Will Americans Get Vaccinated? Predicting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Rates Under Contingent Scenarios
Amid a pandemic, vaccines represent a promising solution for mitigating public health and economic crises, and an improved understanding of individuals’ vaccination intentions is crucial to design optimal immunization campaigns. This study predicts uptake rates for different COVID-19 vaccine specifi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Value in health 2021-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1543-1550 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1550 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1543 |
container_title | Value in health |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Vásquez, William F. Trudeau, Jennifer M. |
description | Amid a pandemic, vaccines represent a promising solution for mitigating public health and economic crises, and an improved understanding of individuals’ vaccination intentions is crucial to design optimal immunization campaigns. This study predicts uptake rates for different COVID-19 vaccine specifications and identifies personal characteristics that moderate an individual’s responsiveness to vaccine attributes.
We developed an online survey with contingent specifications of a COVID-19 vaccine, varying in effectiveness, risks of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket cost. Using population-averaged logit models, we estimated vaccine uptake rates that account for uncertainty, heterogeneity across respondents, and interactions between vaccine and personal characteristics.
We obtained 3047 completed surveys. The highest uptake rate for an annual vaccine, 62%, is predicted when vaccine effectiveness is 80% to 90%, side effects are minimal, and the vaccine is provided at zero cost, with decreases seen in the uptake rate for less effective vaccines, for example, 50% for 50% to 60% effectiveness. Moreover, we found that Americans’ response to vaccine effectiveness depends on their self-reported concern, that is, concerned respondents report a higher willingness to get vaccinated. Our findings also indicate that COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates decrease with vaccine cost and that responsiveness to vaccine cost is moderated by income.
Although providing the COVID-19 vaccine at zero cost will motivate many individuals to get vaccinated, a policy focused exclusively on vaccine cost may not be enough to reach herd immunity thresholds. Although those concerned with COVID-19 will participate, further evidence is needed on how to incentivize participation among the unconcerned (43%) to prevent further pandemic spread.
•Using contingent behavior questions, we present a timely and policy relevant analysis of intended immunization against COVID-19 in the United States. Our contingent vaccine specifications vary in terms of vaccine effectiveness, risk of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket costs.•At 62%, the highest uptake rate predicted for a highly effective annual vaccine with minimal side effects and zero cost, intended participation remains below herd immunity thresholds. Vaccine effectiveness and personal concerns are the most influential factors underlying intentions to be vaccinated.•We found heterogeneous responses to effectiveness and |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8339597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1098301521015825</els_id><sourcerecordid>2597513209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a27c2a0ce4e68ea0c49ac0f835f8bdedc3053c6727877d98d842818a7ac2c3773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFrFDEQxoMotrb-Az4FfPFl10my2WRBlHJqLRQq1quPIZedq1n3kjPZO_C_N8sdgn3o0wzM7_uYmY-QVwxqBqx9O9TD3o41B85qkDWAekJOmeRN1SghnpYeOl0JYPKEvMh5AIBWcPmcnIhGMSZkc0pWP_w40osNJu9syPQSJ3pnnfPBTth_oF8T9t5NPtzTxc3d1ceKdcc50uV2sr-QfitkpsvQY6KLGGYWw0RvHQabfMzn5NnajhlfHusZWX7-9H3xpbq-ubxaXFxXrmlhqixXjltw2GCrsTRNZx2stZBrveqxdwKkcK3iSivVd7rXDddMW2Udd0IpcUbeH3y3u9Wm8GWJZEezTX5j0x8TrTf_T4L_ae7j3mghOtnNBm-OBin-3mGezMZnh-NoA8ZdNlx2wIALpgv6-gE6xF0K5byZUpIJDl2h-IFyKeaccP1vGQZmjtAMZo7QzBEakKZEWETvDiIsv9p7TCY7j8GVHBK6yfTRPyb_C8SAovQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597513209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Will Americans Get Vaccinated? Predicting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Rates Under Contingent Scenarios</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Vásquez, William F. ; Trudeau, Jennifer M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vásquez, William F. ; Trudeau, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><description>Amid a pandemic, vaccines represent a promising solution for mitigating public health and economic crises, and an improved understanding of individuals’ vaccination intentions is crucial to design optimal immunization campaigns. This study predicts uptake rates for different COVID-19 vaccine specifications and identifies personal characteristics that moderate an individual’s responsiveness to vaccine attributes.
We developed an online survey with contingent specifications of a COVID-19 vaccine, varying in effectiveness, risks of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket cost. Using population-averaged logit models, we estimated vaccine uptake rates that account for uncertainty, heterogeneity across respondents, and interactions between vaccine and personal characteristics.
We obtained 3047 completed surveys. The highest uptake rate for an annual vaccine, 62%, is predicted when vaccine effectiveness is 80% to 90%, side effects are minimal, and the vaccine is provided at zero cost, with decreases seen in the uptake rate for less effective vaccines, for example, 50% for 50% to 60% effectiveness. Moreover, we found that Americans’ response to vaccine effectiveness depends on their self-reported concern, that is, concerned respondents report a higher willingness to get vaccinated. Our findings also indicate that COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates decrease with vaccine cost and that responsiveness to vaccine cost is moderated by income.
Although providing the COVID-19 vaccine at zero cost will motivate many individuals to get vaccinated, a policy focused exclusively on vaccine cost may not be enough to reach herd immunity thresholds. Although those concerned with COVID-19 will participate, further evidence is needed on how to incentivize participation among the unconcerned (43%) to prevent further pandemic spread.
•Using contingent behavior questions, we present a timely and policy relevant analysis of intended immunization against COVID-19 in the United States. Our contingent vaccine specifications vary in terms of vaccine effectiveness, risk of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket costs.•At 62%, the highest uptake rate predicted for a highly effective annual vaccine with minimal side effects and zero cost, intended participation remains below herd immunity thresholds. Vaccine effectiveness and personal concerns are the most influential factors underlying intentions to be vaccinated.•We found heterogeneous responses to effectiveness and cost. First, personal concern amplifies responsiveness to effectiveness, with uptake rates diverging by 35 and 49 percentage points for 50% to 60% and 80% to 90% effective vaccines, respectively. Second, cost is moderated by income. Individuals with low income are more sensitive to vaccine costs, opting out at a rate of 30 percentage points over the price range $0 to $400, than a 16-percentage point decline among the affluent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3015</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34711354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrenceville: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Campaigns ; contingent scenarios ; COVID-19 ; COVID-19 vaccines ; Economic crisis ; Herd immunity ; Immunity ; Immunization ; Influenza ; Pandemics ; Personal characteristics ; Personal expenditure ; Polls & surveys ; preference heterogeneity ; Public health ; Responsiveness ; Side effects ; Themed Section: COVID-19 ; Thresholds ; Uncertainty ; Uptake ; Vaccine efficacy ; vaccine uptake ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Value in health, 2021-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1543-1550</ispartof><rights>2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Nov 2021</rights><rights>2021 ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2021 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a27c2a0ce4e68ea0c49ac0f835f8bdedc3053c6727877d98d842818a7ac2c3773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a27c2a0ce4e68ea0c49ac0f835f8bdedc3053c6727877d98d842818a7ac2c3773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301521015825$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,30976,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vásquez, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudeau, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><title>Will Americans Get Vaccinated? Predicting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Rates Under Contingent Scenarios</title><title>Value in health</title><description>Amid a pandemic, vaccines represent a promising solution for mitigating public health and economic crises, and an improved understanding of individuals’ vaccination intentions is crucial to design optimal immunization campaigns. This study predicts uptake rates for different COVID-19 vaccine specifications and identifies personal characteristics that moderate an individual’s responsiveness to vaccine attributes.
We developed an online survey with contingent specifications of a COVID-19 vaccine, varying in effectiveness, risks of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket cost. Using population-averaged logit models, we estimated vaccine uptake rates that account for uncertainty, heterogeneity across respondents, and interactions between vaccine and personal characteristics.
We obtained 3047 completed surveys. The highest uptake rate for an annual vaccine, 62%, is predicted when vaccine effectiveness is 80% to 90%, side effects are minimal, and the vaccine is provided at zero cost, with decreases seen in the uptake rate for less effective vaccines, for example, 50% for 50% to 60% effectiveness. Moreover, we found that Americans’ response to vaccine effectiveness depends on their self-reported concern, that is, concerned respondents report a higher willingness to get vaccinated. Our findings also indicate that COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates decrease with vaccine cost and that responsiveness to vaccine cost is moderated by income.
Although providing the COVID-19 vaccine at zero cost will motivate many individuals to get vaccinated, a policy focused exclusively on vaccine cost may not be enough to reach herd immunity thresholds. Although those concerned with COVID-19 will participate, further evidence is needed on how to incentivize participation among the unconcerned (43%) to prevent further pandemic spread.
•Using contingent behavior questions, we present a timely and policy relevant analysis of intended immunization against COVID-19 in the United States. Our contingent vaccine specifications vary in terms of vaccine effectiveness, risk of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket costs.•At 62%, the highest uptake rate predicted for a highly effective annual vaccine with minimal side effects and zero cost, intended participation remains below herd immunity thresholds. Vaccine effectiveness and personal concerns are the most influential factors underlying intentions to be vaccinated.•We found heterogeneous responses to effectiveness and cost. First, personal concern amplifies responsiveness to effectiveness, with uptake rates diverging by 35 and 49 percentage points for 50% to 60% and 80% to 90% effective vaccines, respectively. Second, cost is moderated by income. Individuals with low income are more sensitive to vaccine costs, opting out at a rate of 30 percentage points over the price range $0 to $400, than a 16-percentage point decline among the affluent.</description><subject>Campaigns</subject><subject>contingent scenarios</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Herd immunity</subject><subject>Immunity</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Personal characteristics</subject><subject>Personal expenditure</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>preference heterogeneity</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>Themed Section: COVID-19</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><subject>Vaccine efficacy</subject><subject>vaccine uptake</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>1098-3015</issn><issn>1524-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kdFrFDEQxoMotrb-Az4FfPFl10my2WRBlHJqLRQq1quPIZedq1n3kjPZO_C_N8sdgn3o0wzM7_uYmY-QVwxqBqx9O9TD3o41B85qkDWAekJOmeRN1SghnpYeOl0JYPKEvMh5AIBWcPmcnIhGMSZkc0pWP_w40osNJu9syPQSJ3pnnfPBTth_oF8T9t5NPtzTxc3d1ceKdcc50uV2sr-QfitkpsvQY6KLGGYWw0RvHQabfMzn5NnajhlfHusZWX7-9H3xpbq-ubxaXFxXrmlhqixXjltw2GCrsTRNZx2stZBrveqxdwKkcK3iSivVd7rXDddMW2Udd0IpcUbeH3y3u9Wm8GWJZEezTX5j0x8TrTf_T4L_ae7j3mghOtnNBm-OBin-3mGezMZnh-NoA8ZdNlx2wIALpgv6-gE6xF0K5byZUpIJDl2h-IFyKeaccP1vGQZmjtAMZo7QzBEakKZEWETvDiIsv9p7TCY7j8GVHBK6yfTRPyb_C8SAovQ</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Vásquez, William F.</creator><creator>Trudeau, Jennifer M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Will Americans Get Vaccinated? Predicting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Rates Under Contingent Scenarios</title><author>Vásquez, William F. ; Trudeau, Jennifer M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-a27c2a0ce4e68ea0c49ac0f835f8bdedc3053c6727877d98d842818a7ac2c3773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Campaigns</topic><topic>contingent scenarios</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Herd immunity</topic><topic>Immunity</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Personal characteristics</topic><topic>Personal expenditure</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>preference heterogeneity</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>Themed Section: COVID-19</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><topic>Vaccine efficacy</topic><topic>vaccine uptake</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vásquez, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trudeau, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vásquez, William F.</au><au>Trudeau, Jennifer M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Will Americans Get Vaccinated? Predicting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Rates Under Contingent Scenarios</atitle><jtitle>Value in health</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1543</spage><epage>1550</epage><pages>1543-1550</pages><issn>1098-3015</issn><eissn>1524-4733</eissn><abstract>Amid a pandemic, vaccines represent a promising solution for mitigating public health and economic crises, and an improved understanding of individuals’ vaccination intentions is crucial to design optimal immunization campaigns. This study predicts uptake rates for different COVID-19 vaccine specifications and identifies personal characteristics that moderate an individual’s responsiveness to vaccine attributes.
We developed an online survey with contingent specifications of a COVID-19 vaccine, varying in effectiveness, risks of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket cost. Using population-averaged logit models, we estimated vaccine uptake rates that account for uncertainty, heterogeneity across respondents, and interactions between vaccine and personal characteristics.
We obtained 3047 completed surveys. The highest uptake rate for an annual vaccine, 62%, is predicted when vaccine effectiveness is 80% to 90%, side effects are minimal, and the vaccine is provided at zero cost, with decreases seen in the uptake rate for less effective vaccines, for example, 50% for 50% to 60% effectiveness. Moreover, we found that Americans’ response to vaccine effectiveness depends on their self-reported concern, that is, concerned respondents report a higher willingness to get vaccinated. Our findings also indicate that COVID-19 vaccine uptake rates decrease with vaccine cost and that responsiveness to vaccine cost is moderated by income.
Although providing the COVID-19 vaccine at zero cost will motivate many individuals to get vaccinated, a policy focused exclusively on vaccine cost may not be enough to reach herd immunity thresholds. Although those concerned with COVID-19 will participate, further evidence is needed on how to incentivize participation among the unconcerned (43%) to prevent further pandemic spread.
•Using contingent behavior questions, we present a timely and policy relevant analysis of intended immunization against COVID-19 in the United States. Our contingent vaccine specifications vary in terms of vaccine effectiveness, risk of side effects, duration of immunity, and out-of-pocket costs.•At 62%, the highest uptake rate predicted for a highly effective annual vaccine with minimal side effects and zero cost, intended participation remains below herd immunity thresholds. Vaccine effectiveness and personal concerns are the most influential factors underlying intentions to be vaccinated.•We found heterogeneous responses to effectiveness and cost. First, personal concern amplifies responsiveness to effectiveness, with uptake rates diverging by 35 and 49 percentage points for 50% to 60% and 80% to 90% effective vaccines, respectively. Second, cost is moderated by income. Individuals with low income are more sensitive to vaccine costs, opting out at a rate of 30 percentage points over the price range $0 to $400, than a 16-percentage point decline among the affluent.</abstract><cop>Lawrenceville</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34711354</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.007</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3015 |
ispartof | Value in health, 2021-11, Vol.24 (11), p.1543-1550 |
issn | 1098-3015 1524-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8339597 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Campaigns contingent scenarios COVID-19 COVID-19 vaccines Economic crisis Herd immunity Immunity Immunization Influenza Pandemics Personal characteristics Personal expenditure Polls & surveys preference heterogeneity Public health Responsiveness Side effects Themed Section: COVID-19 Thresholds Uncertainty Uptake Vaccine efficacy vaccine uptake Vaccines |
title | Will Americans Get Vaccinated? Predicting COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake Rates Under Contingent Scenarios |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T20%3A13%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Will%20Americans%20Get%20Vaccinated?%20Predicting%20COVID-19%20Vaccine%20Uptake%20Rates%20Under%20Contingent%20Scenarios&rft.jtitle=Value%20in%20health&rft.au=V%C3%A1squez,%20William%20F.&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1543&rft.epage=1550&rft.pages=1543-1550&rft.issn=1098-3015&rft.eissn=1524-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2597513209%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597513209&rft_id=info:pmid/34711354&rft_els_id=S1098301521015825&rfr_iscdi=true |