Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Intracranial Vascular System: Comparative Study in 55 Patients

Intracranial vessels were examined in 55 patients with both conventional selective catheterization and intravenous digital subtraction angiography using a prototype digital subtraction unit. In 65% of the patients, the digital subtraction angiogram was diagnostic, but the overall quality was inferio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR 1981-01, Vol.2 (6), p.527-534
Hauptverfasser: Modic, Michael T., Weinstein, Meredith A., Chilcote, William A., Pavlicek, William, Duchesneau, Paul M., Furlan, Anthony J., Little, John R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 534
container_issue 6
container_start_page 527
container_title American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR
container_volume 2
creator Modic, Michael T.
Weinstein, Meredith A.
Chilcote, William A.
Pavlicek, William
Duchesneau, Paul M.
Furlan, Anthony J.
Little, John R.
description Intracranial vessels were examined in 55 patients with both conventional selective catheterization and intravenous digital subtraction angiography using a prototype digital subtraction unit. In 65% of the patients, the digital subtraction angiogram was diagnostic, but the overall quality was inferior to conventional selective angiography. In 22%, the digital subtraction angiogram provided diagnostic information, but there was a significant chance of misinterpreting the results of the study. In 13% of cases, the subtraction angiogram was not diagnostic. As now developed, digital subraction angiography can replace conventional cerebral angiography for preoperative evaluation of the juxtasellar carotid artery prior to transphenoidal surgery because the large intracerebral vessels are consistently well visualized with digital subtraction. The dural sinuses are better visualized with digital subtraction than with conventional angiography because with digital subtraction all the vessels of the brain are opacified, whereas with conventional angiography, there is a mixture of opacified and unopacified blood in the sinuses. Combined with computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography can replace conventional angiography for determining the preoperative extent and vascularity of tumors. It can be used for postoperative evaluation of aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, extracranial to intracranial bypasses, and after the embolization of vascular lesions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8335247</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8335247</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p123t-cdaddd914d4ef2b28b23a0780a59031186eef5562a082734d2c4c1fe6a6811993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVjl1LwzAYhYMoc07_Q_5AIR9Nm3ghjPqxwUChKt6Vt03aRtq0pOmg_94NvfHqwHkeDucCraniSaSE-rpEa0KViBJK5DW6maZvQohQKVuhFSGMCJaukXm0jQ3Q4Xwug4cq2MHhrWvs0HgY2wUPNQ6twXt3ph6cPbmfMFVzBx7nyxRMf4-zoR_BQ7BHg_Mw6wVbh4XAb6fKuDDdoqsausnc_eUGfTw_vWe76PD6ss-2h2ikjIeo0qC1VjTWsalZyWTJOJBUEhCKcEplYkwtRMKASJbyWLMqrmhtEkgkpUrxDXr43R3nsje6MufXXTF624NfigFs8Z842xbNcCwk54LFKf8Bm-Vgpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Intracranial Vascular System: Comparative Study in 55 Patients</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Modic, Michael T. ; Weinstein, Meredith A. ; Chilcote, William A. ; Pavlicek, William ; Duchesneau, Paul M. ; Furlan, Anthony J. ; Little, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Modic, Michael T. ; Weinstein, Meredith A. ; Chilcote, William A. ; Pavlicek, William ; Duchesneau, Paul M. ; Furlan, Anthony J. ; Little, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>Intracranial vessels were examined in 55 patients with both conventional selective catheterization and intravenous digital subtraction angiography using a prototype digital subtraction unit. In 65% of the patients, the digital subtraction angiogram was diagnostic, but the overall quality was inferior to conventional selective angiography. In 22%, the digital subtraction angiogram provided diagnostic information, but there was a significant chance of misinterpreting the results of the study. In 13% of cases, the subtraction angiogram was not diagnostic. As now developed, digital subraction angiography can replace conventional cerebral angiography for preoperative evaluation of the juxtasellar carotid artery prior to transphenoidal surgery because the large intracerebral vessels are consistently well visualized with digital subtraction. The dural sinuses are better visualized with digital subtraction than with conventional angiography because with digital subtraction all the vessels of the brain are opacified, whereas with conventional angiography, there is a mixture of opacified and unopacified blood in the sinuses. Combined with computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography can replace conventional angiography for determining the preoperative extent and vascularity of tumors. It can be used for postoperative evaluation of aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, extracranial to intracranial bypasses, and after the embolization of vascular lesions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-959X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 0020527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20527</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Neuroradiology</publisher><ispartof>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 1981-01, Vol.2 (6), p.527-534</ispartof><rights>American Roentgen Ray Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335247/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8335247/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,53769,53771</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Modic, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Meredith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilcote, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlicek, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchesneau, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Intracranial Vascular System: Comparative Study in 55 Patients</title><title>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</title><description>Intracranial vessels were examined in 55 patients with both conventional selective catheterization and intravenous digital subtraction angiography using a prototype digital subtraction unit. In 65% of the patients, the digital subtraction angiogram was diagnostic, but the overall quality was inferior to conventional selective angiography. In 22%, the digital subtraction angiogram provided diagnostic information, but there was a significant chance of misinterpreting the results of the study. In 13% of cases, the subtraction angiogram was not diagnostic. As now developed, digital subraction angiography can replace conventional cerebral angiography for preoperative evaluation of the juxtasellar carotid artery prior to transphenoidal surgery because the large intracerebral vessels are consistently well visualized with digital subtraction. The dural sinuses are better visualized with digital subtraction than with conventional angiography because with digital subtraction all the vessels of the brain are opacified, whereas with conventional angiography, there is a mixture of opacified and unopacified blood in the sinuses. Combined with computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography can replace conventional angiography for determining the preoperative extent and vascularity of tumors. It can be used for postoperative evaluation of aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, extracranial to intracranial bypasses, and after the embolization of vascular lesions.</description><issn>0195-6108</issn><issn>1936-959X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1981</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVjl1LwzAYhYMoc07_Q_5AIR9Nm3ghjPqxwUChKt6Vt03aRtq0pOmg_94NvfHqwHkeDucCraniSaSE-rpEa0KViBJK5DW6maZvQohQKVuhFSGMCJaukXm0jQ3Q4Xwug4cq2MHhrWvs0HgY2wUPNQ6twXt3ph6cPbmfMFVzBx7nyxRMf4-zoR_BQ7BHg_Mw6wVbh4XAb6fKuDDdoqsausnc_eUGfTw_vWe76PD6ss-2h2ikjIeo0qC1VjTWsalZyWTJOJBUEhCKcEplYkwtRMKASJbyWLMqrmhtEkgkpUrxDXr43R3nsje6MufXXTF624NfigFs8Z842xbNcCwk54LFKf8Bm-Vgpw</recordid><startdate>19810101</startdate><enddate>19810101</enddate><creator>Modic, Michael T.</creator><creator>Weinstein, Meredith A.</creator><creator>Chilcote, William A.</creator><creator>Pavlicek, William</creator><creator>Duchesneau, Paul M.</creator><creator>Furlan, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Little, John R.</creator><general>American Society of Neuroradiology</general><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19810101</creationdate><title>Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Intracranial Vascular System: Comparative Study in 55 Patients</title><author>Modic, Michael T. ; Weinstein, Meredith A. ; Chilcote, William A. ; Pavlicek, William ; Duchesneau, Paul M. ; Furlan, Anthony J. ; Little, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p123t-cdaddd914d4ef2b28b23a0780a59031186eef5562a082734d2c4c1fe6a6811993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1981</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Modic, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Meredith A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chilcote, William A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlicek, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duchesneau, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlan, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Little, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Modic, Michael T.</au><au>Weinstein, Meredith A.</au><au>Chilcote, William A.</au><au>Pavlicek, William</au><au>Duchesneau, Paul M.</au><au>Furlan, Anthony J.</au><au>Little, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Intracranial Vascular System: Comparative Study in 55 Patients</atitle><jtitle>American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR</jtitle><date>1981-01-01</date><risdate>1981</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>534</epage><pages>527-534</pages><issn>0195-6108</issn><eissn>1936-959X</eissn><abstract>Intracranial vessels were examined in 55 patients with both conventional selective catheterization and intravenous digital subtraction angiography using a prototype digital subtraction unit. In 65% of the patients, the digital subtraction angiogram was diagnostic, but the overall quality was inferior to conventional selective angiography. In 22%, the digital subtraction angiogram provided diagnostic information, but there was a significant chance of misinterpreting the results of the study. In 13% of cases, the subtraction angiogram was not diagnostic. As now developed, digital subraction angiography can replace conventional cerebral angiography for preoperative evaluation of the juxtasellar carotid artery prior to transphenoidal surgery because the large intracerebral vessels are consistently well visualized with digital subtraction. The dural sinuses are better visualized with digital subtraction than with conventional angiography because with digital subtraction all the vessels of the brain are opacified, whereas with conventional angiography, there is a mixture of opacified and unopacified blood in the sinuses. Combined with computed tomography, digital subtraction angiography can replace conventional angiography for determining the preoperative extent and vascularity of tumors. It can be used for postoperative evaluation of aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, extracranial to intracranial bypasses, and after the embolization of vascular lesions.</abstract><pub>American Society of Neuroradiology</pub><pmid>0020527</pmid><pmid>20527</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6108
ispartof American journal of neuroradiology : AJNR, 1981-01, Vol.2 (6), p.527-534
issn 0195-6108
1936-959X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8335247
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
title Digital Subtraction Angiography of the Intracranial Vascular System: Comparative Study in 55 Patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T21%3A39%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20Subtraction%20Angiography%20of%20the%20Intracranial%20Vascular%20System:%20Comparative%20Study%20in%2055%20Patients&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20neuroradiology%20:%20AJNR&rft.au=Modic,%20Michael%20T.&rft.date=1981-01-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=534&rft.pages=527-534&rft.issn=0195-6108&rft.eissn=1936-959X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8335247%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/0020527&rfr_iscdi=true