Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies
This study explores the impact of environmental policies and human development on the CO2 emissions for the period of 1995–2015 in the Group of Seven and BRICS economies in the long run through panel cointegration and causality tests. The causality analysis revealed a bilateral causality between env...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-06, Vol.18 (13), p.6727 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 6727 |
container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Sezgin, Funda Hatice Bayar, Yilmaz Herta, Laura Gavriletea, Marius Dan |
description | This study explores the impact of environmental policies and human development on the CO2 emissions for the period of 1995–2015 in the Group of Seven and BRICS economies in the long run through panel cointegration and causality tests. The causality analysis revealed a bilateral causality between environmental stringency policies and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and a unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to the environmental stringency policies for Canada, China, and France. On the other hand, the analysis showed a bilateral causality between human development and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to human development in Brazil, Canada, China, and France. Furthermore, the cointegration analysis indicated that both environmental stringency policies and human development had a decreasing impact on the CO2 emissions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph18136727 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8297282</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549336135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-996b4576dd04c7999119e46e38179972d5144ca69c0b1033371c74ed3c6ddb173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1PAyEQhonR-H31TOLFSxUWFpaLRtu1NjHR-HEmlJ0qzS5U6Dbx30vVGPXEkHneJzMZhI4oOWVMkTM3h7h4pRVlQhZyA-1SIciAC0I3f9U7aC-lOSGs4kJtox3GCyJKonZRPwq49isXg-_AL02LH5fR-Rfw9h3fh9ZZBwkb3-CbvjMej2AFbVisWfwATW8BD-8KXHcuJRd8usD1yjU5DXgWQ4fH8jN89TAZPuLaBh-6LDxAWzPTJjj8fvfR83X9NLwZ3N6NJ8PL24FlqlwOlBJTXkrRNIRbqZSiVAEXwCqaf7JoSsq5NUJZMqWEMSaplRwaZnNkSiXbR-df3kU_7aCxeepoWr2IrjPxXQfj9N-Od6_6Jax0VWR9VWTBybcghrce0lLnRS20rfEQ-qSLklecEPGJHv9D56GPPq-3phRjgrIyU6dflI0hpQizn2Eo0euL6r8XZR9FZ5LH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549336135</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Sezgin, Funda Hatice ; Bayar, Yilmaz ; Herta, Laura ; Gavriletea, Marius Dan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sezgin, Funda Hatice ; Bayar, Yilmaz ; Herta, Laura ; Gavriletea, Marius Dan</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the impact of environmental policies and human development on the CO2 emissions for the period of 1995–2015 in the Group of Seven and BRICS economies in the long run through panel cointegration and causality tests. The causality analysis revealed a bilateral causality between environmental stringency policies and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and a unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to the environmental stringency policies for Canada, China, and France. On the other hand, the analysis showed a bilateral causality between human development and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to human development in Brazil, Canada, China, and France. Furthermore, the cointegration analysis indicated that both environmental stringency policies and human development had a decreasing impact on the CO2 emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136727</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34206509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Alternative energy ; Carbon dioxide ; Causality ; Climate change ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Developing countries ; Emerging markets ; Emissions ; Energy efficiency ; Environmental impact ; Environmental policy ; Environmental protection ; Environmental tax ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Human Development Index ; Impact analysis ; Innovations ; International relations ; LDCs ; Renewable resources ; Sustainable development ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (13), p.6727</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-996b4576dd04c7999119e46e38179972d5144ca69c0b1033371c74ed3c6ddb173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-996b4576dd04c7999119e46e38179972d5144ca69c0b1033371c74ed3c6ddb173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9974-256X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297282/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8297282/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27922,27923,53789,53791</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sezgin, Funda Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayar, Yilmaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herta, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavriletea, Marius Dan</creatorcontrib><title>Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><description>This study explores the impact of environmental policies and human development on the CO2 emissions for the period of 1995–2015 in the Group of Seven and BRICS economies in the long run through panel cointegration and causality tests. The causality analysis revealed a bilateral causality between environmental stringency policies and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and a unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to the environmental stringency policies for Canada, China, and France. On the other hand, the analysis showed a bilateral causality between human development and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to human development in Brazil, Canada, China, and France. Furthermore, the cointegration analysis indicated that both environmental stringency policies and human development had a decreasing impact on the CO2 emissions.</description><subject>Alternative energy</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Emerging markets</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Human Development Index</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Renewable resources</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1PAyEQhonR-H31TOLFSxUWFpaLRtu1NjHR-HEmlJ0qzS5U6Dbx30vVGPXEkHneJzMZhI4oOWVMkTM3h7h4pRVlQhZyA-1SIciAC0I3f9U7aC-lOSGs4kJtox3GCyJKonZRPwq49isXg-_AL02LH5fR-Rfw9h3fh9ZZBwkb3-CbvjMej2AFbVisWfwATW8BD-8KXHcuJRd8usD1yjU5DXgWQ4fH8jN89TAZPuLaBh-6LDxAWzPTJjj8fvfR83X9NLwZ3N6NJ8PL24FlqlwOlBJTXkrRNIRbqZSiVAEXwCqaf7JoSsq5NUJZMqWEMSaplRwaZnNkSiXbR-df3kU_7aCxeepoWr2IrjPxXQfj9N-Od6_6Jax0VWR9VWTBybcghrce0lLnRS20rfEQ-qSLklecEPGJHv9D56GPPq-3phRjgrIyU6dflI0hpQizn2Eo0euL6r8XZR9FZ5LH</recordid><startdate>20210622</startdate><enddate>20210622</enddate><creator>Sezgin, Funda Hatice</creator><creator>Bayar, Yilmaz</creator><creator>Herta, Laura</creator><creator>Gavriletea, Marius Dan</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-256X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210622</creationdate><title>Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies</title><author>Sezgin, Funda Hatice ; Bayar, Yilmaz ; Herta, Laura ; Gavriletea, Marius Dan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-996b4576dd04c7999119e46e38179972d5144ca69c0b1033371c74ed3c6ddb173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Alternative energy</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Emerging markets</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Human Development Index</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Renewable resources</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sezgin, Funda Hatice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayar, Yilmaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herta, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavriletea, Marius Dan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sezgin, Funda Hatice</au><au>Bayar, Yilmaz</au><au>Herta, Laura</au><au>Gavriletea, Marius Dan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><date>2021-06-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>6727</spage><pages>6727-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>This study explores the impact of environmental policies and human development on the CO2 emissions for the period of 1995–2015 in the Group of Seven and BRICS economies in the long run through panel cointegration and causality tests. The causality analysis revealed a bilateral causality between environmental stringency policies and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and a unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to the environmental stringency policies for Canada, China, and France. On the other hand, the analysis showed a bilateral causality between human development and CO2 emissions for Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and unilateral causality from CO2 emissions to human development in Brazil, Canada, China, and France. Furthermore, the cointegration analysis indicated that both environmental stringency policies and human development had a decreasing impact on the CO2 emissions.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34206509</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18136727</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-256X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (13), p.6727 |
issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8297282 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Alternative energy Carbon dioxide Causality Climate change Coronaviruses COVID-19 Developing countries Emerging markets Emissions Energy efficiency Environmental impact Environmental policy Environmental protection Environmental tax Greenhouse effect Greenhouse gases Human Development Index Impact analysis Innovations International relations LDCs Renewable resources Sustainable development Technological change |
title | Do Environmental Stringency Policies and Human Development Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from G7 and BRICS Economies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A48%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Environmental%20Stringency%20Policies%20and%20Human%20Development%20Reduce%20CO2%20Emissions?%20Evidence%20from%20G7%20and%20BRICS%20Economies&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Sezgin,%20Funda%20Hatice&rft.date=2021-06-22&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=6727&rft.pages=6727-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18136727&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2549336135%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549336135&rft_id=info:pmid/34206509&rfr_iscdi=true |