Attentional capture in multiple object tracking
Attentional processes are generally assumed to be involved in multiple object tracking (MOT). The attentional capture paradigm is regularly used to study conditions of attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of sudden onset distractor stimuli in MOT. We investigated...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2021-08, Vol.21 (8), p.16-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Pichlmeier, Sebastian Pfeiffer, Till |
description | Attentional processes are generally assumed to be involved in multiple object tracking (MOT). The attentional capture paradigm is regularly used to study conditions of attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of sudden onset distractor stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether attentional capture does occur in MOT: Are onset distractors processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset distractors were effective in lowering probe detection, thus demonstrating attentional capture. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The attentional capture effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (
Experiment 2
) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency of the onset distractor (
Experiment 3
). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when onset distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between, thus effectively disturbing re-engaging attention on the tracking set (
Experiment 4
). We discuss that rapid dis- and re-engagement of the attention process on target objects and an additional more basic process that continuously provides location information allow managing strong disruptions of attention during tracking. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1167/jov.21.8.16 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8363777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2560298154</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-10a30f146e5e1877a2ff8a505a26dd9c22dbbb89c657768f7cdc6a770415f33f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkF1LwzAYhYMobk6v_AO9FKRdPpqP3ghj-AUDb_Q6pGkyM9umJunAf29lQ_TqPfAennM4AFwjWCDE-HLn9wVGhSgQOwFzREmZc8Lw6R89Axcx7iDEkEJ0DmakJLyCgszBcpWS6ZPzvWozrYY0BpO5PuvGNrmhNZmvd0anLAWlP1y_vQRnVrXRXB3vArw93L-un_LNy-PzerXJNUEs5QgqAi0qmaEGCc4VtlYoCqnCrGkqjXFT17WoNKOcM2G5bjRTnMMSUUuIJQtwd-AOY92ZRk8dg2rlEFynwpf0ysn_n969y63fS0EY4ZxPgJsjIPjP0cQkOxe1aVvVGz9GiSmDuBKIlpP19mDVwccYjP2NQVD-TCyniSVGUkjEyDd-vm5G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560298154</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attentional capture in multiple object tracking</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Pichlmeier, Sebastian ; Pfeiffer, Till</creator><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Sebastian ; Pfeiffer, Till</creatorcontrib><description>Attentional processes are generally assumed to be involved in multiple object tracking (MOT). The attentional capture paradigm is regularly used to study conditions of attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of sudden onset distractor stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether attentional capture does occur in MOT: Are onset distractors processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset distractors were effective in lowering probe detection, thus demonstrating attentional capture. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The attentional capture effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (
Experiment 2
) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency of the onset distractor (
Experiment 3
). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when onset distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between, thus effectively disturbing re-engaging attention on the tracking set (
Experiment 4
). We discuss that rapid dis- and re-engagement of the attention process on target objects and an additional more basic process that continuously provides location information allow managing strong disruptions of attention during tracking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.8.16</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34379083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2021-08, Vol.21 (8), p.16-16</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2021 The Authors 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-10a30f146e5e1877a2ff8a505a26dd9c22dbbb89c657768f7cdc6a770415f33f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363777/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8363777/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Till</creatorcontrib><title>Attentional capture in multiple object tracking</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>Attentional processes are generally assumed to be involved in multiple object tracking (MOT). The attentional capture paradigm is regularly used to study conditions of attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of sudden onset distractor stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether attentional capture does occur in MOT: Are onset distractors processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset distractors were effective in lowering probe detection, thus demonstrating attentional capture. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The attentional capture effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (
Experiment 2
) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency of the onset distractor (
Experiment 3
). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when onset distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between, thus effectively disturbing re-engaging attention on the tracking set (
Experiment 4
). We discuss that rapid dis- and re-engagement of the attention process on target objects and an additional more basic process that continuously provides location information allow managing strong disruptions of attention during tracking.</description><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkF1LwzAYhYMobk6v_AO9FKRdPpqP3ghj-AUDb_Q6pGkyM9umJunAf29lQ_TqPfAennM4AFwjWCDE-HLn9wVGhSgQOwFzREmZc8Lw6R89Axcx7iDEkEJ0DmakJLyCgszBcpWS6ZPzvWozrYY0BpO5PuvGNrmhNZmvd0anLAWlP1y_vQRnVrXRXB3vArw93L-un_LNy-PzerXJNUEs5QgqAi0qmaEGCc4VtlYoCqnCrGkqjXFT17WoNKOcM2G5bjRTnMMSUUuIJQtwd-AOY92ZRk8dg2rlEFynwpf0ysn_n969y63fS0EY4ZxPgJsjIPjP0cQkOxe1aVvVGz9GiSmDuBKIlpP19mDVwccYjP2NQVD-TCyniSVGUkjEyDd-vm5G</recordid><startdate>20210802</startdate><enddate>20210802</enddate><creator>Pichlmeier, Sebastian</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, Till</creator><general>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210802</creationdate><title>Attentional capture in multiple object tracking</title><author>Pichlmeier, Sebastian ; Pfeiffer, Till</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-10a30f146e5e1877a2ff8a505a26dd9c22dbbb89c657768f7cdc6a770415f33f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pichlmeier, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Till</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pichlmeier, Sebastian</au><au>Pfeiffer, Till</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attentional capture in multiple object tracking</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2021-08-02</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>16-16</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>Attentional processes are generally assumed to be involved in multiple object tracking (MOT). The attentional capture paradigm is regularly used to study conditions of attentional control. It has up to now not been used to assess influences of sudden onset distractor stimuli in MOT. We investigated whether attentional capture does occur in MOT: Are onset distractors processed at all in dynamic attentional tasks? We found that sudden onset distractors were effective in lowering probe detection, thus demonstrating attentional capture. Tracking performance as dependent measure was not affected. The attentional capture effect persisted in conditions of higher tracking load (
Experiment 2
) and was dramatically increased in lower presentation frequency of the onset distractor (
Experiment 3
). Tracking performance was shown to suffer only when onset distractors were presented serially with very short time gaps in between, thus effectively disturbing re-engaging attention on the tracking set (
Experiment 4
). We discuss that rapid dis- and re-engagement of the attention process on target objects and an additional more basic process that continuously provides location information allow managing strong disruptions of attention during tracking.</abstract><pub>The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>34379083</pmid><doi>10.1167/jov.21.8.16</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-7362 |
ispartof | Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2021-08, Vol.21 (8), p.16-16 |
issn | 1534-7362 1534-7362 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8363777 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
title | Attentional capture in multiple object tracking |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A27%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attentional%20capture%20in%20multiple%20object%20tracking&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Pichlmeier,%20Sebastian&rft.date=2021-08-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=16-16&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/jov.21.8.16&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2560298154%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560298154&rft_id=info:pmid/34379083&rfr_iscdi=true |