68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.705-729 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 729 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 705 |
container_title | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Matushita, Cristina S da Silva, Ana M Marques Schuck, Phelipi N Bardisserotto, Matteo Piant, Diego B Pereira, Jonatas L Cerci, Juliano J Coura-Filho, George B Esteves, Fabio P Amorim, Barbara J Gomes, Gustavo V Brito, Ana Emília T Bernardo, Wanderley M Mundstock, Eduardo Fanti, Stefano Macedo, Bruna Roman, Diego H Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin Hochhegger, Bruno |
description | Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique.
Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05.
pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions.
68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0817 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8321470</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ebfa1e58652b433fbee88f2c67941898</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>33566470</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-68b21adeae489baf39a7a0a930d601fa7cf61bd50daeb4c9cf67343990f739983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1u1DAQgCMEoqXwCsjc6CGLHSf-4YAEFZSiSiBBz9bYGW-92vzIdov2GXhpnN2lohd77Jn5xvJXVW8YXbFO03c_mZCy7jquVlefvt2sGsr0iiomn1Sn-5RgTD89xkvZSfUipQ2ljaaSPa9OOO-EaCU9rf4IdQn1jzilDBnrNKMLPjgy4GAjjEhgzGGNI3k7pwHOyTylkOM0EhxCSqEEeRqmdYT5dldqMJ-TMJL5yCMORofxPQGSdinjALmwI94H_F3IfRmToYYRtrsU0svqmYdtwlfH_ay6-fL518XX-vr75dXFx-vadazNtVC2YdAjYKu0Bc81SKCgOe0FZR6k84LZvqM9oG2dLkfJW6419bKsip9VVwduP8HGzDEMEHdmgmD2F1NcG4jloVs0aD0w7JToGtty7i2iUr5xQuqWqT3rw4E139kBe4djjrB9BH2cGcOtWU_3RvGGFQMFoA8AV_4sRfQPvYyaxbZJi0azaDTBbu7MYtsstkvv6_-HP3T-08v_AtfAq6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Matushita, Cristina S ; da Silva, Ana M Marques ; Schuck, Phelipi N ; Bardisserotto, Matteo ; Piant, Diego B ; Pereira, Jonatas L ; Cerci, Juliano J ; Coura-Filho, George B ; Esteves, Fabio P ; Amorim, Barbara J ; Gomes, Gustavo V ; Brito, Ana Emília T ; Bernardo, Wanderley M ; Mundstock, Eduardo ; Fanti, Stefano ; Macedo, Bruna ; Roman, Diego H ; Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin ; Hochhegger, Bruno</creator><creatorcontrib>Matushita, Cristina S ; da Silva, Ana M Marques ; Schuck, Phelipi N ; Bardisserotto, Matteo ; Piant, Diego B ; Pereira, Jonatas L ; Cerci, Juliano J ; Coura-Filho, George B ; Esteves, Fabio P ; Amorim, Barbara J ; Gomes, Gustavo V ; Brito, Ana Emília T ; Bernardo, Wanderley M ; Mundstock, Eduardo ; Fanti, Stefano ; Macedo, Bruna ; Roman, Diego H ; Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin ; Hochhegger, Bruno</creatorcontrib><description>Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique.
Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05.
pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions.
68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1677-5538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1677-6119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0817</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33566470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</publisher><subject>Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept] ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; familial [Supplementary Concept] ; Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-(Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept] ; Humans ; Male ; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography ; Positron-Emission Tomography ; Prospective Studies ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Radiopharmaceuticals ; Retrospective Studies ; Review ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.705-729</ispartof><rights>Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-68b21adeae489baf39a7a0a930d601fa7cf61bd50daeb4c9cf67343990f739983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-68b21adeae489baf39a7a0a930d601fa7cf61bd50daeb4c9cf67343990f739983</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7602-0433</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321470/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8321470/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33566470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matushita, Cristina S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Ana M Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuck, Phelipi N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardisserotto, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piant, Diego B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Jonatas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerci, Juliano J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coura-Filho, George B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esteves, Fabio P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Gustavo V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Ana Emília T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, Wanderley M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mundstock, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Bruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Diego H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochhegger, Bruno</creatorcontrib><title>68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>International Brazilian Journal of Urology</title><addtitle>Int Braz J Urol</addtitle><description>Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique.
Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05.
pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions.
68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.</description><subject>Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept]</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>familial [Supplementary Concept]</subject><subject>Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-(Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept]</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Positron-Emission Tomography</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1677-5538</issn><issn>1677-6119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1u1DAQgCMEoqXwCsjc6CGLHSf-4YAEFZSiSiBBz9bYGW-92vzIdov2GXhpnN2lohd77Jn5xvJXVW8YXbFO03c_mZCy7jquVlefvt2sGsr0iiomn1Sn-5RgTD89xkvZSfUipQ2ljaaSPa9OOO-EaCU9rf4IdQn1jzilDBnrNKMLPjgy4GAjjEhgzGGNI3k7pwHOyTylkOM0EhxCSqEEeRqmdYT5dldqMJ-TMJL5yCMORofxPQGSdinjALmwI94H_F3IfRmToYYRtrsU0svqmYdtwlfH_ay6-fL518XX-vr75dXFx-vadazNtVC2YdAjYKu0Bc81SKCgOe0FZR6k84LZvqM9oG2dLkfJW6419bKsip9VVwduP8HGzDEMEHdmgmD2F1NcG4jloVs0aD0w7JToGtty7i2iUr5xQuqWqT3rw4E139kBe4djjrB9BH2cGcOtWU_3RvGGFQMFoA8AV_4sRfQPvYyaxbZJi0azaDTBbu7MYtsstkvv6_-HP3T-08v_AtfAq6o</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Matushita, Cristina S</creator><creator>da Silva, Ana M Marques</creator><creator>Schuck, Phelipi N</creator><creator>Bardisserotto, Matteo</creator><creator>Piant, Diego B</creator><creator>Pereira, Jonatas L</creator><creator>Cerci, Juliano J</creator><creator>Coura-Filho, George B</creator><creator>Esteves, Fabio P</creator><creator>Amorim, Barbara J</creator><creator>Gomes, Gustavo V</creator><creator>Brito, Ana Emília T</creator><creator>Bernardo, Wanderley M</creator><creator>Mundstock, Eduardo</creator><creator>Fanti, Stefano</creator><creator>Macedo, Bruna</creator><creator>Roman, Diego H</creator><creator>Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin</creator><creator>Hochhegger, Bruno</creator><general>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-0433</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Matushita, Cristina S ; da Silva, Ana M Marques ; Schuck, Phelipi N ; Bardisserotto, Matteo ; Piant, Diego B ; Pereira, Jonatas L ; Cerci, Juliano J ; Coura-Filho, George B ; Esteves, Fabio P ; Amorim, Barbara J ; Gomes, Gustavo V ; Brito, Ana Emília T ; Bernardo, Wanderley M ; Mundstock, Eduardo ; Fanti, Stefano ; Macedo, Bruna ; Roman, Diego H ; Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin ; Hochhegger, Bruno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-68b21adeae489baf39a7a0a930d601fa7cf61bd50daeb4c9cf67343990f739983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept]</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>familial [Supplementary Concept]</topic><topic>Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-(Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept]</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Positron-Emission Tomography</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matushita, Cristina S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Ana M Marques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuck, Phelipi N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bardisserotto, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piant, Diego B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Jonatas L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerci, Juliano J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coura-Filho, George B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esteves, Fabio P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Barbara J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomes, Gustavo V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brito, Ana Emília T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernardo, Wanderley M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mundstock, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanti, Stefano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macedo, Bruna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roman, Diego H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hochhegger, Bruno</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International Brazilian Journal of Urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matushita, Cristina S</au><au>da Silva, Ana M Marques</au><au>Schuck, Phelipi N</au><au>Bardisserotto, Matteo</au><au>Piant, Diego B</au><au>Pereira, Jonatas L</au><au>Cerci, Juliano J</au><au>Coura-Filho, George B</au><au>Esteves, Fabio P</au><au>Amorim, Barbara J</au><au>Gomes, Gustavo V</au><au>Brito, Ana Emília T</au><au>Bernardo, Wanderley M</au><au>Mundstock, Eduardo</au><au>Fanti, Stefano</au><au>Macedo, Bruna</au><au>Roman, Diego H</au><au>Tem-Pass, Cinthia Scatolin</au><au>Hochhegger, Bruno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>International Brazilian Journal of Urology</jtitle><addtitle>Int Braz J Urol</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>705</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>705-729</pages><issn>1677-5538</issn><eissn>1677-6119</eissn><abstract>Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive 68Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique.
Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05.
pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions.
68Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia</pub><pmid>33566470</pmid><doi>10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0817</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7602-0433</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1677-5538 |
ispartof | International Brazilian Journal of Urology, 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.705-729 |
issn | 1677-5538 1677-6119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8321470 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Ac-PSMA-617 [Supplementary Concept] Cross-Sectional Studies familial [Supplementary Concept] Glu-NH-CO-NH-Lys-(Ahx)-(Ga(HBED-CC)) [Supplementary Concept] Humans Male Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography Positron-Emission Tomography Prospective Studies Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Radiopharmaceuticals Retrospective Studies Review Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T13%3A50%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=68Ga-Prostate-specific%20membrane%20antigen%20(psma)%20positron%20emission%20tomography%20(pet)%20in%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20Brazilian%20Journal%20of%20Urology&rft.au=Matushita,%20Cristina%20S&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=705&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=705-729&rft.issn=1677-5538&rft.eissn=1677-6119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0817&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_doaj_%3E33566470%3C/pubmed_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33566470&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_ebfa1e58652b433fbee88f2c67941898&rfr_iscdi=true |