Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females

This study evaluated heifer postweaning residual feed intake (RFI) classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females. We analyzed the annual, as well as, cumulative production of 347 Angus females from birth through weaning of their t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational animal science 2021-04, Vol.5 (2), p.txab061-txab061
Hauptverfasser: Parsons, Cory T, Dafoe, Julia M, Wyffels, Samuel A, Van Emon, Megan, DelCurto, Timothy, Boss, Darrin L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page txab061
container_issue 2
container_start_page txab061
container_title Translational animal science
container_volume 5
creator Parsons, Cory T
Dafoe, Julia M
Wyffels, Samuel A
Van Emon, Megan
DelCurto, Timothy
Boss, Darrin L
description This study evaluated heifer postweaning residual feed intake (RFI) classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females. We analyzed the annual, as well as, cumulative production of 347 Angus females from birth through weaning of their third calf. Heifer postweaning RFI was calculated as the actual dry matter intake minus the predicted dry matter intake based on the average daily gain of the contemporary group on an annual basis. Heifers were categorized based on RFI as either low (< −0.50 SD from mean), average (± 0.50 SD from mean), or high (> +0.50 SD from the mean) within year. There was no RFI × Parity interaction (P ≥ 0.14) observed for all production/reproduction traits except for conception rates (P = 0.02). Julian birth date of cows was influenced by RFI classification (P < 0.01) and displayed a quadratic (P = 0.02) effect with high RFI cows being born earlier in the calving season than average RFI cows (71.2 vs. 75.3 d), but did not differ from low RFI cows (74.0 vs. 75.3 d). Cow birth weight, weaning weight, as well as all other cow weight and body condition measurements were not influenced by RFI classification (P ≥ 0.14). As expected, there was a linear increase in cow body weight at weaning with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow RFI classification had no influence on progeny weaning weight, birth date, calving interval, or postpartum interval (P ≥ 0.15). Calf birth weights displayed a quadratic parity effect (P < 0.01) with first calf heifers having calves with lower birth weights than second- and third-parity calves. Calf 205-d adjusted weaning weights displayed a quadratic effect (P = 0.01) with first calf heifers weaning lighter calves than second- and third-parity cows. Weaning weight ratio displayed a linear decrease with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow conception probability displayed a linear tendency for pregnancy 2 (P = 0.09), and a quadratic tendency for pregnancy 4 (P = 0.07) as a function of RFI classification, but no effects were observed for pregnancy 1 and 3. Cow artificial insemination conception rates differed by year of pregnancy (P < 0.01), but not RFI classification (P = 0.81). In summary, heifer postweaning RFI classification had minimal effects on beef cattle production and reproductive efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/tas/txab061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8355441</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/tas/txab061</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2561484203</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f5f4b8da2c3e0f2b45110e28dac21ab58329a4b13a428f89f42b519823fda283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFTEQhhdRbKm98g_kSgRdm6_dZm-EUvwoFLzR6zCbnZwT3U3WTLbaP-TvNOUcRG-EgRlmnnln4G2a54K_EXxQFwXoovyEkffiUXMqu0vVSsHl47_qk-ac6CvnXAzD0Av-tDlRWpn-UsjT5tfNsoIrxJJnewweM1sTlR8IMcQdy0hh2mBmHnFiIRb4hszNQBR8cFBCiqxGxjWnaXMl3CGDOLEVs095geiQLQi0ZVwwHs74kKm0rxmhS3GqxcNC2Yc8tSvkUO7ZVdxtxEbECuMCM9Kz5omHmfD8mM-aL-_ffb7-2N5--nBzfXXbOmWG0va-83o0E0inkHs56k4IjrJ2nBQwdkbJAfQoFGhpvBm8lmMnBiOVr0tGnTVvD7rrNi44ufpzhtmuOSyQ722CYP-dxLC3u3Rnjeo6rUUVeHkUyOn7hlTsEsjhPEPEtJGVXS-00ZKrir46oC4nooz-zxnB7YO5tpprj-ZW-sWBTtv6X_A3F3upWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2561484203</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Parsons, Cory T ; Dafoe, Julia M ; Wyffels, Samuel A ; Van Emon, Megan ; DelCurto, Timothy ; Boss, Darrin L</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Cory T ; Dafoe, Julia M ; Wyffels, Samuel A ; Van Emon, Megan ; DelCurto, Timothy ; Boss, Darrin L</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[This study evaluated heifer postweaning residual feed intake (RFI) classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females. We analyzed the annual, as well as, cumulative production of 347 Angus females from birth through weaning of their third calf. Heifer postweaning RFI was calculated as the actual dry matter intake minus the predicted dry matter intake based on the average daily gain of the contemporary group on an annual basis. Heifers were categorized based on RFI as either low (< −0.50 SD from mean), average (± 0.50 SD from mean), or high (> +0.50 SD from the mean) within year. There was no RFI × Parity interaction (P ≥ 0.14) observed for all production/reproduction traits except for conception rates (P = 0.02). Julian birth date of cows was influenced by RFI classification (P < 0.01) and displayed a quadratic (P = 0.02) effect with high RFI cows being born earlier in the calving season than average RFI cows (71.2 vs. 75.3 d), but did not differ from low RFI cows (74.0 vs. 75.3 d). Cow birth weight, weaning weight, as well as all other cow weight and body condition measurements were not influenced by RFI classification (P ≥ 0.14). As expected, there was a linear increase in cow body weight at weaning with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow RFI classification had no influence on progeny weaning weight, birth date, calving interval, or postpartum interval (P ≥ 0.15). Calf birth weights displayed a quadratic parity effect (P < 0.01) with first calf heifers having calves with lower birth weights than second- and third-parity calves. Calf 205-d adjusted weaning weights displayed a quadratic effect (P = 0.01) with first calf heifers weaning lighter calves than second- and third-parity cows. Weaning weight ratio displayed a linear decrease with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow conception probability displayed a linear tendency for pregnancy 2 (P = 0.09), and a quadratic tendency for pregnancy 4 (P = 0.07) as a function of RFI classification, but no effects were observed for pregnancy 1 and 3. Cow artificial insemination conception rates differed by year of pregnancy (P < 0.01), but not RFI classification (P = 0.81). In summary, heifer postweaning RFI classification had minimal effects on beef cattle production and reproductive efficiency.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2573-2102</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-2102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/tas/txab061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34386712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Forage Based Livestock Systems</subject><ispartof>Translational animal science, 2021-04, Vol.5 (2), p.txab061-txab061</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f5f4b8da2c3e0f2b45110e28dac21ab58329a4b13a428f89f42b519823fda283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f5f4b8da2c3e0f2b45110e28dac21ab58329a4b13a428f89f42b519823fda283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6626-0249 ; 0000-0001-7375-4645</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355441/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8355441/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,1598,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Cory T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dafoe, Julia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyffels, Samuel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Emon, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelCurto, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boss, Darrin L</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females</title><title>Translational animal science</title><description><![CDATA[This study evaluated heifer postweaning residual feed intake (RFI) classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females. We analyzed the annual, as well as, cumulative production of 347 Angus females from birth through weaning of their third calf. Heifer postweaning RFI was calculated as the actual dry matter intake minus the predicted dry matter intake based on the average daily gain of the contemporary group on an annual basis. Heifers were categorized based on RFI as either low (< −0.50 SD from mean), average (± 0.50 SD from mean), or high (> +0.50 SD from the mean) within year. There was no RFI × Parity interaction (P ≥ 0.14) observed for all production/reproduction traits except for conception rates (P = 0.02). Julian birth date of cows was influenced by RFI classification (P < 0.01) and displayed a quadratic (P = 0.02) effect with high RFI cows being born earlier in the calving season than average RFI cows (71.2 vs. 75.3 d), but did not differ from low RFI cows (74.0 vs. 75.3 d). Cow birth weight, weaning weight, as well as all other cow weight and body condition measurements were not influenced by RFI classification (P ≥ 0.14). As expected, there was a linear increase in cow body weight at weaning with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow RFI classification had no influence on progeny weaning weight, birth date, calving interval, or postpartum interval (P ≥ 0.15). Calf birth weights displayed a quadratic parity effect (P < 0.01) with first calf heifers having calves with lower birth weights than second- and third-parity calves. Calf 205-d adjusted weaning weights displayed a quadratic effect (P = 0.01) with first calf heifers weaning lighter calves than second- and third-parity cows. Weaning weight ratio displayed a linear decrease with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow conception probability displayed a linear tendency for pregnancy 2 (P = 0.09), and a quadratic tendency for pregnancy 4 (P = 0.07) as a function of RFI classification, but no effects were observed for pregnancy 1 and 3. Cow artificial insemination conception rates differed by year of pregnancy (P < 0.01), but not RFI classification (P = 0.81). In summary, heifer postweaning RFI classification had minimal effects on beef cattle production and reproductive efficiency.]]></description><subject>Forage Based Livestock Systems</subject><issn>2573-2102</issn><issn>2573-2102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFTEQhhdRbKm98g_kSgRdm6_dZm-EUvwoFLzR6zCbnZwT3U3WTLbaP-TvNOUcRG-EgRlmnnln4G2a54K_EXxQFwXoovyEkffiUXMqu0vVSsHl47_qk-ac6CvnXAzD0Av-tDlRWpn-UsjT5tfNsoIrxJJnewweM1sTlR8IMcQdy0hh2mBmHnFiIRb4hszNQBR8cFBCiqxGxjWnaXMl3CGDOLEVs095geiQLQi0ZVwwHs74kKm0rxmhS3GqxcNC2Yc8tSvkUO7ZVdxtxEbECuMCM9Kz5omHmfD8mM-aL-_ffb7-2N5--nBzfXXbOmWG0va-83o0E0inkHs56k4IjrJ2nBQwdkbJAfQoFGhpvBm8lmMnBiOVr0tGnTVvD7rrNi44ufpzhtmuOSyQ722CYP-dxLC3u3Rnjeo6rUUVeHkUyOn7hlTsEsjhPEPEtJGVXS-00ZKrir46oC4nooz-zxnB7YO5tpprj-ZW-sWBTtv6X_A3F3upWQ</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Parsons, Cory T</creator><creator>Dafoe, Julia M</creator><creator>Wyffels, Samuel A</creator><creator>Van Emon, Megan</creator><creator>DelCurto, Timothy</creator><creator>Boss, Darrin L</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-0249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-4645</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females</title><author>Parsons, Cory T ; Dafoe, Julia M ; Wyffels, Samuel A ; Van Emon, Megan ; DelCurto, Timothy ; Boss, Darrin L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-6f5f4b8da2c3e0f2b45110e28dac21ab58329a4b13a428f89f42b519823fda283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Forage Based Livestock Systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Cory T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dafoe, Julia M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyffels, Samuel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Emon, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DelCurto, Timothy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boss, Darrin L</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Translational animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsons, Cory T</au><au>Dafoe, Julia M</au><au>Wyffels, Samuel A</au><au>Van Emon, Megan</au><au>DelCurto, Timothy</au><au>Boss, Darrin L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females</atitle><jtitle>Translational animal science</jtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>txab061</spage><epage>txab061</epage><pages>txab061-txab061</pages><issn>2573-2102</issn><eissn>2573-2102</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[This study evaluated heifer postweaning residual feed intake (RFI) classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females. We analyzed the annual, as well as, cumulative production of 347 Angus females from birth through weaning of their third calf. Heifer postweaning RFI was calculated as the actual dry matter intake minus the predicted dry matter intake based on the average daily gain of the contemporary group on an annual basis. Heifers were categorized based on RFI as either low (< −0.50 SD from mean), average (± 0.50 SD from mean), or high (> +0.50 SD from the mean) within year. There was no RFI × Parity interaction (P ≥ 0.14) observed for all production/reproduction traits except for conception rates (P = 0.02). Julian birth date of cows was influenced by RFI classification (P < 0.01) and displayed a quadratic (P = 0.02) effect with high RFI cows being born earlier in the calving season than average RFI cows (71.2 vs. 75.3 d), but did not differ from low RFI cows (74.0 vs. 75.3 d). Cow birth weight, weaning weight, as well as all other cow weight and body condition measurements were not influenced by RFI classification (P ≥ 0.14). As expected, there was a linear increase in cow body weight at weaning with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow RFI classification had no influence on progeny weaning weight, birth date, calving interval, or postpartum interval (P ≥ 0.15). Calf birth weights displayed a quadratic parity effect (P < 0.01) with first calf heifers having calves with lower birth weights than second- and third-parity calves. Calf 205-d adjusted weaning weights displayed a quadratic effect (P = 0.01) with first calf heifers weaning lighter calves than second- and third-parity cows. Weaning weight ratio displayed a linear decrease with increasing parity (P < 0.01). Cow conception probability displayed a linear tendency for pregnancy 2 (P = 0.09), and a quadratic tendency for pregnancy 4 (P = 0.07) as a function of RFI classification, but no effects were observed for pregnancy 1 and 3. Cow artificial insemination conception rates differed by year of pregnancy (P < 0.01), but not RFI classification (P = 0.81). In summary, heifer postweaning RFI classification had minimal effects on beef cattle production and reproductive efficiency.]]></abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>34386712</pmid><doi>10.1093/tas/txab061</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6626-0249</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7375-4645</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2573-2102
ispartof Translational animal science, 2021-04, Vol.5 (2), p.txab061-txab061
issn 2573-2102
2573-2102
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8355441
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Forage Based Livestock Systems
title Impacts of heifer postweaning residual feed intake classification on reproductive and performance measurements of first-, second-, and third-parity Angus beef females
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A04%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20heifer%20postweaning%20residual%20feed%20intake%20classification%20on%20reproductive%20and%20performance%20measurements%20of%20first-,%20second-,%20and%20third-parity%20Angus%20beef%20females&rft.jtitle=Translational%20animal%20science&rft.au=Parsons,%20Cory%20T&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=txab061&rft.epage=txab061&rft.pages=txab061-txab061&rft.issn=2573-2102&rft.eissn=2573-2102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/tas/txab061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2561484203%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2561484203&rft_id=info:pmid/34386712&rft_oup_id=10.1093/tas/txab061&rfr_iscdi=true