Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment

Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7986
Hauptverfasser: MacKay, Melissa, Colangeli, Taylor, Gillis, Daniel, McWhirter, Jennifer, Papadopoulos, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 15
container_start_page 7986
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 18
creator MacKay, Melissa
Colangeli, Taylor
Gillis, Daniel
McWhirter, Jennifer
Papadopoulos, Andrew
description Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph18157986
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8345485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559431660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9vFCEYh4mxsbV69WhIvHjoVBgYhrmYNOPaNmmtpuqVsPzpsmFghRl1v0s_rIxdm9YLkLwPz_u--QHwCqNjQjr0zq1N2qwwx03bcfYEHGDGUEUZwk8fvPfB85zXCBFOWfcM7BNKGKpbfgBuF7_l4IILN_A6Kic9vDTaSdgnl12GfRyGKTglRxcD1FOawYVMfgv7q-_nHyrcQZviAD9PS-8UPDPSjysog4afzK-8k9mY4JdJejduj4oyjCaMR3-hPqZk8iYGPYt3kutSdkM5XoA9K302L3f3Ifj2cfG1P6surk7P-5OLSlFOx4q0Dea8qbWmBNUYGyxbKmutCGsQqylTS6Is11YzaVFLLMdLQjsrOdGWI04Owfs772ZaDkar0jpJLzbJDTJtRZROPK4EtxI38afghDaUN0XwdidI8cdk8igGl5XxXgYTpyzqpukomeMo6Jv_0HWcUijrzRTnaM6yUMd3lEox52Ts_TAYiTl48Tj48uH1wxXu8X9Jkz-NRqub</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558801815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>MacKay, Melissa ; Colangeli, Taylor ; Gillis, Daniel ; McWhirter, Jennifer ; Papadopoulos, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Melissa ; Colangeli, Taylor ; Gillis, Daniel ; McWhirter, Jennifer ; Papadopoulos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157986</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34360278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acceptance tests ; Best practice ; Canada ; Communication ; Communication channels ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crises ; Ethics ; Grey literature ; Health care ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; News media ; Pandemics ; Principles ; Public Health ; Risk communication ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sentiment analysis ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Trust ; Trustworthiness</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7986</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7646-259X ; 0000-0002-6682-1528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345485/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345485/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colangeli, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhirter, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.</description><subject>Acceptance tests</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication channels</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Grey literature</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sentiment analysis</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9vFCEYh4mxsbV69WhIvHjoVBgYhrmYNOPaNmmtpuqVsPzpsmFghRl1v0s_rIxdm9YLkLwPz_u--QHwCqNjQjr0zq1N2qwwx03bcfYEHGDGUEUZwk8fvPfB85zXCBFOWfcM7BNKGKpbfgBuF7_l4IILN_A6Kic9vDTaSdgnl12GfRyGKTglRxcD1FOawYVMfgv7q-_nHyrcQZviAD9PS-8UPDPSjysog4afzK-8k9mY4JdJejduj4oyjCaMR3-hPqZk8iYGPYt3kutSdkM5XoA9K302L3f3Ifj2cfG1P6surk7P-5OLSlFOx4q0Dea8qbWmBNUYGyxbKmutCGsQqylTS6Is11YzaVFLLMdLQjsrOdGWI04Owfs772ZaDkar0jpJLzbJDTJtRZROPK4EtxI38afghDaUN0XwdidI8cdk8igGl5XxXgYTpyzqpukomeMo6Jv_0HWcUijrzRTnaM6yUMd3lEox52Ts_TAYiTl48Tj48uH1wxXu8X9Jkz-NRqub</recordid><startdate>20210728</startdate><enddate>20210728</enddate><creator>MacKay, Melissa</creator><creator>Colangeli, Taylor</creator><creator>Gillis, Daniel</creator><creator>McWhirter, Jennifer</creator><creator>Papadopoulos, Andrew</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-259X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-1528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210728</creationdate><title>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</title><author>MacKay, Melissa ; Colangeli, Taylor ; Gillis, Daniel ; McWhirter, Jennifer ; Papadopoulos, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceptance tests</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication channels</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Grey literature</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sentiment analysis</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colangeli, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhirter, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacKay, Melissa</au><au>Colangeli, Taylor</au><au>Gillis, Daniel</au><au>McWhirter, Jennifer</au><au>Papadopoulos, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-07-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>7986</spage><pages>7986-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34360278</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18157986</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-259X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-1528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1660-4601
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7986
issn 1660-4601
1661-7827
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8345485
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Acceptance tests
Best practice
Canada
Communication
Communication channels
Coronaviruses
COVID-19
Crises
Ethics
Grey literature
Health care
Humans
Infectious diseases
News media
Pandemics
Principles
Public Health
Risk communication
SARS-CoV-2
Sentiment analysis
Social Media
Social networks
Trust
Trustworthiness
title Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A42%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20Social%20Media%20Crisis%20Communication%20during%20Early%20COVID-19%20from%20Public%20Health%20and%20News%20Media%20for%20Quality,%20Content,%20and%20Corresponding%20Public%20Sentiment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=MacKay,%20Melissa&rft.date=2021-07-28&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=7986&rft.pages=7986-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18157986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2559431660%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558801815&rft_id=info:pmid/34360278&rfr_iscdi=true