Probiotics as a New Regulator for Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Despite the proposed role of the gut microbiota-bone axis, findings on the association between probiotic consumption and bone health are conflicting. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of probiotic consumption on bone health parameters. A systematic literature search of relevant repor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine 2021, Vol.2021, p.1-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine |
container_volume | 2021 |
creator | Malmir, Hanieh Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat Soroush, Ahmad-Reza Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad Fahimfar, Noushin Ostovar, Afshin Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad Larijani, Bagher Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin |
description | Despite the proposed role of the gut microbiota-bone axis, findings on the association between probiotic consumption and bone health are conflicting. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of probiotic consumption on bone health parameters. A systematic literature search of relevant reports published in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Google scholar before December 2020 was conducted. All clinical trials or experimental studies, which examined the relationship between probiotic consumption and bone health parameters, were included. No limitation was applied during the search. After screening articles based on inclusion criteria, 44 studies remained. In clinical trials, probiotic consumption affects bone health parameters such as serum calcium levels (3.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 6.59 mmol/l), urinary calcium levels (4.85; 95% CI: 1.16, 8.53 mmol/l), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (−5.53; 95% CI: −9.83, −0.86 ng/l). In most studies, Lactobacillus species such as L. helveticus, L. reuteri, and L. casei were consumed and women aged 50 years or older were assessed. Spinal and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) was not affected significantly by probiotic consumption. In 37 animal experiments, probiotic or symbiotic feeding mostly had effects on bone health parameters. Some strains of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus including L. reuteri, L. casei, L. paracasei, L. bulgaricus, and L. acidophilus have indicated beneficial effects on bone health parameters. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that probiotic supplementation might improve bone health. Further studies are needed to decide on the best probiotic species and appropriate dosages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/2021/3582989 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8355998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2561327848</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-dd1b8e39d753ab4c57586ad5fbe29a55bba99f0f3399a45195a4b3a4cfd8ca033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90VtLwzAYBuAgiuc7f0DBG0GrzWlJvBDm8ATzgAfwLnxt0y3SNTNpJ_v3ZmwIeiEkJJAnLwkvQgc4O8WY8zOSEXxGuSRKqjW0jQXDKSNSrv_sxfsW2gnhI8uIEkJsoi3KqGJUqG30-uRdbl1ri5BAHMmD-UqezairoXU-qeK8dI1Jbg3U7fg86Scv89CaCcQb0c1s5NCUyb1pIe03UM-DDXtoo4I6mP3Vuoverq9eB7fp8PHmbtAfpgUjvE3LEufSUFUKTiFnBRdc9qDkVW6IAs7zHJSqsopSpYBxrDiwnAIrqlIWkFG6iy6WudMun5iyME3rodZTbyfg59qB1b9PGjvWIzfTknKulIwBR6sA7z47E1o9saEwdQ2NcV3QhPewIpnsiUgP_9AP1_n44aWiREi2CDxZqsK7ELypfh6DM72oSy_q0qu6Ij9e8rFtSviy_-tvDZKTEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561327848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probiotics as a New Regulator for Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Malmir, Hanieh ; Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat ; Soroush, Ahmad-Reza ; Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad ; Fahimfar, Noushin ; Ostovar, Afshin ; Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad ; Larijani, Bagher ; Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin</creator><contributor>Ostadmohammadi, Vahidreza ; Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Malmir, Hanieh ; Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat ; Soroush, Ahmad-Reza ; Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad ; Fahimfar, Noushin ; Ostovar, Afshin ; Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad ; Larijani, Bagher ; Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin ; Ostadmohammadi, Vahidreza ; Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the proposed role of the gut microbiota-bone axis, findings on the association between probiotic consumption and bone health are conflicting. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of probiotic consumption on bone health parameters. A systematic literature search of relevant reports published in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Google scholar before December 2020 was conducted. All clinical trials or experimental studies, which examined the relationship between probiotic consumption and bone health parameters, were included. No limitation was applied during the search. After screening articles based on inclusion criteria, 44 studies remained. In clinical trials, probiotic consumption affects bone health parameters such as serum calcium levels (3.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 6.59 mmol/l), urinary calcium levels (4.85; 95% CI: 1.16, 8.53 mmol/l), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (−5.53; 95% CI: −9.83, −0.86 ng/l). In most studies, Lactobacillus species such as L. helveticus, L. reuteri, and L. casei were consumed and women aged 50 years or older were assessed. Spinal and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) was not affected significantly by probiotic consumption. In 37 animal experiments, probiotic or symbiotic feeding mostly had effects on bone health parameters. Some strains of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus including L. reuteri, L. casei, L. paracasei, L. bulgaricus, and L. acidophilus have indicated beneficial effects on bone health parameters. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that probiotic supplementation might improve bone health. Further studies are needed to decide on the best probiotic species and appropriate dosages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1741-427X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-4288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2021/3582989</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34394379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Bias ; Bone density ; Bone mineral density ; Calcium (blood) ; Calcium (urinary) ; Clinical outcomes ; Clinical trials ; Dietary supplements ; Fractures ; Gender ; Intestinal microflora ; Lactobacillus ; Meta-analysis ; Microbiota ; Osteoporosis ; Parathyroid ; Parathyroid hormone ; Probiotics ; Quality of life ; Review ; Reviews ; Supplements ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, 2021, Vol.2021, p.1-35</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Hanieh Malmir et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Hanieh Malmir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Hanieh Malmir et al. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-dd1b8e39d753ab4c57586ad5fbe29a55bba99f0f3399a45195a4b3a4cfd8ca033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-dd1b8e39d753ab4c57586ad5fbe29a55bba99f0f3399a45195a4b3a4cfd8ca033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6395-4915 ; 0000-0002-5670-3536</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355998/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355998/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,886,4025,27924,27925,27926,53792,53794</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ostadmohammadi, Vahidreza</contributor><contributor>Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi</contributor><creatorcontrib>Malmir, Hanieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soroush, Ahmad-Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahimfar, Noushin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostovar, Afshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larijani, Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin</creatorcontrib><title>Probiotics as a New Regulator for Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine</title><description>Despite the proposed role of the gut microbiota-bone axis, findings on the association between probiotic consumption and bone health are conflicting. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of probiotic consumption on bone health parameters. A systematic literature search of relevant reports published in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Google scholar before December 2020 was conducted. All clinical trials or experimental studies, which examined the relationship between probiotic consumption and bone health parameters, were included. No limitation was applied during the search. After screening articles based on inclusion criteria, 44 studies remained. In clinical trials, probiotic consumption affects bone health parameters such as serum calcium levels (3.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 6.59 mmol/l), urinary calcium levels (4.85; 95% CI: 1.16, 8.53 mmol/l), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (−5.53; 95% CI: −9.83, −0.86 ng/l). In most studies, Lactobacillus species such as L. helveticus, L. reuteri, and L. casei were consumed and women aged 50 years or older were assessed. Spinal and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) was not affected significantly by probiotic consumption. In 37 animal experiments, probiotic or symbiotic feeding mostly had effects on bone health parameters. Some strains of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus including L. reuteri, L. casei, L. paracasei, L. bulgaricus, and L. acidophilus have indicated beneficial effects on bone health parameters. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that probiotic supplementation might improve bone health. Further studies are needed to decide on the best probiotic species and appropriate dosages.</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Bone density</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Calcium (blood)</subject><subject>Calcium (urinary)</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dietary supplements</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Intestinal microflora</subject><subject>Lactobacillus</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Osteoporosis</subject><subject>Parathyroid</subject><subject>Parathyroid hormone</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Supplements</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1741-427X</issn><issn>1741-4288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RHX</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90VtLwzAYBuAgiuc7f0DBG0GrzWlJvBDm8ATzgAfwLnxt0y3SNTNpJ_v3ZmwIeiEkJJAnLwkvQgc4O8WY8zOSEXxGuSRKqjW0jQXDKSNSrv_sxfsW2gnhI8uIEkJsoi3KqGJUqG30-uRdbl1ri5BAHMmD-UqezairoXU-qeK8dI1Jbg3U7fg86Scv89CaCcQb0c1s5NCUyb1pIe03UM-DDXtoo4I6mP3Vuoverq9eB7fp8PHmbtAfpgUjvE3LEufSUFUKTiFnBRdc9qDkVW6IAs7zHJSqsopSpYBxrDiwnAIrqlIWkFG6iy6WudMun5iyME3rodZTbyfg59qB1b9PGjvWIzfTknKulIwBR6sA7z47E1o9saEwdQ2NcV3QhPewIpnsiUgP_9AP1_n44aWiREi2CDxZqsK7ELypfh6DM72oSy_q0qu6Ij9e8rFtSviy_-tvDZKTEA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Malmir, Hanieh</creator><creator>Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat</creator><creator>Soroush, Ahmad-Reza</creator><creator>Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad</creator><creator>Fahimfar, Noushin</creator><creator>Ostovar, Afshin</creator><creator>Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad</creator><creator>Larijani, Bagher</creator><creator>Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-3536</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Probiotics as a New Regulator for Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Malmir, Hanieh ; Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat ; Soroush, Ahmad-Reza ; Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad ; Fahimfar, Noushin ; Ostovar, Afshin ; Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad ; Larijani, Bagher ; Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-dd1b8e39d753ab4c57586ad5fbe29a55bba99f0f3399a45195a4b3a4cfd8ca033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Bone density</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Calcium (blood)</topic><topic>Calcium (urinary)</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dietary supplements</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Intestinal microflora</topic><topic>Lactobacillus</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Osteoporosis</topic><topic>Parathyroid</topic><topic>Parathyroid hormone</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Supplements</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malmir, Hanieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soroush, Ahmad-Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fahimfar, Noushin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostovar, Afshin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larijani, Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malmir, Hanieh</au><au>Ejtahed, Hanieh-Sadat</au><au>Soroush, Ahmad-Reza</au><au>Mortazavian, Amir Mohammad</au><au>Fahimfar, Noushin</au><au>Ostovar, Afshin</au><au>Esmaillzadeh, Ahmad</au><au>Larijani, Bagher</au><au>Hasani-Ranjbar, Shirin</au><au>Ostadmohammadi, Vahidreza</au><au>Vahidreza Ostadmohammadi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Probiotics as a New Regulator for Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2021</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>1-35</pages><issn>1741-427X</issn><eissn>1741-4288</eissn><abstract>Despite the proposed role of the gut microbiota-bone axis, findings on the association between probiotic consumption and bone health are conflicting. This systematic review aimed to assess the effect of probiotic consumption on bone health parameters. A systematic literature search of relevant reports published in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Google scholar before December 2020 was conducted. All clinical trials or experimental studies, which examined the relationship between probiotic consumption and bone health parameters, were included. No limitation was applied during the search. After screening articles based on inclusion criteria, 44 studies remained. In clinical trials, probiotic consumption affects bone health parameters such as serum calcium levels (3.82; 95% CI: 1.05, 6.59 mmol/l), urinary calcium levels (4.85; 95% CI: 1.16, 8.53 mmol/l), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (−5.53; 95% CI: −9.83, −0.86 ng/l). In most studies, Lactobacillus species such as L. helveticus, L. reuteri, and L. casei were consumed and women aged 50 years or older were assessed. Spinal and total hip bone mineral density (BMD) was not affected significantly by probiotic consumption. In 37 animal experiments, probiotic or symbiotic feeding mostly had effects on bone health parameters. Some strains of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus including L. reuteri, L. casei, L. paracasei, L. bulgaricus, and L. acidophilus have indicated beneficial effects on bone health parameters. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that probiotic supplementation might improve bone health. Further studies are needed to decide on the best probiotic species and appropriate dosages.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><pmid>34394379</pmid><doi>10.1155/2021/3582989</doi><tpages>35</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6395-4915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-3536</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1741-427X |
ispartof | Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine, 2021, Vol.2021, p.1-35 |
issn | 1741-427X 1741-4288 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8355998 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Bias Bone density Bone mineral density Calcium (blood) Calcium (urinary) Clinical outcomes Clinical trials Dietary supplements Fractures Gender Intestinal microflora Lactobacillus Meta-analysis Microbiota Osteoporosis Parathyroid Parathyroid hormone Probiotics Quality of life Review Reviews Supplements Systematic review |
title | Probiotics as a New Regulator for Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T14%3A09%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probiotics%20as%20a%20New%20Regulator%20for%20Bone%20Health:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Evidence-based%20complementary%20and%20alternative%20medicine&rft.au=Malmir,%20Hanieh&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=2021&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=1-35&rft.issn=1741-427X&rft.eissn=1741-4288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2021/3582989&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2561327848%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561327848&rft_id=info:pmid/34394379&rfr_iscdi=true |