Concurrent Taxol-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Boost in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix- Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center

Objective In light of the dogma that brachytherapy is irreplaceable for the successful treatment of cervical cancer, and the limited availability of brachytherapy facilities in developing countries, we sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of taxol- and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy del...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e16313-e16313
Hauptverfasser: John, Christopher, Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian, Masilamani, Hemavathi, Kondaveeti, Satish S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e16313
container_issue 7
container_start_page e16313
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 13
creator John, Christopher
Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian
Masilamani, Hemavathi
Kondaveeti, Satish S
description Objective In light of the dogma that brachytherapy is irreplaceable for the successful treatment of cervical cancer, and the limited availability of brachytherapy facilities in developing countries, we sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of taxol- and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy delivered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer as an alternative to brachytherapy, which is mandated as the standard of care according to current guidelines. Methods The records from our institution were reviewed to identify patients who underwent chemoradiation with two doses of tri-weekly docetaxel (80mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) concurrent with EBRT between January 2017 and 2019 for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Here, 48 cases were analysed, with a median follow-up period of two years. Results The two groups were homogenously matched, and the patients who received EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost achieved complete pathological response rates of 68% and 83%, respectively (p=0.243). The odds ratio was 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-2.08), indicative of non-significance and non-inferiority based on the analysis using the chi-squared test (with Pearson’s correlation) and Student's t-test. The disease-free survival durations calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates were 22 and 24 months, two-year disease-free survival rates were 83% and 91.3%, and two-year overall survival (OS) were 85.6% and 94% for the EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost groups, respectively (p=0.657). Conclusion In this retrospective analysis, we concluded that EBRT boost was non-inferior to brachytherapy boost and could be considered as a reasonable alternative in locally advanced cervical cancer when used concurrently with more dose-intense chemotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.16313
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8272959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553241429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-50df2a76fbd8bd293b6a84fac6c54e6d5c97a75a40ae5266094bb224f738d2073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFu1DAQhiMEolXpjQfwkQNpHceOkwvSbqCl0kpIaDlbE2fCGjn2YjtR8248HNluQXDySJ7_-2fmz7K3Bb2RUjS3ego4xZuiKovyRXbJiqrO66LmL_-pL7LrGH9QSgsqGZX0dXZRciZlScVl9qv1boUEdIns4dHbfAsRe_LRT53FRNoDjj4dMMBxIRAJOLKxCYODZGYkgw_kwaUAGmaTICxku9aH5Y9i631MxDiy8xqsXcimn8Hp1aCFoI3zI5AWw2wec_IVU_DxiPqJvHFgl2giuQt-JED2GJI5GaxCXDVuHeJN9moAG_H6-b3Kvt192ref892X-4d2s8s143XKBe0HBrIaur7uetaUXQU1H0BXWnCseqEbCVIAp4CCVRVteNcxxgdZ1v16sfIq-3DmHqduxF7jaWOrjsGM60TKg1H__zhzUN_9rGomWSOaFfDuGRD8zwljUqOJGq0Fh36KiglRMl5wdmp9f27V6zFiwOGvTUHVKXN1zlw9ZV7-Bp4DpJ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553241429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Concurrent Taxol-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Boost in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix- Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>John, Christopher ; Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian ; Masilamani, Hemavathi ; Kondaveeti, Satish S</creator><creatorcontrib>John, Christopher ; Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian ; Masilamani, Hemavathi ; Kondaveeti, Satish S</creatorcontrib><description>Objective In light of the dogma that brachytherapy is irreplaceable for the successful treatment of cervical cancer, and the limited availability of brachytherapy facilities in developing countries, we sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of taxol- and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy delivered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer as an alternative to brachytherapy, which is mandated as the standard of care according to current guidelines. Methods The records from our institution were reviewed to identify patients who underwent chemoradiation with two doses of tri-weekly docetaxel (80mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) concurrent with EBRT between January 2017 and 2019 for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Here, 48 cases were analysed, with a median follow-up period of two years. Results The two groups were homogenously matched, and the patients who received EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost achieved complete pathological response rates of 68% and 83%, respectively (p=0.243). The odds ratio was 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-2.08), indicative of non-significance and non-inferiority based on the analysis using the chi-squared test (with Pearson’s correlation) and Student's t-test. The disease-free survival durations calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates were 22 and 24 months, two-year disease-free survival rates were 83% and 91.3%, and two-year overall survival (OS) were 85.6% and 94% for the EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost groups, respectively (p=0.657). Conclusion In this retrospective analysis, we concluded that EBRT boost was non-inferior to brachytherapy boost and could be considered as a reasonable alternative in locally advanced cervical cancer when used concurrently with more dose-intense chemotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.16313</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34277305</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto (CA): Cureus</publisher><subject>Obstetrics/Gynecology ; Oncology ; Radiation Oncology</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e16313-e16313</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, John et al. 2021 John et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-50df2a76fbd8bd293b6a84fac6c54e6d5c97a75a40ae5266094bb224f738d2073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272959/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8272959/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>John, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masilamani, Hemavathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondaveeti, Satish S</creatorcontrib><title>Concurrent Taxol-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Boost in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix- Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><description>Objective In light of the dogma that brachytherapy is irreplaceable for the successful treatment of cervical cancer, and the limited availability of brachytherapy facilities in developing countries, we sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of taxol- and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy delivered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer as an alternative to brachytherapy, which is mandated as the standard of care according to current guidelines. Methods The records from our institution were reviewed to identify patients who underwent chemoradiation with two doses of tri-weekly docetaxel (80mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) concurrent with EBRT between January 2017 and 2019 for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Here, 48 cases were analysed, with a median follow-up period of two years. Results The two groups were homogenously matched, and the patients who received EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost achieved complete pathological response rates of 68% and 83%, respectively (p=0.243). The odds ratio was 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-2.08), indicative of non-significance and non-inferiority based on the analysis using the chi-squared test (with Pearson’s correlation) and Student's t-test. The disease-free survival durations calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates were 22 and 24 months, two-year disease-free survival rates were 83% and 91.3%, and two-year overall survival (OS) were 85.6% and 94% for the EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost groups, respectively (p=0.657). Conclusion In this retrospective analysis, we concluded that EBRT boost was non-inferior to brachytherapy boost and could be considered as a reasonable alternative in locally advanced cervical cancer when used concurrently with more dose-intense chemotherapy.</description><subject>Obstetrics/Gynecology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Radiation Oncology</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkcFu1DAQhiMEolXpjQfwkQNpHceOkwvSbqCl0kpIaDlbE2fCGjn2YjtR8248HNluQXDySJ7_-2fmz7K3Bb2RUjS3ego4xZuiKovyRXbJiqrO66LmL_-pL7LrGH9QSgsqGZX0dXZRciZlScVl9qv1boUEdIns4dHbfAsRe_LRT53FRNoDjj4dMMBxIRAJOLKxCYODZGYkgw_kwaUAGmaTICxku9aH5Y9i631MxDiy8xqsXcimn8Hp1aCFoI3zI5AWw2wec_IVU_DxiPqJvHFgl2giuQt-JED2GJI5GaxCXDVuHeJN9moAG_H6-b3Kvt192ref892X-4d2s8s143XKBe0HBrIaur7uetaUXQU1H0BXWnCseqEbCVIAp4CCVRVteNcxxgdZ1v16sfIq-3DmHqduxF7jaWOrjsGM60TKg1H__zhzUN_9rGomWSOaFfDuGRD8zwljUqOJGq0Fh36KiglRMl5wdmp9f27V6zFiwOGvTUHVKXN1zlw9ZV7-Bp4DpJ8</recordid><startdate>20210711</startdate><enddate>20210711</enddate><creator>John, Christopher</creator><creator>Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian</creator><creator>Masilamani, Hemavathi</creator><creator>Kondaveeti, Satish S</creator><general>Cureus</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210711</creationdate><title>Concurrent Taxol-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Boost in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix- Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center</title><author>John, Christopher ; Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian ; Masilamani, Hemavathi ; Kondaveeti, Satish S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c248t-50df2a76fbd8bd293b6a84fac6c54e6d5c97a75a40ae5266094bb224f738d2073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Obstetrics/Gynecology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Radiation Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>John, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masilamani, Hemavathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondaveeti, Satish S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>John, Christopher</au><au>Venkitaraman, Balasubramanian</au><au>Masilamani, Hemavathi</au><au>Kondaveeti, Satish S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Concurrent Taxol-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Boost in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix- Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><date>2021-07-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e16313</spage><epage>e16313</epage><pages>e16313-e16313</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Objective In light of the dogma that brachytherapy is irreplaceable for the successful treatment of cervical cancer, and the limited availability of brachytherapy facilities in developing countries, we sought to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of taxol- and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy delivered concurrently with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer as an alternative to brachytherapy, which is mandated as the standard of care according to current guidelines. Methods The records from our institution were reviewed to identify patients who underwent chemoradiation with two doses of tri-weekly docetaxel (80mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) concurrent with EBRT between January 2017 and 2019 for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. Here, 48 cases were analysed, with a median follow-up period of two years. Results The two groups were homogenously matched, and the patients who received EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost achieved complete pathological response rates of 68% and 83%, respectively (p=0.243). The odds ratio was 0.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-2.08), indicative of non-significance and non-inferiority based on the analysis using the chi-squared test (with Pearson’s correlation) and Student's t-test. The disease-free survival durations calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates were 22 and 24 months, two-year disease-free survival rates were 83% and 91.3%, and two-year overall survival (OS) were 85.6% and 94% for the EBRT boost and brachytherapy boost groups, respectively (p=0.657). Conclusion In this retrospective analysis, we concluded that EBRT boost was non-inferior to brachytherapy boost and could be considered as a reasonable alternative in locally advanced cervical cancer when used concurrently with more dose-intense chemotherapy.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto (CA)</cop><pub>Cureus</pub><pmid>34277305</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.16313</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2021-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e16313-e16313
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8272959
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Obstetrics/Gynecology
Oncology
Radiation Oncology
title Concurrent Taxol-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as an Alternative for Intracavitary Brachytherapy Boost in Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix- Retrospective Analysis From a Tertiary Care Center
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T20%3A30%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Concurrent%20Taxol-Based%20Doublet%20Chemotherapy%20as%20an%20Alternative%20for%20Intracavitary%20Brachytherapy%20Boost%20in%20Locally%20Advanced%20Carcinoma%20Cervix-%20Retrospective%20Analysis%20From%20a%20Tertiary%20Care%20Center&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=John,%20Christopher&rft.date=2021-07-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e16313&rft.epage=e16313&rft.pages=e16313-e16313&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.16313&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2553241429%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553241429&rft_id=info:pmid/34277305&rfr_iscdi=true