed to assess staff radiation exposure both inside and outside the exam room. Results The glass barriers attenuated a mean of 61% of the normal X‐ray beams. When the mAs was increased to match EI values, there was no discernible degradation of image quality as determined by the CNR. This was corroborated with subjective assessments of image quality by chest radiologists. The glass‐hardened beams acted as a filter for low energy X‐rays, and some facilities observed slight changes in patient effective doses. There was scattering from both the phantoms and the glass barriers within the room. Conclusions Glass barriers require an approximate 2.5 times increase in beam intensity, with all other technique factors held constant. Further refinements are necessary for increased source‐to‐image distance and beam quality in order to adequately match EI values. This does not result in a significant increase in the radiation dose delivered to the patient. The use of lead aprons, mobile shields, and increased distance from scattering sources should be employed where practicable in order to keep staff radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13330</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34216091</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Anthropomorphism ; chest X‐ray ; Consensus ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease transmission ; Humans ; infection prevention ; Medical Imaging ; Noise ; Pandemics ; Patient safety ; Personal protective equipment ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiation detectors ; Radiation Dosage ; radiation safety ; Radiography, Thoracic ; SARS-CoV-2</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.219-229</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-24bbf39cc959d4013afbe0368bebefccc9012bdc8f3dfd50cfe927fb917e59c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364281/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364281/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34216091$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wait, John M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Virgil N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Amirh M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Ann N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, Jessica</creatorcontrib><title>Multi‐institution consensus paper for acquisition of portable chest radiographs through glass barriers</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Background To conserve personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduce exposure to potentially infected COVID‐19 patients, several Californian facilities independently implemented a method of acquiring portable chest radiographs through glass barriers that was originally developed by the University of Washington. Methods This work quantifies the transmission of radiation through a glass barrier using six radiographic systems at five facilities. Patient entrance air kerma (EAK) and effective dose were estimated both with and without the glass barrier. Beam penetrability and resulting exposure index (EI) and deviation index (DI) were measured and used to adjust the tube current‐time product (mAs) for glass barriers. Because of beam hardening, the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was measured with image quality phantoms to ensure diagnostic integrity. Finally, scatter surveys were performed to assess staff radiation exposure both inside and outside the exam room. Results The glass barriers attenuated a mean of 61% of the normal X‐ray beams. When the mAs was increased to match EI values, there was no discernible degradation of image quality as determined by the CNR. This was corroborated with subjective assessments of image quality by chest radiologists. The glass‐hardened beams acted as a filter for low energy X‐rays, and some facilities observed slight changes in patient effective doses. There was scattering from both the phantoms and the glass barriers within the room. Conclusions Glass barriers require an approximate 2.5 times increase in beam intensity, with all other technique factors held constant. Further refinements are necessary for increased source‐to‐image distance and beam quality in order to adequately match EI values. This does not result in a significant increase in the radiation dose delivered to the patient. The use of lead aprons, mobile shields, and increased distance from scattering sources should be employed where practicable in order to keep staff radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Anthropomorphism</subject><subject>chest X‐ray</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infection prevention</subject><subject>Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Personal protective equipment</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiation detectors</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>radiation safety</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0Eou3ChQdAlrggpF38L4l9QVqtoCC14gJny3bsxFVip3YC6o1H4Bl5ErxNqQoH7IOtmd984_EHwAuMdhgh8laZkewwpRQ9Aqe4IvVWCMweP7ifgLOcrxDCmFP-FJxQRnCNBD4F_eUyzP7Xj58-5NnPy-xjgCaGbENeMpzUZBN0MUFlrhef_W0-OjjFNCs9WGh6m2eYVOtjl9TUZzj3KS5dD7tB5Qy1SsnblJ-BJ04N2T6_Ozfg64f3Xw4ftxefzz8d9hdbwxqGtoRp7agwRlSiZQhT5bRFtObaautMiSNMdGu4o61rK2ScFaRxWuDGVsIIugHvVt1p0aNtjQ1zUoOckh9VupFRefl3JvhedvGb5LRmhOMi8PpOIMXrpQwnR5-NHQYVbFyyJBXjDDe1OPZ69Q96FZcUyniFqjFighdXNmC3Up0arPTBxdLXlN3a0Zevts6X-L7BZTHOm1LwZi0wKeacrLt_PUby6Lg8Oi5vHS_wy4fz3qN_LC4AXoHvpc3Nf6Tk_nBJVtHfLP66Lg</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>McKenney, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Wait, John M. S.</creator><creator>Cooper, Virgil N.</creator><creator>Johnson, Amirh M.</creator><creator>Wang, Jia</creator><creator>Leung, Ann N.</creator><creator>Clements, Jessica</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Multi‐institution consensus paper for acquisition of portable chest radiographs through glass barriers</title><author>McKenney, Sarah E. ; Wait, John M. S. ; Cooper, Virgil N. ; Johnson, Amirh M. ; Wang, Jia ; Leung, Ann N. ; Clements, Jessica</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4740-24bbf39cc959d4013afbe0368bebefccc9012bdc8f3dfd50cfe927fb917e59c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Anthropomorphism</topic><topic>chest X‐ray</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infection prevention</topic><topic>Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Personal protective equipment</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiation detectors</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>radiation safety</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McKenney, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wait, John M. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Virgil N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Amirh M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Ann N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, Jessica</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McKenney, Sarah E.</au><au>Wait, John M. S.</au><au>Cooper, Virgil N.</au><au>Johnson, Amirh M.</au><au>Wang, Jia</au><au>Leung, Ann N.</au><au>Clements, Jessica</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi‐institution consensus paper for acquisition of portable chest radiographs through glass barriers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>219-229</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Background To conserve personal protective equipment (PPE) and reduce exposure to potentially infected COVID‐19 patients, several Californian facilities independently implemented a method of acquiring portable chest radiographs through glass barriers that was originally developed by the University of Washington. Methods This work quantifies the transmission of radiation through a glass barrier using six radiographic systems at five facilities. Patient entrance air kerma (EAK) and effective dose were estimated both with and without the glass barrier. Beam penetrability and resulting exposure index (EI) and deviation index (DI) were measured and used to adjust the tube current‐time product (mAs) for glass barriers. Because of beam hardening, the contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) was measured with image quality phantoms to ensure diagnostic integrity. Finally, scatter surveys were performed to assess staff radiation exposure both inside and outside the exam room. Results The glass barriers attenuated a mean of 61% of the normal X‐ray beams. When the mAs was increased to match EI values, there was no discernible degradation of image quality as determined by the CNR. This was corroborated with subjective assessments of image quality by chest radiologists. The glass‐hardened beams acted as a filter for low energy X‐rays, and some facilities observed slight changes in patient effective doses. There was scattering from both the phantoms and the glass barriers within the room. Conclusions Glass barriers require an approximate 2.5 times increase in beam intensity, with all other technique factors held constant. Further refinements are necessary for increased source‐to‐image distance and beam quality in order to adequately match EI values. This does not result in a significant increase in the radiation dose delivered to the patient. The use of lead aprons, mobile shields, and increased distance from scattering sources should be employed where practicable in order to keep staff radiation doses as low as reasonably achievable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34216091</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.13330</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.219-229
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8364281
source PubMed Central Free; MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Aluminum
Anthropomorphism
chest X‐ray
Consensus
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Disease transmission
Humans
infection prevention
Medical Imaging
Noise
Pandemics
Patient safety
Personal protective equipment
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiation detectors
Radiation Dosage
radiation safety
Radiography, Thoracic
SARS-CoV-2
title Multi‐institution consensus paper for acquisition of portable chest radiographs through glass barriers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A00%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi%E2%80%90institution%20consensus%20paper%20for%20acquisition%20of%20portable%20chest%20radiographs%20through%20glass%20barriers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=McKenney,%20Sarah%20E.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=219-229&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.13330&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA711114887%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561049833&rft_id=info:pmid/34216091&rft_galeid=A711114887&rfr_iscdi=true