On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration
Purpose Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufactu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.72-82 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 82 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 72 |
container_title | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Oare, Courtney C. Deufel, Christopher L. McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan De La Fuente Herman, Tania Ferreira, Clara |
description | Purpose
Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufacturing variability, the insert may unintentionally increase or decrease the distance between the sources and tumor. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance in measuring and identifying outliers in Silastic inserts. The importance of regular quality assurance (QA) is illustrated in an experience where a systematic problem was detected and the manufacturer's 22‐mm mold was corrected.
Methods
A detailed description of the molds and manufacturing process used to produce Silastic inserts is provided, including photographs of the process steps. The variability in Silastic insert production was evaluated by measuring the thickness of 124 Silastic inserts. An estimate of how the observed Silastic thickness discrepancies impact the dose to the tumor and critical eye structures was performed using homogeneous dose calculations. A standard QA protocol was developed to guide the clinical user.
Results
Thickness of the measured Silastic inserts ranged from 1.22 to 2.67 mm, demonstrating variation from the 2.25 mm standard. Six of the 22‐mm inserts were outliers (Δthickness >3 standard deviations) and were excluded from the statistics. The outliers were investigated with the help of the manufacturer, who discovered that a systematic error was accidentally introduced into the 22‐mm mold.
Conclusions
Due to manufacturing errors or variability, the Silastic inserts used in COMS eye plaques may be thicker or thinner than the design standard. Such variations may impact tumor control or increase the risk of normal tissue side effects. A standardized QA program is recommended to detect variations and communicate unusual findings to the manufacturer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.13325 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8364280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A711115067</galeid><sourcerecordid>A711115067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-4535601c2c966deed5be31210baa9e3c64db7460a25c69576d6c626a6d6fd12b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEoqVw4QkscSmIXfyReBMOSNGKL6nVqiqcrYkz2XWV2KnttOQBeS-8uxUCDtiyZjT-zd8z1mTZS0aXjFL-DvTAl0wIXjzKTlnB5aKqWP74D_8kexbCDaWMlaJ8mp2InAtW5dVp9nNjSdwhMcPofASrkbiO3E7QmzgTCGHyh-D5Vf2adM6T9ebymuCMZOzhdkJybXoI0WhibEAfw3tSk-1kWiTRkQEhCeCANiY_7lwb3pI4j0ZDT-7AG4jG2RQD26ZD8AcMY38oYefuyVWdVCN6jWPEBJAB7NSBjpM3dkugQe8PCs-zJx30AV882LPs-6eP39ZfFhebz1_X9cVC5xUvFnkhCkmZ5rqSskVsiwYF44w2ABUKLfO2WeWSAi-0rIqVbKWWXEKyXct4I86yD0fdcWoGbHXqy0OvRm8G8LNyYNTfN9bs1NbdqVLInJc0CZw_CHiXfi9ENZigse_BopuC4kUqlApeioS--ge9cZO3qb1ESUbzqsz31PJIbaFHZWzn0rs67RYHo53FzqR4vWJpFVSuUsKbY4L2LgSP3e_qGVX7cVL7cVKHcUowO8L3SWX-D6nq9SU_5vwCwlPNdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561049843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Oare, Courtney C. ; Deufel, Christopher L. ; McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan ; De La Fuente Herman, Tania ; Ferreira, Clara</creator><creatorcontrib>Oare, Courtney C. ; Deufel, Christopher L. ; McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan ; De La Fuente Herman, Tania ; Ferreira, Clara</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufacturing variability, the insert may unintentionally increase or decrease the distance between the sources and tumor. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance in measuring and identifying outliers in Silastic inserts. The importance of regular quality assurance (QA) is illustrated in an experience where a systematic problem was detected and the manufacturer's 22‐mm mold was corrected.
Methods
A detailed description of the molds and manufacturing process used to produce Silastic inserts is provided, including photographs of the process steps. The variability in Silastic insert production was evaluated by measuring the thickness of 124 Silastic inserts. An estimate of how the observed Silastic thickness discrepancies impact the dose to the tumor and critical eye structures was performed using homogeneous dose calculations. A standard QA protocol was developed to guide the clinical user.
Results
Thickness of the measured Silastic inserts ranged from 1.22 to 2.67 mm, demonstrating variation from the 2.25 mm standard. Six of the 22‐mm inserts were outliers (Δthickness >3 standard deviations) and were excluded from the statistics. The outliers were investigated with the help of the manufacturer, who discovered that a systematic error was accidentally introduced into the 22‐mm mold.
Conclusions
Due to manufacturing errors or variability, the Silastic inserts used in COMS eye plaques may be thicker or thinner than the design standard. Such variations may impact tumor control or increase the risk of normal tissue side effects. A standardized QA program is recommended to detect variations and communicate unusual findings to the manufacturer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13325</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34231949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>eye plaque ; LDR brachytherapy ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Measurement ; Melanoma ; Methods ; Production processes ; quality assurance ; Quality control ; Radiation Oncology Physics ; Radiation therapy ; Scanners ; Silastic ; Tumors ; uveal melanoma</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.72-82</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-4535601c2c966deed5be31210baa9e3c64db7460a25c69576d6c626a6d6fd12b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-4535601c2c966deed5be31210baa9e3c64db7460a25c69576d6c626a6d6fd12b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364280/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8364280/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1417,11562,27924,27925,45574,45575,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oare, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deufel, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Fuente Herman, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Clara</creatorcontrib><title>On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><description>Purpose
Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufacturing variability, the insert may unintentionally increase or decrease the distance between the sources and tumor. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance in measuring and identifying outliers in Silastic inserts. The importance of regular quality assurance (QA) is illustrated in an experience where a systematic problem was detected and the manufacturer's 22‐mm mold was corrected.
Methods
A detailed description of the molds and manufacturing process used to produce Silastic inserts is provided, including photographs of the process steps. The variability in Silastic insert production was evaluated by measuring the thickness of 124 Silastic inserts. An estimate of how the observed Silastic thickness discrepancies impact the dose to the tumor and critical eye structures was performed using homogeneous dose calculations. A standard QA protocol was developed to guide the clinical user.
Results
Thickness of the measured Silastic inserts ranged from 1.22 to 2.67 mm, demonstrating variation from the 2.25 mm standard. Six of the 22‐mm inserts were outliers (Δthickness >3 standard deviations) and were excluded from the statistics. The outliers were investigated with the help of the manufacturer, who discovered that a systematic error was accidentally introduced into the 22‐mm mold.
Conclusions
Due to manufacturing errors or variability, the Silastic inserts used in COMS eye plaques may be thicker or thinner than the design standard. Such variations may impact tumor control or increase the risk of normal tissue side effects. A standardized QA program is recommended to detect variations and communicate unusual findings to the manufacturer.</description><subject>eye plaque</subject><subject>LDR brachytherapy</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Production processes</subject><subject>quality assurance</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology Physics</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Silastic</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>uveal melanoma</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAQxyMEoqVw4QkscSmIXfyReBMOSNGKL6nVqiqcrYkz2XWV2KnttOQBeS-8uxUCDtiyZjT-zd8z1mTZS0aXjFL-DvTAl0wIXjzKTlnB5aKqWP74D_8kexbCDaWMlaJ8mp2InAtW5dVp9nNjSdwhMcPofASrkbiO3E7QmzgTCGHyh-D5Vf2adM6T9ebymuCMZOzhdkJybXoI0WhibEAfw3tSk-1kWiTRkQEhCeCANiY_7lwb3pI4j0ZDT-7AG4jG2RQD26ZD8AcMY38oYefuyVWdVCN6jWPEBJAB7NSBjpM3dkugQe8PCs-zJx30AV882LPs-6eP39ZfFhebz1_X9cVC5xUvFnkhCkmZ5rqSskVsiwYF44w2ABUKLfO2WeWSAi-0rIqVbKWWXEKyXct4I86yD0fdcWoGbHXqy0OvRm8G8LNyYNTfN9bs1NbdqVLInJc0CZw_CHiXfi9ENZigse_BopuC4kUqlApeioS--ge9cZO3qb1ESUbzqsz31PJIbaFHZWzn0rs67RYHo53FzqR4vWJpFVSuUsKbY4L2LgSP3e_qGVX7cVL7cVKHcUowO8L3SWX-D6nq9SU_5vwCwlPNdQ</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Oare, Courtney C.</creator><creator>Deufel, Christopher L.</creator><creator>McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan</creator><creator>De La Fuente Herman, Tania</creator><creator>Ferreira, Clara</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration</title><author>Oare, Courtney C. ; Deufel, Christopher L. ; McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan ; De La Fuente Herman, Tania ; Ferreira, Clara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4925-4535601c2c966deed5be31210baa9e3c64db7460a25c69576d6c626a6d6fd12b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>eye plaque</topic><topic>LDR brachytherapy</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Production processes</topic><topic>quality assurance</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology Physics</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Silastic</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>uveal melanoma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oare, Courtney C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deufel, Christopher L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Fuente Herman, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Clara</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oare, Courtney C.</au><au>Deufel, Christopher L.</au><au>McCauley Cutsinger, Jordan</au><au>De La Fuente Herman, Tania</au><au>Ferreira, Clara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>72</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>72-82</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Eye plaques are widely used for ocular melanoma and provide an effective alternative to enucleation with adequate tumor control. A COMS plaque utilizes a Silastic insert for precise positioning of the radioactive seeds with respect to the scleral surface of the eye; however, due to manufacturing variability, the insert may unintentionally increase or decrease the distance between the sources and tumor. The purpose of this work is to provide guidance in measuring and identifying outliers in Silastic inserts. The importance of regular quality assurance (QA) is illustrated in an experience where a systematic problem was detected and the manufacturer's 22‐mm mold was corrected.
Methods
A detailed description of the molds and manufacturing process used to produce Silastic inserts is provided, including photographs of the process steps. The variability in Silastic insert production was evaluated by measuring the thickness of 124 Silastic inserts. An estimate of how the observed Silastic thickness discrepancies impact the dose to the tumor and critical eye structures was performed using homogeneous dose calculations. A standard QA protocol was developed to guide the clinical user.
Results
Thickness of the measured Silastic inserts ranged from 1.22 to 2.67 mm, demonstrating variation from the 2.25 mm standard. Six of the 22‐mm inserts were outliers (Δthickness >3 standard deviations) and were excluded from the statistics. The outliers were investigated with the help of the manufacturer, who discovered that a systematic error was accidentally introduced into the 22‐mm mold.
Conclusions
Due to manufacturing errors or variability, the Silastic inserts used in COMS eye plaques may be thicker or thinner than the design standard. Such variations may impact tumor control or increase the risk of normal tissue side effects. A standardized QA program is recommended to detect variations and communicate unusual findings to the manufacturer.</abstract><cop>Malden Massachusetts</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>34231949</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.13325</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2021-08, Vol.22 (8), p.72-82 |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8364280 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); PubMed Central |
subjects | eye plaque LDR brachytherapy Manufacturers Manufacturing Measurement Melanoma Methods Production processes quality assurance Quality control Radiation Oncology Physics Radiation therapy Scanners Silastic Tumors uveal melanoma |
title | On the importance of quality assurance (QA) for COMS eye plaque Silastic inserts: A guide to measurement methods, typical variations, and an example of how QA intercepted a manufacturing aberration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T03%3A00%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20importance%20of%20quality%20assurance%20(QA)%20for%20COMS%20eye%20plaque%20Silastic%20inserts:%20A%20guide%20to%20measurement%20methods,%20typical%20variations,%20and%20an%20example%20of%20how%20QA%20intercepted%20a%20manufacturing%20aberration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Oare,%20Courtney%20C.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=72&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=72-82&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.13325&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA711115067%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561049843&rft_id=info:pmid/34231949&rft_galeid=A711115067&rfr_iscdi=true |