Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment
Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication'...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7986 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 7986 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | MacKay, Melissa Colangeli, Taylor Gillis, Daniel McWhirter, Jennifer Papadopoulos, Andrew |
description | Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph18157986 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8345485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559431660</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9vFCEYh4mxsbV69WhIvHjoVBgYhrmYNOPaNmmtpuqVsPzpsmFghRl1v0s_rIxdm9YLkLwPz_u--QHwCqNjQjr0zq1N2qwwx03bcfYEHGDGUEUZwk8fvPfB85zXCBFOWfcM7BNKGKpbfgBuF7_l4IILN_A6Kic9vDTaSdgnl12GfRyGKTglRxcD1FOawYVMfgv7q-_nHyrcQZviAD9PS-8UPDPSjysog4afzK-8k9mY4JdJejduj4oyjCaMR3-hPqZk8iYGPYt3kutSdkM5XoA9K302L3f3Ifj2cfG1P6surk7P-5OLSlFOx4q0Dea8qbWmBNUYGyxbKmutCGsQqylTS6Is11YzaVFLLMdLQjsrOdGWI04Owfs772ZaDkar0jpJLzbJDTJtRZROPK4EtxI38afghDaUN0XwdidI8cdk8igGl5XxXgYTpyzqpukomeMo6Jv_0HWcUijrzRTnaM6yUMd3lEox52Ts_TAYiTl48Tj48uH1wxXu8X9Jkz-NRqub</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2558801815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>MacKay, Melissa ; Colangeli, Taylor ; Gillis, Daniel ; McWhirter, Jennifer ; Papadopoulos, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Melissa ; Colangeli, Taylor ; Gillis, Daniel ; McWhirter, Jennifer ; Papadopoulos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157986</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34360278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acceptance tests ; Best practice ; Canada ; Communication ; Communication channels ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Crises ; Ethics ; Grey literature ; Health care ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; News media ; Pandemics ; Principles ; Public Health ; Risk communication ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Sentiment analysis ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Trust ; Trustworthiness</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7986</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7646-259X ; 0000-0002-6682-1528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345485/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8345485/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,725,778,782,883,27911,27912,53778,53780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34360278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colangeli, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhirter, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.</description><subject>Acceptance tests</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Communication channels</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Grey literature</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Risk communication</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Sentiment analysis</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9vFCEYh4mxsbV69WhIvHjoVBgYhrmYNOPaNmmtpuqVsPzpsmFghRl1v0s_rIxdm9YLkLwPz_u--QHwCqNjQjr0zq1N2qwwx03bcfYEHGDGUEUZwk8fvPfB85zXCBFOWfcM7BNKGKpbfgBuF7_l4IILN_A6Kic9vDTaSdgnl12GfRyGKTglRxcD1FOawYVMfgv7q-_nHyrcQZviAD9PS-8UPDPSjysog4afzK-8k9mY4JdJejduj4oyjCaMR3-hPqZk8iYGPYt3kutSdkM5XoA9K302L3f3Ifj2cfG1P6surk7P-5OLSlFOx4q0Dea8qbWmBNUYGyxbKmutCGsQqylTS6Is11YzaVFLLMdLQjsrOdGWI04Owfs772ZaDkar0jpJLzbJDTJtRZROPK4EtxI38afghDaUN0XwdidI8cdk8igGl5XxXgYTpyzqpukomeMo6Jv_0HWcUijrzRTnaM6yUMd3lEox52Ts_TAYiTl48Tj48uH1wxXu8X9Jkz-NRqub</recordid><startdate>20210728</startdate><enddate>20210728</enddate><creator>MacKay, Melissa</creator><creator>Colangeli, Taylor</creator><creator>Gillis, Daniel</creator><creator>McWhirter, Jennifer</creator><creator>Papadopoulos, Andrew</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-259X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-1528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210728</creationdate><title>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</title><author>MacKay, Melissa ; Colangeli, Taylor ; Gillis, Daniel ; McWhirter, Jennifer ; Papadopoulos, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-37518852dd430211e1a74a2dc36506246cb3cf8dfd6af073f81b349fa83df8083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acceptance tests</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Communication channels</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Grey literature</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Risk communication</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Sentiment analysis</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MacKay, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colangeli, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillis, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWhirter, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadopoulos, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MacKay, Melissa</au><au>Colangeli, Taylor</au><au>Gillis, Daniel</au><au>McWhirter, Jennifer</au><au>Papadopoulos, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-07-28</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>7986</spage><pages>7986-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Rising COVID-19 cases in Canada in early 2021, coupled with pervasive mis- and disinformation, demonstrate the critical relationship between effective crisis communication, trust, and risk protective measure adherence by the public. Trust in crisis communication is affected by the communication's characteristics including transparency, timeliness, empathy, and clarity, as well as the source and communication channels used. Crisis communication occurs in a rhetorical arena where various actors, including public health, news media, and the public, are co-producing and responding to messages. Rhetorical arenas must be monitored to assess the acceptance of messaging. The quality and content of Canadian public health and news media crisis communication on Facebook were evaluated to understand the use of key guiding principles of effective crisis communication, the focus of the communication, and subsequent public emotional response to included posts. Four hundred and thirty-eight posts and 26,774 anonymized comments were collected and analyzed. Overall, the guiding principles for effective crisis communication were inconsistently applied and combined. A limited combination of guiding principles, especially those that demonstrate trustworthiness, was likely driving the negative sentiment uncovered in the comments. Public health and news media should use the guiding principles consistently to increase positive sentiment and build trust among followers.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34360278</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18157986</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7646-259X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-1528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-07, Vol.18 (15), p.7986 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8345485 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acceptance tests Best practice Canada Communication Communication channels Coronaviruses COVID-19 Crises Ethics Grey literature Health care Humans Infectious diseases News media Pandemics Principles Public Health Risk communication SARS-CoV-2 Sentiment analysis Social Media Social networks Trust Trustworthiness |
title | Examining Social Media Crisis Communication during Early COVID-19 from Public Health and News Media for Quality, Content, and Corresponding Public Sentiment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T03%3A42%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20Social%20Media%20Crisis%20Communication%20during%20Early%20COVID-19%20from%20Public%20Health%20and%20News%20Media%20for%20Quality,%20Content,%20and%20Corresponding%20Public%20Sentiment&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=MacKay,%20Melissa&rft.date=2021-07-28&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=7986&rft.pages=7986-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18157986&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2559431660%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2558801815&rft_id=info:pmid/34360278&rfr_iscdi=true |