Influence of Forest Visitors' Perceived Restorativeness on Social-Psychological Stress
This study was conducted to verify the perceived restorativeness of citizens visiting forests on social-psychological stress and psychological resilience according to forest space type. The study involved a questionnaire survey conducted on citizens who visited forests between 1 May and 15 July 2020...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of environmental research and public health 2021-06, Vol.18 (12), p.6328 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 6328 |
| container_title | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Lee, Don-Gak Lee, Mi-Mi Jeong, Young-Mi Kim, Jin-Gun Yoon, Yung-Kyoon Shin, Won-Sop |
| description | This study was conducted to verify the perceived restorativeness of citizens visiting forests on social-psychological stress and psychological resilience according to forest space type. The study involved a questionnaire survey conducted on citizens who visited forests between 1 May and 15 July 2020, when social distancing in daily life was being implemented. Three types of forest spaces (urban forest, national park, and natural recreation forest) were selected for the survey. They used the survey results of 1196 people as analysis data for this study. In this study, the PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) and the PWI-SF (Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form) were used to evaluate perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress of citizens visiting forests. In the study, the average score of visitors' perceived restorativeness was 5.31 ± 0.77. Social-psychological stress was found in the healthy group, potential stress group, and high-risk group. These groups made up 8.0%, 82.5%, and 9.5% of the respondents, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis between perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress revealed that the higher the perceived restorativeness, the lower the social-psychological stress. "Diversion Mood", "Not bored", and "Coherence", which are the sub-factors of perceived restorativeness according to the forest space type, were found to have meaningful results for psychological resilience. However, there was no significant difference in the forest space type between "Compatibility" and social-psychological stress, which are sub-factors of perceived restorativeness. In conclusion, the forest space type affects the psychological resilience of those who visit the forest. Urban forests, national parks, and natural recreation forests are places to reduce stress. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijerph18126328 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8296131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544976824</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e2664293d7a3c146172c589e955bfe3fc0cbf5378014591c94639bbc0a34376b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1LAzEQxYMofl89yoIHvazma7PJRRCxKggWq72GbDprU7abmuwW_O-NtBb1NDPMbx7zeAidEHzJmMJXbgZhMSWSUMGo3EL7RAicc4HJ9q9-Dx3EOMOYSS7ULtpjnGKJabGPxo9t3fTQWsh8nQ18gNhlYxdd50M8z4YQLLglTLKXtPDBdGloIcbMt9nIW2eafBg_7dQ3_t1Z02SjLknEI7RTmybC8boeorfB3evtQ_70fP94e_OUW05klwMVglPFJqVhlnBBSmoLqUAVRVUDqy22VV2wUmLCC0Ws4oKpqrLYMM5KUbFDdL3SXfTVHCYW2i6YRi-Cm5vwqb1x-u-mdVP97pdaUiUII0ngYi0Q_EefPOq5ixaaxrTg-6hpwSUnhBVlQs_-oTPfhzbZ-6a4KoWkPFGXK8oGH2OAevMMwfo7Mv03snRw-tvCBv_JiH0B7HGTjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544976824</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of Forest Visitors' Perceived Restorativeness on Social-Psychological Stress</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lee, Don-Gak ; Lee, Mi-Mi ; Jeong, Young-Mi ; Kim, Jin-Gun ; Yoon, Yung-Kyoon ; Shin, Won-Sop</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Don-Gak ; Lee, Mi-Mi ; Jeong, Young-Mi ; Kim, Jin-Gun ; Yoon, Yung-Kyoon ; Shin, Won-Sop</creatorcontrib><description>This study was conducted to verify the perceived restorativeness of citizens visiting forests on social-psychological stress and psychological resilience according to forest space type. The study involved a questionnaire survey conducted on citizens who visited forests between 1 May and 15 July 2020, when social distancing in daily life was being implemented. Three types of forest spaces (urban forest, national park, and natural recreation forest) were selected for the survey. They used the survey results of 1196 people as analysis data for this study. In this study, the PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) and the PWI-SF (Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form) were used to evaluate perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress of citizens visiting forests. In the study, the average score of visitors' perceived restorativeness was 5.31 ± 0.77. Social-psychological stress was found in the healthy group, potential stress group, and high-risk group. These groups made up 8.0%, 82.5%, and 9.5% of the respondents, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis between perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress revealed that the higher the perceived restorativeness, the lower the social-psychological stress. "Diversion Mood", "Not bored", and "Coherence", which are the sub-factors of perceived restorativeness according to the forest space type, were found to have meaningful results for psychological resilience. However, there was no significant difference in the forest space type between "Compatibility" and social-psychological stress, which are sub-factors of perceived restorativeness. In conclusion, the forest space type affects the psychological resilience of those who visit the forest. Urban forests, national parks, and natural recreation forests are places to reduce stress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126328</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34208025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Climate change ; Coronaviruses ; Correlation analysis ; COVID-19 ; Emotions ; Forests ; Humans ; Medical research ; Mental disorders ; Mood ; National parks ; Outdoor air quality ; Parks & recreation areas ; Parks, Recreational ; Perceptions ; Polls & surveys ; Psychological stress ; Questionnaires ; Recreation ; Research methodology ; Resilience ; Risk groups ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Social interactions ; Stress ; Stress, Psychological ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urban forests ; Well being</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (12), p.6328</ispartof><rights>2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 by the authors. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e2664293d7a3c146172c589e955bfe3fc0cbf5378014591c94639bbc0a34376b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e2664293d7a3c146172c589e955bfe3fc0cbf5378014591c94639bbc0a34376b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5665-1502 ; 0000-0003-4023-3872 ; 0000-0002-7432-6519</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296131/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8296131/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34208025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Don-Gak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mi-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Young-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Yung-Kyoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Won-Sop</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of Forest Visitors' Perceived Restorativeness on Social-Psychological Stress</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>This study was conducted to verify the perceived restorativeness of citizens visiting forests on social-psychological stress and psychological resilience according to forest space type. The study involved a questionnaire survey conducted on citizens who visited forests between 1 May and 15 July 2020, when social distancing in daily life was being implemented. Three types of forest spaces (urban forest, national park, and natural recreation forest) were selected for the survey. They used the survey results of 1196 people as analysis data for this study. In this study, the PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) and the PWI-SF (Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form) were used to evaluate perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress of citizens visiting forests. In the study, the average score of visitors' perceived restorativeness was 5.31 ± 0.77. Social-psychological stress was found in the healthy group, potential stress group, and high-risk group. These groups made up 8.0%, 82.5%, and 9.5% of the respondents, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis between perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress revealed that the higher the perceived restorativeness, the lower the social-psychological stress. "Diversion Mood", "Not bored", and "Coherence", which are the sub-factors of perceived restorativeness according to the forest space type, were found to have meaningful results for psychological resilience. However, there was no significant difference in the forest space type between "Compatibility" and social-psychological stress, which are sub-factors of perceived restorativeness. In conclusion, the forest space type affects the psychological resilience of those who visit the forest. Urban forests, national parks, and natural recreation forests are places to reduce stress.</description><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Outdoor air quality</subject><subject>Parks & recreation areas</subject><subject>Parks, Recreational</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Psychological stress</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Risk groups</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urban forests</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1LAzEQxYMofl89yoIHvazma7PJRRCxKggWq72GbDprU7abmuwW_O-NtBb1NDPMbx7zeAidEHzJmMJXbgZhMSWSUMGo3EL7RAicc4HJ9q9-Dx3EOMOYSS7ULtpjnGKJabGPxo9t3fTQWsh8nQ18gNhlYxdd50M8z4YQLLglTLKXtPDBdGloIcbMt9nIW2eafBg_7dQ3_t1Z02SjLknEI7RTmybC8boeorfB3evtQ_70fP94e_OUW05klwMVglPFJqVhlnBBSmoLqUAVRVUDqy22VV2wUmLCC0Ws4oKpqrLYMM5KUbFDdL3SXfTVHCYW2i6YRi-Cm5vwqb1x-u-mdVP97pdaUiUII0ngYi0Q_EefPOq5ixaaxrTg-6hpwSUnhBVlQs_-oTPfhzbZ-6a4KoWkPFGXK8oGH2OAevMMwfo7Mv03snRw-tvCBv_JiH0B7HGTjQ</recordid><startdate>20210611</startdate><enddate>20210611</enddate><creator>Lee, Don-Gak</creator><creator>Lee, Mi-Mi</creator><creator>Jeong, Young-Mi</creator><creator>Kim, Jin-Gun</creator><creator>Yoon, Yung-Kyoon</creator><creator>Shin, Won-Sop</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-1502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-3872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-6519</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210611</creationdate><title>Influence of Forest Visitors' Perceived Restorativeness on Social-Psychological Stress</title><author>Lee, Don-Gak ; Lee, Mi-Mi ; Jeong, Young-Mi ; Kim, Jin-Gun ; Yoon, Yung-Kyoon ; Shin, Won-Sop</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-e2664293d7a3c146172c589e955bfe3fc0cbf5378014591c94639bbc0a34376b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Outdoor air quality</topic><topic>Parks & recreation areas</topic><topic>Parks, Recreational</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Psychological stress</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Risk groups</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urban forests</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Don-Gak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Mi-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeong, Young-Mi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jin-Gun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Yung-Kyoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Won-Sop</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Don-Gak</au><au>Lee, Mi-Mi</au><au>Jeong, Young-Mi</au><au>Kim, Jin-Gun</au><au>Yoon, Yung-Kyoon</au><au>Shin, Won-Sop</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of Forest Visitors' Perceived Restorativeness on Social-Psychological Stress</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2021-06-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>6328</spage><pages>6328-</pages><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1661-7827</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>This study was conducted to verify the perceived restorativeness of citizens visiting forests on social-psychological stress and psychological resilience according to forest space type. The study involved a questionnaire survey conducted on citizens who visited forests between 1 May and 15 July 2020, when social distancing in daily life was being implemented. Three types of forest spaces (urban forest, national park, and natural recreation forest) were selected for the survey. They used the survey results of 1196 people as analysis data for this study. In this study, the PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) and the PWI-SF (Psychosocial Well-being Index Short Form) were used to evaluate perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress of citizens visiting forests. In the study, the average score of visitors' perceived restorativeness was 5.31 ± 0.77. Social-psychological stress was found in the healthy group, potential stress group, and high-risk group. These groups made up 8.0%, 82.5%, and 9.5% of the respondents, respectively. Pearson's correlation analysis between perceived restorativeness and social-psychological stress revealed that the higher the perceived restorativeness, the lower the social-psychological stress. "Diversion Mood", "Not bored", and "Coherence", which are the sub-factors of perceived restorativeness according to the forest space type, were found to have meaningful results for psychological resilience. However, there was no significant difference in the forest space type between "Compatibility" and social-psychological stress, which are sub-factors of perceived restorativeness. In conclusion, the forest space type affects the psychological resilience of those who visit the forest. Urban forests, national parks, and natural recreation forests are places to reduce stress.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>34208025</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph18126328</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5665-1502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-3872</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7432-6519</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1660-4601 |
| ispartof | International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021-06, Vol.18 (12), p.6328 |
| issn | 1660-4601 1661-7827 1660-4601 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8296131 |
| source | MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Climate change Coronaviruses Correlation analysis COVID-19 Emotions Forests Humans Medical research Mental disorders Mood National parks Outdoor air quality Parks & recreation areas Parks, Recreational Perceptions Polls & surveys Psychological stress Questionnaires Recreation Research methodology Resilience Risk groups Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Social interactions Stress Stress, Psychological Surveys and Questionnaires Urban forests Well being |
| title | Influence of Forest Visitors' Perceived Restorativeness on Social-Psychological Stress |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T05%3A34%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20Forest%20Visitors'%20Perceived%20Restorativeness%20on%20Social-Psychological%20Stress&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Lee,%20Don-Gak&rft.date=2021-06-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=6328&rft.pages=6328-&rft.issn=1660-4601&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph18126328&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2544976824%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544976824&rft_id=info:pmid/34208025&rfr_iscdi=true |