Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training using loads from a repetition maximum value (%1RM) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elderly women. Methods: Twenty-five elderly women (60–75 years old) were randomly assigned to a group that trained using loads determin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7892
Hauptverfasser: Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro, Pietta-Dias, Caroline, Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf, Noll, Matias, Alberton, Cristine Lima, Pinto, Ronei Silveira, Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 15
container_start_page 7892
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro
Pietta-Dias, Caroline
Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf
Noll, Matias
Alberton, Cristine Lima
Pinto, Ronei Silveira
Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins
description Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training using loads from a repetition maximum value (%1RM) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elderly women. Methods: Twenty-five elderly women (60–75 years old) were randomly assigned to a group that trained using loads determined by 1RM test (G%; n = 12) or to a group that trained using loads determined by RPE (GPE; n = 13). Elderly women trained for 12 weeks using five exercises performed with 2–3 sets of 8–15 repetitions. Loads progressed from 45% to 75% of 1RM (G%) and from 13 to 18 from Rating Perceived Exertion of Borg Scale (GPE). The outcome measures, 1RM and maximum repetitions (RMs with 70% 1RM), were assessed before, between and after training programs. Results: Increased 1RM value and RMs were observed in both groups (20–42%, p < 0.001 and 56–76%, p < 0.001, respectively, for %G; and 17–56%, p < 0.001 and 47–106%, p < 0.001, respectively, for GPE), without differences between them. Conclusions: Prescribing loads using the RPE and 1RM might be similarly effective for training elderly women in order to promote strength gains. As a practical application, RPE could be an additional method to determine training loads. In spite of the promising results of the present study, it is not possible to state that the use of RPE is effective in monitoring loads during sub maximal strength training in elderly and more research must be carried out to confirm it.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph18157892
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8345571</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2558806265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7e5506734c5aab9cde457544bd8c43ccb5d48af1e2e572c9995c2255d9d375af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFuEzEQhleIipbClbMlLlxS7LW9tjkgVSFQpCBQW8TRcuzZxNGuHWxvRXgD3rqOWhXKaUYz3_z_jKZpXhF8RqnCb_0W0m5DJOFCqvZJc0K6Ds9Yh8nTf_Lj5nnOW4ypZJ161hxTRmtVspPmz6UpPqxR7NE3SBb8DTi0-AWp-BiQycigL1A20aES0QcokEYfAF0n48NhbhmNy8gHdFUShHXZ_G3V4mJwkIY9-hFHCO_QObo0wcXR_64m8xhKisNQ06syuf2L5qg3Q4aX9_G0-f5xcT2_mC2_fvo8P1_OLFW8zARwjjtBmeXGrJR1wLjgjK2ctIxau-KOSdMTaIGL1iqluG1bzp1yVHDT09Pm_Z3ublqN4CzUNcygd8mPJu11NF4_7gS_0et4oyVlnAtSBd7cC6T4c4Jc9OizhWEwAeKUdTVTrBWCiIq-_g_dximFet6BkhJ3bccrdXZH2RRzTtA_LEOwPnxZP_4yvQWO85w0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558806265</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro ; Pietta-Dias, Caroline ; Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf ; Noll, Matias ; Alberton, Cristine Lima ; Pinto, Ronei Silveira ; Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro ; Pietta-Dias, Caroline ; Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf ; Noll, Matias ; Alberton, Cristine Lima ; Pinto, Ronei Silveira ; Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training using loads from a repetition maximum value (%1RM) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elderly women. Methods: Twenty-five elderly women (60–75 years old) were randomly assigned to a group that trained using loads determined by 1RM test (G%; n = 12) or to a group that trained using loads determined by RPE (GPE; n = 13). Elderly women trained for 12 weeks using five exercises performed with 2–3 sets of 8–15 repetitions. Loads progressed from 45% to 75% of 1RM (G%) and from 13 to 18 from Rating Perceived Exertion of Borg Scale (GPE). The outcome measures, 1RM and maximum repetitions (RMs with 70% 1RM), were assessed before, between and after training programs. Results: Increased 1RM value and RMs were observed in both groups (20–42%, p &lt; 0.001 and 56–76%, p &lt; 0.001, respectively, for %G; and 17–56%, p &lt; 0.001 and 47–106%, p &lt; 0.001, respectively, for GPE), without differences between them. Conclusions: Prescribing loads using the RPE and 1RM might be similarly effective for training elderly women in order to promote strength gains. As a practical application, RPE could be an additional method to determine training loads. In spite of the promising results of the present study, it is not possible to state that the use of RPE is effective in monitoring loads during sub maximal strength training in elderly and more research must be carried out to confirm it.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157892</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34360184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Audiences ; Body mass index ; Cardiovascular disease ; Chronic illnesses ; Exercise ; Load ; Loads (forces) ; Older people ; Physical fitness ; Physical training ; Population ; Sports training ; Strength training ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7892</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7e5506734c5aab9cde457544bd8c43ccb5d48af1e2e572c9995c2255d9d375af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7e5506734c5aab9cde457544bd8c43ccb5d48af1e2e572c9995c2255d9d375af3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5827-5723 ; 0000-0002-1482-0718 ; 0000-0002-5258-9406</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345571/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345571/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietta-Dias, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberton, Cristine Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Ronei Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</creatorcontrib><title>Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><description>Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training using loads from a repetition maximum value (%1RM) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elderly women. Methods: Twenty-five elderly women (60–75 years old) were randomly assigned to a group that trained using loads determined by 1RM test (G%; n = 12) or to a group that trained using loads determined by RPE (GPE; n = 13). Elderly women trained for 12 weeks using five exercises performed with 2–3 sets of 8–15 repetitions. Loads progressed from 45% to 75% of 1RM (G%) and from 13 to 18 from Rating Perceived Exertion of Borg Scale (GPE). The outcome measures, 1RM and maximum repetitions (RMs with 70% 1RM), were assessed before, between and after training programs. Results: Increased 1RM value and RMs were observed in both groups (20–42%, p &lt; 0.001 and 56–76%, p &lt; 0.001, respectively, for %G; and 17–56%, p &lt; 0.001 and 47–106%, p &lt; 0.001, respectively, for GPE), without differences between them. Conclusions: Prescribing loads using the RPE and 1RM might be similarly effective for training elderly women in order to promote strength gains. As a practical application, RPE could be an additional method to determine training loads. In spite of the promising results of the present study, it is not possible to state that the use of RPE is effective in monitoring loads during sub maximal strength training in elderly and more research must be carried out to confirm it.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Physical fitness</subject><subject>Physical training</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Sports training</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkcFuEzEQhleIipbClbMlLlxS7LW9tjkgVSFQpCBQW8TRcuzZxNGuHWxvRXgD3rqOWhXKaUYz3_z_jKZpXhF8RqnCb_0W0m5DJOFCqvZJc0K6Ds9Yh8nTf_Lj5nnOW4ypZJ161hxTRmtVspPmz6UpPqxR7NE3SBb8DTi0-AWp-BiQycigL1A20aES0QcokEYfAF0n48NhbhmNy8gHdFUShHXZ_G3V4mJwkIY9-hFHCO_QObo0wcXR_64m8xhKisNQ06syuf2L5qg3Q4aX9_G0-f5xcT2_mC2_fvo8P1_OLFW8zARwjjtBmeXGrJR1wLjgjK2ctIxau-KOSdMTaIGL1iqluG1bzp1yVHDT09Pm_Z3ublqN4CzUNcygd8mPJu11NF4_7gS_0et4oyVlnAtSBd7cC6T4c4Jc9OizhWEwAeKUdTVTrBWCiIq-_g_dximFet6BkhJ3bccrdXZH2RRzTtA_LEOwPnxZP_4yvQWO85w0</recordid><startdate>20210726</startdate><enddate>20210726</enddate><creator>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro</creator><creator>Pietta-Dias, Caroline</creator><creator>Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf</creator><creator>Noll, Matias</creator><creator>Alberton, Cristine Lima</creator><creator>Pinto, Ronei Silveira</creator><creator>Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-5723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-0718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-9406</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210726</creationdate><title>Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro ; Pietta-Dias, Caroline ; Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf ; Noll, Matias ; Alberton, Cristine Lima ; Pinto, Ronei Silveira ; Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-7e5506734c5aab9cde457544bd8c43ccb5d48af1e2e572c9995c2255d9d375af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Physical fitness</topic><topic>Physical training</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Sports training</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietta-Dias, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noll, Matias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberton, Cristine Lima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Ronei Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiggemann, Carlos Leandro</au><au>Pietta-Dias, Caroline</au><au>Schoenell, Maira Cristina Wolf</au><au>Noll, Matias</au><au>Alberton, Cristine Lima</au><au>Pinto, Ronei Silveira</au><au>Kruel, Luiz Fernando Martins</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><date>2021-07-26</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>7892</spage><pages>7892-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of training using loads from a repetition maximum value (%1RM) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) in elderly women. Methods: Twenty-five elderly women (60–75 years old) were randomly assigned to a group that trained using loads determined by 1RM test (G%; n = 12) or to a group that trained using loads determined by RPE (GPE; n = 13). Elderly women trained for 12 weeks using five exercises performed with 2–3 sets of 8–15 repetitions. Loads progressed from 45% to 75% of 1RM (G%) and from 13 to 18 from Rating Perceived Exertion of Borg Scale (GPE). The outcome measures, 1RM and maximum repetitions (RMs with 70% 1RM), were assessed before, between and after training programs. Results: Increased 1RM value and RMs were observed in both groups (20–42%, p &lt; 0.001 and 56–76%, p &lt; 0.001, respectively, for %G; and 17–56%, p &lt; 0.001 and 47–106%, p &lt; 0.001, respectively, for GPE), without differences between them. Conclusions: Prescribing loads using the RPE and 1RM might be similarly effective for training elderly women in order to promote strength gains. As a practical application, RPE could be an additional method to determine training loads. In spite of the promising results of the present study, it is not possible to state that the use of RPE is effective in monitoring loads during sub maximal strength training in elderly and more research must be carried out to confirm it.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34360184</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18157892</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5827-5723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-0718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5258-9406</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7892
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8345571
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Arthritis
Audiences
Body mass index
Cardiovascular disease
Chronic illnesses
Exercise
Load
Loads (forces)
Older people
Physical fitness
Physical training
Population
Sports training
Strength training
Womens health
title Rating of Perceived Exertion as a Method to Determine Training Loads in Strength Training in Elderly Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A12%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rating%20of%20Perceived%20Exertion%20as%20a%20Method%20to%20Determine%20Training%20Loads%20in%20Strength%20Training%20in%20Elderly%20Women:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Tiggemann,%20Carlos%20Leandro&rft.date=2021-07-26&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=7892&rft.pages=7892-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18157892&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2558806265%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558806265&rft_id=info:pmid/34360184&rfr_iscdi=true